Back to chapter

20.3:

The Calvin Benson Cycle

JoVE Core
Cell Biology
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Core Cell Biology
The Calvin Benson Cycle

Languages

Share

The Calvin-Benson cycle is the second phase of photosynthesis, where plants use ATP and NADPH—the end products of the light reactions—to form sugar.

This series of reactions is subdivided into three stages.

During the carbon fixation stage, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase or RuBisCo catalyzes the addition of CO2 to a five-carbon sugar, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate or RuBP, therefore fixing inorganic CO2 into an organic molecule. 

 This reaction generates an unstable six-carbon intermediate, which is further cleaved into two small three-carbon molecules called 3-phosphoglycerate or 3-PGA. 

In the reduction stage, 3-phosphoglycerate kinase adds a phosphate to the carboxyl group of 3-PGA, yielding 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate.

Then, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase transfers electrons from NADPH to 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate, producing two molecules of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate or G3P.

One G3P leaves the Calvin-Benson cycle to form essential plant metabolites, and the other undergoes a complex set of reactions along with ATP to regenerate RuBP. 

Overall, it takes 6 CO2 molecules in the fixation stage, 12 ATP and 12 NADPH in the reduction stage, and 6 ATP in the regeneration stage to produce one six-carbon sugar.

20.3:

The Calvin Benson Cycle

Ribulose 1,5- bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo) is a critical enzyme that catalyzes carbon dioxide assimilation during photosynthesis. However, it is an inefficient enzyme, having an extremely slow catalytic rate. A typical enzyme can process about a thousand molecules per second; however, RuBisCo fixes only around three-carbon dioxides per second. Photosynthetic cells compensate for this slow rate by synthesizing very high amounts of RuBisCo, making it the most abundant single enzyme on Earth.

In addition, RuBisCo has a poor substrate specificity due to which oxygen can easily attach to the carbon dioxide binding site of the enzyme. As a result, an abnormal molecule is produced along with the release of CO2. This process is called photorespiration or, more accurately- oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle.

Every photosynthetic organism experiences a basal level of photorespiration; however, under high intracellular oxygen levels, photorespiration exceeds photosynthesis. Most tropical plants have developed a mechanism to circumvent the wasteful photorespiration through a special process that increases the intracellular CO2 levels. In such plants, the Calvin cycle's usual carbon fixation step is preceded by several steps that temporarily fix CO2 by forming four-carbon intermediates such as oxaloacetate and malate. The plants that rely on this process are called C4 plants, and the assimilation process is termed the C4 pathway.

Another variation of CO2 fixation is observed in succulent plants that grow in hot and arid environments. In these plants, stomata remain closed during the daytime to prevent loss of water from the plants. Because closure of stomata also prevents gas molecules from entering the leaf, CO2 is absorbed during night-time when cool and moist air enables opening of stomata. CO2 trapped overnight in the form of malate is released during the daytime by the NADP-linked malic enzymes. Because this method of CO2 assimilation was first discovered in the plants of the Crassulaceae family, it is called crassulacean acid metabolism, or CAM pathway.

Suggested Reading

  1. Parry, M. A. J., P. J. Madgwick, J. F. C. Carvalho, and P. J. Andralojc. "Prospects for increasing photosynthesis by overcoming the limitations of Rubisco." The Journal of Agricultural Science 145, no. 1 (2007): 31.
  2. Parry, Martin AJ, P. John Andralojc, Joanna C. Scales, Michael E. Salvucci, A. Elizabete Carmo-Silva, Hernan Alonso, and Spencer M. Whitney. "Rubisco activity and regulation as targets for crop improvement." Journal of Experimental Botany 64, no. 3 (2013): 717-730.