JoVE Science Education
Developmental Psychology
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Science Education Developmental Psychology
Metacognitive Development: How Children Estimate Their Memory
  • 00:00Overview
  • 00:57Experimental Design
  • 01:52Running the Experiment
  • 03:43Representative Results
  • 04:32Applications
  • 05:19Summary

元认知的发展: 儿童如何估计他们的记忆

English

Share

Overview

资料来源: 实验室的朱迪思 · Danovitch 和尼古拉 Noles — — 路易斯维尔大学

人类的记忆是会犯错误,和人们往往不能准确地记得他们已经看到或听到。成年人都知道他们有限的内存容量,所以他们使用策略,如排练和助记符的设备,以改善它们的重要信息的回忆。因为成年人了解内存限制的他们知道它更有意义的物品写下来他们购物清单上而不是来尝试记住物品,当他们去商店。这种能力去思考自己的内存被称为记忆。记忆是一个组件的一整套更广泛的让人们去思考自己的知识的认知过程和思维,即元认知。

虽然年幼的孩子明白人有思想和数量有限的知识,他们往往有麻烦承认他们自己的知识和认知能力的限制。儿童的能力,准确地估计自己的内存容量和能力提高小学多年来。测量记忆和其发展的一个常用方法是给孩子们一个机会来预测如何好,他们能记住的东西,然后观察如何以及他们的预测符合他们实际的召回。

本实验演示如何衡量儿童的元记忆由 Shin,比约克隆和贝克开发方法的基础。1

Procedure

招募年龄在 6 至 9 岁的儿童。对于本演示的目的,测试只有一个孩子。较大的样本大小 (如 Shin,比约克隆和贝克研究1) 建议时进行任何实验。 参与者应是没有历史的发育障碍,有正常的听力和视力。 1.准备学习材料。 创建一套 18 卡一张黑白的图片的一个常见的对象与打印每张卡片上的对象的名称。 对象的示例列表是: 自?…

Results

Researchers tested 32 6-year-olds and 32 9-year-olds and found that children’s predictions improved with age (Figure 1). Older children predicted they would remember less items than younger children, yet the total number of items they actually recalled was higher. The average prediction accuracy score for 6-year-olds was 4.19, indicating that they consistently overestimated their memory. The average prediction accuracy score for 9-year-olds was 1.02, indicating that their predictions about their memory were more realistic. Similarly, 78% of 6-year-olds overestimated their memory, but only 46% of 9-year-olds did so (Figure 2). Chi-square tests comparing the number of children who overestimated their memory across age groups were significant at the p < 0.05 level.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Average predicted and actual recall for children in each age group (out of 18 items).

Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of children at each age who overestimated their memory.

Applications and Summary

Children’s tendency to overestimate their knowledge and abilities, including their memory, has consequences for their behavior in a number of situations. In the classroom, thinking that they remember or know more than they do can make it hard for children to understand the value of studying or rehearsing new information. Even when young children are faced with direct evidence of their limitations (e.g., failing to remember items in a memory test), they often persist in overestimating their abilities.

This excessively positive view of themselves can also have consequences for children’s physical well-being, as younger children are more likely to engage in a dangerous behavior, like a bicycle stunt, because they believe they are capable of doing so successfully. Older children who realize their limitations are less likely to risk activities well outside of their capabilities.

Although it may seem like overestimating yourself and having poor metacognitive awareness would only have negative consequences for young children, some researchers have proposed that children’s overestimation of their abilities is beneficial in some ways, as well. In reality, young children are not very capable. They still have a lot to learn, and it may be that having a true understanding of the limits of their knowledge, memory, strength, etc., would decrease their motivation to try new things or face a challenging task. However, because children believe they are capable, and in some ways invincible, they are willing to take on challenges, like learning to multiply or doing a cartwheel. Thus, thinking that they will succeed (even if it is actually unlikely) can help motivate children to try new activities and learn more about the world.

References

  1. Shin, H., Bjorklund, D. F., & Beck, E. F. The adaptive nature of children's overestimation in a strategic memory task. Cognitive Development. 22 (2), 197-212 (2007).

Transcript

Conceptualizing one’s own memory, referred to as metamemory, is often difficult for young children to do.

Although young children understand that people have thoughts and a limited amount of knowledge, they often have trouble acknowledging the limits of their own memory abilities, often overestimating their capabilities.

Importantly, their ability to accurately estimate their own memory capacity improves over the elementary school years, and they start using adult-like strategies, such as making lists to improve recall of information.

This video demonstrates how to design and conduct an experiment investigating metamemory in school-aged children, as well as how to analyze and interpret results involving predicted and actual memory recall.

In this experiment, children in two age groups—6 and 9 year-olds—are first asked to predict how well they think they can remember objects before being shown the items.

After observing the objects and waiting through a short delay, in which they complete distractor puzzles to prevent rehearsal, the children are then asked to recall as many objects as possible.

Here, the dependent variables are the number of objects the child predicted to remember as well as the total number of objects the child actually recalled during the memory test.

Children’s capacity to accurately predict memory ability is expected to improve with age. In other words, the prediction of 9-year-olds will more closely match their actual recall, compared to 6-year-olds.

Before the experiment begins, gather the study materials, which include a set of 18 cards that contain different black and white pictures of common objects with their names labeled and a number line that ranges from 1 to 18.

When the child arrives, verify with the parent or guardian that they have no history of developmental disorders and normal hearing. Have them sit on the opposite side of the table.

To begin the experiment, inform the child that they will be playing a memory game and will have time to study the cards at the end.

Using the number line, ask the child how many of the 18 pictures they think they will remember, and record their response.

During the object presentation phase, present each card, one at a time, and ask the child to name the object or read the label. Make sure to provide feedback every time, and place the card face up on the table.

After all 18 cards have been presented, inform the child that they will have 2 min to study the pictures. Start the timer, and allow them to study in any way they want to. When the time has elapsed, pick up the cards.

To ensure that the child is not continuing to rehearse the studied items, create a buffer between the study and memory test by giving them a set of puzzles to work on during a delay period of 5 min.

At the end of the delay period, ask the child to recall as many of the 18 items as possible. Record their responses. Continue to encourage the child to remember as many items as possible, until they fail to recall any items for about 10 s.

When the child fails to recall more items, end the memory test session and thank them for their participation.

Once the study is finished, average both the number of items that children predicted they would recall and the number they actually recalled by age group. Notice the difference between age groups.

To calculate each child’s prediction accuracy, subtract the actual number of items recalled from the predicted recall value. Using these scores, now graph the percentage of children by age group who overestimated their memory—that is, those who predicted that they would recall more than they did—and compare the percentages using a chi-square test. Note that fewer 9-year-olds overestimated their memory compared to 6-year-olds, indicating that memory prediction improves as a function of age.

Now that you are familiar with children’s tendencies to overestimate their memory abilities, let’s examine both positive and negative consequences for their behavior in a number of situations across development.

The mere thought of thinking about succeeding can help motivate children to face challenging tasks. For example, their naivety likely contributes to their willingness to try new activities—like jumping into a swimming pool.

In contrast, children’s excessively positive views of themselves can also have risky consequences for their physical well-being. Younger children are more likely to engage in a dangerous behavior—like performing a bicycle stunt—as a consequence of their tendency to overestimate their knowledge and abilities.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction for studying how children’s metamemory develops over time. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and conduct the experiment, and finally how to analyze and interpret the results.

Thanks for watching!

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. Metacognitive Development: How Children Estimate Their Memory. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).