This report presented an MR-compatible gas delivery system and a comprehensive experimental protocol that allows the mapping of vascular reactivity in the human brain. A diagram of the gas delivery system is illustrated in Figure 1. All parts inside the MRI scanner room are plastic to ensure their MRI compatibility. The system can be conceptually divided into three sub-systems, including a gas intake sub-system (bag, delivery tube, two-way valve), a breathing interface sub-system (nose clip, mouthpiece, U-shape tube), and a monitoring sub-system (CO2 concentration, oxygen saturation, heart rate, breathing rate). The gas intake sub-system allows the gas to be inhaled to reach the two-way valve. Only inhaled air, but not exhaled air, will flow through this sub-system. The breathing interface sub-system allows the subject to breathe in and out the intended gas. Both inhaled and exhaled gas will flow through this sub-system. The monitoring sub-system should therefore sample the gas at a point along the breathing interface sub-system.
Clinical applications of this technique may include evaluations of brain vascular reserve in neurological diseases such as stroke, atherosclerosis, moyamoya disease, vascular dementia, multiple sclerosis, and brain tumor. The technique can also be used in functional MRI studies to normalize or calibrate fMRI signal for a better quantification of neural activity23,24.
An important feature of the proposed system and experimental protocol is that the gas mixture can be delivered to the subject while causing minimal motion or discomfort. Therefore, it is critical to place the U-shape tube (Item #12) such that it (and the mouthpiece connected to the end of it) naturally falls downwards into the subject’s mouth. This way, the subject does not need to use his facial muscle to hold or support the mouthpiece. It is also important to be aware that the subject will not be able to talk while the mouthpiece is in their mouth. Therefore, the researcher should avoid talking to the subject with a question tone. Instead, only clear, definitive instructions should be given. Additionally, a researcher should pay close attention to the physiological parameters (e.g., EtCO2, sO2, heart rate, breathing rate) during the entire course of the experiment and respond promptly when one or more of the physiological parameters deviate outside the typical range.
While an exhaustive survey of other gas delivery systems used in the literature is beyond the scope of this article, it is useful to compare the current system to a few commonly used ones17,18. A major difference is that our system uses a mouthpiece to deliver the intended gas while most other systems have used a mask in design. The potential complications of using a mask are two folds. First, a mask occupies a substantial amount of space, and it might not always be feasible to fit the mask into the tight space inside the head coil, considering that, for many subjects, their noses would almost touch the head coil even without a mask. This is especially the case for head coils intended to achieve high sensitivity, which are usually designed to fit tightly to the subject’s head. A second complication associated with a mask design is that there is large space inside the mask which results in substantial mixing of inhaled and exhaled gas. Consequently, it could affect the accuracy of the measurement of EtCO2, which ideally should be based on exhaled gas only. Accurate EtCO2 is of course important for the reliability of the CVR map. Another major difference of our system in comparison to many other systems is that our system delivers the gas from a bag instead of a gas tank. Therefore, tanks are not needed in the scanner area, saving precious space in the control room of an MRI suite. In our design, we bring the bag before the start of the scan and, following the scan, the bag is emptied, folded, and put away. Finally, compared to several other systems18,21, the current gas delivery system is simpler, requires less training time, and its consumables are less expensive.
It should be pointed out that, although the protocol presented in this report has primarily focused on CO2 inhalation, the presented gas delivery system allows the delivery of other gas mixtures (e.g., any fraction of O2, any fraction of CO2, any fraction of N2, and their combination) to a human for them to breathe while s/he is lying inside the MRI scanner. One can also use the gas delivery system outside the context of MRI, for example in conjunction with electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetoencephalogram (MEG), positron emission tomography (PET), or optimal imaging.
When providing a recommendation of imaging parameters, we have primarily focused on BOLD sequence. Another sequence that can be potentially used in CVR mapping is Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI, which provides a quantitative measure of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in physiologic units (ml blood per 100 g tissue per min). Therefore, the advantage of ASL-based CVR mapping is that the results are easier to interpret, unlike BOLD signal which reflects a combined effect of blood flow, blood volume as well as possible contributions of brain metabolic alterations during CO2 challenge25-27. However, a limitation of the ASL technique is that its sensitivity is several folds lower than that of BOLD28. As a result, our experience is that, at present, it is highly challenging to obtain an individual-level, voxel-by-voxel CVR map using ASL. Therefore, for application studies of CVR, we mainly use the BOLD sequence and thus also focus on this technique in our recommendations.
One limitation of the present method is that breathing through a mouthpiece with the nose blocked (by a nose clip) is not entirely natural and some subjects (especially patients) may perceive this as a source of discomfort. Breathing with the mouthpiece and nose clip may also exacerbate the feeling of claustrophobia. Additionally, the subject may experience dry mouth due to breathing by mouth only. Therefore, it is recommended that the researcher try his best to complete the experiment swiftly. Finally, it is important to note that, based on the authors’ experience, the potential discomfort mentioned above is transient and will disappear as soon as the experiment is finished.