Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Medicine

A Preclinical Model of Exertional Heat Stroke in Mice

doi: 10.3791/62738 Published: July 1, 2021
Michelle A. King1, Jamal M. Alzahrani1, Thomas L. Clanton1, Orlando Laitano1,2

Abstract

Heat stroke is the most severe manifestation of heat-related illnesses. Classic heat stroke (CHS), also known as passive heat stroke, occurs at rest, whereas exertional heat stroke (EHS) occurs during physical activity. EHS differs from CHS in etiology, clinical presentation, and sequelae of multi-organ dysfunction. Until recently, only models of CHS have been well established. This protocol aims to provide guidelines for a refined preclinical mouse model of EHS that is free from major limiting factors such as the use of anesthesia, restraint, rectal probes, or electric shock. Male and female C57Bl/6 mice, instrumented with core temperature (Tc) telemetric probes were utilized in this model. For familiarization with the running mode, mice undergo 3 weeks of training using both voluntary and forced running wheels. Thereafter, mice run on a forced wheel inside a climatic chamber set at 37.5 °C and 40%-50% relative humidity (RH) until displaying symptom limitation (e.g., loss of consciousness) at Tc of 42.1-42.5 °C, although suitable results can be obtained at chamber temperatures between 34.5-39.5 °C and humidity between 30%-90%. Depending on the desired severity, mice are removed from the chamber immediately for recovery in ambient temperature or remain in the heated chamber for a longer duration, inducing a more severe exposure and a higher incidence of mortality. Results are compared with sham-matched exercise controls (EXC) and/or naïve controls (NC). The model mirrors many of the pathophysiological outcomes observed in human EHS, including loss of consciousness, severe hyperthermia, multi-organ damage as well as inflammatory cytokine release, and acute phase responses of the immune system. This model is ideal for hypothesis-driven research to test preventative and therapeutic strategies that may delay the onset of EHS or reduce the multi-organ damage that characterizes this manifestation.

Introduction

Heat stroke is characterized by central nervous system dysfunction and subsequent organ damage in hyperthermic subjects1. There are two manifestations of heatstroke. Classic heat stroke (CHS) affects mostly elderly populations during heat waves or children left in sun-exposed vehicles during hot summer days1. Exertional heat stroke (EHS) occurs when there is an inability to thermoregulate adequately during physical exertion, typically, but not always, under high ambient temperatures resulting in neurological symptoms, hyperthermia, and subsequent multi-organ dysfunction and damage2. EHS occurs in recreational and elite athletes as well as military personnel and in laborers with and without concomitant dehydration3,4. Indeed, EHS is the third leading cause of mortality in athletes during physical activity5. It is extremely challenging to study EHS in humans as the episode can be lethal or lead to long-term negative health outcomes6,7. Therefore, a reliable preclinical model of EHS could serve as a valuable tool to overcome the limitations of retrospective and associative clinical observations in human EHS victims. Preclinical models of CHS in rodents and pigs have been well characterized8,9,10. However, preclinical models of CHS do not directly translate into EHS pathophysiology due to the unique effects of physical exercise on the thermoregulatory profile and innate immune response11. In addition, previous attempts to develop preclinical EHS models in rodents posed significant restrictions, including superimposed stress stimuli induced by electric shock, insertion of a rectal probe, and predefined maximum core body temperatures with high mortality rates12,13,14,15,16 that do not match current epidemiological data. These represent significant limitations that may confound data interpretation and provide unreliable biomarker indexes. Therefore, the protocol aims to characterize and describe the steps of a standardized, highly repeatable, and translatable preclinical model of EHS in mice that is largely free from the limitations mentioned above. Adjustments to the model that can result in graded physiological outcomes from moderate to fatal heat stroke are described. To the authors' knowledge, this is the only preclinical model of EHS with such characteristics, making it possible to pursue relevant EHS research in a hypothesis-driven manner11,17,18.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

All procedures have been reviewed and approved by the University of Florida IACUC. C57BL/6J male or female mice, ~4 months old, weighing within a range of 27-34 g and 20-25 g, respectively, are used for the study.

1. Surgical implantation of the telemetric temperature monitoring system

  1. Upon arrival from the vendor, allow the animals to rest in the vivarium for at least 1 week prior to surgery to minimize the stress of transportation.
  2. Group house the mice (maximum of 5 per cage under local IACUC guidelines) until the day of surgery for temperature telemetric device implantation. House them in standard 7.25" (W) x 11.75" (L) x 5" (H) cages containing corncob bedding. Maintain the light cycle on a 12 x 12 light cycle (on: 7 AM; off: 7 PM). Maintain the housing temperature at 20-22 °C and relative humidity (RH) at 30%-60%. Provide the standard chow diet and water ad libitum until the EHS protocol.
    NOTE: The rationale for individual housing is to avoid frequent fighting injury in male C57bl/6J mice and to provide ample opportunity for spontaneous wheel running for each mouse.
  3. For placement of the telemetry devices, anesthetize the mouse with isoflurane (4%, 0.4-0.6 L/min of O2 flow) in an induction chamber. Then, place the mouse under continuous anesthesia via a nose cone (1.5%, 0.6 L/min).
  4. Use eye lube, such as a vet ointment, to protect the animal's eyes from damage or injury during surgery.
  5. To prepare the surgical site, shave the lower abdomen with small animal hair clippers or use a commercially available hair remover. Administer the first dose of subcutaneous buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) during this time.
  6. Scrub the area with three washes of povidone-iodine (or similar germicidal scrub) followed by 70% isopropyl alcohol rinse (or sterile saline depending on local veterinary requirements). Then, transfer the mouse to the surgical area.
  7. Use an adhesive drape to isolate the surgical site on the mouse. Using sterile instruments and aseptic technique, make a ~1 cm incision on the midline along the linea alba, about 0.5 cm from the costal margin. Then, separate the skin from the muscle layer and make a slightly smaller incision on the linea alba, careful not to damage the bowels or internal organs.
  8. Once the muscle layer is open, place the sterile telemeter (miniature reusable battery-free radiotelemetry device; 16.5 x 6.5 mm) into the intraperitoneal cavity in front of the caudal arteries and veins and dorsal to the digestive organs to allow it to float freely.
    NOTE: All telemeters are cleaned with soap and water, thoroughly rinsed and gas sterilized with ethylene oxide between usages. If gas sterilization is not available, immersion in sterilization solutions (following manufacturer’s recommendation for dilution and immersion time) is accepted to  disinfect and sterilize the telemeters.
  9. Close the abdominal opening with a sterile 5-0 absorbable suture, and close the skin using a simple interrupted stitch with 5-0 proline suture.
    NOTE: Allowing the telemeter to float in the abdominal compartment without tying it to the abdominal wall (a method recommended by the manufacturer) has been demonstrated to be successful and preferred by the authors to eliminate excess tension in the abdominal wall during healing. Further, this has no impact on the receiver's ability to obtain the signal from the emitter.
  10. Place the mouse in its clean cage with a portable heating pad under the cage. Monitor the mouse every 15 min during the first hour of recovery from anesthesia, and then return to the animal housing facility.
  11. Provide mice with subcutaneous buprenorphine injections every 12 h for 48 h during recovery and continue to monitor for signs of distress. If available, give slow-release buprenorphine subcutaneously every 24 h (1 mg/kg) for 48 h. Allow the mice to recover for ~2 weeks following surgery before introducing a voluntary wheel running.

2. Familiarization: Voluntary and forced wheel running

  1. Following recovery from surgery, place the voluntary running wheels in the cage for free access to the wheel. Other running wheel selections may be equally effective, but ensure it fits within the limited cage sizes available.
    NOTE: The running wheels had to be slightly reduced in dimension to fit in a standard cage.
  2. Acclimate the mouse to the voluntary wheel in the cage for 2 weeks. Once acclimated, the mouse is ready for training with familiarization procedures for the forced running wheels.
  3. Perform the four training sessions (one/day) in the environmental chamber at room temperature (~25 °C, 30% relative humidity).
    NOTE: Although this is ideal, mice were also successfully trained in identical forced running wheels outside the chamber. Several mice can then be trained simultaneously without interfering with the use of the chamber.
  4. To begin the first training session, allow the mouse to free wheel in the modified running wheel for 15 min by removing or loosening the motor drive belt to allow the mouse to determine the speed of the wheel and acclimatize to it in a non-stressful manner.
    NOTE: Protocols can be run with software and hardware supplied by the running wheel manufacturer or may be substituted by an external programmable power supply that is wired directly to the wheel motor, which allows for automation of the incremental exercise protocol.
  5. Calibrate the system for each running wheel to determine the relationship between the power supply voltage and meters/minute (m/min) of each wheel.
    NOTE: The forced running wheels were also modified to elevate the motor 15 cm, invert and move the pulley driving the wheel down to 5 cm above the telemetry receiver platform. This ensured that the receiver platform obtained accurate telemetry data during the running protocol without interference from the motor.
  6. After a brief rest period (<5 min), initiate the forced running wheel protocol. Start the wheel at 2.5 m/min and increase 0.3 m/min every 10 min for a total of 1 h to mimic the first hour of the actual EHS trial, but at room temperature. Return the mouse to its home cage and allow for 24 h recovery. Conduct the subsequent three forced running sessions in the same manner on consecutive days. After day 1, the free-wheeling acclimation portion is unnecessary.
  7. Allow the mouse 2-3 days of wash-out or recovery from the stress of the forced running wheel practice, but allow the mouse free access to the home cage voluntary wheel. The mouse is now prepared to undergo the EHS protocol.

3. EHS protocol

  1. The night before the EHS protocol, place the mouse in the environmental chamber at room temperature (~25 °C, ≈30% relative humidity) to acclimate to the chamber.
  2. Use a data acquisition system to collect continuous Tc, averaged over 30-s intervals overnight.
  3. On the morning of the EHS protocol, make sure the mouse is at or below a normal range of diurnal temperature before increasing the chamber temperature (i.e., 36-37.5 °C). This ensures the mouse does not have a fever or has experienced undue stress during this period.
  4. Once the mouse is stable and within a range of normal resting core temperature, remove the food and water and weigh the animal. Shut the chamber door and increase the chamber temperature to a target of 37.5 °C and 40%-50% relative humidity, or the desired environmental temperature and humidity19. Verify the chamber temperature and humidity with a calibrated temperature and humidity monitor.
  5. Surround the chamber with a black-out curtain to keep light and disturbances minimal during the protocol. Monitor the mouse continuously during the protocol via remote IR illuminated cameras. Focus a second camera on the temperature and humidity monitor, placed close to the running wheel. Make any adjustments to the controller for the environmental chamber set-point to ensure accurate temperature readings near the animal.
  6. Once the chamber has reached its target temperature as measured by the second camera on the temperature monitor (this can take ~30 min), quickly open the chamber door and place the mouse in the forced running wheel.
  7. Initiate the forced running wheel protocol at a speed of 2.5 m/min and increase the speed 0.3 m/min every 10 min until the mouse reaches a Tc of 41 °C. Once the mouse has reached this core temperature, allow the speed to remain constant until symptom limitation, characterized by an apparent loss of consciousness, a backward fall or fainting, and the inability to continue to run or hold on to the wheel. Confirm this time point when the mouse has three backward rotations on the wheel without signs of a physical response. Alternatively, identify a humane endpoint following local IACUC rules to determine when to stop the protocol (e.g., when Tc ~43 °C). This endpoint is slightly above symptom limitation in essentially all mice.
  8. To perform the Rapid Cooling protocol (R), once the mouse reaches symptom limitation, stop the wheel, and remove it immediately from the forced running wheel. Weigh the mouse and place it back in its home cage to recover at room temperature. During this time, leave the chamber door open and return the incubator set point to room temperature to allow the chamber to cool rapidly. This procedure results in >99% long-term survival.
  9. To perform a more Severe (S) EHS exposure, keep the animal's home cage within the 37.5 °C chamber during the EHS protocol. When the animal reaches symptom limitation, allow them to remain in the running wheel until they return to consciousness as observed by the remote camera (~5-9 min).
  10. Then quickly remove the mouse from the running wheel and return it directly to its pre-warmed cage to result in a much slower cooling profile (Figure 1A, red dashed line), essentially eliminating the EHS hypothermic phase. Remove the filter top from the cage during this time to improve equilibration with the chamber.
  11. Use a recovery cage precooled to room temperature to perform a less severe alternative procedure to result in a suppressed hypothermic phase but with a 100% survival rate20.
  12. For the S protocol, carefully monitor the mouse during recovery and check continuously for humane endpoints. Although it is difficult to remotely test for commonly used humane endpoints (e.g., righting reflex), observe the mice remotely for normal movements during recovery such as grooming, normal breathing, licking, etc. Monitor the Tc during this time.
  13. Mice are unlikely to recover if their core temperature reverses direction during the recovery phase, eventually exceeding 40 °C; at this time, terminate the experiment and evaluate the mouse for standard humane endpoints.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The typical thermoregulatory profiles during the entirety of the EHS protocol and early recovery of a mouse is illustrated in Figure 1A. This profile comprises four distinct phases that can be defined as the chamber heating stage, incremental exercise stage, steady-state exercise stage, and a recovery stage by either a rapid cooling (R) or severe (S) method17. The main thermoregulatory outcomes include maximum Tc achieved (Tc,max) and the time required to reach Tc,max. Ascending thermal area allows for determining the effective exposure to temperature >39.5 °C21 and hypothermia depth (Tc,min). Typical values for these variables summarized from several studies are shown in Table 1. Other outcome variables routinely measured include the total distance run, the maximum speed achieved, and the percentage weight lost during the EHS protocol (a surrogate measure for dehydration). Again, typical values can be observed in Table 1. Female mice are more resistant to heat stroke in this model and run nearly 2-fold longer distances than male mice17, as illustrated schematically in Figure 1B and summarized numerically in Table 1.

Terminal experiments have been performed at different time points post-EHS, ranging from immediately before and after collapse19 to 30 days11,17,22. This model consistently demonstrates histological damage to the intestines, kidney, and liver19. Other expected results include common biomarkers of stress or immune responsiveness11,17, (Table 2), as well as end organ dysfunction including indicators of liver (alanine transaminase), muscle (creatine kinase), intestinal (fatty acid binding protein 2), and kidney (creatinine: blood urea nitrogen ratio) as shown in Table 319. Future investigations may consider measuring other markers of tissue damage or oxidative stress.

In the R preclinical model, >99% of the animals survive until sample collection. However, in the S model, as described above, the mortality increases to >30% (N = 32, P < 0.003). A typical recovery temperature profile for the S model is illustrated in Figure 1A (dashed red line), where Tc stays above 37 °C throughout the 2 h recovery period. The partition of EHS recovery periods during each stage of the EHS protocol and recovery is compared in Figure 2 between the classic and the S models. Interestingly, there is no difference in the time required to recover to 39.5 °C in the two models. However, the time to cool to the environmental temperature (37.5 °C, above normal body temperature) was greatly prolonged (P < 0.0001).

Figure 1
Figure 1: Thermoregulatory profiles during the entirety of the EHS protocol and early recovery of a mouse. (A) The typical core temperature profile of a C57Bl6 mouse undergoing the protocol on the vertical axis. On the horizontal axis, as time progresses from chamber heating (-50) to the beginning of the incremental portion of the protocol. As the mouse reaches 41 °C, speed is kept constant during the steady-state phase until it reaches symptom-limitation. During recovery, core temperature drops at different rates for severe (red dashed line) and rapid cooling (solid line) models. (B) Schematic representation of the sex differences observed in core temperature and duration. The dashed line is male, and the solid line is female. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Duration in which mouse's core temperature remained >39.5 °C for rapid cooling (R) and slow cooling (S) protocols. Note that significant differences exist in the Tc,max to 37.5 °C and Tc,max to Tc,min segments. Data are mean ± standard deviation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Males Females EXC
Tc,max  (°C) 42.1 ± 0.2 42.3 (42.2–42.4) 38.5 ± 0.2
Time to Tc (min) 123 ± 11 208 (152–252) 113 ± 10
%Weight Loss in EHS 8.1 ± 2.1 6.0 (5.1–7.6 4.5% ± 1.0%
Hypothermia depth (°C) 33.0 ± 1.1 31.7 (30.7–33.1) n/a
Ascending thermal area (°C >39.5 • S) 96.5 ± 14.7 240 (202–285) n/a
Total Distance (m) 444.9 ± 89.3 623 (424–797) Matched
Maximum speed (m/min) 5.3 ± 0.6 8.1 (7.1–9.2) 5.2

Table 1: Expected temperature and exercise responses using the rapid cooling model of exertional heat stroke. All data from environmental temperature = 37.5°C, 30%-40% relative humidity. Means ± SD summarized from King et al. 201519, Garcia et al. 201817, Garcia et al. 202018.
Tc,max = maximum core temperature achieved at or near symptom limitation during exertional heat stroke (EHS).
% Weight loss = %weight difference from immediately before and after EHS. Ascending thermal area = an indicator of thermal load. It is the product of time x temperature > 39.5 °C during the EHS protocol.

Male Female
Males EXC 30 min 3 h 24 h EXC 30 min 3 h 24 h
Corticosterone (ng/mL) 50 ± 10 175 ± 42 152 ± 28 46 ± 26 72 ± 11 219 ± 78 259 ± 36 95 ± 24
IL-6 (pg/mL) 3.8 ± 0 58.0 ± 50.0 37.0 ± 43 5.1 ± 4.0 3.7 ± 0.3 97.0 ± 48 10.4 ± 16.0 5.0 ± 4.2
GCS-F (pg/mL) 34.2 ± 16.4 573 ± 462 1080 ± 52 87.8 ± 40.5 44.2 ± 20.0 238 ± 194 1712 ± 1700 208.4 ± 193

Table 2: Biomarker of stress hormone/cytokine responses in a rapid cooling model of the exertional heat stroke.
Data are means ± SD, All data from environmental temperature = 37.5 °C, 30%-40% relative
humidity. Summarized from Garcia et al. 201817.

Time point EXC 30 min 3 h 24 h
Creatine Kinase (IU/L) 215 ± 108 309 ± 145 1392 ± 1797 344  ± 196
Blood Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) 23 ±  2.7 66 ± 2.6 34 ± 8.5 17.2 ± 0.4
Creatinine:BUN ratio 131 ± 70.0 210.7 ± 22.8 268.6 ± 118 52.3 ± 14
Alanine transaminase 25 ± 3.7 367 ± 744 123 ± 167 207 ± 236
FABP-2 (ng/mL) 2.3 ± 1.0 10.2 ± 1.0 2.6 ± 3.1 1.2 ± 0.5

Table 3: Biomarkers of organ Injury in male mice during recovery from rapid cooling model of exertional heat stroke.
Data are means ± SD. All data from environmental temperature = 37.5 °C. King et al. 201519.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

This technical review aims to provide guidelines for the performance of a preclinical model of EHS in mice. Detailed steps and materials required for the execution of a reproducible EHS episode of variable severities are provided. Importantly, the model largely mimics the signs, symptoms, and multi-organ dysfunction observed in human EHS victims11,19. Furthermore, this model allows for the examination of the mechanism underlying short- and long-term EHS recovery19,20,22,23 and the effect of interventions on thermoregulation, performance measurements in the heat, rate of temperature reductions after stroke, and indicators of multi-organ dysfunction and functional tests of recovery. This model allows investigators to draw comparisons between other models that may be relevant for comparisons such as those describing malignant hyperthermia or rhabdomyolysis24,25,26.

This preclinical model eliminates unnecessary stressors, such as the use of electrical stimulation, rectal probes, anesthesia, or predetermined Tc cut-offs. Further, it highlights sex differences and innate tolerance to EHS. There are, however, some critical steps that must be adhered to. For instance, minor elevations in relative humidity may prolong the duration of the protocol because mice are able to use condensation of water vapor to cool themselves (opposite of the effects of humidity in humans)19. Also, it is important to note that when using the S mode, the empty cage must be kept inside the chamber during the entire duration of the test. If the cage is left outside the chamber, exposed to room temperature, it creates a sufficient gradient to cool the mouse even if quickly returned to the heated chamber20. A unique but not necessarily required feature of the protocol is using a small, forced running wheel (17.1 cm diameter). This diameter requires the mice to lift their upper torsos to meet the wheel as speed increases and undergo considerable coordination to keep up with the speed of the wheel and step on the widely spaced rungs of the wheel. Therefore, the efficiency, speed, and performance using such a wheel are much different from when mice run on a flat surface such as a treadmill or much larger diameter wheels available. If different diameter wheels are used, the example data shown here are unlikely to be representative. Given that the running activity is more complex in the smaller wheel, its use may appropriately simulate complex motor activities in the heat typical of diverse activities rather than simply running on flat surfaces.

The ability to select the severity by adjusting the cooling rate is another advantage of this model. The main therapeutic intervention known to be effective in counteracting negative outcomes of EHS is immediate cooling below 40 °C27. Therefore, the rapid cooling approach described in the R model is recommended for those trying to reverse-translate an EHS episode into exercise settings where cooling stations are readily available. However, in many other instances, such as in military scenarios or sports events held in remote settings, victims are often left in the heat, post-collapse, often for hours until medical support is available. This makes the slow cooling (S) approach a valid model for more severe outcomes. Presumably, this approach could be further modified to provide a wide range of severity of outcomes and to test cooling protocols.

Perhaps the most critical step in this procedure is ensuring proper implantation of the telemetric temperature device and allowing for ample recovery post-surgery. The ensuing inflammation process involved in the recovery can greatly alter the ability of the mouse to respond favorably to the EHS protocol, as infections and inflammation have been shown to impact thermoregulatory responses during EHS negatively3,27. Proper suturing is imperative for the success of the surgery and for promoting proper wound healing. It is critical to ensure that the muscle layer has been sutured separately from the skin layer. The muscle layer should also be cut only along the linea alba to ensure unnecessary blood loss and damage to the muscle. It is imperative to administer analgesics at proper times and provide sufficient time for the animals to recover fully from surgery before introducing the in-cage running wheels. The mouse must be monitored during recovery for signs and symptoms of distress and weight loss.

Throughout the development of this protocol, a variety of successful modifications were tested. The first modification included the pace at which the training was conducted and the elimination of the free-wheeling portion during acclimation. Because of equipment limitations, training was carried out utilizing the same protocol but with incremental increases in the speed of 0.5 m/min every 10 min for 60 min; free-wheeling was not utilized in the initial training session. These small changes did not affect the overall outcome or training status of the mouse. A second modification that was tested was the placement of the mouse during the increase in environmental chamber temperature. The protocol states that the mouse must rest in the home cage until the target environmental temperature is reached. However, to eliminate the opening of the chamber door at the target temperature, the mouse was placed in the forced running wheel to rest while the chamber was reaching the target temperature. The Tc and activity of the mice did not significantly differ whether the mouse was resting in the wheel or the home cage during this time period. Lastly, a variety of environmental conditions were tested ranging from 37.5-39.5 °C with 30%-90% RH19. The overall pattern remained similar while Tc,max, and exercise duration did differ. Manipulation of the target temperature and humidity can therefore be tailored to individual research goals.

There are a few additional limitations to bear in mind for this protocol. For example, because the protocol is symptom-limited, the mouse will not run beyond the point of collapse, this makes it difficult to make a more severe model based on exercise intensity. However, the modified cooling protocol rectifies this limitation. Another limitation is that any future therapeutic or intervention must be administered remotely, before or after the EHS protocol. If the animal had to be stopped for therapeutic administration, the Tc would immediately drop, and the thermoregulatory profile would be altered.

Although these limitations present a few logistical issues, this model displays advantageous features compared to other models that have employed stressful stimuli or invasive equipment. In the future, this model can be used to uncover the mechanisms underlying EHS and test novel interventions that may delay the onset of EHS or prevent the multi-organ dysfunction that ensues. In summary, this protocol establishes guidelines for the execution of a reliable preclinical model of EHS in mice and hopefully identifies the potential pitfalls to avoid when recreating this approach in other environments and future investigations.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. All work performed and all support for this project were generated at the University of Florida.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Department of Defense W81XWH-15-2-0038 (TLC) and BA180078 (TLC) and the BK and Betty Stevens Endowment (TLC). JMA was supported by financial aid from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Michelle King was with the University of Florida at the time this study was conducted. She is currently employed by the Gatorade Sports Science Institute, a division of PepsiCo R&D.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
 1080P HD 4 Security Cameras 4CH Home Video Security Camera System w/ 1TB HDD 2MP Night View Cameras CCTV Surveillance Kit LaView
5-0 Coated Vicryl Violet Braided Ethicon
5-0 Ethilon Nylon suture Black Monofilament Ethicon
Adhesive Surgical Drape with Povidone 12x18 Jorgensen Labset al.
BK Precision Multi-Range Programmable DC Power Supplies Model 9201 BK Precision
DR Instruments Medical Student Comprehensive Anatomy Dissection Kit  DR Instruments
Energizer Power Supply Starr Life Sciences
G2 Emitteret al. Starr Life Sciences
Layfayette Motorized Wheel Model #80840B Layfayette
Patterson Veterinary Isoflurane Patterson Veterinary
Platform receiveret al. Starr Life Sciences
Scientific Environmental Chamber Model 3911 ThermoForma
Training Wheels  Columbus Inst.

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Leon, L. R., Bouchama, A. Heat stroke. Comprehensive Physiology. 5, (2), 611-647 (2015).
  2. Laitano, O., Leon, L. R., Roberts, W. O., Sawka, M. N. Controversies in exertional heat stroke diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Journal of Applied Physiology. 127, (5), 1338-1348 (2019).
  3. King, M. A., et al. Influence of prior illness on exertional heat stroke presentation and outcome. PLOS One. 14, (8), 0221329 (2019).
  4. Carter, R., et al. Epidemiology of hospitalizations and deaths from heat illness in soldiers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 37, (8), 1338-1344 (2005).
  5. Howe, A. S., Boden, B. P. Heat-related illness in athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 35, (8), 1384-1395 (2007).
  6. Wallace, R. F., Kriebel, D., Punnett, L., Wegman, D. H., Amoroso, P. J. Prior heat illness hospitalization and risk of early death. Environmental Research. 104, (2), 290-295 (2007).
  7. Wang, J. -C., et al. The association between heat stroke and subsequent cardiovascular diseases. PLOS One. 14, (2), 0211386 (2019).
  8. Leon, L. R., Blaha, M. D., DuBose, D. A. Time course of cytokine, corticosterone, and tissue injury responses in mice during heat strain recovery. Journal of Applied Physiology. 100, (4), 1400-1409 (2006).
  9. Leon, L. R., DuBose, D. A., Mason, C. W. Heat stress induces a biphasic thermoregulatory response in mice. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 288, (1), 197-204 (2005).
  10. Leon, L. R., Gordon, C. J., Helwig, B. G., Rufolo, D. M., Blaha, M. D. Thermoregulatory, behavioral, and metabolic responses to heatstroke in a conscious mouse model. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 299, (1), 241-248 (2010).
  11. King, M. A., Leon, L. R., Morse, D. A., Clanton, T. L. Unique cytokine and chemokine responses to exertional heat stroke in mice. Journal of Applied Physiology. 122, (2), 296-306 (2016).
  12. Costa, K. A., et al. l-Arginine supplementation prevents increases in intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation in Male Swiss mice subjected to physical exercise under environmental heat stress. The Journal of Nutrition. 144, (2), 218-223 (2014).
  13. Hubbard, R. W. Effects of exercise in the heat on predisposition to heatstroke. Medicine and Science in Sports. 11, (1), 66-71 (1979).
  14. Hubbard, R. W., et al. Rat model of acute heatstroke mortality. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology. 42, (6), 809-816 (1977).
  15. Hubbard, R. W., et al. Diagnostic significance of selected serum enzymes in a rat heatstroke model. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology. 46, (2), 334-339 (1979).
  16. Hubbard, R. W., et al. Role of physical effort in the etiology of rat heatstroke injury and mortality. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology. 45, (3), 463-468 (1978).
  17. Garcia, C. K., et al. Sex-dependent responses to exertional heat stroke in mice. Journal of Applied Physiology. 125, (3), Bethesda, Md. 841-849 (2018).
  18. Garcia, C. K., et al. Effects of Ibuprofen during Exertional Heat Stroke in Mice. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 52, (9), 1870-1878 (2020).
  19. King, M. A., Leon, L. R., Mustico, D. L., Haines, J. M., Clanton, T. L. Biomarkers of multi-organ injury in a pre-clinical model of exertional heat stroke. Journal of Applied Physiology. 118, (10), Bethesda, Md. (2015).
  20. Murray, K. O., et al. Exertional heat stroke leads to concurrent long-term epigenetic memory, immunosuppression and altered heat shock response in female mice. The Journal of Physiology. 599, (1), 119-141 (2021).
  21. Leon, L. R., DuBose, D. A., Mason, C. W. Heat stress induces a biphasic thermoregulatory response in mice. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 288, 197-204 (2005).
  22. Laitano, O., et al. Delayed metabolic dysfunction in myocardium following exertional heat stroke in mice. The Journal of Physiology. 598, (5), 967-985 (2020).
  23. Iwaniec, J., et al. Acute phase response to exertional heat stroke in mice. Experimental Physiology. 106, (1), 222-232 (2020).
  24. He, S. -X., et al. Optimization of a rhabdomyolysis model in mice with exertional heat stroke mouse model of EHS-rhabdomyolysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 11, (2020).
  25. Lopez, J. R., Kaura, V., Diggle, C. P., Hopkins, P. M., Allen, P. D. Malignant hyperthermia, environmental heat stress, and intracellular calcium dysregulation in a mouse model expressing the p.G2435R variant of RYR1. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 121, (4), 953-961 (2018).
  26. Laitano, O., Murray, K. O., Leon, L. R. Overlapping mechanisms of exertional heat stroke and malignant hyperthermia: evidence vs. conjecture. Sports Medicine. 50, (9), Auckland, N.Z. 115-123 (2020).
  27. Casa, D. J., Armstrong, L. E., Kenny, G. P., O'Connor, F. G., Huggins, R. A. Exertional heat stroke: new concepts regarding cause and care. Current Sports Medicine Reports. 11, (3), 115-123 (2012).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

King, M. A., Alzahrani, J. M., Clanton, T. L., Laitano, O. A Preclinical Model of Exertional Heat Stroke in Mice. J. Vis. Exp. (173), e62738, doi:10.3791/62738 (2021).More

King, M. A., Alzahrani, J. M., Clanton, T. L., Laitano, O. A Preclinical Model of Exertional Heat Stroke in Mice. J. Vis. Exp. (173), e62738, doi:10.3791/62738 (2021).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter