JoVE Science Education
Neuropsychology
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Science Education Neuropsychology
Motor Maps
  • 00:00Overview
  • 01:37Experimental Design
  • 04:24Running the Experiment
  • 07:18Data Analysis and Representative Results
  • 09:04Applications
  • 10:38Summary

운동 지도

English

Share

Overview

출처: 조나스 T. 카플란과 사라 I. 짐벨의 연구소 – 서던 캘리포니아 대학

뇌 조직의 한 가지 원리는 정보의 지형 매핑입니다. 특히 감각 및 모터 코르티체에서, 뇌의 인접 한 영역은 신체의 인접 한 부분에서 정보를 나타내는 경향이, 뇌의 표면에 표현 된 신체의지도의 결과. 뇌의 주요 감각 및 모터 지도는 중앙 황액으로 알려진 눈에 띄는 황액을 둘러싸고 있습니다. 중앙 황액에 피질 전방은 중앙 자이러스로 알려져 있으며 1 차 모터 피질을 포함하고 있으며, 중앙 황액에 피질 후방은 포스트 센트럴 자이루스로 알려져 있으며 1 차 감각 피질을 포함(도 1).

Figure 1
그림 1: 중앙 설커스 주변의 감각 및 모터 맵. 바디의 이펙터의 모터 지도가 포함된 1차 모터 피질은, 전두엽의 중앙 자이루스에서 중앙 설커스에 앞쪽입니다. 신체의 외부 부위로부터 접촉, 통증 및 온도 정보를 받는 주요 일부 (감각) 피질은 정수리 엽의 중앙 자이루스에서 중앙 황액에 후방에 위치합니다.

이 실험에서 기능성 신경 이미징은 프리센트럴 자이러스에서 모터 맵을 시연하는 데 사용됩니다. 이 지도는 종종 사람의 뇌의이 부분에 표현 된 자신의 자아의 작은 버전이 있기 때문에”작은 사람”에 대한 라틴어 모터 homunculus라고합니다. 이 지도의 한 가지 흥미로운 속성은 더 많은 피질 공간이 손과 입과 같은 미세한 제어를 필요로하는 신체 부위에 전념하여 피질에 있는 부속물을 불균형하게 표현한다는 것입니다. 또한, 모터 시스템의 해부학 때문에 신체의 오른쪽을 제어하는 뉴런이 왼쪽 1 차 운동 피질에 있으며 그 반대의 경우도 마찬가지입니다. 따라서 실험에 참여한 참가자가 오른손이나 발을 움직여야 하는 경우 왼쪽 중앙 자이루스의 활성화가 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

이 실험에서 참가자는 뇌 활동이 fMRI로 측정하는 동안 좌우 측면에서 손과 발을 번갈아 움직여야합니다. fMRI 신호는 참가자들이 하는 움직임에 비해 느린 혈액 산소화의 변화에 의존하기 때문에, 이동 기간은 다양한 조건이 서로 및 휴식 기준선으로부터 구별될 수 있도록 고요함의 기간으로 분리됩니다. 움직임의 정확한 타이밍을 달성하기 위해 참가자들은 시각적 신호로 각 움직임을 시작하고 종료할 시기를 지시받습니다. 이 비디오의 방법은 1 차적인 모터 피질에 있는 somatotopy를 입증한 몇몇 fMRI 연구 결과에 의해 이용된 것과 유사합니다. 1,2

Procedure

1. 20명의 참가자를 모집합니다. 참가자는 신경 또는 심리적 장애의 역사가 없는지 확인합니다. 참가자가 손별 설문지를 사용하여 모든 오른손잡이임을 확인하십시오. 참가자가 시각적 신호를 제대로 볼 수 있도록 정상 또는 정상 시력으로 수정되었는지 확인합니다. 참가자가 몸에 금속이 없는지 확인합니다. 이것은 fMRI에 관련된 높은 자기장 때문에 중요한 안전 요?…

Results

In this experiment, researchers measured brain activity with fMRI, while participants moved their hands or feet. Statistical analysis of the changes in blood flow is represented by different colors on the surface of the standard atlas brain. The colors identify the voxels, whose time course best matched the predicted time course for a specific condition.

The results demonstrate different activation foci within the precentral gyrus for the movement of the different limbs (Figure 2). Movement of the right hand produced the greatest activation on the left lateral surface of the gyrus (blue), while movement of the left hand produced the greatest activation on the right lateral surface (green). When participants moved their feet, activation was greatest where the precentral gyrus extends around to the medial surface of the brain. Right-sided foot movements produced activation on the left medial surface (cyan), while the greatest activation for left foot movements was on the right medial surface (yellow).

Figure 2
Figure 2: Brain activations resulting from movement of the hands and feet across participants. Blue = Movement of the right hand; Green = Movement of the left hand; Cyan = Movement of the right foot; Yellow = Movement of the left foot.

Applications and Summary

These results demonstrate the somatotopic, or body-mapped organization of the human primary motor cortex. This mapping has implications for how damage to the brain affects movement. For example, damage to the left precentral gyrus leads to difficulty in moving the right side of the body, and the specific parts of primary motor cortex affected can lead to problems in controlling specific parts of the body. However, it is also important to note that the primary motor cortex is only one of many brain regions involved in the control of movement. The precentral gyrus is part of a wider network of brain regions that participate in the selection, planning, and coordination of movement.

The ability to measure effector-specific activity in motor cortex also leads to the possibility of brain-computer interfaces, such as those that allow control of prosthetic limbs. For example, using direct recordings of neurons in the primary motor cortex, researchers have demonstrated that monkeys can control a prosthetic limb to feed themselves.3

References

  1. Lotze, M., et al. fMRI evaluation of somatotopic representation in human primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 11, 473-481 (2000).
  2. Rao, S.M., et al. Somatotopic mapping of the human primary motor cortex with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology 45, 919-924 (1995).
  3. Velliste, M., Perel, S., Spalding, M.C., Whitford, A.S. & Schwartz, A.B. Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature 453, 1098-1101 (2008).

Transcript

Motor information is organized according to anatomical divisions in the primary motor cortex, creating a topographical map in the brain.

Located in the precentral gyrus, cortical representations of the body are organized into a motor homunculus—”little man”—and are arranged in an inverted manner, such that the areas that control the toes are found in the medial wall and the tongue is located near the lateral sulcus.

Furthermore, body parts that require finer voluntary motor control, such as the hands and their associated digits, have larger representations in the cortex, compared to anatomical features that don’t require such precise manipulation—like the hip.

The homunculus is also lateralized, with neurons in the left primary motor cortex—shown here—controlling the right side of the body, and vice versa. Thus, when an individual moves their right hip, there is increased cortical activation on their left precentral gyrus within a discrete region.

This video details an experiment that uses modern functional neuroimaging to demonstrate the body-mapped organization of the human primary motor cortex, including how to collect and analyze brain activity when participants move their hands or feet.

In this experiment, brain activity is measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging, abbreviated as fMRI, while participants are repetitively cued to move different body parts—like the digits on their left or right hands.

This technique relies on changes in blood oxygenation levels, referred to as the BOLD—Blood-Oxygenation-Level-Dependent—response. For an in-depth look at the principles behind the method, please refer to another video in JOVE’s SciEd Essentials of Neuroscience Collection, fMRI: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

In the context presented here, when a body part, such as the left foot, is flexing back and forth, oxygenated cerebral blood flow—supplied by arteries in the brain—increases to neural regions that are active during this movement, like the primary motor cortex.

However, this hemodynamic response occurs more slowly than the actual physical motion, which warrants that actions be separated with periods of rest.

Thus, each body movement is precisely timed to distinguish the four conditions from one another: left hand, left foot, right hand, and right foot.

For example, participants in a fMRI machine are asked to start gesturing their left hand when one appears on the left side of a presentation screen.

The required hand movement is actually complex, and involves touching the thumb to each finger, in order, starting with the pointer. Then, the participant must repeat these actions in the opposite direction, starting with the pinky.

Movement is stopped when the cue—in this instance, the picture of the left hand—disappears from the screen.

Likewise, when they see a foot on the right, they are instructed to move their right foot by pushing it down repeatedly, until the image disappears.

Here, the dependent variable is the intensity of the BOLD response after a movement from the hand or foot, which can then be localized to specific brain regions.

For a left hand movement, brain activation is primarily expected on the right dorsolateral surface of the precentral gyrus. In contrast, for a right hand movement, brain activation is anticipated on the left dorsolateral surface. These results would align with the lateralized motor homunculus.

Prior to the experiment, recruit participants who are right-handed, have normal or corrected-to-normal vision, do not have any metallic implants in their body, or suffer from claustrophobia on account of experimental control and safety concerns.

Have them fill out pre-scan paperwork, which includes questions related to health and safety issues during the session, such as consent for a radiologist to look at their images in the case of incidental findings, as well as detailing the risks and benefits of the study.

Ask the participant to also remove all metal objects from their body—including watches, phones, wallets, keys, belts, and coins—to prepare for entering into the scanning room.

Next, explain the task rules: the appendage they need to move—in this case their foot—will appear as a visual cue on the corresponding side of the screen. Demonstrate how they should move their foot by repeatedly pressing it down, as if pushing on an imaginary pedal.

When a hand cue appears, they must touch the thumb to each finger of the same hand in order and then repeat this sequence in reverse.

Now, bring the participant into the imaging room. Provide earplugs to protect their ears from loud noises and earphones so that they can hear any additional communication during the session. Have them lie down on the bed with their head in the coil and secure it with foam pads to avoid excess movement and blur during the scan.

Above the participants’ eyes, place a mirror that reflects a screen at the back of the scanner bore. Then, give them a squeeze ball to use in case of emergency. Also remind them that it is very important to stay as still as possible the entire time.

After guiding the participant inside the machine, first collect high-resolution, anatomical images. To begin the functional portion, synchronize the stimulus presentation with the start of the scanner.

Present the visual cues via a laptop connected to a projector, each for 12 s, followed by 12 s of resting baseline. Alternate between the four conditions: left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot—repeating each four times within 6.5 min.

Once the scan is completed, direct the participant out of the room. Debrief them and provide compensation for their participation in the study.

As the first step of the analysis, preprocess the data by performing motion correction to reduce artifacts, temporal filtering to remove signal drifts, and spatial smoothing to increase the signal-to-noise ratio.

Using these data, create a model of the expected hemodynamic response for each task condition. Then, fit the data to this model, resulting in a statistical map for each subject, where the value at each voxel—a 3D pixel of volume—represents the extent to which that voxel was involved in the task condition.

Register the participant’s brain to a standard atlas in order to combine data across each participant. Then, combine all statistical maps across participants for a group level analysis. Note that changes in blood flow are represented by different colors on the surface of the brain.

Movements of the right hand, shown in blue, produced the greatest activation on the left lateral surface of the precentral gyrus, whereas engaging the left hand, represented in green, produced the greatest activation on the right lateral surface.

Additionally, flexing the right foot, indicated by light blue, produced activation on the left medial surface, while the greatest activation for left foot movements, in yellow, were on the right medial surface.

These results suggest that motor actions can be localized to discrete regions of the primary motor cortex in both hemispheres, supporting the motor homunculus.

Now that you are familiar with executing an fMRI experiment to observe the organization of the primary motor cortex, let’s consider how the brain manages movement after damage, or after the attachment of prosthetic limbs.

Damage to the left precentral gyrus, such as from a stroke, can lead to difficulty in moving the right side of the body.

As you’ve learned in this video, the specific parts that are impacted depend upon the extent of injury: impairments could be small and affect a single finger, or large enough to influence all of the digits and the entire arm.

While the representations seem straightforward, the primary motor cortex does not work alone, as it’s just a segment within a wider network of regions that are involved in the selection, planning, and coordination of movement. Thus, localizing damage may not be as easy as it seems.

One potential therapeutic approach for improving limb function in amputees involves brain-computer interfaces. This technically advanced method is based on electromyographic, or EMG signals—the electrical communication between motor neurons and muscle movements.

Researchers are developing ways to integrate EMG recordings with limb prostheses to more seamlessly control motor behaviors, like standing, or even walking up a ramp.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to motor maps. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and conduct the fMRI experiment, and finally how to analyze and interpret the brain activation results.

Thanks for watching!

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. Motor Maps. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).