Legoux, F. P., Moon, J. J. Peptide:MHC Tetramer-based Enrichment of Epitope-specific T cells. J. Vis. Exp. (68), e4420, doi:10.3791/4420 (2012).
A basic necessity for researchers studying adaptive immunity with in vivo experimental models is an ability to identify T cells based on their T cell antigen receptor (TCR) specificity. Many indirect methods are available in which a bulk population of T cells is stimulated in vitro with a specific antigen and epitope-specific T cells are identified through the measurement of a functional response such as proliferation, cytokine production, or expression of activation markers1. However, these methods only identify epitope-specific T cells exhibiting one of many possible functions, and they are not sensitive enough to detect epitope-specific T cells at naive precursor frequencies. A popular alternative is the TCR transgenic adoptive transfer model, in which monoclonal T cells from a TCR transgenic mouse are seeded into histocompatible hosts to create a large precursor population of epitope-specific T cells that can be easily tracked with the use of a congenic marker antibody2,3. While powerful, this method suffers from experimental artifacts associated with the unphysiological frequency of T cells with specificity for a single epitope4,5. Moreover, this system cannot be used to investigate the functional heterogeneity of epitope-specific T cell clones within a polyclonal population.
The ideal way to study adaptive immunity should involve the direct detection of epitope-specific T cells from the endogenous T cell repertoire using a method that distinguishes TCR specificity solely by its binding to cognate peptide:MHC (pMHC) complexes. The use of pMHC tetramers and flow cytometry accomplishes this6, but is limited to the detection of high frequency populations of epitope-specific T cells only found following antigen-induced clonal expansion. In this protocol, we describe a method that coordinates the use of pMHC tetramers and magnetic cell enrichment technology to enable detection of extremely low frequency epitope-specific T cells from mouse lymphoid tissues3,7. With this technique, one can comprehensively track entire epitope-specific populations of endogenous T cells in mice at all stages of the immune response.
1. Cell Isolation from Lymphoid Tissue
- Add 1 ml of ice cold cEHAA (EHAA + 10% FBS, pen/strep, gentamycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 55 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) or other equivalent T cell medium, to a 60 mm culture dish containing a small square of 100 μm nylon mesh and place on ice.
- Euthanize mouse.
- Remove the spleen and as many easily accessible lymph nodes as possible. These should include at least the inguinal, axillary, brachial, cervical, and mesenteric lymph nodes. Place them on top of the nylon mesh in the culture dish.
- Using the flat top of a closed 1.5 ml microfuge tube, gently mash the lymphoid tissue over the nylon mesh to liberate lymphocytes. Add another 1 ml of cEHAA and pipet up and down to work cells into a suspension. Transfer the cells through another piece of nylon mesh placed over the top of a 15 ml polypropylene centrifuge tube. Rinse the dish and mesh with another 1 ml of ice cold cEHAA, pooling the volumes into the same tube. Repeat to achieve a final cell suspension volume of 4 ml.
- Add cold sorter buffer (PBS + 2% FBS, 0.05% Azide) to a final volume of 15 ml and centrifuge the tube for 5 min at 300 x g, 4 °C.
- Carefully aspirate the supernatant, making sure no droplets of liquid are left on the sides of the tube. Resuspend the cell pellet in Fc block (sorter buffer + 2.4G2 antibody) to a final volume equal to approximately twice that of the pellet itself. For example, the spleen and lymph nodes of a naive mouse usually produces a cell pellet of about 100 μl. In this case, add 100 μl of Fc block to bring the volume to 200 μl. If a large degree of cell clumping has occurred, carefully remove the cell clump at this point with a pipet tip.
2. Tetramer Staining
- Add PE- or APC-labeled pMHC tetramer to a final concentration of 10 nM (or empirically optimized concentration).
- Mix and incubate for 1 hr at room temperature (or empirically optimized time and temperature).
- Add cold sorter buffer to a volume of 15 ml and centrifuge the tube for 5 min at 300 x g, 4 °C. Keep samples on ice or at 4 °C from now on.
- Carefully aspirate the supernatant, making sure no droplets of liquid are left on the sides of the tube. Resuspend the cell pellet in sorter buffer to a final volume of 200 μl. For double tetramer enrichment, resuspend to a final volume of 150 μl.
3. Magnetic Enrichment
- Add 50 μl of Miltenyi anti-PE or anti-APC microbeads. For double tetramer enrichment, add 50 μl of both.
- Mix and incubate for 20 min at 4 °C.
- Add cold sorter buffer to a volume of 15 ml and centrifuge the tube for 5 min at 300 x g, 4 °C.
- While waiting, set up a Miltenyi LS magnetic column on a MidiMACS or QuadroMACS magnet. Position an open 15 ml polypropylene centrifuge tube on a rack directly underneath the column.
- Add 3 ml of sorter buffer to the top of the column, allowing it to drain into the 15 ml tube.
- Place a 100 μm nylon mesh square on top of the column.
- When cells have finished spinning, carefully aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 3 ml of sorter buffer.
- Transfer the cell suspension through the nylon mesh onto the top of the column.
- When the cell suspension has completely drained into the column, rinse the original tube with another 3 ml of sorter buffer and transfer the buffer through the nylon mesh into the column, rinsing the mesh in the process. Discard the nylon mesh.
- When the buffer has completely drained into the column, add another 3 ml of sorter buffer to the column.
- Repeat step 10 for a total of 3 x 3 ml washes.
- Remove the column from the magnet and place over a new 15 ml polypropylene centrifuge tube.
- Add 5 ml of sorter buffer to the column.
- Immediately insert the plunger into the top of the column and in one continuous motion, push the plunger all the way down, forcing the buffer out the column into the tube.
- Centrifuge the tubes containing the eluted bound fraction and the flow-through unbound fraction for 5 min at 300 x g, 4 °C.
- Carefully aspirate the supernatant from the bound fraction, making sure no droplets of liquid are left on the sides of the tube. Resuspend the cell pellet in sorter buffer to a final volume of exactly 95 μl. Aspirate and resuspend the unbound fraction to a final volume of 2 ml.
4. Flow Cytometry
- For each fraction, remove 5 μl and add to 200 μl of counting beads (adjusted to a concentration of 200,000/ml in sorter buffer) in a 5 ml FACS tube. Set aside at 4 °C for analysis later. To save time, beads can be pre-aliquoted to labeled tubes before the start of the experiment.
- Prepare a master mix of antibodies to stain surface markers on the cells (Table 1). To save time, this can be done prior to the start of the experiment.
- For the bound fraction, add a dose of antibody cocktail directly to the ~90 μl of cells in the tube. If analysis of the unbound fraction is desired, transfer 90 μl of cells to a 5 ml FACS tube and add a dose of antibody cocktail.
- Set up a panel of single-color compensation controls for the flow cytometer. For each fluorochrome to be used, mix 50 μl of leftover unbound fraction cells in a 5 ml FACS tube with 1 μl of anti-CD4 antibody conjugated to the corresponding fluorochrome. Remember to set up an unstained control as well.
- Vortex and incubate all samples for 30 min at 4 °C.
- Add 5 ml of sorter buffer to each tube and centrifuge for 5 min at 300 x g, 4 °C.
- For the bound fraction, carefully aspirate supernatant and resuspend the cells in 200 μl of sorter buffer. Transfer the cells into a 1.2 ml FACS microtube. Rinse the tube with another 200 μl of sorter buffer and pool into the same microtube. If cell clumps are apparent, pass the cells through a 50 μm filter.
- For the unbound fraction and compensation controls, decant or aspirate the supernatant and resuspend in 2 ml sorter buffer.
- Set up the flow cytometer using the single-color compensation controls. Select side scatter-width (SSC-W) as an additional parameter to be recorded.
- Analyze the stained samples using a sequence of successive inclusion gates to identify CD4+ or CD8+ T cells as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. For bound fractions, collect as many cells as possible up to a maximum of 2,000,000 total events. For unbound fractions, collect 1,000,000 total events. Keep the acquisition rate at or below 3,000 events per second.
- Using the same machine settings, analyze the counting bead samples. Collect 10,000 total events.
- Save all data as FCS files.
5. Data Analysis
- Analyze FCS data files for the counting bead samples using FlowJo software. Plot forward scatter by FITC and set a gate aroung the counting beads (see Figures 1 and 2). Determine the total number of counting beads detected in each sample. Subtract from the total number of collected events to determine the number of cell events collected.
- Calculate the total number of all cells in each sample using the equations outlined in Box 1.
- Analyze FCS data files for the stained bound and unbound fraction samples. Set up a sequence of successive inclusion gates to identify lymphoid+, side-scatter-widthlo, dump-, CD3+, CD4+ or CD8+, tetramer+ T cells in each sample as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.
- Multiply the total number of cells in the sample by the frequencies of each of the inclusion gates used to define CD4+tetramer+ or CD8+tetramer+ cells to calculate the total number of epitope-specific T cells (Box 1).
Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.
Figure 1 depicts representative flow cytometry plots of pMHCII tetramer enriched spleen and lymph node samples from naive mice, while Figure 2 depicts representative data for mice previously immunized with the relevant peptide+CFA. Serial gating removes autofluorescent and other unwanted events from the analysis of CD4+ T cell populations. The CD8+ T cell population serves as a useful internal negative control for pMHCII tetramer staining of CD4+ T cells. Note that bound fractions from the enrichment usually contain a significantly higher proportion of autofluorescent cells than the unbound fractions, making gating more challenging.
Absolute numbers of epitope-specific T cells in a sample are calculated by multiplying the total number of all cells in the bound fraction of the enriched sample, as determined from the bead count analysis, with the proportion of these cells that are tetramer+, as determined from the cell staining analysis (Box 1).
For the naive mouse in Figure 1, the concentration of all cells in the bound fraction of the sample is (4411/5589) (200,000) (0.200/0.005) = 6.31 x 106 /ml. The total number of all cells in the sample is (6.31 x 106 /ml) (0.095) = 6.00 x 105. Finally, the total number of epitope-specific CD4+ T cells is (6.00 x 105) (41.5%) (96.6%) (10.2%) (62.3%) (0.64%) = 98.
For the immunized mouse in Figure 2, the concentration of all cells in the bound fraction of the sample is (6410/3590) (200,000) (0.200/0.005) = 1.43 x 107 /ml. The total number of all cells in the sample is (1.43 x 107 /ml) (0.095) = 1.36 x 106. Finally, the total number of epitope-specific CD4+ T cells is (1.36 x 106) (40.9%) (93.9%) (9.54%) (72.0%) (42.7%) = 1.53 x 104.
The efficiency of enrichment declines as the number of epitope-specific T cells increases8, so tetramer+ cells may be seen in the unbound fraction of samples containing very high frequencies of epitope-specific T cells. In such cases, the number of epitope-specific T cells present in the unbound fraction can be calculated separately and added to the number found in the bound fraction. Therefore, in Figure 2, the concentration of all cells in the unbound fraction of the sample is (9031/969) (200,000) (0.200/0.005) = 7.46 x 107 /ml, the total number of all cells is (7.46 x 107 /ml) (2.0) = 1.49 x 108, and the total number of epitope-specific CD4+ T cells is (1.49 x 108) (62.7%) (96.4%) (44.5%) (54.7%) (0.0409%) = 8.97 x 103. Adding the numbers in the bound and unbound fractions, there are 1.53 x 104 + 8.97 x 103 = 2.43 x 104 total epitope-specific CD4+ T cells in the whole sample. Indeed, if epitope-specific cell expansion is sufficiently robust, the enrichment process can be skipped.
||dump (B220, CD11b, CD11c, F4/80)
||pMHC tetramer or phenotypic marker
||pMHC tetramer or phenotypic marker
Table 1. Suggested antibody staining strategy
Figure 1. Flow cytometric analysis of epitope-specific CD4+ T cells in naive mice following pMHCII tetramer-based enrichment. Representative plots are shown for the bound (A) and unbound (B) fractions. A succession of gates are set to select lymphoid-scatter+, side-scatter-widthlo, dump-, CD3+ events. Of these, CD4+ or CD8+ events are gated for the analysis of epitope-specific T cells or background staining. Aliquots of unstained cells from the bound (C) and unbound (D) fraction were mixed with fluorescent counting beads and analyzed separately. Click here to view larger figure.
Figure 2. Flow cytometric analysis of epitope-specific CD4+ T cells in peptide-immunized mice following pMHCII tetramer-based enrichment. Representative plots are shown for the bound (A) and unbound (B) fractions. A succession of gates are set to select lymphoid-scatter+, side-scatter-widthlo, dump-, CD3+ events. Of these, CD4+ or CD8+ events are gated for the analysis of epitope-specific T cells or background staining. Aliquots of unstained cells from the bound (C) and unbound (D) fraction were mixed with fluorescent counting beads and analyzed separately. Click here to view larger figure.
Box 1. Calculation of epitope-specific T cell numbers
Absolute numbers of epitope-specific T cells are best calculated with the aid of fluorescent counting beads. An aliquot of unstained cells from each sample is mixed with a defined volume of counting beads set at a known concentration and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The concentration of cells in the sample can be inferred from a comparison of their frequency with the known concentration of fluorescent counting beads.
The total number of cells in the sample is then calculated by multiplying the cell concentration with the total sample volume.
The total number of epitope-specific T cells in the sample is simply the total number of all cells in the sample multiplied by the percentage of cells that are tetramer-positive.
Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.
The pMHC tetramer based cell enrichment method presented by this protocol is a powerful tool for studying epitope-specific T cells from endogenous T cell repertoires. The use of pMHC tetramers enables detection of epitope-specific T cells based directly on the ability of their TCRs to bind cognate pMHC ligands. The enrichment provides a level of sensitivity such that extremely rare populations of antigen-specific T cells can be detected from endogenous repertoires of T cells without any manipulation of their genetic makeup or precursor frequency. As a result, this technique allows the investigator to directly track endogenous antigen-specific T cell populations from in vivo experimental systems from their naive levels through all stages of the immune response.
This protocol has been optimized for the use of pMHC class II (pMHCII) tetramers to enrich epitope-specific CD4+ T cells from the secondary lymphoid organs of mice. However, the technique is also applicable to pMHC class I (pMHCI) tetramers and CD8+ T cells9. Unlike CD4, the CD8 coreceptor plays a significant role in stabilizing TCR-MHC interactions, and this can have practical implications for pMHCI tetramer staining10. Most notably, the use of CD8 antibodies should be restricted to clones that do not impair CD8-tetramer binding, and they should be added to cells after tetramer staining. Indeed, some pMHCI tetramers have been engineered with mutated MHCI-CD8 binding sites to mitigate nonspecific binding to CD8+ T cells11,12.
Tetramer concentration, incubation time, and incubation temperature can greatly affect the efficiency of tetramer staining, and conditions should be optimized to achieve the best combination of high tetramer signal, low background signal, low tetramer internalization, and minimal changes to cell physiology. Ideally, these conditions should be empirically determined for each unique reagent. In our hands, however, a final concentration of 10 nM and an incubation of 1 hr at room temperature provides good generic conditions for most pMHCI or pMHCII tetramers. In general, pMHCI tetramers seem to stain more easily than pMHCII tetramers, and staining can often be performed at 4 °C for as little as 30 min.
The scale of this procedure is suited for the analysis of nearly all the secondary lymphoid organs of a mouse in a single sample. Therefore, each sample represents a fairly comprehensive analysis of the entire circulating peripheral T cell repertoire of a mouse. Epitope-specific T cells can also be enriched from other relevant tissues, including the thymus13,14. When thymii from 4-5 week old mice are analyzed, epitope-specific single positive thymocytes can be detected at numbers similar to those of peripheral naive T cells. Epitope-specific double-positive thymocytes, however, are very difficult to detect due to their low levels of TCR expression.
This protocol can also be adapted to detect epitope-specific human CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in blood or other tissues15-17. The frequency of epitope-specific T cells is roughly the same between mice and humans17, so the analysis of 50 - 100 ml of blood would yield comparable numbers of epitope-specific T cells as the pooled spleen and lymph nodes of a mouse18.
A major challenge in the flow cytometric analysis of cells following tetramer-based enrichment is distinguishing true cell events from background. This is largely due to the fact that many autofluorescent cells are also non-specifically enriched during the process. If not carefully gated out, these autofluorescent cells can appear as false tetramer-positive cells and throw off the accuracy of the analysis, particularly in the case of rare naive T cell populations. Our protocol employs a two-step gating strategy in which CD3+ events are first gated away from dump lineage+ events, and then CD4+ events are gated away from CD8+ events. In the process, autofluorescent cells, which tend to lie along the center diagonal of any FACS plot, are gated out of the analysis in two iterative steps. The effective removal of autofluorescent events comes at the cost of many fluorescent colors, so we highly recommend the use of flow cytometers capable of at least 6 fluorescent parameters.
Most pMHC tetramers are conjugated to PE and APC due to the brightness of these fluorochromes, and anti-PE and anti-APC magnetic microbeads are readily available to enable enrichment with them. However, other fluorochromes can also be used so long as corresponding magnetic microbeads are available. Indeed, multiple tetramers with different fluorochrome labels can be used together with the corresponding antibody-conjugated microbeads to simultaneously enrich multiple epitope-specific T cell populations from the same sample. We have outlined a very basic antibody-fluorochrome setup that is optimized for the use of PE- and APC-labeled tetramers (Table 1), but many other effective combinations are possible to increase flexibility in the study of phenotypic markers.
CD8+ T cell populations can be used as an internal negative control, since they should not bind to pMHCII ligands (and vice versa for epitope-specific CD8+ T cell enrichment). The frequency of tetramer+ CD8+ cells in a sample provides a good assessment of the level of background tetramer staining, although bona fide tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells with cross-restricted specificity to pMHCII epitopes may exist at very small frequencies19. Occasionally during very strong immune responses, these cells may exist at expanded frequencies. If desired, TCR transgenic T cells with or without relevant epitope specificity can be used as additional positive and negative controls. Note that for unknown reasons, some TCR transgenic cells and hybridomas do not stain well with their relevant tetramers.
Our protocol involves the use of fluorescent counting beads to assist in the calculation of cell numbers. While cell counts can also be achieved manually with a hemacytometer, we find that the use of counting beads results in much greater experimental precision, especially when multiple investigators are involved. Due to the small numbers and volumes of cells that are handled in this protocol, the minimization of experimental error should be a high priority.
Tetramer staining is compatible with cell fixation and permeabilization, and several studies have successfully analyzed intracellular cytokine and transcription factor expression in cells following tetramer-based cell enrichment20,21. However, the extra steps involved contribute to additional cell losses in the samples.
Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.
No conflicts of interest declared.
The authors would like to thank Andre Han and Lawrence Yen for technical assistance, and members of the Jenkins lab for help in the development of this protocol.
|PE or APC conjugated pMHC tetramer (or multimer)
||Made by investigator, obtained from the NIH tetramer core, or purchased from commercial sources
|Anti-PE conjugated magnetic microbeads
|Anti-APC conjugated magnetic microbeads
|LS magnetic columns
|MidiMACS or QuadroMACS magnet
||130-042-302 or 130-090-976
|Cell counting beads
- Knutson, K.L., dela Rosa, C., & Disis, M.L. Laboratory analysis of T-cell immunity. Front Biosci. 11, 1932-1944 (2006).
- Kearney, E.R., Pape, K.A., Loh, D.Y., & Jenkins, M.K. Visualization of peptide-specific T cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo. Immunity. 1, 327-339 (1994).
- Moon, J.J., et al. Tracking epitope-specific T cells. Nat Protoc. 4, 565-581 (2009).
- Hataye, J., Moon, J.J., Khoruts, A., Reilly, C., & Jenkins, M.K. Naive and memory CD4+ T cell survival controlled by clonal abundance. Science. 312, 114-116 (2006).
- Marzo, A.L., et al. Initial T cell frequency dictates memory CD8+ T cell lineage commitment. Nat Immunol. 6, 793-799 (2005).
- Davis, M.M., Altman, J.D., & Newell, E.W. Interrogating the repertoire: broadening the scope of peptide-MHC multimer analysis. Nature reviews. Immunology. 11, 551-558 (2011).
- Moon, J.J., et al. Naive CD4(+) T cell frequency varies for different epitopes and predicts repertoire diversity and response magnitude. Immunity. 27, 203-213 (2007).
- Seah, S.G., et al. The linear range for accurately quantifying antigen-specific T-cell frequencies by tetramer staining during natural immune responses. European Journal of Immunology. 41, 1499-1500 (2011).
- Obar, J.J., Khanna, K.M., & Lefrancois, L. Endogenous naive CD8+ T cell precursor frequency regulates primary and memory responses to infection. Immunity. 28, 859-869 (2008).
- Daniels, M.A. & Jameson, S.C. Critical role for CD8 in T cell receptor binding and activation by peptide/major histocompatibility complex multimers. J Exp Med. 191, 335-346 (2000).
- Pittet, M.J., et al. Alpha 3 domain mutants of peptide/MHC class I multimers allow the selective isolation of high avidity tumor-reactive CD8 T cells. Journal of Immunology. 171, 1844-1849 (2003).
- Choi, E.M., et al. High avidity antigen-specific CTL identified by CD8-independent tetramer staining. Journal of Immunology. 171, 5116-5123 (2003).
- Chu, H.H., et al. Positive selection optimizes the number and function of MHCII-restricted CD4+ T cell clones in the naive polyclonal repertoire. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106, 11241-11245 (2009).
- Chu, H.H., Moon, J.J., Kruse, A.C., Pepper, M., & Jenkins, M.K. Negative Selection and Peptide Chemistry Determine the Size of Naive Foreign Peptide-MHC Class II-Specific CD4+ T Cell Populations. J Immunol. 185, 4705-4713 (2010).
- Legoux, F., et al. Impact of TCR reactivity and HLA phenotype on naive CD8 T cell frequency in humans. J Immunol. 184, 6731-6738 (2010).
- Alanio, C., Lemaitre, F., Law, H.K., Hasan, M., & Albert, M.L. Enumeration of human antigen-specific naive CD8+ T cells reveals conserved precursor frequencies. Blood. 115, 3718-3725 (2010).
- Kwok, W.W., et al. Frequency of Epitope-Specific Naive CD4+ T Cells Correlates with Immunodominance in the Human Memory Repertoire. Journal of Immunology. 188, 2537-2544 (2012).
- Jenkins, M.K., Chu, H.H., McLachlan, J.B., & Moon, J.J. On the composition of the preimmune repertoire of T cells specific for Peptide-major histocompatibility complex ligands. Annu Rev Immunol. 28, 275-294 (2010).
- Matechak, E.O., Killeen, N., Hedrick, S.M., & Fowlkes, B.J. MHC class II-specific T cells can develop in the CD8 lineage when CD4 is absent. Immunity. 4, 337-347 (1996).
- Burchill, M.A., et al. Linked T cell receptor and cytokine signaling govern the development of the regulatory T cell repertoire. Immunity. 28, 112-121 (2008).
- Pepper, M., et al. Different routes of bacterial infection induce long-lived TH1 memory cells and short-lived TH17 cells. Nature Immunology. 11, 83-89 (2010).