$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
As an example, we studied C. elegans in a quartz cuvette 1 cm wide, 5 mm thick and 4 cm tall cuvette. Sampling a single worm using video analysis, the average swimming frequency obtained from video analysis in a 5 mm thick cuvette is about 2.5 Hz (Figure 4). Similarly, sampling a single worm using the real time data acquisition method, we obtain a swimming frequency of about 2.7 Hz (Figure 5), using the digital oscilloscope (PicoScope).This procedure can be repeated for many worms. A detailed study of freely swimming worms revealed an average swimming frequency of 2.37 Hz in a 5 mm cuvette.6 As expected, the swimming frequency is higher than that for a crawling worm (~.8 Hz).3 Using this diffraction method, the average swimming frequencies of a C. elegans, which is confined to a microscope slide, has been found to match the previously published value of 2 Hz.1,7
Following procedures 3.) and then 6.) allows for the modeling of swimming diffraction patterns with the help of worm images obtained with a conventional microscope. The modeled diffraction patterns are used to simulate a swim cycle of the C. elegans (Figure 6). A successful model consists of physically feasible successive swim patterns matching the swimming frequencies. The worm should be in the same shape at the end of a swim cycle as it was in the beginning of a swim cycle.

Figure 1. A green HeNe laser was used to create a dynamic diffraction pattern using live C. elegans. This diffraction pattern was filmed at 240 fps.

Figure 2. Drawing a black dot increases absorption of the transmitted beam. Saturation of the camera due to scattered light is reduced and the diffraction pattern becomes visible.

Figure 3. Screen shot of the video analysis software (Logger Pro) with a worm diffraction pattern that is being tracked. Click here to view larger figure.

Figure 4. Video data corresponding to the swim cycle of a nematode in a 5 mm cuvette. The curve fit reveals a swimming frequency of ~ 2.5 Hz.

Figure 5. Real time data corresponding to the swim cycle of a nematode in a 5 mm cuvette. The curve fit reveals a swimming frequency of ~ 2.7 Hz.

Figure 6. The top row represents the actual diffraction patterns and is matched to the modeled diffraction patterns in the bottom row. The modeled diffraction patterns were produced using worms on a microscope slide (middle row).