$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
A simple PμSL system using an off-the-shelf digital data projector is shown in Figure 1. A convex lens with a focal length of 75 mm concentrates the beam into small illumination area of 2 cm by 2 cm. Resulting in-plane optical resolution is about 45 μm. Vertical resolution is determined by the precision level of the linear stage. Layer thickness of the structures made for this study is 160 μm. Each layer was polymerized for 8 sec light illumination. A representative 3D structure fabricated by the system is shown in Figure 1D. This objects consists of 58 layers of PEGDA.
We prepared photo-curable PEGDA hydrogel. Low crosslinking, therefore large swelling, of PEGDA hydrogel was achieved by adding non-crosslinking PEG into prepolymer solution. Length-wise swelling ratio of the resulting PEGDA hydrogel is 1.5, which corresponds to higher than 300% volumetric expansion.
A set of PEGDA hydrogel tubes were designed and fabricated based on our theory12. We placed a sample upside down and put in the bath with water covered with oil layer on top as illustrated in Figure 2A. Depending on the dimensional parameters, circular tubes either remained stable or transformed into a wavy pattern as shown in Figure 2B. The wide variety of swelling pattern of different samples was captured by a digital camera and presented in Figure 3A.

Figure 1. A desktop projection micro-stereolithography system (a) schematic representation (b) actual system (c) close-up view of components (d) representative 3D structures. Click here to view larger figure.

Figure 2. (a) Experimental setup for hydrogel tube swelling (b) constrained hydrogel tube transforms into different patterns. Scale bar indicates 5 mm.

Figure 3. (a) Patterns formed in swelling experiment. Vertical axis indicates t/h (thus stability), and horizontal axis indicates h/D (thus buckling mode). Scale bar indicates 5 mm. (b) Buckling mode depends only on h/D. Experimental result agrees well with theoretical prediction. Click here to view larger figure.
| Sample | D (μm) | t (μm) | h (μm) |
| I | i | 9300 ± 420 | 760 ± 40 | 840 ± 40 |
| ii | 9700 ± 420 | 1040 ± 40 | 1060 ± 40 |
| iii | 9700 ± 420 | 1210 ± 40 | 1340 ± 40 |
| iv | 9700 ± 420 | 1660 ± 40 | 1680 ± 40 |
| II | i | 9000 ± 420 | 480 ± 40 | 880 ± 40 |
| ii | 9000 ± 420 | 660 ± 40 | 1060 ± 40 |
| iii | 9500 ± 420 | 740 ± 40 | 1350 ± 40 |
| iv | 9200 ± 420 | 970 ± 40 | 1650 ± 40 |
| III | i | 8900 ± 420 | 160 ± 40 | 790 ± 40 |
| ii | 8900 ± 420 | 300 ± 40 | 1020 ± 40 |
| iii | 9100 ± 420 | 380 ± 40 | 1330 ± 40 |
| iv | 9000 ± 420 | 490 ± 40 | 1630 ± 40 |
| IV | i | 8900 ± 420 | 140 ± 40 | 780 ± 40 |
| ii | 8800 ± 420 | 190 ± 40 | 1010 ± 40 |
| iii | 9300 ± 420 | 230 ± 40 | 1340 ± 40 |
| iv | 8900 ± 420 | 290 ± 40 | 1650 ± 40 |
Table 1. Sample dimensions measured through optical microscope. Errors indicate measurement uncertainty.