$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
M. xanthus is a slow growing bacterium that moves on solid surfaces. To test our experimental set-up, we performed a time-lapse experiment with motile DK1622 WT cells. Phase contrast images were acquired at intervals of 5 min for 24 h (Figure 2A, B). The majority of cells aligned in groups. As expected, cells displayed motility and predominantly moved in groups. We further observed that cells occasionally reversed direction of movement. These findings suggest that WT cells under the tested conditions behave normally in terms of cell motility. However, even when cells are recorded every 5 min, the identification of individual cells is difficult. Moreover, because cells are motile, many cells escape or enter the field of view making it difficult to follow cells for extended periods.
In order to trace the same M. xanthus cells for several rounds of the cell cycle by live-cell imaging, individual strains can be deleted for the mglA gene, which is essential for motility25. This prevents cells from moving out of the field of view during the imaging protocol. In-frame deletions are generated as described by Shi et al.26
As expected, in phase contrast live-cell imaging with non-motile ΔmglA cells (Figure 3), cells did not display active movement. We were able to follow the growth and division of individual cells during microcolony formation. Based on the time-lapse recordings in which images were acquired at intervals of 5 min for 24 h, it was possible to quantify the interdivision time (the time between two cell division events) with single cell resolution. Cells of the ΔmglA mutant had an inter-division time of 235 ± 50 min (n = 97 cells). With approximately 4 h, the interdivision time is similar to the doubling time measured in suspension cultures for WT cells. This provides evidence that M. xanthus cells grow optimally under these experimental conditions.
To investigate whether our set-up allows cells to grow normally while tracking YFP-labeled proteins over long periods, we performed fluorescence time-lapse imaging with M. xanthus cells that express a YFP-tagged protein. To this end, we followed ParB-YFP as a marker for the origin of replication (ori). ParB is as component of the ParABS system in M. xanthus and binds to the parS sites proximal to the ori; therefore, the origin duplication and chromosome segregation can be followed19,20,21. With image acquisition (phase contrast and fluorescence, 200 ms acquisition time in YFP channel) every 20 min, cells grew, divided, and displayed growth even at 24 h (Figure 4A). At the start of the recordings, ParB-YFP formed two clusters in the subpolar regions in the majority of cells (Figure 4A). Shortly before or after cell division, the subpolar ParB-YFP cluster at the old cell pole duplicated. One of the two clusters remained at the old cell pole while the second copy translocated to the new cell pole, reaching its final subpolar position after approximately 40 - 60 min (Figure 4A, B). These observations are in agreement with previous data generated from short time-lapse recordings using thin agar pads19. We conclude that this experimental set-up allows fluorescence time-lapse microscopy to track chromosome segregation over several cell cycles in slow growing M. xanthus cells, without perturbing cell growth or the chromosome segregation machinery.
In a similar experiment, we sought to follow markers for cell division by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. Similar to nearly all other bacteria, M. xanthus requires FtsZ, a bacterial tubulin-like GTPase, for cell division16,17,18. FtsZ forms a ring-like structure at midcell, the so-called Z-ring, that helps to recruit all other proteins required for cell division27,28. In M. xanthus, the formation of the Z-ring and its positioning at midcell is stimulated by the three PomXYZ proteins16,17. These three proteins form a chromosome-associated complex that transfers across the nucleoid from the site of cell division in the "mother" cell to the middle of the nucleoid in the two daughter cells. The middle of the nucleoid coincides with midcell, before chromosome segregation, and here the PomXYZ complex recruits FtsZ and stimulates Z-ring formation.
Here, we first followed non-motile cells expressing ftsZ-gfp. Because FtsZ-GFP overall shows a weaker fluorescence signal than ParB-YFP, we increased the exposure time 5-fold to 1 s in the GFP channel. As expected, strong accumulation of FtsZ-GFP was only observed at midcell and this localization dictated the position of cell division constriction (Figure 5A). FtsZ-GFP predominantly formed a cluster at midcell in longer cell. It was also evident that this cluster increased in intensity over time. After cell division, we observed that FtsZ-GFP re-accumulated at midcell in the two daughter cells approximately 2 h later (Figure 5B). This is consistent with the finding that approximately 50% of cells in a population display FtsZ localization at midcell based on snap-shot analysis16,17.
In a second experiment, we followed non-motile ΔmglA cells for 24 h that express mCherry-pomX. As part of the PomXYZ system, PomX helps to guide Z-ring formation and positioning, thereby stimulating cell division at midcell16. The fluorescence signal of mCherry-PomX is strong and allows an exposure time in the fluorescence channel of 250 ms. Importantly, all cells grew in size and displayed a cell division event over the course of the experiment, forming microcolonies after 24 h (Figure 6A). As previously reported16, almost all cells contained an mCherry-PomX cluster. The majority of these localized at midcell and clusters away from midcell translocated to midcell during the course of the experiment. During cell divisions, mCherry-PomX clusters were split, with each daughter cell receiving a cluster. As opposed to FtsZ-GFP, mCherry-PomX localized at midcell 80 - 90% of the cell cycle and reached this position soon after cell division (Figure 6B).

Figure 1: Schematic of the experimental set-up used throughout this study. (A) A metal or plastic frame serves as a support for the sample. A coverslip is fixed to the metal frame with tape to reduce motion of the sample. (B) Side view of the experimental sample set-up. Cells are mounted onto the coverslip shown in (A). The agarose pad that supplies nutrients and humidity to the cells is placed on top of the cells. The agarose pad is covered by an additional coverslip to reduce evaporation. For high quality images, a 100X oil immersion phase contrast objective is used. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Phase contrast time-lapse microscopy of WT M. xanthus cells. Cells were followed for 24 h and images were acquired every 5 min. (A) Representative images of the same field of view every 5 min are shown. Colored arrows indicate directionality of movement of individual cells. The same color marks the same cell over time. Numbers indicate time in minutes. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images of the same field of view after every hour are shown. Note that the same field of view is shown but because cells are moving, cells are constantly entering and leaving the field of view. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. PH: phase contrast. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Phase contrast time-lapse microscopy of non-motile M. xanthus cells. ΔmglA cells were followed for 24 h. Images were acquired every 5 min and representative images after every hour are shown. Selected cell division constrictions are marked with orange arrows. Numbers indicate time in hours. PH: phase contrast. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy of ParB-YFP in non-motile M. xanthus cells. Cells of a ΔmglA mutantexpressing parB-yfp in the presence of native parB (SA4749; ΔmglA; parB+/PnatparB-yfp) were followed for 24 h by phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. (A) Images were acquired every 20 min and representative images every hour until 10 h are shown, together with the same cells after 24 h. Images are shown in phase contrast (PH) and as overlay of phase contrast and the YFP signal. Selected cell divisions are marked with orange arrows. White and green arrows indicate ParB-YFP cluster duplication events, with the green arrows marking the translocating cluster. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images were acquired as in (A) but are shown at higher temporal resolution. Numbers indicate time in minutes. Arrows are as in (A). Scale bar: 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy of FtsZ-GFP in non-motile M. xanthus cells. Cells of a ΔmglA mutant expressing ftsZ-gfp in presence of native ftsZ (SA8241; ΔmglA; ftsZ+/PnatftsZ-gfp) were followed for 24 h by phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. (A) Images were acquired every 20 min and representative images every hour until 10 h are shown, together with the same cells after 24 h. Images are shown in phase contrast (PH) and as overlay of phase contrast and GFP signal. Selected cell divisions are marked with orange arrows. White arrows indicate FtsZ-GFP clusters at midcell. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images were acquired as in (A) but are shown at higher temporal resolution. Numbers indicate time in minutes. Green and white arrows mark FtsZ-GFP clusters in the left and right cells, respectively. Orange arrows indicate cell divisions. Scale bar: 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy of mCherry-PomX in non-motile M. xanthus cells. Non-motile ΔpomX cells accumulating mCherry-PomX (SA4797; ΔmglA; ΔpomX/PpomZ mCherry-pomX) were followed for 24 h by phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy every 20 min. (A) Representative images every hour until 10 h are shown, together with the same cells after 24 h. Images are shown in phase contrast (PH) and as overlay of phase contrast and mCherry signal. Selected cell divisions are marked with orange arrows. White and green arrows indicate mCherry-PomX clusters before and after splitting events, respectively. Numbers indicate time in hours. Scale bar: 5 µm. (B) Images were acquired as in (A) and are shown at higher temporal resolution. Arrows are as in (A). Scale bar: 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Bacterial strain | Relevant genotype1 | Reference |
| DK1622 | Wildtype | 23 |
| SA4420 | ΔmglA | 24 |
| SA4749 | ΔmglA; parB+/attB::PnatparB-yfp (pAH7) | This study |
| SA4797 | ΔmglA; ΔpomX/ attB::PpomZ mCherry-pomX (pAH53) | 16 |
| SA8241 | ΔmglA;ftsZ+/ mxan18-19::PnatftsZ-gfp (pDS150) | This study |
Plasmids in brackets contain indicated gene fusions and were intergated at the indicated sites on the genome.
Plasmids integrated at the attB site or the mxan18-19 intergenic region were expressed from
their native promoter (Pnat) or the native promoter of pomZ (PpomZ). |
Table 1: List of bacterial strains used in this study.
| Plasmids | Relevant characteristics | Reference |
| pAH7 | Pnat parB-yfp;Mx8 attP; TetR | 19 |
| pAH53 | PpomZ mCherry-pomX; Mx8 attP ; KmR | 16 |
| pDS150 1 | Pnat ftsZ-gfp ; mxan18-19 ; TetR | This study |
| pMR3691 | Plasmid for vanillate inducible gene expression | 18 |
| pKA51 | Pnat ftsZ-gfp ; Mx8 attP; TetR | 17 |
1 pDS150: pDS150 is a derivative of pKA51 in which the Mx8 attP site was replaced with the mxan18-19 intergenic region.
For this the mxan18-19 intergenic region was amplified from pMR3691 with primers Mxan18-19 fwd BsdRI
(GCGATCATTGCGCGCCAGACGATAACAGGC) and Mxan18-19 rev BlpI
(GCGGCTGAGCCCGCGCCGACAACCGCAACC) and cloned into pKA51. |
Table 2: List of plasmids used in this study.