Joint kinematics have been described using a number of methodologies, such as motion capture sensors, 2D-3D registration, and cadaveric studies. Each method has specific advantages and disadvantages. For example, motion capture sensors can measure fast, large-scale motions using infrared cameras with or without sensors on the subject1,2. However, these methods measure skin motion to infer joint kinematics, and therefore contain skin motion errors3.
Cadaveric studies have been used to evaluate ranges of motion, instability, and contact areas4,5,6. This approach can measure small changes in small joints using CT or optical sensors attached directly to bone using pins or screws. Cadaveric models can mainly evaluate passive motions, although multiple actuators have been used to apply external forces to tendons to simulate dynamic motion7. Active joint motion can be measured by 2D-3D registration techniques, matching 3DCT images to 2D fluoroscopy images. Although the accuracy of the registration process remains controversial, the reported accuracy is generally high enough for large joint kinematics8,9. However, this method cannot be applied to small bones or multiple bones in narrow spaces.
In contrast, 4DCT is a dynamic CT method that obtains a series of volumetric data. Active joint motions can be analyzed using this approach10. This technology provides precise 3D positional data of all substances inside the CT gantry. The 3D joint motions are clearly visualized in a viewer. However, describing joint kinematics from such a series of volume data is still difficult, because all the bones are moving and no landmarks can be traced during the active motions in vivo.
We developed a method for 4DCT analysis that provides the in vivo joint kinematics of the whole bones around the joint during active motions. The aim of this article is to present our method, the sequential 3D-3D registration technique for 4DCT analysis, and show representative results obtained using this method.