Reducing Willow Wood Fuel Emission by Low Temperature Microwave Assisted Hydrothermal Carbonization

* These authors contributed equally

Your institution must subscribe to JoVE's Chemistry section to access this content.

Fill out the form below to receive a free trial or learn more about access:



A protocol for the emission precursor depletion from low quality biomass by low temperature microwave assisted hydrothermal carbonization treatment is presented. This protocol includes the microwave parameters and the analysis of the biocoal product and process water.

Cite this Article

Copy Citation | Download Citations

Knappe, V., Paczkowski, S., Robles, L. A., Gonzales, A., Pelz, S. Reducing Willow Wood Fuel Emission by Low Temperature Microwave Assisted Hydrothermal Carbonization. J. Vis. Exp. (147), e58970, doi:10.3791/58970 (2019).


Biomass is a sustainable fuel, as its CO2 emissions are reintegrated in biomass growth. However, the inorganic precursors in the biomass cause a negative environmental impact and slag formation. The selected short rotation coppice (SRC) willow wood has a high ash content (Equation 1 = 1.96%) and, therefore, a high content of emission and slag precursors. Therefore, the reduction of minerals from SRC willow wood by low temperature microwave assisted hydrothermal carbonization (MAHC) at 150 °C, 170 °C, and 185 °C is investigated. An advantage of MAHC over conventional reactors is an even temperature conductance in the reaction medium, as microwaves penetrate the whole reactor volume. This allows a better temperature control and a faster cooldown. Therefore, a succession of depolymerization, transformation and repolymerization reactions can be analyzed effectively. In this study, the analysis of the mass loss, ash content and composition, heating values and molar O/C and H/C ratios of the treated and untreated SCR willow wood showed that the mineral content of the MAHC coal was reduced and the heating value increased. The process water showed a decreasing pH and contained furfural and 5-methylfurfural. A process temperature of 170 °C showed the best combination of energy input and ash component reduction. The MAHC allows a better understanding of the hydrothermal carbonization process, while a large-scale industrial application is unlikely because of the high investment costs.


The application of microwaves for hydrothermal carbonization (MAHC) was used for the thermochemical transformation of biomass model compounds like fructose, glucose1,2 or cellulose3, and for organic substrates, preferably waste material4,5,6,7,8,9,10. The utilization of microwaves is advantageous as it allows an even heating of the treated biomass2,10 mainly through thermal losses of a dielectric solvent11,12, though the microwaves do not transfer enough energy to directly break chemical bonds and induce reactions13. The microwaves penetrate the whole reaction volume of the HTC reactor vessel and transfer the energy directly to the material, which is not possible with a conventional reactor that shows a slower heating rate due to the high heating capacity of the steel mantle and the sample itself14. The even excitation of the sample’s water molecules by microwaves allows an improved process control, as the temperature in the microwave reactor is evenly distributed11,14,15 and the cooldown after the reaction is much faster. Furthermore, conventional reactors heat up much slower and the chemical reactions occurring during the heating can bias the results that are usually assigned to the final temperature. The improved process control in an MAHC reactor enables a precise elaboration of the temperature dependency of selected HTC reactions (e.g., dehydration or decarboxylation). Another advantage of the even temperature distribution in the HTC-reactor volume is the lower adhesion of immobilized and completely carbonized particles on the inner reactor wall2. However, water is only an average microwave absorbing solvent that even shows decreasing microwave absorbance at higher temperatures, which limits the achievable maximum temperature. This negative effect is compensated when acids are produced during the HTC process or catalyzers (ionic or polar species) are added before the treatment. Microwave induced reactions show higher product yields in general11,15 and specifically of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) from fructose in comparison to sand-bed catalyzed reactions12. They also have a much better energy balance then conventional heating methods15,16.

The fundamental chemical concept of hydrothermal carbonization is the degradation and successive polymerization of the biomass. In the course of these complex interacting reactions the tissue is depleted of oxygen, which increases the heating value. At first, the polymers hemicellulose and cellulose are hydrolyzed to sugar monomers17, though low temperatures mainly affect the hemicellulose18,19,20,21. In this early stage of the HTC reactions, organic acids are formed from the transformation of the sugar aldehydes and the deacetylation of hemicellulose. These acids can be acetic, lactic, levulinic,  acrylic or formic acid20,21,22 and they decrease the pH of the reaction water in the reactor. Due to dissociation, they form free negative ions that increase the ion product in the process water. The increasing ion product allows the solving of cations, which are the major constituents of the ash in the biomass. By this mechanism, the tissue is depleted from emission precursors and slag formers (e.g., potassium, sodium, calcium, chlorine and heavy metals)23,24.

The formed organic acids can support the dehydration of sugar monomers to furans. A common sugar dehydration product is furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, which are feasible products for the chemical industry, as they serve as platform products (e.g., for the synthesis of biopolymers). 5-Methylfurfural can be formed by catalyzed reactions from cellulose25,26 or 5-hydroxymethylfurfural27. While the biopolymer synthesis is an artificial repolymerization under controlled conditions, the furans can also condense, polymerize and form high molecular weight aromatic structures in the complex chemical environment of the MAHC reactor. The interaction of the solubilized organic and inorganic compounds with the modified wood cell matrix add to the complexity of the reaction system20. The furan polymerization reaction pathways employ aldol condensation or/and intermolecular dehydration18,20 and yield hydrochar particles with a hydrophobic shell and a more hydrophilic core28. It is not yet revealed whether biomass particles are completely decomposed and then repolymerized or if the biomass particles serve as a template for the carbonization. However, the degradation and repolymerization reactions comprise dehydration and decarboxylation reactions, as well29,30, which induces the drop in the van Krevelen diagram towards the O/C and H/C ratios of black carbon.

While other studies proved the mineral reducing effect of conventional reactor based hydrothermal treatment31, of a water washing with combined mechanical leaching32 or water/ammonium acetate/hydrochloric acid washing33, our studies investigate the mineral leaching during low temperature carbonization with microwaves for the first time. As this study focuses on emission precursor leaching for fuel upgrading, it investigates the fate of potassium, sodium, magnesium, calcium, chlorine, sulfur, nitrogen and heavy metals. Fine dust precursors form volatile salts (e.g., KCl or K2SO4) at elevated temperatures in the gaseous phase. When these salts accumulate in the flue gas, heavy metals like zinc can scavenge them as nucleation particles, which leads to a particle growth chain reaction. At lower flue gas temperatures, salt condensation further triggers the particle growth and results in cancerogenous fine dust emission from the chimney. These emissions are at present the main factor that compromises the sustainability of biomass fuels. A sustainable energy supply relies on their reduction by expensive filters or their reduction in the fuels (e.g., by MAHC). As this study follows a practical approach, short rotation coppice (SRC) willow wood was chosen as a potential bioenergy feedstock with high growth rates. It can be grown by farmers on their fields for a self-sustainable power supply by gasification, but also for heat generation by direct combustion. A disadvantage of willow SRC is its high bark content due to a low stem:bark ratio at mature stage. The bark contains a lot of minerals in comparison to wood34,35,36,37 and yields higher quantities of gaseous or particle emissions38. Low temperature HTC can improve the combustion properties of SRC willow wood and, thereby, contribute to a sustainable heat and power supply. Another important parameter of the HTC biocoal investigated in this study is its energy density, its higher initial combustion temperature and its higher final combustion temperature39.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


1. Preparation of sample material

  1. Harvest five year old willow, clone type “Tordes” ([Salix schwerinii x S. viminalis] x S. vim.), with a height of 12−14 m and a breast diameter of approximately 15 cm.
  2. Chip the wood and dry the chips in a kiln dryer for 24 h at 105 °C.
  3. Cut the wood chips with a cutting mill and grind with a centrifugal mill to a particle size of 0.12 mm.

2. Microwave assisted hydrothermal carbonization

  1. Use a microwave oven with 850 W and a magnetron frequency of 2,455 MHz.
  2. Place 500 mg of raw material from step 1.3 in a 50 mL polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) reaction vessel with a spatula. Add 10 mL of demineralized water. Screw down the reaction vessel cap so that the pressure valve in the cap is on the same level as the cap brim.
  3. For each treatment temperature, put twelve reaction vessels with raw materials in the microwave oven and close the oven.
  4. Set up three temperature programs, with the microwave for the three temperatures: 150 °C (ramp +12.5 °C min-1, hold 60 min, peak power 50%), 170 °C (ramp +9.6 °C min-1, hold 60 min, peak power 80%), and 185 °C (ramp +5.3 °C min-1, hold 30 min, ramp -1.1 °C min-1 to 150 °C, peak power 100%). Start the microwave oven, for each single program.
  5. After the program is completed, remove the reaction vessels, allow them to cool and reactivate. Then open them under a fume cupboard after releasing the pressure inside.
  6. Add 35 mL of twice distilled water to each reaction vessel. Pour the solution in each vessel to a centrifuge cylinder and centrifuge at 1,714 x g for 10 min.
  7. The process water is drained into another tube and stored frozen at -5 °C for pH and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis.
  8. Freeze the centrifuge cylinder with the remaining biocoal pellet at -5 °C. Then take out the biocoal pellet and dry it at 105 °C for 24 h. Weigh the biocoal pellet and calculate the weight loss induced by the MAHC treatment.
  9. Repeat steps 2.2−2.8 four times per temperature (48 reaction vessels per temperature) to produce enough biocoal (approximately 22 g) for the subsequent analysis.

3. Ash content determination

  1. Weigh 20 empty ceramic dishes individually. Add in each 1 g of sample (5 x 1 g of raw material, and 5 x 1 g of biocoal from each temperature treatment).
    NOTE: Because the dishes cannot be labeled, a plan must be drawn for the arrangement of the vessels in the oven.
  2. Place the open ceramic dishes into a muffle furnace and close the furnace.
  3. Program a temperature program for the muffle furnace (+6 °C min-1 from 25 °C to 250 °C, hold 60 min, +10 °C min-1 to 550 °C, hold 120 min) and start the program.
  4. After the program is completed, let the muffle furnace cool down to 105 °C. Then open the furnace and take out the ceramic dishes.
  5. Place the ceramic dishes in an extractor (Table of Materials) filled with a drying agent consisting of silica gel. Close the desiccator and vacuum dry with the help of a vacuum pump.
  6. Take out the ceramic dishes after 24 h of cooling. Weigh the ceramic dish containing the ash and calculate the ash weight by subtracting the weight of the empty ceramic dish.
  7. Determine the ash content in percent by dividing the ash weight by the dry mass of the raw material or biocoal.

4. Determination of the higher and lower heating values

  1. Activate the water pump of the calorimeter and open the oxygen valve to supply 99.5% oxygen to the calorimeter.
  2. Weigh 1 g of glucose and place it into a plastic sample bag with a defined calorific value of 46,479 J/g. Put the sample bag into the combustion crucible of a calorimeter bomb.
  3. Add 5 mL of twice deionized water in the bottom of the bomb and screw down the bomb. Put the bomb into the calorimeter and close the calorimeter.
  4. Enter the weight of the sample and change settings to sample bag method. Start the calorimeter.
  5. After the measurement is completed, take out the bomb, turn it upside down and shake it slowly for 1 min.
  6. Unscrew the bomb, remove 5 mL of twice demineralized water and store it in a screw cap container for subsequent ion chromatography analysis.
  7. Repeat steps 4.2−4.6 three times to obtain the calibration standard.
  8. Repeat steps 4.2−4.6 five times with each MAHC biocoal (150 °C, 170 °C, 185 °C) and the raw material.
  9. Calculate the lower heating value using the following equation40:
    Equation 2
    where LHV is the lower heating value, HHV is the higher heating value obtained from the calorimeter in step 4.4, and ω is the hydrogen content [Equation 3 obtained from elemental analysis.

5. Ion chromatography for the quantification of chlorine

NOTE: Check the calibration of ion chromatograph before analysis.

  1. Take out the 5 mL of solution from step 4.8 and add 45 mL of twice demineralized water in a 50 mL volumetric mask.
  2. Insert the sample suction tube into a sample container and draw approximately 3 mL of the sample with a syringe into the pre-column. Start the analysis run.
  3. Carry out the measurements according to manufacturer’s instructions.
  4. Repeat steps 5.2 and 5.3 for each sample prepared in section 4.

6. Elemental analysis for the determination of the O/C and H/C ratios

  1. Select an appropriate method from the instrument manual for the samples to be measured.
  2. Make all the 20 mg sulfonamide standards and blanks required to calibrate the device.
  3. To prepare a material sample, put 20 mg of sample in tin foil on the micro balance. Weigh the sample on the tin foil, close the foil around the sample and press the package to contain as little air as possible. Afterwards repeat this 5x for each sample.
    NOTE: In order to be able to analyze the biochar samples, the same amount of tungsten trioxide as the amount of the sample must be added in a ratio of 1:1. This is needed to compensate the missing oxygen in the biochar to ensure complete combustion in the elemental analyzer.
  4. Insert the prepared samples in the autosampler of the elemental analyzer.
  5. Open the oxygen and helium valve for the combustion chamber of the elemental analyzer.
  6. Start the analysis when the device has reached the temperature specified by the device. In this case, wait till the temperature reaches 900 °C.
  7. Calculate the moles of each element in the sulfonamide standard by the sulfonamide standard weight (step 6.2), and the weight of 1 mole of the respective element.
  8. Calculate the relationship between moles of C, H, S, and N in sulfonamide, obtained from step 6.7, and the respective peak areas.
  9. Subtract the sample ash content, obtained from step 3.7, from the total sample weight.
  10. Compare the respective element peak area in the sulfonamide standard and the sample, and multiply by the mole of each element in sulfonamide to obtain the mole of the element in the sample.
  11. Calculate the weight of C, H, S, and N in the sample by multiplying the mole of the element, obtained from step 6.10, with the respective molar mass of the element from the periodic table.
  12. Calculate the weight of oxygen in the sample by using the ash free sample mass, obtained from step 6.9, and subtracting the weight of C, H, N, and S, obtained from step 6.11.
  13. Calculate the molar H/C and O/C ratios in the raw material and the MAHC biocoal samples.

7. Induced coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy

  1. Weigh 400 mg of dried raw material or MAHC biocoal and put it into a 50 mL PTFE reaction vessel with a spatula. Add 3 mL of 69% nitric acid and 9 mL of 35% hydrochloric acid.
  2. Screw down the reaction vessel cap so that the pressure valve in the cap is on the same level as the cap brim.
  3. Put the reaction vessels of the samples to be analyzed in the microwave oven and close the oven.
  4. Program the temperature program for the complete degradation of the organic material: ramp +15.5 °C min-1 to 200 °C, hold 30 min, cool down to 180 °C, hold for 5 min. Start the microwave oven.
  5. After the program is completed, remove the reaction vessels, allow them to cool and reactivate. Then open the vessels under a fume cupboard after releasing the pressure inside.
  6. Pour the samples into a 50 mL bulb cylinder. Then rinse the reaction vessel thoroughly with twice deionized water and transfer it to the bulb cylinder. Top up the cylinder to the 50 mL mark with twice deionized water to ensure even dilution of all samples.
  7. Filter the sample from step 7.6 with 150 µm mesh filter paper. Fill the filtrate in 50 mL conical centrifuge tubes.
  8. Put the standard samples in the autoinjector of the ICP-OES. The standard samples are of the known concentrations (0.0001 ppm, 0.001 ppm, 0.1 ppm, 1 ppm 10 ppm, 20 ppm, 50 ppm) of the elements to be quantified (Ca, As, B, Be, Fe, Se, Zn, Ag, Al, Ba, Bi, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ga, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Te, Tl,V).
  9. Put the samples in the autoinjector of the ICP-OES and run the ICP-OES analysis with the same parameters.
  10. After the ICP-OES analysis, obtain the elemental concentration from the software, automatically calculated in mg/kg, based on the calibration curves obtained from standard samples in step 7.8.
  11. Calculate the elemental concentration reduction in the produced biocoal:
    Equation 4
    where Conc. in biomass is the elemental concentration in the biomass and Conc. In coal is the elemental concentration in the biocoal.

8. Measuring the pH of the HTC process water

  1. Fill each liquid fraction from the MAHC treatment (step 2.7) of the raw material and the three biocoals in four respective beakers.
  2. Calibrate the pH probe with standard solutions.
  3. Measure the pH of the liquid fraction of the raw material and the three MAHC biocoals.

9. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

  1. Filter the liquid fractions from the MAHC treatment (step 2.7) with 150 µm mesh filter paper. Add 20 mL of methanol to 1 mL of the filtered liquid fractions.
  2. Transfer 200 µL to a GC-MS autosampler vial and put the vial in the GC-MS autosampler.
  3. Dilute pure standards of furfural and 5-methylfurfural (analytical grade) down to 10-2, 10-3, 10-4, and 10-5 with methanol.
  4. Put the standards in the GC-MS autosampler and analyze them with the parameters: 1 µL injection volume at 230 °C injector temperature and 1:40 split; 5MS non-polar column (Table of Materials) with 15 m length and 0.25 mm film thickness; temperature program 30 °C, hold 2 min, ramp of +40 °C/min to 250 °C, hold 2 min; ionization with 70 mV and MS detector at the scan mode with a m/z range of 35−400, each scan in 0.3 s.
  5. Establish calibration curves by the total ion count (TIC) peak area and the compound concentration.
  6. Run the prepared HTC biocoal liquid phase samples with the same analytical parameters and identify furfural and 5-methylfurfural by means of retention time of the standard and the spectrum match in a spectra library.
  7. Determine the concentrations of furfural and 5-methylfurfural by using the calculated calibration curve (step 9.6) and inserting the sample peak areas of furfural and 5-methylfurfural.

10. Statistics

  1. Analyze the data with the Shapiro Wilks test for normal distribution.
  2. Use the Mann-Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed data sets and the t-test for normally distributed data sets to find significant differences between data sets.
    NOTE: If one data set is normally distributed and the other not, use the Mann-Whitney U test.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The results of the elemental analysis revealed differences between the O/C-H/C ratio of the willow wood and the MAHC biocoals (Figure 1). The raw material shows higher O/C-H/C ratios and a higher variation of the values. The MAHC treatment reduced the value variation due to homogenization in the microwave reactor. The precision of the microwave reactor allowed the differentiation of three stages of degradation. The H/C ratio was reduced at 150 °C and the variations in the H/C and O/C ratios were reduced, as well. At 170 °C the O/C ratio was reduced and at 185 °C the O/C ratio was further reduced.

The temperature induced an increasing brown color, while the process water showed the same tendency though the shade was brighter (Figure 2). In both biocoal and process water the increase in aromatic rings like furans and poly-benzenes, which contain a succession of single bonds and double bonds that are optically active, induce this color change (Figure 2). The side reaction acid formation from the sugar monomers induced a formation of soluble acids and, in consequence, a pH drop in the process water28 (Table 1). A mass loss was measured in the 150 °C sample, though no color alternation in comparison to the raw material was visible (Figure 2 and Table 1). A high increase of the heating value of the 170 °C biocoal was accompanied by a high weight loss. This weight loss was caused by exothermal conversion reactions that yielded furans (Table 1). The lower, though significantly different, increase of the heating value between the 170 °C and the 185 °C biocoal was accompanied by a lower weight loss in comparison to the weight loss between 150 °C and 170 °C. The pH dropped from 4.25 at 150 °C to 3.6 at 170 °C and stayed constant from 170 °C to 185 °C. Due to the resulting rising ion product by the additional acid, inorganics and thus ash components in the process water can be solved23.

Table 2 shows the fate of the selected emission precursors. There are significantly reduced elements in Table 2, like sulfur, potassium, calcium, chlorine, and magnesium, and not significantly reduced elements, like nitrogen and sodium. Heavy metals in biomass, except silver and lithium, were significantly reduced, as can be seen in Table 3, but silver and lithium are only insignificantly reduced.

The results of the mass loss corrected element reduction are shown in Figure 3. As the mass loss was not considered here, which can even lead to higher element concentrations in comparison to the raw biomass in case of an intensive high temperature HTC treatment, all calculated losses were higher than in Table 2 and Table 3 and display the absolute element losses induced by the increasing ion product. Different elements show a different temperature dependent leaching in to the process water. Chlorine and potassium were intensively transferred to the process water at 150 °C, while sulfur, magnesium, sodium, calcium, zinc, barium, manganese, and strontium showed their highest depletion rate at 170 °C. Only the silver and lithium concentration in the biocoal showed an even decrease rate that was temperature independent, while nitrogen was not affected by the MAHC treatment at all. The sum of the losses of the fine dust formers chlorine, potassium, magnesium, sodium and calcium at 150 °C, 170 °C and 185 °C was 5,782 mg/kg, 8,529 mg/kg and 8,833 mg/kg, respectively, while the sum of losses of the quantified heavy metals was 87 mg/kg, 170 mg/kg and 182 mg/kg for 150 °C, 170 °C and 185 °C, respectively, and the sulfur content showed losses of 548, 2,089 and 2,431 mg/kg for 150 °C, 170 °C and 185 °C, respectively.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Typical value ranges for biomass, peat, lignite, coal and anthracite in the van Krevelen diagram18,20,30,41. The inset shows the atomic O/C and H/C ratio of MAHC coal samples. (A) Mainly dehydration. (B) Dehydration and decarboxylation. (C) Mainly dehydration. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Images of the raw material and the MAHC biocoal and process water after the respective temperature treatment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Leaching of emission precursors from the SRC willow biomass in percent based on the raw biomass weight. The percentage of the weight loss is calculated on the basis of the untreated biomass weight. The lower graph shows the elements with a high leaching rate between 150−170 °C and the upper graph shows elements with different leaching behavior. This figure has been modified from Knappe et al.42. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Parameters Willow wood 150 °C 170 °C 185 °C
Mass Losscoal (%) - 7.60 ± 2.93 25.54 ± 2.87 28.89 ± 1.96
Higher Heating Valuecoal (J g-1): 18,843 ± 96 18,551 ± 143 19,358 ± 314 20,029 ± 88
Lower Heating Valuecoal (J g-1) 17,430 ± 130 17,220 ± 180 18,130 ± 310 18,730 ± 120
Process water
pH 4.25 3.6 3.6
Furfural (mg kg-1) 0 0.1 ± 0.005 1.565 ± 0.031
5-Methylfurfural (mg kg-1) 0 0.009 ± 0.0001 0.012 ± 010002

Table 1: Energy content and process water properties. It shows the mass loss and the higher and lower heating values of raw material and biocoal as well as the pH and the concentrations of furfural and 5-methylfurfural of the process water.

Treatment Ash content (%) N S Cl K Mg Na Ca
(%DM) (%DM) (%DM) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Raw 1.96 ± 0.08 0.47 ± 0.01 0.48 ± 0.19 0.24 ± 0.01 3,113 ± 26 710 ± 11 348 ± 50 11,768 ± 240
150 °C 1.15 ± 0.03 0.41 ± 0.04 0.41 ± 0.17 0.06 ± 0.02 616 ± 14 625 ± 23 311 ± 45 9,501 ± 189
* - - * ** * - **
170 °C 0.90 ± 0.06 0.40 ± 0.03 0.24 ± 0.04 0.07 ± 0.01 534 ± 31 383 ± 36 303 ± 66 8,917 ± 141
* * ** * ** * - **
185 °C 1.04 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.05 0.14 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.03 525 ± 21 371 ± 44 301 ± 32 8,880 ± 191
* - ** * ** * - **
DM: dry mass.

Table 2: Selected emission precursors and the overall ash content. The stars indicate the level of significance (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).

Treatment As Cd Pb Hg Ni Zn Ba Ag Mn Sr Li
Raw n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 106 ± 3 14 ± 1 37 ± 4 75 ± 1 30 ± 1 27 ± 3
150 °C n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 77 ± 2 13 ± 1 35 ± 4 51 ± 1 19 ± 1 24 ± 2
* * - ** ** -
170 °C n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 57 ± 3 8 ± 1 34 ± 3 26 ± 1 10 ± 1 20 ± 1
* ** - ** ** **
185 °C n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 55 ± 2 7 ± 1 27 ± 2 29 ± 1 9 ± 1 17 ± 2
* ** ** ** ** **
n.d.: not detected (below element specific threshold).

Table 3: Heavy metal content in the raw material and the MAHC samples. The stars indicate the level of significance (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


The MAHC allows the differentiation of the steps of the chemical degradation by applying different intensities of thermal treatment. Therefore, it is possible to assess the interactions between the mass loss, O/C-H/C ratio, heating value, ash component reduction, pH increase of the process water and accumulation of furans in the process water. The advantage of the MAHC method over the conventional HTC reactor method is based on the thermal conduction via microwaves that penetrate the whole reactor volume and conduct the heat on microlevel rather than heating the reactor volume by macroscopic layers of different temperatures10. This allowed the identification of three different degradation stages, which were mainly triggered by the dehydration and decarboxylation of the respective monomers. Hydrolysis and deacetylation of hemicellulose will slightly increase the H/C ratio of the biomass and it was not possible to isolate these reactions in this experiment, e.g., at 150 °C. The second temperature step (150−170 °C) induced a drop in the O/C ratio due to decarboxylation. The decrease in the H/C ratio suggested a parallel dehydration. Between 170 and 185 °C, there was insignificant change in the O/C ratio but a relative decrease in the H/C ratio, which could be explained by demethanation. However, gas formation was not monitored in these experiments, as the microwave reactor allowed no access to the gaseous phase during the reaction. It is also possible that dehydration of more stable tertiary OH groups, intermediates formed during the dehydration of sugars to furans (Table 1), caused this H/C shift. Tertiary OH groups require a higher activation energy and are degraded at higher temperatures. The O/C and H/C ratio homogenization of the product biomass was visible in the van Krevelen diagram (Figure 1), as well, though the heating values did not show the same tendency (Table 1).

Heating a sample of biomass immersed in water is limited to a maximum temperature of 185 °C with the setup used in this study. This is caused by the medium microwave absorbing properties of water (loss tanδ 0.123)11. This absorbing property is even reduced at elevated temperatures, leading to a temperature maximum that depends on the applied microwave power, in the case of this study 185 °C with 850 W. At this maximum temperature the temperature cannot be kept on a constant level, but it fluctuates comparable to results presented by Dallinger et al.11 The authors of the mentioned study propose the addition of 0.03 M sodium chloride to achieve a constant temperature. Such a measure would compromise the concept of our study, as an addition of emission relevant elements will decrease the beneficial effect of MAHC on biomass fuels.

As expected, the O/C-H/C ratio dropped in the biocoal with decreasing pH. The reason behind this is the dehydration of the biocoal that induced acid formation and depletes the biocoal of oxygen, which in turn increases the heating value of the biocoal, as well. The identical pH in the process water of the 170 °C and the 185 °C treatment suggested that the first O/C-H/C ratio drop was induced by dehydration and decarboxylation, while the O/C-H/C ratio drop between 170 °C and 185 °C was dominated by dehydration. Decarboxylation of the biocoal does not yield acids but furans and, therefore, is not affecting the pH but yields higher furan concentrations (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Table 1). In this study, 5-methylfurfural was yielded in considerable amounts (Table 1), but several studies have shown that the formation of 5-methylfurfural is a secondary reaction with 5-HMF as an educt25,26,27. As we did not identify 5-HMF due to its comparably low vapor pressure and the restricted GC temperature program, we are not able to confirm these statements. Future studies should seek to identify a large range of organic analytes, including 5-HMF, to link the organic analysis of the process water to the reaction steps published in the literature.

The raw material has a high O/C-H/C relation fluctuation. The reason behind this is of a methodical nature, as despite the fine milling before the elemental analysis the relatively high amount of bark particles were not evenly distributed in the small sample size. This effect was postulated by Liu et al. in their HTC study43, and they found the same effect of the HTC treatment that can be seen in this study, which is a homogenization of the O/C-H/C relation due to the applied hydrothermal carbonization. This homogenization can already be achieved at relatively low temperatures (Figure 1).

The MAHC treatment at 150 °C reduced the heating value. This is interesting, as the HTC treatment usually increases the heating value. The reason for this atypical behavior is the hydrolysis. It decomposes the carbohydrates in the wood tissue by acetal hydrolysis, but this cleavage employs an integration of oxygen into the macromolecules, which causes the lower heating value of the hydrolysis product. From an energetical point of view the MAHC or HTC treatment is obviously inefficient at temperatures that only allow hydrolysis, as weight and heating value are both reduced. Energy efficient is the heating value increase between 170 °C to 185 °C (Table 1), because here is the best relation of energy input and heating value increase. It can be concluded that high temperatures are effective in case of the goal to increase the heating value of the raw material. However, other studies proved that a shift from HTC carbonization to HTC liquefaction at higher temperatures decreases the biocoal yield 9 and that many other factors (e.g., the type of material24 and the particle size9) influences the biocoal yield, as well.

From the point of view of emission precursor depletion of the raw material the optimum temperature is 170 °C, because a further temperature increase does not yield much higher depletion rates (Figure 3). Especially the fine dust precursors chlorine, potassium, magnesium, sodium and calcium do not respond to an elevation of temperature from 170 °C (Table 2 and Figure 3). An example from the literature is given by Rheza et al., who found that increasing the process temperature from 200 °C to 260 °C leads to comparable ash depletion23. This leads to the conclusion that in case the goal of the treatment is ash reduction the process temperature has an optimum and should neither exceed or be lower than this optimum. The leaching behavior of the heavy metals shows the same tendency (Table 2, Table 3, and Figure 3). Therefore, the ash dumping of the heavy metal rich filter ash can be reduced in medium- and large-scale heating plants and, thereby, costs can be saved due to an adapted HTC treatment. The reduction of zinc at 150 °C decreases the concentration of this element below the limit of 100 mg/kg according to DIN EN ISO 17225-2. Only the sulfur and chlorine content of both the raw material and the MAHC biocoal will not allow the pelletization of neither the raw material nor the biocoal (limits of 0.05 mg/kg and 0.03 mg/kg, respectively). Therefore, the biocoal or the raw material can be used in medium or large scale heating plants with SOx reduction measures and acid resistance against sulfuric and chlorine acid. A positive aspect of the elemental leaching is the reduction of potassium and magnesium by 83%. Both elements are ash melting temperature reducers and their elimination reduces the risk of clogging of conveying systems by slag formation (Figure 3).

In this study the elemental concentration in the coal was analyzed, but with the applied methods the processes of salt formation in the process water could not be analyzed. There is probably an interaction of solution of minerals from the solid phase to the liquid phase, alkali salt formation in the liquid phase and precipitation of the salts in the solid phase. In future studies it will be interesting to analyze the centrifugation pellet of the process water for precipitated salts to gain an inside into these processes.

The MAHC allows to study chemical reaction successions during thermal treatment of biomass even at low temperatures, which can be seen in the temperature dependence of the process steps hydrolysis, dehydration and decarboxylation. In the frame of this study, 170 °C was identified as the ideal temperature to reach a relative maximum of energy densification, a maximum of emission precursor reduction at a relatively low energy input. This allows the application of the MAHC and also the HTC method for the upgrade of low quality high emission biofuel by reducing emission precursors. Such biomass is abundant in cities and in rural areas in the form of leaves, bark or straw. Such biomass will be needed for the raw material supply in a sustainable energy production scenario. A major drawback is that the proposed technology is more expensive than torrefaction, and it requires disposal of the process water, which is a mineral and organic compound rich waste that has to be treated by either a biogas plant or a wastewater treatment plant44. Therefore, recent applications are limited to laboratory studies11,13. Running the MAHC process at too low temperatures could compromise its energy self-sustainability as the exothermal stage of biomass conversion might not be reached for all biomasses. In such a case the application of the method will be bound to places with a surplus of thermal energy (e.g., combustion engines for mobility or wood gas and fossil fuel power generators).

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


The authors have nothing to disclose.


The authors like to thank Christoph Warth, Michael Russ, Carola Lepski, Julian Tejada and Dr. Rainer Kirchhof for their technical support. The study was funded by the BMBF (Project BiCoLim-Bio-Combustibles Limpios) under the grant number 01DN16036.


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
5MS non-polar cloumn Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham, USA TraceGOLD SQC GCMS
9µm polyvinylalcohol particle column Methrom AG, Filderstadt, Germany Metrosep A Supp 4 -250/4.0 Ion chromatography
argon Westfalen AG, Münster, Germany UN 1006 ICP-OES
calorimeter IKA-Werke GmbH & Co.KG, Stauffen, Germany C6000 higher and lower heating value
centrifuge Andreas Hettich GmbH & Co.KG, Germany Rotofix 32 A
centrifuge mill Retsch Technology GmbH, Haan,
ZM 200
ceramic dishes Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany XX83.1 Ash content
cutting mill Fritsch GmbH, Markt Einersheim, Germany pulverisette 19
D(+) Glucose Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany X997.1 higher and lower heating value
elemental analyzer elementar Analysesysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany varioMACRO cube elemental analysis
exicator DWK Life Sciences GmbH, Wertheim, Germany DURAN DN300 Ash content
GC-MS system Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham, USA Trace 1300 GCMS
hydrochloric acid Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany HN53.3 ICP-OES
ICP OES Spectro Analytical Instruments GmbH, Kleve, Germany Spectro Blue-EOP- TI ICP-OES
Ion chromatograph Methrom GmbH&Co.KG, Filderstadt, Germany 833 Basic IC plus Ion chromatography
kiln dryer Schellinger KG, Weingarten, Germany
kiln dryer Schellinger KG, Weingarten, Germany Ash content
mesh filter paper Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany L874.1 ICP-OES
microwave oven Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria Multiwave Go
muffel furnance Carbolite Gero GmbH &Co.KG, Neuhausen, Germany AAF 1100 Ash content
nitric acid Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany 4989.1 ICP-OES
oxygen Westfalen AG, Münster, Germany UN 1072 higher and lower heating value
pH-meter ylem Analytics Germany Sales GmbH & Co. KG, Weilheim,Germany pH 3310 pH
sample bag IKA-Werke GmbH & Co.KG, Stauffen, Germany C12a higher and lower heating value
Standard Laboratory Vessels and Instruments
standard samples Bernd Kraft GmbH, Duisburg, Germany ICP-OES
sulfonamite elementar Analysesysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany SLBS4782 elemental analysis
teflon reaction vessels Anton Paar, Austria HVT50
teflon reaction vessels Anton Paar, Austria HVT50 ICP-OES
tin foil elementar Analysesysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany S12.01-0032 elemental analysis
tungstenVIoxide elementar Analysesysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany 11.02-0024 elemental analysis
twice deionized water Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany
twice deionized water Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany higher and lower heating value
twice deionized water Carl Roth GmbH&Co.KG, Karlsruhe, Germany ICP-OES



  1. Li, C., Zhao, Z. K., Cai, H., Wang, A., Zhang, T. Microwave-promoted conversion of concentrated fructose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in ionic liquids in the absence of catalysts. Biomass and Bioenergy. 35 , (5), 2013-2017 (2011).
  2. Möller, M., Harnisch, F., Schröder, U. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal degradation of fructose and glucose in subcritical water. Biomass and Bioenergy. 39, 389-398 (2012).
  3. Guiotoku, M., Rambo, C. R., Hansel, F. A., Magalhães, W. L. E., Hotza, D. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic materials. Materials Letters. 63, (30), 2707-2709 (2009).
  4. Guiotoku, M., Rambo, C. R., hansel, F. A., Magalhães, W. L. E., Hotza, D. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic materials. Materials Letters. (63), 2707-2709 (2009).
  5. Kannan, S., Gariepy, Y., Raghavan, G. S. V. Optimization and characterization of hydrochar produced from microwave hydrothermal cabonization of fish waste. Waste Management. 159-168 (2017).
  6. Elaigwu, S. E., Greenway, G. M. Microwave-assisted and conventional hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic waste material: Comparison of the chemical and structural properties of the hydrochars. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 118, 1-8 (2016).
  7. Elaigwu, S. E., Greenway, G. M. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of rapeseed husk: A strategy for improving its solid fuel properties. Fuel Processing Technology. 149, 305-312 (2016).
  8. Chen, W. -H., Ye, S. -C., Sheen, H. -K. Hydrothermal carbonization of sugarcane bagasse via wet torrefaction in association with microwave heating. Bioresource technology. 118, 195-203 (2012).
  9. Nizamuddin, S., et al. Upgradation of chemical, fuel, thermal, and structural properties of rice husk through microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization. Environmental science and pollution research international. 25, (18), 17529-17539 (2018).
  10. Nizamuddin, S., et al. An overview of microwave hydrothermal carbonization and microwave pyrolysis of biomass. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 17, (4), 813-837 (2018).
  11. Dallinger, D., Kappe, C. O. Microwave-assisted synthesis in water as solvent. Chemical reviews. 107, (6), 2563-2591 (2007).
  12. Qi, X., Watanabe, M., Aida, T. M., Smith, J. R. L. Catalytic dehydration of fructose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by ion-exchange resin in mixed-aqueous system by microwave heating. Green Chemistry. 10, (7), 799 (2008).
  13. Nüchter, M., Ondruschka, B., Bonrath, W., Gum, A. Microwave assisted synthesis - a critical technology overview. Green Chem. 6, (3), 128-141 (2004).
  14. Schanche, J. -S. Microwave synthesis solutions from personal chemistry. Molecular Diversity. 7, (2-4), 291-298 (2003).
  15. Kappe, C. O. Controlled microwave heating in modern organic synthesis. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English). 43, (46), 6250-6284 (2004).
  16. Gronnow, M. J., White, R. J., Clark, J. H., Macquarrie, D. J. Energy Efficiency in Chemical Reactions: A Comparative Study of Different Reaction Techniques. Organic Process Research & Development. 9, (4), 516-518 (2005).
  17. Kruse, A., Dahmen, N. Hydrothermal biomass conversion: Quo vadis? The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 134, 114-123 (2018).
  18. Reza, M. T., et al. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass for Energy and Crop Production. Applied Bioenergy. 1, (1), (2014).
  19. Libra, J. A., et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels. 2, (1), 71-106 (2011).
  20. Reza, M. T., Uddin, M. H., Lynam, J. G., Hoekman, S. K., Coronella, C. J. Hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine: reaction chemistry and water balance. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 4, (4), 311-321 (2014).
  21. Funke, A., Ziegler, F. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: A summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 4, (2), 160-177 (2010).
  22. Kruse, A., Funke, A., Titirici, M. -M. Hydrothermal conversion of biomass to fuels and energetic materials. Current opinion in chemical biology. 17, (3), 515-521 (2013).
  23. Reza, M. T., Lynam, J. G., Uddin, M. H., Coronella, C. J. Hydrothermal carbonization: Fate of inorganics. Biomass and Bioenergy. 49, 86-94 (2013).
  24. Zhang, D., et al. Comparison study on fuel properties of hydrochars produced from corn stalk and corn stalk digestate. Energy. 165, 527-536 (2018).
  25. Huang, Y. -B., Yang, Z., Dai, J. -J., Guo, Q. -X., Fu, Y. Production of high quality fuels from lignocellulose-derived chemicals: a convenient C-C bond formation of furfural, 5-methylfurfural and aromatic aldehyde. RSC Advances. 2, (30), 11211 (2012).
  26. Van de Vyver, S., Geboers, J., Jacobs, P. A., Sels, B. F. Recent Advances in the Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose. ChemCatChem. 3, (1), 82-94 (2011).
  27. Delidovich, I., Leonhard, K., Palkovits, R. Cellulose and hemicellulose valorisation: an integrated challenge of catalysis and reaction engineering. Energy & Environmental Science. 7, (9), 2803 (2014).
  28. Sevilla, M., Fuertes, A. B. The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon. 47, (9), 2281-2289 (2009).
  29. Yao, Z., Ma, X. Characteristics of co-hydrothermal carbonization on polyvinyl chloride wastes with bamboo. Bioresource technology. 247, 302-309 (2018).
  30. Funke, A., Ziegler, F. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: A summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. (4), 160-177 (2010).
  31. Liu, Z., Balasubramanian, R. Upgrading of waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and low temperature pyrolysis (LTP): A comparative evaluation. Applied Energy. 114, 857-864 (2014).
  32. Khalsa, J., Döhling, F., Berger, F. Foliage and Grass as Fuel Pellets-Small Scale Combustion of Washed and Mechanically Leached Biomass. Energies. 9, (5), 361 (2016).
  33. Saddawi, A., Jones, J. M., Williams, A., Le Coeur, C. Commodity Fuels from Biomass through Pretreatment and Torrefaction: Effects of Mineral Content on Torrefied Fuel Characteristics and Quality. Energy & Fuels. 26, (11), 6466-6474 (2012).
  34. Energie aus Biomasse: Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren. Kaltschmitt, M., Hartmann, H., Hofbauer, H. Springer Vieweg. (2016).
  35. Fengel, D., Wegener, G. Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Walter de Gruyter. Berlin. (1989).
  36. Obernberger, I., Thek, G. Physical characterisation and chemical composition of densified biomass fuels with regard to their combustion behaviour. Biomass and Bioenergy. 27, (6), 653-669 (2004).
  37. Kenney, W. A., Sennerby-Forsse, L., Layton, P. A review of biomass quality research relevant to the use of poplar and willow for energy conversion. Biomass. 21, (3), 163-188 (1990).
  38. Tharakan, P. J., Volk, T. A., Abrahamson, L. P., White, E. H. Energy feedstock characteristics of willow and hybrid poplar clones at harvest age. Biomass and Bioenergy. 25, (6), 571-580 (2003).
  39. Liu, Z., Quek, A., Balasubramanian, R. Preparation and characterization of fuel pellets from woody biomass, agro-residues and their corresponding hydrochars. Applied Energy. 1315-1322 (2014).
  40. Technischen Komitee ISO/TC 238. "Solid biofuels" und Technisches Komitee CEN/TC 335 "Biogene Festbrennstoffe" Solid biofuels - Determination of calorific value (ISO 18125:2017); German version EN ISO 18125:2017. Beuth. Berlin. (2017).
  41. Kambo, H. S., Dutta, A. A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 45, 359-378 (2015).
  42. Knappe, V., et al. Low temperature microwave assisted hydrothermal carbonization (MAHC) reduces combustion emission precursors in short rotation coppice willow wood. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 134, 162-166 (2018).
  43. Liu, Z., Quek, A., Kent Hoekman, S., Balasubramanian, R. Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel. 103, 943-949 (2013).
  44. Hoekman, S. K., Broch, A., Robbins, C., Zielinska, B., Felix, L. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of selected woody and herbaceous biomass feedstocks. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 3, (2), 113-126 (2013).



    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Usage Statistics