This study presents methodologies to study the pathomorphological and molecular mechanisms underlying chickpea–Rhizoctonia bataticola interaction. The blotting paper method is useful to rapidly study chickpea genotype responses, while the sick pot-based method can be used to simultaneously impose drought and R. bataticola infection and screen for tolerant genotypes.
Dry root rot (DRR) disease is an emerging biotic stress threat to chickpea cultivation around the world. It is caused by a soil-borne fungal pathogen, Rhizoctonia bataticola. In the literature, comprehensive and detailed step-by-step protocols on disease assays are sparse. This article provides complete details on the steps involved in setting up a blotting paper technique for quickly screening genotypes for resistance to DRR. The blotting paper technique is easy and less expensive. Another method, based on the sick pot approach, is a mimic of natural infection and can be applied to study the interacting components—plant, pathogen, and environment—involved in the disease triangle.
Moreover, in nature, DRR occurs mostly in rainfed chickpea cultivation areas, where soil moisture recedes as crop growth advances. Drought stress is known to predispose chickpea plants to DRR disease. Pathomorphological and molecular understanding of plant-pathogen interaction under drought stress can pave the way for the identification of elite DRR-resistant varieties from the chickpea germplasm pool. This article provides a stepwise methodology for the preparation of a sick pot and subsequent disease assay. Overall, the information presented herein will help researchers prepare R. bataticola fungal inoculum, maintain this pathogen, set up the blotting paper technique, prepare sick culture and sick pot, and assess pathogen infection in chickpea plants.
Dry root rot (DRR) is one of the economically significant diseases in chickpea1,2. It is a root-specific disease caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola (teleomorph, Macrophomina phaseolina). Infected plants lack lateral roots and possess brittle taproots and yellow foliage1,3. DRR under drought stress has been reported to be an emerging threat to chickpea cultivation1,2,3. Moreover, DRR incidence is reported to be aggravated under drought stress under field conditions1,2,3. DRR is more prevalent in rainfed areas than in irrigated fields4. The utilization of resistant varieties is the way to overcome the disease and circumvent fungicide use1,13. Because chickpea germplasm available across the globe harbors genetic variation for the trait5, the screening and identification of resistant/susceptible genotypes are critical for molecular breeding for crop improvement.
Robust, easy, and cost-effective disease assays are essential to investigate R. bataticola infection patterns in chickpea. The primary disease assay used to observe the response of chickpea genotypes to R. bataticola infection is the blotting paper technique1,4. It is a simple technique and can be executed using liquid fungal inoculum, seedlings with roots, and sterile blotting paper. However, this technique has not been utilized to its maximum because no step-by-step-protocol is available in the literature.
Meanwhile, the sick pot technique involves the preparation of a potential sick culture and the imposition of drought stress. Given that drought stress aggravates DRR disease incidence3, it is essential to study the plant-pathogen interaction under drought stress6,7. The sick pot technique provides the platform for such a simultaneous study, promoting better possibilities for germplasm screening and understanding the mechanistic basis of the interaction. Pathomorphological changes such as an increase in root length and reduction in lateral root number—inherent to DRR disease—can be addressed using the sick pot technique1,3,7.
Herein, a detailed protocol for blotting paper and sick pot techniques, which can be used to study the interaction between chickpea and R. bataticola and screen chickpea germplasm, is presented. The details of the materials used in the study are given in the Table of Materials.
1. Isolation of R. bataticola and storage
2. Blotting paper technique
NOTE: The blotting paper technique entails the preparation of liquid fungal inoculum, seedling preparation, and disease assessment.
3. Sick pot technique
NOTE: The sick pot technique entails the preparation of virulent inoculum and a sick pot, maintenance of moisture level, and assessment of disease symptoms.
This study aimed to demonstrate techniques such as blotting paper and sick pot techniques to facilitate pathomorphological and molecular understanding of plant-pathogen interaction under drought stress. To accomplish this, plants exhibiting DRR symptoms1,3,4 were collected from a chickpea field, and the fungus was isolated using the hyphal tip method8. R. bataticola fungal culture appears dark gray on the PDA plate and slant on four days after incubation (Figure 1A & C) and darker in grey color in the PDB medium on five days after incubation (Figure 1B). R. bataticola has septate mycelia (Figure 1D), and it produces microsclerotia (Figure 1E), which act as primary inoculum in the soil10.
The steps given in Figure 2 were followed to execute the blotting paper technique. Eight-day-old plants were infected with liquid inoculum (50%), and eight days after infection, plants were observed for symptoms. Plants showed root rot because of extensive necrosis, as well as leaf yellowing, which is the typical root and foliar symptoms of DRR disease (Figure 3B and Supplementary Figure 1A).
The sick pot technique was carried out using the steps shown in Figure 4. The concentrations of fungal inoculum in Soilrite and field soil was 10% and 5%, respectively. DRR-susceptible seeds show the typical DRR symptoms such as root rot, lack of lateral roots, leaf yellowing, and premature death, as compared to control plants (Figure 5A and B). Plants subjected to infection in the sick pot made with Soilrite died and showed root rot seven days after sowing (Figure 5C and Supplementary Figure 2C). Meanwhile, plants growing in the sick pot made with field soil showed typical foliar symptoms, i.e., straw-colored foliage 48 days after sowing (Figure 5E).
The influence of drought on DRR disease was also studied in the sick pot under laboratory conditions. Drought stress was imposed by withholding water3. The plants under drought stress (30% FC) showed aggravated disease incidence as compared to the pathogen-only-treated (90% FC) plants (Figure 6A and B). Control and drought-treated plants did not show any symptoms (Figure 6A and B). Roots under combined stress had more necrotic spots and rot as compared to pathogen only-plants (Figure 6B).
Figure 1: Characteristic morphological features of Rhizoctonia bataticola. The causal agent of dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola, ITCC 8635) was isolated from the field (National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, 28.6139°N, 77.2090°E). From the cultures, the fungus was isolated using the hyphal tip method8. Images show the 4-days-old R. bataticola culture in potato dextrose agar in a Petri plate (A), 5-days-old liquid culture (B), and 10-days-old slant culture (C). Fungal mycelia (D) and microsclerotia (black arrows) (E) was teased on a microscope slide and stained with WGA-FITC and aniline blue, respectively. Images (E, F, scale bar, 20, and 50 µm) were captured under the 20x and 40x objective lens of an epifluorescent microscope. White arrows show the cross walls in the mycelia. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Steps involved in R. bataticola inoculation and DRR assays in the blotting paper technique. Surface sterilize the seeds by passing them through running tap water and washing with 2% sodium hypochlorite, followed by washing with sterile RO water 3–4 times (step 1). Then, sow 30 seeds in 15-cm-high pots containing Soilrite (step 2) and allow the seeds to grow for eight days in a growth room with 28 °C ± 2 °C temperature, 16 h photoperiod with a light intensity of 150 μmol m−2 s−1, and relative humidity of 70% (step 3). Uproot the plants and wash them with sterilized water (step 4). Prepare the fungal inoculum by inoculating 500 mL PDB media with fungus (step 5). For the infection, use 5-days-old fungal broth culture. Then, inoculate the plants by dipping the roots into the fungal inoculum in a beaker for 30 s and remove excess inoculum by touching the inner sidewall of the beaker (step 6). After infection, place fungal-inoculated and mock-inoculated plants in different blotting papers in separate clean trays (step 7). Moisten the blotting paper with adequate sterile water daily and observe the symptoms, viz., shedding off of lateral roots, yellowing and wilting of plant leaves, rotten seeds, and root rot at eight days post-infection (step 8) (A). Images represent essential steps (steps 3–7) (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: DRR disease symptoms in chickpea-based on the blotting paper technique. Following the protocol depicted in Figure 2, DRR-susceptible plants (genotype, JG 62) were subjected to infection using the blotting paper technique, and symptoms were captured eight days after infection. Images show the representative control plants (mock-inoculated) with healthy shoots (red arrow) and roots with more lateral roots (yellow arrow) (A). Images show the representative infected plants with typical symptoms, such as wilting, yellowing, and drying of leaves (blue arrows) and dried/necrotic roots with fewer lateral roots (white arrows) (B). The scale bar is 1 cm. Experiments were repeated at least five times. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Overview of sick pot preparation for R. bataticola inoculation and DRR disease assays. Prepare the fungal inoculum by inoculating a PDA plate with a 5 mm fungal disc of actively growing fungal culture and incubate at 28 °C for ten days. Then, for preparing the substrate, wash the chickpea seeds with tap water, soak the seeds in water overnight, and autoclave at 121 lbs for 15 min. Then, inoculate 100 g of the substrate with three agar plugs from 10-day-old culture and mix well. Then, incubate the inoculated substrate at 30 °C for 15 days in an incubator. Crush the sick culture (fungal grown substrate), dry and powder it, and store at 4 °C. Then, mix 50 g of sick culture with 100 g of dry Soilrite thoroughly (sick pot) (A). Then, sow the surface-sterilized susceptible chickpea seeds and observe the symptoms, viz., tap root rot, lateral root necrosis, and leaf yellowing. Assimilate the plants showing symptoms in the same pot. For further experiments, use the pots showing 90% infection as the susceptible genotype. Images represent the inoculum (i), the substrate (ii), and control and inoculated sick culture (iii) (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: DRR disease symptoms in chickpea-based on the sick pot technique. For making a sick pot, the protocol depicted in Figure 4 was used. Then, surface-sterilized DRR-susceptible chickpea genotype (JG 62) seeds were sown in the control (A) and sick pot (B). Each plant in the pot represents one replicate, and dead or stunted plant growth was observed in the sick pot. Plants on the right side of the panel (C) indicate the presence and absence of lateral roots (yellow arrow) in the control and treatment, respectively. The graph shows the number of dead plants in the sick pot treatment as compared to the control (D). The sick pot was prepared on sterilized field soil collected from the NIPGR field, and sick culture was mixed. Surface-sterilized seeds were sown, and disease symptoms were captured 48 days after sowing. The image shows the control plants (E), and the typical DRR foliar symptoms, namely, the drying of plants, are indicated (white arrows). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test. The bar represents the SEM of nine biological replicates, and the asterisk denotes a statistically significant value at P < 0.0001. The yellow arrow indicates necrotic/rotten, dried primary root without any lateral roots. Experiments were repeated at least ten times, with similar results. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: The sick pot method is useful to study the influence of drought stress on plant-pathogen interaction. A pot experiment was conducted to study the effect of drought on R. bataticola infection. The experiment comprised control, drought-only, pathogen-only (R. bataticola, pathogen), and combined drought and R. bataticola stress (combined stress). Plants were grown in a growth room with 28 °C ± 2 °C temperature, 16 h photoperiod with a light intensity of 150 μmol m−2 s−1, and 70% relative humidity. The sick pot was prepared following the protocol depicted in Figure 4. Then, surface-sterilized DDR-susceptible chickpea genotype (JG 62) seeds were sown in control and sick pots. Control and pathogen treatments were irrigated throughout the experiment. Drought stress was imposed on plants under drought and combined stress treatment. Water was withheld 18 days after sowing, and the desired drought level was reached 24 days after sowing. Plants were observed for symptoms 29 days after sowing. The image shows the foliar and root changes under treatments (A). Images show unstained plant roots observed under the 0.5X objective lens of an SMZ25/SMZ18 research stereomicroscope (B). The red arrow indicates the uninfected lateral roots, and the black arrows indicate the infected lateral roots. Experiments were repeated at least ten times, with similar results. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure S1: Inoculum size and reduction in lateral root number in chickpea. Following the protocol depicted in figure 2, DRR susceptible plants (genotype, JG 62) were subjected to infection with varied size of inoculum using blotting paper technique, and symptoms were captured eight days after infection. Plants were inoculated with varied inoculum size (0.1%, 1%, 10% and 20% w/v in water)Images show the representative infected plants with typical symptoms such as wilting, yellowing, and drying of leaves and dried/necrotic roots with less lateral roots (B). Graph shows the number of lateral roots in plants under infection with inoculum variation (B). The scale bar is 1 cm. n=10. Please click here to download this figure.
Supplementary Figure S2: Foliar symptoms of DRR in chickpea in soilrite. Following the protocol depicted in figure 4, surface sterilized seeds were sown, and disease symptoms were captured on 14 days after sowing. The representative image shows the control plants (A), and the picture shows the typical DRR foliar symptoms, namely drying of plants (white arrows) (B). Disease score was developed based on necrotic spots on the roots. The scoring was developed across the days (C). The photographs (A&B) are from the same experiment. Scale bar= 3 cm. n= 10. Please click here to download this figure.
The blotting paper technique provides a straightforward approach to screen chickpea genotypes under laboratory conditions. Dip inoculation enables the investigation of interaction on a temporal basis with easy control over inoculum load (Supplementary Figure 1) and facilitates in vitro screening. Furthermore, even young seedlings can be used. Five-day-old fungal culture (Figure 1B) can yield enough inoculum to infect the plants. Liquid inoculum contains both mycelia and microsclerotia (Figure 1D & E). Root rot symptoms (Figure 3B) can be used to score the disease and identify resistant genotypes. DRR occurrence is majorly influenced by drought stress1,3,5. However, with this technique alone, drought stress imposition is impossible, and screening with this technique will not reflect natural responses.
The sick pot technique allows the study of the interactions among plants, pathogens, and drought stress. It provides a way to screen the genotypes under combined drought and pathogen stress to identify resistant genotypes. In a sick pot, drought stress can be imposed at any age of the plant and screen the plants. Plants show typical DRR symptoms (Figure 5C & F and Supplementary Figure 2B & C) in the sick pot method. Plants subjected to combined drought and pathogen infection showed severe root rot as compared to pathogen-only treatment. This implies that available chickpea germplasm needs to be screened to identify a resistant genotype to not only pathogen but also combined pathogen and drought stress. Several studies were attempted earlier to screen the genotypes but by using blotting paper technique11,12. Besides, field screening has also been conducted but without imposing drought stress11. It is crucial to impose drought stress during different stages of chickpea and assess the genotype response.
TROUBLE SHOOTING
For the blotting paper technique, the volume of the inoculum in the beaker should be at the level where the entire plant root is dipped. Additionally, excess watering will lead to wet rot of the plant roots. Do not use tap water for watering the plants because it can cause contamination.
For the sick pot technique, Desi chickpea varieties are preferable. The number of seeds can vary depending upon the researchers’ needs. The volume of water used to soak seeds should be threefold more because the seeds imbibe water. Bacterial growth will occur if the washing is not done correctly. Non-autoclaved water can be used to soak the seeds. The color of the seeds after autoclaving should be black instead of brown, which indicates improper autoclaving. Over drying in a hot air oven leads to the drying of seeds; such seeds cannot be used for fungal inoculation. Inoculating the bottles outside the laminar flow may cause contamination. White fungal growth in inoculated chickpea meal is a sign of improper autoclaving. Biosafety precautions should be followed in discarding the used inoculum, blotting paper, and infected plants.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Projects at the M.S.K lab are supported by the National Institute of Plant Genome Research core funding. VI acknowledges DBT- JRF (DBT/2015/NIPGR/430). We thank trainee students, Miss. Rishika, Mr. Jayachendrayan, and Miss. Durgadevi for technical help during video shooting and Mr. Sandeep Dixit, Miss. Anjali and Dr. Avanish Rai for critically assessing raw data and the manuscript files. We thank Mr. Rahim H Tarafdar and Mr. Sunder Solanki for their help in the laboratory. We acknowledge DBT-eLibrary Consortium (DeLCON) and NIPGR Library for providing access to e-resources and NIPGR Plant Growth Facility for plant growth support/space.
Fungus- Rhizoctonia bataticola | Pathogen inoculum | Indian Type Culture Collection No. 8365 | GenBank: MH509971.1, ITCC 8635 (https://www.iari.res.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article& id=1251&Itemid=1370) |
Soilrite mix | Soil medium in the lab | Keltech Energies Limited, Bangalore, India | http://www.keltechenergies.com/ |
Filter paper | Blotting paper to support the plant growth | Himedia | http://himedialabs.com/catalogue/chemical2017/index.html#374 |
Pot | Growing plants | 10 and 30 cm size pots | Routinely used nursery pots, for example, https://dir.indiamart.com/impcat/nursery-pots.html |
Potato dextrose agar/broth | Culture and maintain the fungus | Cat# 213400, DifcoTM, MD, USA | https://www.fishersci.com/shop/products/bd-difco-dehydrated-culture-media-potato-dextrose-agar-3/p-4901946 |
Incubator | Culture the fungus | LOM-150-2, S/N AI13082601-38, MRC, incubator, and shaker | http://www.mrclab.com/productDetails.aspx?pid=91131 |
Growth chamber | Growing plants in controlled condition | Model No. A1000, Conviron, Canada | https://www.conviron.com/products/gen1000-reach-in-plant-growth-chamber |
Laminar airflow | Carrying out aseptic exercises | Telstar, Bio II advance, Class II cabinet, EN-12469-2000 | https://www.telstar.com/lab-hospitals-equipment/biological-safety-cabinets/bio-ii-advance-plus/, http://www.atlantisindia.co.in/laminar-air-flow.html |
Mesh | Filtering the fungal mycelia | Nylon mosquito net | Mesh with 0.6-1 mm diameter pore size |
Autoclave | Autoclaving media and chickpea seeds | Autoclave | http://www.scientificsystems.in/autoclave |
Microscopes | Visualizing the infection ang fungal mycelia | SMZ25 / SMZ18, Research Stereomicroscopes, Leica EZ4 educational stereomicroscope | https://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com/products/stereomicroscopes-macroscopes/smz25-smz18 https://www.leica-microsystems.com/products/stereo-microscopes-macroscopes/p/leica-ez4/ https://www.microscopyu.com/museum/eclipse-80i |
Weighing balance | Weighing fungus and chemicals | Sartorius Electronic Weighing Balance, BSA 4202S-CW | https://www.sartorius.com/en/products/weighing/laboratory-balances |
WGA-FITC | Fungus staining | Sigma | https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/l4895?lang=en®ion=IN |
Aniline blue | Fungus staining | Himedia | http://www.himedialabs.com/intl/en/products/Chemicals/Dyes-Indicators-and-Stains/Aniline-blue-Water-soluble-Practical-grade-GRM901 |