Although the rabbit iliac artery and the pig coronary artery models are the most frequently used for stent placement 1, a combination of radiological and surgical equipment is required, animal housing capacity is limited, and the costs of purchase are high. Limitations of the rat stent model is the necessary use of specifically designed stents for rats, the metal-to-artery ratio resulting in more vascular injury2, and the artificially high incidence of thrombosis3.
The rat stenting model is a simple, inexpensive, rapid, and accurate preclinical model 4. After the initial report of direct stenting of the rat aorta by Lowe et al. 5, feasibility and suitability of this model for the evaluation of the pathophysiology of in-stent restenosis has been thoroughly shown 5,6. The diameter of the rat aorta is adequate to allow expansion of commercially available stents without disruption of the physiologic vessel architecture. It has been shown that pathophysiological mechanisms, such as thrombus formation, inflammation, and SMC proliferation, develop in these rat models as they do in the rabbit and pig. Therefore, these models are good representations of the actual process of restenosis.
The OCT high-resolution imaging technology is useful to evaluate intimal hyperplasia. The penetration depth is only 1.5-2 mm, but its resolution is an order of magnitude greater than that of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) 7,8. Multiple studies comparing OCT with IVUS conclude that OCT is currently the preferred technique to evaluate neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation 8-10. Especially in small animals with small vessel diameters, the high resolution of OCT renders it the best imaging modality for the evaluation of restenosis.
In summary, this video shows that (1) rat aortic stenting is easily feasible, (2) rat abdominal aorta stenting is suitable for testing commercially manufactured stents and (3) OCT imaging is an accurate and elegant technique for longitudinal monitoring of in-stent restenosis.