Biomarkers are extremely useful tools across multiple disciplines, including medicine, cell biology, genetics, psychology, sociology, demography, and social epidemiology. Within each discipline, early phase validity and reliability biomarker research was used to uncover both hidden disease risk and provide longitudinal prediction of health outcomes. In these instances, biomarkers that are accurate, durable (i.e. they can survive the lag between sample collection and implementation of the lab assay to extract the biomarker), and versatile (i.e. useful in a variety of models) are required.
While DBS collection is a relatively straightforward procedure, several techniques can help maximize volume of collected spots. Before collection begins, ensuring a participant's hand is warm, and therefore that blood vessels are dilated, will help blood flow once the finger is punctured. Using hand warmers or having a participant run their hands under warm water can help with this process. Milking the finger before collection will pull blood to the finger tip and warm the hand to help blood flow. Milking is a process that improves with practice. Collectors should use whatever technique they find most comfortable and effective, but the most common approach involves milking the participant's hand with the collector's opposite hand. This method will allow the collector's thumb to work deep into the participant's palm while the opposite hand can stabilize the participant's wrist. As an example, if one were collecting blood from a finger on the participant's left hand, the collector would stabilize the participant's wrist with their left hand and milk with their right hand. Common mistakes made while milking include not using a firm grip, pulling the skin above the hand rather working into the muscles to pull blood towards the finger tip. It is also important to avoid pinching the finger with the milking hand or tightly gripping the participant's wrist with the nonmilking hand, both of which impede blood flow.
When puncturing the finger, make the puncture as deep as possible by firmly pressing the lancet into the finger before discharge. A shallow puncture results in less blood flow and quicker clotting. After puncturing the finger, working quickly is key. Thin blood leads to easier collection and larger spots. After puncture, the blood becomes more and more viscous until clotting. The less time required to collect the blood spots on the card the greater their volume.
Ideally the participant's blood will be thin enough that drops will fall of their own weight, but this will not be the case for all participants, as some people's blood is thicker or clots faster than others. If the blood is too thick to fall from the finger, the filter card must be brought to the blood for collection. When bringing the card to the blood it is important to hold the card in contact with the drop while it is hanging from the finger for as long possible, rather than just dabbing the blood to the card. This will help pull blood from the finger to maximize the size of the spot. This technique requires steady hands to maintain contact between the blood and the card. Using both hands, one to steady the participants hand and one to hold the card, and keeping both hands in contact with one another helps to stabilize the card and the blood together.
Advanced research areas, such as cardiometabolic risk assessment, have long relied upon biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) for early risk detection and prevention efforts, as well as biomarkers of "hard endpoints" for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and CVD-associated mortality12. Clinical epidemiology frequently assesses biomarkers to prospectively predict cardiometabolic risk outcomes such as heart disease and Type II diabetes. Perhaps the most widely used of all biomarkers is the Framingham risk score, a composite that includes blood pressure, HDL cholesterol levels and total cholesterols levels that has demonstrated utility in predicting CVD13. However, the Framingham score has experienced some technical controversies, and has limitations in studies focused on linking social and environmental factors to health, suggesting the need for more accurate and specific biomarkers related to cardiovascular research.
There are a number of commercially available kits using ELISA or similar techniques available for the assay of DBS samples. Necessary for the assay of DBS samples are the use of specific and optimized elution steps to bring the dried samples into solution2. This is an expanding area of research as assays for more analytes are currently being developed1. Among the assays already validated and being widely used are cholesterol2,CRP10,14,15, IgE16, EBV9,15, leptin17, and cyotkines18. There are a number of laboratories specializing in the assay of DBS, including the University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine (UW Lab Med) Biomarker Laboratory (Director: Mark Wener).
Bearing in mind that a panel of biomarkers, rather than a lone biomarker, is most useful in the fields of cardiovascular and diabetes research, biomarkers need to be considered along with a variety of contextual factors in order to maximize their utility. Biomarker research can be expensive however, both financially and in time for data collection. Thus, while it is vital to choose biomarkers that are accurate, durable, and versatile, work and family biomarker research must be rooted in practicality by selecting biomarkers that are inexpensive, appropriate, and can be collected quickly with ease. Furthermore, practical considerations often result in an inability to simultaneously maximize price, quality, and speed within one procedure. Herein lie the next steps in health biomarker research within field and population studies. The field of biomarker research is currently in a period of dramatic growth; however, most of the work is yet to come.