Method Article

Stretching Micropatterned Cells on a PDMS Membrane

DOI:

10.3791/51193

January 22nd, 2014

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This manuscript presents a technique to apply or release forces on adherent cells or tissues using unidirectional stretching.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Mechanical forces exerted on cells and/or tissues play a major role in numerous processes. We have developed a device to stretch cells plated on a PolyDiMethylSiloxane (PDMS) membrane, compatible with imaging. This technique is reproducible and versatile. The PDMS membrane can be micropatterned in order to confine cells or tissues to a specific geometry. The first step is to print micropatterns onto the PDMS membrane with a deep UV technique. The PDMS membrane is then mounted on a mechanical stretcher. A chamber is bound on top of the membrane with biocompatible grease to allow gliding during the stretch. The cells are seeded and allowed to spread for several hours on the micropatterns. The sample can be stretched and unstretched multiple times with the use of a micrometric screw. It takes less than a minute to apply the stretch to its full extent (around 30%). The technique presented here does not include a motorized device, which is necessary for applying repeated stretch cycles quickly and/or computer controlled stretching, but this can be implemented. Stretching of cells or tissue can be of interest for questions related to cell forces, cell response to mechanical stress or tissue morphogenesis. This video presentation will show how to avoid typical problems that might arise when doing this type of seemingly simple experiment.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The cells composing a tissue in higher organisms are subject to mechanical tensions and stretching forces coming either from the external environment or from surrounding cells1,2. Cells must adapt to and resist these forces in order to maintain tissue integrity. Such forces are also important for tissues morphogenesis during development3,4. Applying mechanical forces on cultured cells is a way to mimic what might happen in a tissue, but with a quantitative and independent control of cell shape and cell deformation5,6. For this, several techniques might be used. One can press on the cells (the whole cell or part of it), for example using AFM or derivatives7,8 or stretch the substrate the cells are growing on.

The method described in this paper demonstrates how to stretch a plane substrate plated with cells. This technique was originally developed to assess the role of forces exerted on mitotic mammalian cells9. Mitotic cells stay connected to the substrate through retraction fibers and stretching the membrane exerted a force on those fibers, which in turn provoked the rotation of the mitotic spindle. The interest of combining adhesive micropatterns and stretching is to achieve independent control of forces and shape of individual cells. It is for example possible to stretch an ovoid cell into a perfectly isotropic round shape, while uniaxial stretch is applied. If the cells are not platted on micropatterns, uniaxial stretching results in cell elongation, with most cells having a long axis aligned with the stretch axis. It is then difficult to separate the effect of the long axis alignment and the effect of the stretch applied to the cells.

The device is suitable for any live cell imaging, including long time lapse fluorescent microscopy, and drugs can be added during the experiment. The deep UVs micropatterning method10 was described in details in Azioune et al.11 Patterning on PDMS was described in Azioune et al.12 The present stretching protocol is a video version of Carpi et al.13

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Passivation of the PDMS

  1. Cut a piece of PDMS approximately 35 mm x 20 mm from a pre made sheet (for instance, GelPak, as listed in the table of materials).
  2. Remove the top and the bottom protective layers of plastic (if necessary) and use tweezers to place the PDMS in a plastic (not cell culture treated) Petri dish.
  3. Wash the PDMS with 70% ethanol for 5 min on a rotator at 30 oscillations/min.
  4. Dry the surface by flowing air on it.
  5. Illuminate with deep UV (λ = 180 nm) for 5 min at a distance from the UV bulbs of about 5 cm (see Materials sheet for lamp reference; parameters will vary for different lamps).
  6. Prepare 200 µl of EDC/NHS solution for each PDMS piece (this must be prepared just before use because the reactivity of the solution decays in a matter of hr). For 1 ml of 0.05 M MES + 0.5 M NaCl buffer at pH 6.0, add 11.5 mg of Sulfo-NHS and 19.2 mg of EDC.
  7. Transfer the PDMS sheets from the Petri dish to the lid of the Petri dish, which has not been illuminated. This will ensure that the surroundings of the PDMS are very hydrophobic and facilitate the next step.
  8. Add EDC/NHS solution and incubate for 15 min at room temperature.
  9. Rinse EDC/NHS with water.
  10. Add PLL-g-PEG solution (0.5 mg/ml in HEPES 10 mM pH 8.6) and incubate from 3 hr to overnight at room temperature.
  11. Rinse the PLL-g-PEG with water. Passivated PDMS (functionalized with PLL-g-PEG) can be stored for several days at 4 °C.

2. Patterning of the PDMS

  1. Take a PDMS sheet and place it on a synthetic quartz photomask bearing the microfeatures for patterning (see Figure 1). Place the PDMS side bearing the PLL-g-PEG facing the chrome side of the photomask.
  2. Illuminate for 7 min through the photomask at a distance from the UV bulbs of about 5 cm.
  3. Add water onto the mask + PDMS and peel the PDMS slowly off the mask.
  4. Incubate with fibronectin solution at 50 mg/ml in HEPES buffer at pH 8.6 for 1 hr at room temperature. It is possible to use others ECM proteins, but these have not been tested with this protocol.
  5. Rinse with PBS.

3. Mounting the Device

  1. Mount the previously passivated PDMS onto the stretching device (see Discussion for troubleshooting).
    1. Attach one side of the PDMS to the fixed part of the stretcher.
    2. Fix the other side to the mobile part of the stretcher without clamping too much of the PDMS sheet.
  2. Cut a rectangle of PDMS (22 mm x 19 mm) in a thick PDMS stab and cut another rectangle inside in order to have a pool (or frame) that will retain the cells and media (see Figure 2).
  3. Add silicone grease under this PDMS pool and place it on top of the PDMS sheet to create a medium retaining pool. The grease will allow the gliding of the pool over the PDMS sheet during stretching.

4. Patterning the Cells

  1. Detach the cells from a 50% confluency culture flask with Versene.
  2. Count the cells and resuspend them at a concentration of 200,000 cells/ml.
  3. Add 1 ml of cell suspension in the pool (see Discussion for additional details).
  4. Let the cells bind to the patterns for 10-30 min (depending on the cell type, RPE-1 cells will take 10 min and HeLa cells 20 min).
  5. Gently flush the floating cells with equilibrated medium (equilibrate medium in incubator).
  6. Let the cells spread for a few hr on the patterns (RPE-1 will need at least 2 hr; HeLa cells will need 3 hr).
  7. Add a coverslip on top of the pool to avoid evaporation and medium leakage in case the PDMS breaks.
  8. Put the device on an inverted microscope and start imaging. Avoid the use of oil immersion objectives as it will not work due to focusing problems.

5. Stretching

  1. Turn the micrometric screw while correcting the stage position in the x-, y-, and z-axis (mainly x). The stage position needs to be corrected to counteract the widening of the PDMS and the loss of focus. (See "During the stretch" paragraph in the DISCUSSION).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The technique presented in this video protocol allowed the application of forces on the retraction fibers of mitotic mammalian cells. Indeed, during cell division, at the mitotic stage, mammalian cells retract to take the shape of a sphere and leave behind thin actin cables surrounded by membrane which are attached to the substrate. These cables (retraction fibers), are the memory of the cell geometry before going into division. Making micropatterns with deep UV through a photomask on PDMS thin film (Figure 1

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Although this technique has been used numerous times and is thoroughly tested, there are several critical steps that can lead to a failed experiment.

About the PDMS:

For this work, GelPak, a commercially available thin PDMS sheet, was used. Alternatively PDMS sheets can be cast directly from PDMS mix. We recommend using GelPak because it is more reproducible, and is less likely to break compared to custom made PDMS.

About the device:

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was founded by Institut Curie, Paris, France. The mechanical stretcher was designed by Damien Cuvelier (Institut Curie) and is manufactured by GREM (mecanique-grem.com). The patterning on PDMS was developed by Ammar Azioune (Bordeaux II University).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
GelPakGelPakPF-60-X4Different thickness/stickiness are available. One alternative could be to cast your PDMS yourself.
Silicon greaseGE Bayer SiliconesBaysilone-PasteThis one is biocompatible
Stretching deviceGREM mécaniqueStretcher 2011 
EDC (N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride)Sigma3450Stable 6 months at -20 °C
NHS (N-Hydroxysulfosuccinimide sodium salt)Sigma56485Protect from humidity
Pll-g-peg (PLL(20)-g[3.5]-PEG(2) 20 mg)SurfaceSolutions (Zurich) 
Synthetic Quartz photomaskToppanTake standard binary photomask in Quartz
Fibronectin from bovine plasmaSigmaF1141 

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Vogel, V., Sheetz, M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 265-275 (2006).
  2. Terenna, C. R., et al. Physical mechanisms redirecting cell polarity and cell shape in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 18 (22), 1748-1753 (2008).
  3. Guillot, C., Lecuit, T. Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis. Science. 340 (6137), 1185-1189 (2013).
  4. Bosveld, F., et al. Mechanical control of morphogenesis by Fat/Dachsous/Four-jointed planar cell polarity pathway. Science. 336 (6082), 724-727 (2012).
  5. Farhadifar, R., Roper, J. C., Aigouy, B., Eaton, S., Julicher, F. The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Curr. Biol. 17, 2095-2104 (2007).
  6. Rauzi, M., Verant, P., Lecuit, T., Lenne, P. F. Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1401-1410 (2008).
  7. Mitrossilis, D., et al. Real-time single-cell response to stiffness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (38), 16518-16523 (2010).
  8. Irimia, D., Charras, G., Agrawal, N., Mitchison, T., Toner, M. Polar stimulation and constrained cell migration in microfluidic channels. Lab Chip. 12, 1783-1790 (2007).
  9. Fink, J., et al. External forces control mitotic spindle positioning. Nat. Cell. Biol. 13 (7), 771-778 (2011).
  10. Azioune, A., Storch, M., Bornens, M., Théry, M., Piel, M. Simple and rapid process for single cell micro-patterning. Lab Chip. 9 (11), 1640-1642 (2009).
  11. Azioune, A., Carpi, N., Tseng, Q., Théry, M., Piel, M. Protein micropatterns: A direct printing protocol using deep Uvs. Methods Cell Biol. 97, 133-146 (2010).
  12. Azioune, A., et al. Robust method for high-throughput surface patterning of deformable substrates. Langmuir. 27 (12), 7349-7352 (2011).
  13. Carpi, N., Piel, M., Azioun, A., Cuvelier, D., Fink, J. Micropatterning on silicon elastomer (PDMS) with deep UVs. Protoc. Exch. , (2011).
  14. Sinha, B., et al. Cells respond to mechanical stress by rapid disassembly of caveolae. Cell. 144 (3), 402-413 (2011).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Cell StretchingMicropatterningDeep UV TechniqueMechanical StretcherFibronectin CoatingVideo MicroscopyRetraction FibersMitotic CellsSubstrate Stretching

Related Articles