Delivery remains the main challenge for the therapeutic implementation of small interfering RNA (siRNA). This protocol involves the use of a multifunctional and biocompatible siRNA delivery platform, consisting of arginine and polyethylenimine grafted porous silicon microparticles.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) can be used to suppress gene expression, thereby providing a new avenue for the treatment of various diseases. However, the successful implementation of siRNA therapy requires the use of delivery platforms that can overcome the major challenges of siRNA delivery, such as enzymatic degradation, low intracellular uptake and lysosomal entrapment. Here, a protocol for the preparation and use of a biocompatible and effective siRNA delivery system is presented. This platform consists of polyethylenimine (PEI) and arginine (Arg)-grafted porous silicon microparticles, which can be loaded with siRNA by performing a simple mixing step. The silicon particles are gradually degraded over time, thereby triggering the formation of Arg-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles. This delivery vehicle provides a means for protecting and internalizing siRNA, without causing cytotoxicity. The major steps of polycation functionalization, particle characterization, and siRNA loading are outlined in detail. In addition, the procedures for determining particle uptake, cytotoxicity, and transfection efficacy are also described.
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are double-stranded RNA molecules that can suppress the expression of genes. In recent years, siRNAs have been developed as a new generation of biodrugs that show therapeutic potential for future use in clinical applications1-5. However, the successful implementation of siRNA therapy remains a considerable challenge, due to degradation by nucleases, poor intracellular uptake, low transfection efficiency and inefficient release from the endosome/lysosome5. Many of these hurdles can be overcome by the development of delivery platforms, which can safely and efficiently deliver siRNA to diseased tissue. Compared to viral carriers, non-viral platforms provide several advantages, such as safety, low cost and ease of tailoring. In particular, cationic nanoparticles, such as polymers and lipids, have proved useful for siRNA delivery3.
Previously, we have developed a discoidal drug delivery system, termed the multistage vector (MSV). This platform is based on sequential stages, in which one vehicle is released from another. The first stage vehicle is a microparticle made from biodegradable porous silicon (pSi), while the second stage vehicles are nanoparticles loaded with drugs or contrast agents6,7. The nanoparticles, which are embedded in the pSi material, are gradually released as the Si degrades8. A benefit of using Si particles is that the morphology and surface characteristics can easily be tailored to achieve optimal biodistribution and drug release. Recently, the successful use of the MSV platform for the delivery of siRNA liposomes to tumor tissue was shown in an ovarian and breast cancer mouse model9, 10.
In this work, we have fabricated a universal delivery system for siRNA based on the principals of the MSV platform. The efficacy of this delivery system has previously been demonstrated using different siRNA molecules11. The system is a polycation-functionalized porous silicon (PCPS) carrier, consisting of pSi grafted with polyethylenimine (PEI) and arginine (Arg). PEI can aid in forming electrostatic interactions with siRNA, while Arg and pSi can serve to reduce the toxicity of PEI, as previously demonstarted11. In addition, the presence of PEI can assist in intracellular uptake and endosomal escape, while the pSi microparticles enable siRNA protection and sustained release. The pSi particles gradually degrade under physiological conditions, thereby resulting in the formation of Arg-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles (Figure 1), which have a distinct morphology and a narrow size distribution11. For details regarding the stability of the PCPS/siRNA system, please refer to the study by Shen et al.11. This PCPS platform differs from the conventional MSV, since the second stage nanoparticles are not initially present in the carrier, but are formed over time as the first-stage carrier degrades11, 12. The siRNA loading efficiency, cytotoxicity and gene silencing efficiency of the PCPS system has been evaluated in vitro. Transfection efficiency was measured using siRNA against the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) oncogene, which is involved in DNA repair10. Previously, the suppression of ATM has been shown to decrease tumor growth in a breast cancer model10.
1. PCPS Particle Preparation
2. PCPS Particle Characterization
3. Loading of siRNA into PCPS Particles
4. Optimization of siRNA/PCPS Particle Ratio
5. Release of siRNA from PCPS Particles
6. Confocal Microscopy of PCPS Particles
7. Characterization of Arg-PEI/control siRNA Nanoparticles
8. Cell Culture
9. Confocal Microscopy of Live Cells with PCPS Particles
10. Confocal Microscopy of Fixed Cells with PCPS Particles
11. Flow Cytometry of Cells with PCPS/fluorescent Control siRNA Particles
12. Cell Viability of Cells with PCPS Particles and PCPS/control siRNA Particles
13. Western Blot of Cells with PCPS/ATM Mutated siRNA Particles
This protocol describes the use of a non-viral delivery system for safe and efficient siRNA transfection. The SEM results reveal that the PCPS particles are cylindrical in shape and have a diameter of 2.6 μm (Figure 2A). The particles are positively charged with a zeta potential of approximately +8.21 (Figure 2B), thereby enabling electrostatic binding with negatively charged nucleotides. Confocal images of different layers of the PCPS particles demonstrate that fluorescent control siRNA is loaded inside the porous silicon particles (Figure 2C). The formation and release of Arg-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles from the pSi particles was confirmed with DLS and AFM. The size distribution of the particles ranged from 70-120 nm, with an average size of 94 nm (Figure 2D). AFM images illustrate that the nanoparticles have a spherical shape (Figure 2E).
The ratio of particles to siRNA was optimized by agarose gel electrophoresis to ensure high binding affinity (Figure 3A). A wide range of particle to siRNA ratios was used (2 × 105, 4 × 105, 6 × 105, 8 × 105, 10 × 105 and 12 × 105/0.2 μg siRNA). The results indicate that siRNA can bind tightly to the particles when the particle amount is above 8 × 105. A ratio of 10 × 105 PCPS/0.2 μg siRNA was selected for further experiments. Furthermore, siRNA was successfully released from the carrier when treated with SDS, as illustrated in Figure 3B.
Next, the cellar internalization of PCPS/fluorescent control siRNA particles was evaluated in MDA-MB-231 cells. Confocal images taken after 24 hr of treatment show that the particles are effectively internalized into cells (Figure 4). Similarly, Figure 5 demonstrates that 89% of cells have internalized PCPS/siRNA particles after 24 hr of incubation. Moreover, the internalization process was recorded for 12 hr (Video 1). These results indicate that the PCPS particles can efficiently deliver siRNA into cells. The long-term accumulation of siRNA inside the cells was also evaluated by confocal microscopy. At day 7 and day 10 the siRNA was still detectable inside the cells (Figure 6).
One of the most important factors to consider when developing a siRNA delivery system is the safety of the carrier13. PEI is known to form polyplexes with siRNA, aid in cellular uptake and trigger release from the endosome/lysosome. However, PEI can have toxic effects, due to the presence of positively charged primary amino groups in the backbone14,15. For instance, PEI binding to the glycocalyx on the cell surface can result in the formation of large clusters16. In order to eliminate this charge-induced toxicity, PEI was covalently conjugated to arginine through a bridge linker, to reduce the number of primary amino groups. The cell viability remained over 95% after 48 hr and 72 hr when particles and siRNA were used at a concentration of up to 6 × 105/well and 100 nM, respectively (Figure 7A). Next, the transfection efficacy of siRNA against the oncogene ATM was evaluated in MDA-MB-231 cells. Western blot results demonstrate that the protein levels of ATM are decreased after treatment with PCPS/ATM siRNA (Figure 7B). The results suggest the PCPS platform is a safe and efficient delivery system for siRNA.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of polycation-functionalized porous silicon (PCPS) particles. Arginine (Arg)-polyethylenimine (PEI)/small interfering RNA (siRNA) nanoparticles are formed following the degradation of silicon (Si).
Figure 2. Characterization of PCPS particles. (A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of PCPS particles. (B) Zeta potential of PCPS particles. (C) Confocal images of different layers of the PCPS/fluorescent control siRNA particles. (D) Size distribution of the arginine Arg-PEI/control siRNA nanoparticles released from the porous silicon microparticles. (E) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of Arg-PEI/control siRNA nanoparticles. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Agarose gel for optimization of the PCPS/siRNA delivery system. (A) Binding affinity between PCPS particles and control siRNA. The bands represent unbound siRNA. (B) siRNA release following incubation with 2% SDS for 1 hr. The bands represent total siRNA (unbound and bound). Sample 1: siRNA; sample 2: 2 × 105 PCPS particles/0.2 μg siRNA; sample 3: 4 × 105 PCPS particles/0.2 μg siRNA; sample 4: 6 × 105 PCPS particles/0.2 μg siRNA; sample 5: 8 × 105 PCPS particles/0.2 μg siRNA; sample 6: 10 × 105 PCPS particles/0.2 μg siRNA; sample 7: 12 × 105 PCPS particles/0.2 μg siRNA.
Figure 4. Confocal microscope images of PCPS/fluorescent siRNA particles (red) in MDA-MB-231 cells (24 hr incubation). The nucleus and filamentous actin was visualized with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue) and phalloidin (green), respectively. Three different layers were imaged (top, mid and basal). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5. Quantitative flow cytometry analysis of fluorescent MDA-MB-231 cells after incubation with PCPS/control fluorescent siRNA particles. Untreated cells were used as a negative control. 89% of cells had internalized the particles.
Figure 6. Confocal images of fluorescent control siRNA (red) inside MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were incubated with PCPS/fluorescent control siRNA particles for 1 day, 7 days and 10 days. Cells were then visualized with confocal microscopy. The nucleus and filamentous actin was visualized with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue) and phalloidin (green), respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7. Cell viability and gene silencing in vitro. (A) A cell viability assay of cells incubated with PCPS particles and PCPS/control siRNA particles (Scr). Experiment was performed in triplicate and results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Untreated cells (blank) and cells incubated with PBS were used as controls. (B) Western blot of PCPS/ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) siRNA particles. Cells were exposed to PCPS/control siRNA (Scr) particles and PCPS/ATM siRNA particles. Untreated cells (mock) were used as a control. β-actin was used as a loading control.
Video 1. Time-dependent uptake of PCPS/fluorescent control siRNA particles in live MDA-MB-231 cells. The video was recorded for 12 hr after exposing the cells to particles.
This protocol describes a method for the successful delivery and transfection of siRNA into cells. In particular, the delivery of siRNA is achieved by using a multifunctional platform consisting of polycation-functionalized pSi particles. The use of siRNA therapy has great potential, e.g., cancer treatment, as various oncogenes can be targeted with high specificity. Therefore, there exists a demand to develop siRNA delivery vehicles, which can mitigate the challenges of siRNA therapy. In conclusion, we have outlined a protocol that shows promise for the safe and efficient delivery of siRNA. However, there are some key factors that should be taken into account when performing the described technique. For instance, an important consideration when preparing the PCPS particles is to handle the siRNA carefully, in order to avoid degradation by nucleases. In particular, clean gloves and RNAse free tubes and water should be used at all times when working with siRNA. If the siRNA transfection efficacy is low, a spray that removes RNAse contamination can be used to spray gloves and working areas. In addition, if the transfection is unsuccessful, the siRNA should be tested with a commercial transfection reagent, to determine whether the problem is caused by the siRNA or the particles. Another critical consideration for successful implementation of the PCPS/siRNA delivery system is to take care when performing centrifugation and washing steps. Namely, the supernatant should be fully discarded to remove excess reagents that are required throughout the particle preparation steps.
An important advantage of the PCPS/siRNA delivery system is safety. Several siRNA transfection agents have a high cationic charge, which contributes to cellular toxicity13,15. Indeed, most commercial protocols indicate that the reagents should be incubated with the cells for only a few hours, to avoid cell death. On the contrary, cells can be exposed to the PCPS particles for several days without any signs of toxicity, as is evident from the cell viability results. The PCPS particles can bind siRNA with high affinity due to the presence of PEI. However the charge-induced toxicity of PEI is prevented by the unique setup of the delivery platform. Especially the covalent binding of Arg to PEI and the encapsulation of PEI inside the Si pores contribute to reduced toxicity. Another advantage of the PCPS platform is that siRNA transfection can take place in the presence of serum. Other existing methods usually require the use of serum-free cell culture media, thereby adding additional steps to the transfection process and potentially interfering with regular cell signaling pathways.
An additional benefit of the PCPS system is that it does not require any modification of the siRNA molecules. While some current methods require complicated conjugation steps to stabilize the siRNA or to enable cellular internalization13, the PCPS system relies on simple mixing for siRNA loading. The binding to PEI and the pores in the Si material provide a protective environment for the siRNA, thereby reducing contact with nucleases. The PCPS particles can be stored for prolonged periods of time as dried material or in isopropyl alcohol. Moreover, if the PCPS/siRNA particles are lyophilized they can be stored for at least three months at 4 °C. The lyophilized PCPS particles should be suspended in RNase free water just before transfection, and should not be stored in solution. Finally, the PCPS platform permits sustained release of siRNA, as previously reported11, consequently increasing the time period in which target genes remain suppressed. Accordingly, after cellular internalization, the Si particles gradually degrade, resulting in the formation of Arg-PEI/siRNA nanoparticles. Subsequently, the siRNA is slowly released in the cytoplasm, where it can bind to messenger RNA (mRNA), thereby exerting biological activity. Although, PCPS particles provide several advantages in comparison to existing methods for siRNA delivery, a limitation of the technique is that non-functionalized pSi microparticles are required as a starting material. While the particles can be synthesized using photolithography and electrochemical etching17, these techniques are not readily available at all institutions.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors acknowledge financial support from Houston Methodist Research Institute, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos., 21231007 and 21121061), the Ministry of Education of China (Nos., 20100171110013 and 313058), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program No. 2014CB845604), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Name of the Material/Equipment | Company/Institution | Catalog Number | Comments/Description |
Polyethylenimine (PEI), branched | Sigma-Aldrich | 408727 | Average molecular weight ~25,000 Da |
L-Arginine | Sigma-Aldrich | A5006 | Reagent grade, ≥98% |
Boc-Asp-OH | Sigma-Aldrich | 408-468 | 99% |
(3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane | Sigma-Aldrich | 440140 | 99% |
Hydrogen peroxide solution | Sigma-Aldrich | 216763 | 30 wt. % in H2O |
Sulfuric acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 339741 | 100.00% |
Isopropyl alcohol | Sigma-Aldrich | W292907 | ≥99.7% |
Ethanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 459844 | ≥99.5% |
N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) | Sigma-Aldrich | 03449 | ≥99% |
Albumin from bovine serum | Sigma-Aldrich | A7030-10G | Blocking agent |
Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated siRNA | Sigma-Aldrich | Designed in-house | |
Tris Acetate-EDTA buffer | Sigma-Aldrich | T9650 | For DNA agarose gel electrophoresis |
Penicillin-Streptomycin | Sigma-Aldrich | P4333 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum | Sigma-Aldrich | F2442 | |
TWEEN 20 | Sigma-Aldrich | P1379 | Polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate |
2-Mercaptoethanol | Sigma Aldrich | M6250 | For Western blot |
Sodium dodecyl sulfate | Sigma-Aldrich | L3771 | |
Sodium phosphate monobasic | Sigma-Aldrich | 71496 | For making phosphate buffer |
Sodium phosphate dibasic | Sigma-Aldrich | 71640 | For making phosphate buffer |
Anti-Mouse IgG | Sigma-Aldrich | A4416 | Secondary antibody (anti-mouse) for Western blot |
N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) | Sigma-Aldrich | 130672 | 98% |
CELLSTAR 96W Microplate Tissue Culture Treated Clear w/ Lid | Greiner Bio-One | 655182 | 96-well plate |
10X Tris-Glycine Liquid | Li-Cor | 928-40010 | Transfer buffer for Western blot |
Paraformaldehyde solution 4% in PBS | Santa Cruz | Sc-281692 | Fixation of cells |
CellTiter 96 AQueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS) | Promega | G5421 | Proliferation assay |
Phosphate buffered saline | Fisher Scientific | BP399-500 | 10 X Solution |
Corning cellgro Dulbecco's Modification of Eagle's (Mod.) | Fisher Scientific | MT-15-017-CM | Cell culture media, 1X solution |
Triton X-100 | Fisher Scientific | AC21568-2500 | Octyl phenol ethoxylate, permeabilization agent |
Cover glass | Fisher Scientific | 12-530C | |
Methanol | Fisher Scientific | A412-1 | For Western blot transfer buffer |
Plastic Cuvettes | Fisher Scientific | 14-377-010 | For size measurements using Zetasizer Nano ZS |
Molecular BioProducts RNase AWAY Surface Decontaminant | Fisher Scientific | 14-754-34 | Spray for removing RNAse contamination |
Agarose | Fisher Scientific | BP165-25 | Low melting point, for running RNA samples |
ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI | Invitrogen | P36935 | Antifade reagent with DAPI, nucelus detection |
Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin | Invitrogen | A12379 | Dissolve 300 units in 1.5 ml methanol, detection of filamentous actin |
SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain | Invitrogen | S33102 | Visualization of RNA |
Negative Control siRNA | Qiagen | 1022076 | Control siRNA |
AllStars Neg. siRNA AF 555 | Qiagen | 1027294 | Fluorescent control siRNA |
Cell scraper | Celltreat | 229310 | |
BioLite Multidishes and Microwell Plates | Thermo Scientific | 130184 | 6-well plate |
Pierce LDS Sample Loading Buffer (4X) | Thermo Scientific | 84788 | Sample loading buffer for Western blot |
Pierce BCS Protein Assay Kit | Thermo Scientific | 23227 | Protein quantification assay |
Halt Protease Inhibitor Single-Use Cocktails (100X) | Thermo Scientific | 78430 | Protease inhibitor cocktail, use at 1X |
M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent | Thermo Scientific | 78501 | Protein extraction reagent |
Sorvall Legend Micro 21R | Thermo Scientific | 75002440 | Centrifuge |
Beta Actin Antibody | Thermo Scientific | MA1-91399 | β-actin primary antibody (from mouse) for western blor |
6X TriTrack DNA Loading Dye | Thermo Scientific | R1161 | DNA loading dye |
Nuclease-Free Water | Life Technologies | AM9938 | |
Non-Fat Dry Milk | Lab Scientific | M0841 | For Western blot |
2-well BD Falcon culture slides | BD Biosciences | 354102 | 2-well culture slides |
Amersham ECL Western blot detection reagent. | GE Healthcare Life Sciences | RPN2106 | Western blot detection reagent |
BA Membranes | GE Healthcare Life Sciences | 10402096 | Nitrocellulose membrane for Wester blot |
ATM (D2E2) Rabbit mAb | Cell Signaling | 2873S | ATM primary antibody (from rabbit) for Western blot |
Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody | Cell Signaling | 7074 | Secondary antibody (anti-rabbit) for Western blot |
Folded capillary cells | Malvern | DTS 1061 | For zeta potentail measurements using Zetasizer Nano ZS |
MDA-MB-231 cell line | ATCC | HTB-26 | Mammary Gland/Breast |
12% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Gel | Bio-rad | 456-1043 | For Western blot |
Biorad PowerPac HC | Bio-rad | 164-5052 | Power supply for electrophoresis |
10x Tris/Glycine/SDS Buffer | Bio-rad | 161-0732 | Running buffer for Western blot |
Wide Mini-Sub Cell GT Cell | Bio-rad | 170-4405 | Electrophoresis equipment for DNA agarose gel |
Mini-PROTEAN Tetra cell | Bio-rad | 165-8000 | Electrophoresis equipment for Western blot |
ChemiDoc XRS+ System with Image Lab Software | Bio-rad | 170-8265 | Image acquisition and analysis software for gels and blots |
4" (10cm) dia., 5x7mm diced Silicon Wafer | Ted Pella | 16007 | Silicon waferfor scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy |
Thermomixer R | Eppendorf | 22670107 | Shaker |
Isoton II diluent | Beckman Coulter | 8546719 | Isoton diluent |
Multisizer 4 Coulter Counter | Beckman Coulter | A63076 | Particle counting analyzer |
Non-functionalized porous silicon particles | Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin | Dicoidal shape. 2.6 μm (diameter) x 0.7 μm (hight), provided in isopropyl alcohol | |
Zetasizer Nano ZS | Malvern | Particle analyzer system for size and zeta potential | |
Scanning Electron Microscope | FEI | Particle size and shape | |
Atomic Force Microscope | Bruker | Particle size and shape | |
Fluo ViewTM 1000 Confocal Microscope | Olympus | Visualization of fixed and live cells |