$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The mammalian cochlea is a highly ordered complex organ. In the mouse, between the emergence of the primitive inner ear from the otic vesicle on day E11 and completion of the developmental program at early postnatal stages, multiple waves of cell signaling and coordinated changes in gene expression take place. Running from base to apex of the cochlear duct is the sound detecting sensory epithelium, or organ of Corti. Development of the organ of Corti is exquisitely controlled such that by the end of development, it will consist of a single row of inner hair cells, three rows of outer hair cells interspersed with five rows of supporting cells (two rows of pillar cells, three rows of Deiters’ cells)1. Deviation from this precise order results in hearing loss, highlighting the importance of study of the genesis and patterning of the sensory epithelium2.
In vitro culturing of the embryonic mouse cochlea is an essential tool in studying the mechanisms of development of the organ of Corti. This technique was established in 1974 and over the last 40 years, has been used to elucidate many of the mechanisms by which the sensory epithelium is specified and the organ of Corti established3. The cochlea is a complex organ with dynamic developmental processes; a manipulation may take as long as seven days to manifest1. For example, when adding GSK 3β inhibitors to a cochlear explant culture at E13, the optimal incubation period to observe a robust effect of the compound is six days4.
Live imaging of the developing cochlea allows investigation into changes in the morphology of the organ of Corti, changes in gene expression, tracking of migrating, proliferating or dying cells, and it allows real-time observation of the results of pharmaceutical agents and disruption of signaling pathways. Until now, live imaging of the cochlea has mainly been performed using confocal microscopy to image small areas of the organ of Corti over short time periods5-8, but this technique has limitations due to explant viability. In imaging of the effects of longer-term manipulations on slow developmental processes, the imaging environment is crucial. Typically a confocal live imaging system uses a humidified plastic box that sits on the microscope. Heat and humidity can escape through the gaps in the incubating box where it meets the microscope table, through the access windows, through the hinged openings and through the gaps around various parts of the microscope- such as the objective or the light source. This is not optimal for maintaining healthy explants for more than two or three days.
We define ‘incubator microscope’ as an inverted microscope sealed inside a standard CO2 incubator, rather than an incubator built around the microscope. An incubator microscope extends the life of the experiment such that rather than imaging over two or three days, samples can be imaged for up to two weeks. An incubator microscope provides an excellent environment for cell growth and differentiation, with minimal disturbance to explant cultures and standard controlled conditions. In studies that take place over multiple days it is common to resort to imaging samples on a daily basis by removing them from the incubator and carrying them to an inverted fluorescent microscope. While this approach can work, removing the dishes from the incubator inflicts stress on the sensitive developing tissue. Changes in acidity of the culturing medium and fluctuations in temperature due to removal from the incubator can result in suboptimal development and unhealthy tissue. Imaging the same region at the same focal plane and in the same orientation at every time point is extremely challenging. By using an automated system within an incubator, it is possible to maintain healthy tissue, to collect images at more time points and to ensure that the same area is captured in every frame. In recent years several integrated microscope tissue incubators have been developed, these have been useful not only in clinical practice9 but also in stem cell and cancer research10,11.
Here we present a protocol for long term live imaging of embryonic mouse cochlear explants. We use an automated microscopy system inside a standard CO2 incubator that has the capability to capture images of multiple samples at set time points. The system consists of an inverted microscope set inside an incubator. Samples are placed in a rotating dais that allows imaging of multiple samples at each time point. Illumination, image capture, and rotation of the dais are controlled by an automated system operated through Metamorph software. By setting an imaging routine using the operating software we can set an experiment to run for up to two weeks with minimal human intervention. In this example we use both bright field and fluorescence to show large-scale growth and rearrangement of the cochlea, and specifically, the prosensory region. In this experiment, cochleae will be dissected from Sox2EGFP reporter mice on embryonic day E13. In vitro cultures will be established and then imaged over five days.