$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Activated carbon has unique adsorption properties, such as a developed porous structure, a high specific surface area, and various surface functional groups; therefore, it is employed as an adsorbent in water treatment or purification1,2,3,4. Besides its physical advantages, activated carbon is cost-effective and harmless to the environment, and its raw material (e.g., biomass) is abundant and easily obtained5,6. The physicochemical properties of activated carbon depend on the precursors that are used in its preparation and on the experimental conditions of the activation process7.
Two methods are typically used to prepare activated carbon: a one-step and a two-step approach8. The term one-step approach refers to precursors being carbonized and activated simultaneously while the two-step approach refers to that sequentially. In view of energy conservation and environmental protection, the one-step approach is more preferred for its lower temperature and pressure demanding.
Besides, chemical and physical activation are utilized to improve the textural properties of activated carbon. Chemical activation possesses apparent advantages over physical activation because of its lower activation temperature, shorter activation time, higher carbon yield, and more developed and controllable pore structure in a certain degree9. It has been tested that chemical activation can be performed by impregnating biomass used as feedstock with H3PO4, ZnCl2, or other specific chemicals, followed by pyrolysis to increase the porosity of the activated carbon, because lignocellulosic components of biomass can be easily removed by a subsequent heating treatment, owing to the dehydrogenation capability of these chemicals10,11. Hence, chemical activation greatly enhances the formation of activated carbon's pores or improves the adsorptive performance to contaminants12. An acidic activator is preferred to H3PO4, due to its relatively lower energy demand, higher yield, and less impact on the environment13.
Microwave pyrolysis has the superiority in time savings, uniform interior heating, energy-efficiency, and selective heating, making it an alternative heating method to synthesis-activated carbon14,15. Compared with conventional electric heating, microwave pyrolysis can enhance thermo-chemical processes and promote certain chemical reactions16. Recently, extensive studies have focused on preparing activated carbon by chemical activation from biomass using one-step microwave pyrolysis9,17,18,19. So, it is considerably informative and environment-friendly to synthesis biomass-based activated carbon by microwave-assisted H3PO4 activation.
In addition, to improve the adsorption affinities of activated carbon toward specific heavy-metal ions, modification by heteroatom [N, O, sulfur (S), etc.] doping into carbon structures has been proposed, and this has proven to be a desirable method20,21,22,23,24,25,26. Defective sites in or at the edges of a graphite layer can be replaced by heteroatoms to generate functional groups27. Hence, nitrification and reduction modification are used to modify resultant carbon samples to dope N/O functional groups which play a crucial role in efficiently coordinating with heavy metal to form complexing and ion-exchange28.
Based on the findings above, we present a protocol to synthesize N/O dual-doped mesoporous carbon from biomass by chemical activation and two different pyrolysis methods followed up by modification. This protocol also determines which heating method favors the ensuing modification for doping of the N/O functional groups and, thus, enhancing the adsorption performance.