$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Emergence of M. rotundata is asynchronous without exposure to an environmental cue, with emergence occurring uniformly throughout the day4. However, when exposed to a square-wave thermoperiod (4° C thermoperiod), emergence becomes synchronous to the thermophase4,5. This result is similar to other studies where insects have been found to use thermoperiod cues to regulate emergence, including the flesh fly Sarcophaga crassipalpis6, the onion fly Delia atiqua7 and the boll weevil Anthonomus grandis grandis8. One study has shown that stress during development affects the synchrony of adult emergence in S. crassipaplpis9. Here, we present results from M. rotundata that were exposed to a stress during development, to test the hypothesis that this treatment causes the desynchronization of adult emergence.
Successful run
The user should watch the LCD screen before opening the incubator to make sure insects are no longer emerging. Once the experiment is completed, the SD card is removed and the data can be exported into RStudio as a comma-delimited file to be visualized as a bubble plot, as described earlier. Figure 8 displays bee emergence under a 4° C thermoperiod after exposure to a cold stress during development. The red crosshairs indicate the median time and day of emergence and the file name is the title. This R script should be used to visualize the data, but should not serve as the sole analysis. To analyze emergence response to an environmental cue, the data can be analyzed for rhythmicity (see Analysis).
Complication
When a sensor is clogged with metal BBs, the lack of a signal is repeatedly counted, giving rise to multiple false data points. Figure 9 demonstrates the same dataset presented in Figure 8, but with one of the six channels clogged with BBs, therefore creating the large bubble on the graph. In the event of a clogged sensor, data from this channel can be easily removed from the analysis. Incorporating multiple channels in an experiment is beneficial in minimizing the impact of a clogged sensor.
Analysis
Analyzing data for presence of synchronization can be done by calculating "parameter R," a scalar statistic that identifies if emergence is rhythmic or arrhythmic10,11,12. This is done by calculating the highest number of emerging adults in an 8-hour window, dividing this number by the number of adults emerging outside the 8-hour window, then multiplying by 100. All individuals that emerged should be pooled to calculate the number of emerging adults for each hour of the day. The theoretical range of parameter R is from 0 (all emergence occurs within the gate) to 200 (emergence is distributed uniformly throughout the day)10. R values < 60 are considered rhythmic emergence, 60 < R < 90 are weakly rhythmic, and R > 90 are arrhythmic. R values > 150 indicate uniform distribution of emergence10. Figure 8 shows that emergence is rhythmic with parameter R = 20.21 < 60. Due to the fact that this type of data is distributed around a repeating 24-hour clock, circular statistics must be employed for a more robust analysis (described in detail in Bennett et al., 20185). This can be accomplished via circular statistics packages available for RStudio (Package 'circular'- CRAN.R-project.org).

Figure 1: Additive manufactured components. Using PLA filament, 3D print the required parts for the system. For each channel being constructed, parts needed are 1 collector manifold (green), 1 end cap (red), 6 platform supports (orange), 4 tube rack base plates (purple), and 4 tube rack face plates (yellow). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Tube rack platform assembly. Use hot glue to assemble two tube rack platforms per channel being constructed. Use three platform supports (shown in orange) with a section of corrugated plastic (shown in grey). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Collector manifold x-ray. Insert one infrared detector into one socket of the collector (shown in blue) and the emitter into the second socket (shown in red). Feed the detector wires through the cabling channel (shown in yellow) and pull all four wires through the access hole (highlighted in green). Ensure no bare wires are touching, using hot glue to secure them in place. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Connector wiring. Wiring diagram for the RJ45 jack prior to affixing to the collector manifold, as seen from the bottom of the jack and wiring table for connecting the LCD screen to the central processor. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Ball collector assembly. Using one end cap (shown in red), one collector manifold (shown in green) and a 24 x 30 cm piece of corrugated plastic (shown in light grey) assemble the shell of the ball collector assembly. Use an 8 x 27 cm piece of corrugated plastic (shown in dark grey) to add a ramp. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Central Processor PCB board. The PCB board for the central processor consists of a bottom layer (depicted in green), a top layer (depicted in red), and a silkscreen layer (depicted in blue). Solder female headers to all pass-through holes, except for those for the RJ45 jacks (along the bottom) and for the pull-down resistors (directly above the RJ45 pads). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Final assembly. When in use, the apparatus should be assembled with a tube rack platform on either side of each ball collector being used. Tube racks with attached faceplates should be positioned so that they are at the very edge of the Tube Rack Platform, reducing the possibility of falling BBs bouncing off of the apparatus. The footprint of the assembled apparatus is approximately 25 cm x 35 cm, with a height of 20 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Graph of a typical experimental run after processing in R. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9: Graph of an experiment that suffered from a clogged detector, as shown by the relatively large bubble on day 4. The clogged channel can be removed from the analysis, thereby preserving the remaining data points. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.