Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Bioengineering

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies

Published: February 3, 2023 doi: 10.3791/63275

Summary

Commercial smartwatches equipped with wearable sensors are increasingly being used in population studies. However, their utility is often constrained by their limited battery duration, memory capacity, and data quality. This report provides examples of cost-effective solutions to real-life technical challenges encountered during studies involving asthmatic children and elderly cardiac patients.

Abstract

Wearable sensors, which are often embedded in commercial smartwatches, allow for continuous and non-invasive health measurements and exposure assessments in clinical studies. Nevertheless, the real-life application of these technologies in studies involving a large number of participants for a significant observation period may be hindered by several practical challenges.

In this study, we present a modified protocol from a previous intervention study for the mitigation of health effects from desert dust storms. The study involved two distinct population groups: asthmatic children aged 6-11 years and elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Both groups were equipped with a smartwatch for the assessment of physical activity (using a heart rate monitor, pedometer, and accelerometer) and location (using GPS signals to locate individuals in indoor "at home" or outdoor microenvironments). The participants were required to wear the smartwatch equipped with a data collection application on a daily basis, and data were transmitted via a wireless network to a centrally administered data collection platform for the near real-time assessment of compliance.

Over a period of 26 months, more than 250 children and 50 patients with AF participated in the aforementioned study. The main technical challenges identified included restricting access to standard smartwatch features, such as gaming, internet browser, camera, and audio recording applications, technical issues, such as loss of GPS signal, especially in indoor environments, and the internal smartwatch settings interfering with the data collection application.

The aim of this protocol is to demonstrate how the use of publicly available application lockers and device automation applications made it possible to address most of these challenges in a simple and cost-effective way. In addition, the inclusion of a Wi-Fi received signal strength indicator significantly improved indoor localization and largely minimized GPS signal misclassification. The implementation of these protocols during the roll-out of this intervention study in the spring of 2020 led to significantly improved results in terms of data completeness and data quality.

Introduction

Digital health technology applications and wearable sensors enable non-invasive and cost-effective patient monitoring both in healthcare and home settings1. At the same time, the large amount of data collected and the availability of wearable-based analytic platforms enable the development of algorithms for automated health event prediction, prevention, and intervention for a wide range of acute and chronic diseases2. Commercially available wearable sensors, primarily used for fitness tracking, are also increasingly being used by medical professionals in public health research and represent a promising tool for multimodal and continuous data collection under real-life conditions3. More importantly, though, unbiased data collection from wearables sensors allows researchers to overcome the challenges of recall bias that characterize traditional data collection methods such as interviews and diaries4.

However, for the purposes of clinical trials or other population studies, data accuracy, reliability, and integrity are essential. In addition, the credibility of the collected data may also be affected by several other parameters, such as age-group applicability as well as the memory capacity and energy efficiency of the device5. Recent systematic reviews of laboratory and field-based studies with limited numbers of participants have generally confirmed the applicability of commercial smartwatches for activity, heart rate, seizure, and behavior monitoring, although the reviews have also demonstrated poor suitability for elderly users, as well as battery, memory, and data quality limitations6,7. These limitations may be further amplified in larger population studies under real-life conditions where additional parameters such as inconsistent internet connectivity, device comfort, and incorrect smartwatch use come into play8. Specifically, appearance and inconvenience are significant barriers to wearing sensors daily9, while concerns relating to privacy and confidentiality issues may affect recruitment in studies involving wearable sensors10. Concerning the applicability of commercial smartwatches and fitness trackers for measuring physical activity in research studies, a recent study by Henriksen et al. suggested that the selection of an appropriate device for a particular study should not only be based on the available embedded sensors but rather also take into account validation and previous use in research, appearance, battery life, robustness, water resistance, connectivity, and usability11.

For the purposes of this study, we present a protocol to improve on the challenges encountered during the LIFE MEDEA project, an intervention study for the mitigation of the health effects of desert dust storms12. The study involved two distinct population groups: asthmatic children aged 6-11 years and elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Both groups were equipped with a commercial smartwatch for the assessment of physical activity (using a heart rate monitor, pedometer, and accelerometer) and location (using GPS signals to locate individuals in indoor "at home" or outdoor microenvironments). The participants were required to wear the smartwatch daily, and data were transmitted via a wireless network to a centrally administered data collection platform via the data collection application for the near real-time assessment of compliance. Additional details on the smartwatch and system setup are provided in a previous study13. During the first year of the project implementation, several technical and real-life challenges relating to the device emerged, which affected recruitment, the compliance of participants in wearing the device daily, and the completeness of the collected data. Some challenges were population-specific, such as the requirement of school administrators and many parents that the children wearing the smartwatches should not have access to standard smartwatch features, such as gaming, internet browser, camera, and audio-recording applications. Other challenges were technical in nature, such as loss of GPS signal, especially in indoor environments, and internal smartwatch settings interfering with the data collection application. A detailed overview of the main challenges identified as well as a brief description of their implications and solutions are presented in Table 1.

In this study, we suggest simple, cost-effective, and off-the-shelf solutions to improve user compliance, data quality, and data completeness in population studies employing wearable sensors and provide the relevant protocols. In addition, we demonstrate the data completeness improvements from the implementation of such protocols using representative results from the study13.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

Administrative and ethics approvals were obtained from the Cyprus Ministry of Health (YY5.34.01.7.6E) and the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee (ΕΕΒΚ/ΕΠ/2016.01.23). Patients with atrial fibrillation and the guardians of the asthmatic children provided written informed consent prior to participation in the study.

1. Application lockers and device automation applications

NOTE: Freely available application lockers and device automation applications (taskers) can be found for both Android devices and IOS devices. The specific applications used in the present study are listed in the Table of Materials.

  1. Use a smartphone device preferably equipped with the same Android version as the smartwatch.
    1. From the Play Store, download and install the data collection application, the application locker, and the tasker.
    2. Download a freely available application that can extract the Android application package (APK) of the downloaded applications already installed on the smartphone.
      ​NOTE: The application creates a folder named Extracted-Apks in the internal storage of the smartphone and stores the exported APK files. Save the APK files instead of downloading the application locker and the tasker during the setup of every smartwatch device to ensure that the same versions of the applications are used across all the devices.

2. Development of the automated procedures using the tasker

NOTE: A tasker allows for the step-by-step development of automated processes. These can vary according to the requirements of the project. Previous coding or programming experience is not required. In the following steps, the following terms and definitions are used: trigger (a starting state that, when met, allows the tasker to initiate the process), condition (a condition that, when met, allows the process to continue to the next step), and action (the process outcome). In the provided figures, the parallelogram denotes a trigger, the diamond denotes a condition, and the rectangle denotes an action. Each process may result in more than one action, and these are labeled as actions a, b, c, (...) under each process. A separate process was set up for each individual problem identified during the field implementation of the project. This approach ensured there was no overlap between the conditions set and allowed the smooth operation of the automated process as a whole.

  1. Launch the device automation application, and navigate to the interface to build tasks.
    NOTE: The interface differs between different device automation applications. The steps described below are based on the tasker used in the study presented here12, but similar steps apply across all applications of this kind. Device automation applications allow for the development of different processes (also called macros). All the macros described in this protocol are provided in Supplementary File 1.
    1. To create a process, select Macros.
  2. Create a process that systematically activates the data collection application (Figure 1). Do so by following the steps below.
    1. Add a macro or task by clicking the plus sign. Add a trigger to create a start point for the process. Click on the plus sign on the trigger tab.
    2. Select Date and Time, and select the Regular Interval tab. Do not use a reference time, but set a regular interval.
    3. Set a fixed time interval to act as a trigger to initiate a procedure. Set the interval at 7.5 min, and click on OK.
      NOTE: This condition creates a regular trigger that is executed every 7.5 min. The selection of the trigger interval is based on the battery capacity of the device and other conditions that affect the smooth operation of the data collection application.
    4. To add an action, click on the plus sign on the action tab. Select the Conditions/loops tab. Select the IF clause.
    5. Add a condition by clicking on the plus sign. Select the Date and Time tab. Select Stopwatch. Click on Ok.
    6. Set a fixed duration to be added as a condition. As part of the procedure, the condition being tested is whether a stopwatch value is either >29 min or <1 s.
      NOTE: The former reflects the preference to systematically activate the data collection application every 30 min, and the latter represents the preference to activate the data collection application even in cases when the stopwatch is not working or has stopped.
    7. Change the AND by clicking on the triangle. Select OR.
      NOTE: Whenever one of the conditions is met, the process can continue.
    8. To add an action between the IF statement, click on the End if. Select Add action above.
    9. Navigate to find the Screen tab. Select the action Screen On, and click on Ok.
      NOTE: When the conditions are met, the tasker will enable the screen.
    10. Following similar steps, add a second action that reduces the brightness of the screen to the lowest percentage.
    11. Add an additional action that resets and restarts the stopwatch that is used in this automated process. This creates a loop.
    12. Follow similar steps, and add an action that enables the data collection application. Select Applications.
    13. Select Launch Application. Find and select the data collection application. Select Force NEW, and click on OK.
      NOTE: The process is complete. The trigger, the conditions, and the actions are set. This process systematically enables the data collection application in frequent time intervals to counteract any random application crashing. The action Screen On is designed to prevent the hibernation settings of commercial devices, and the action Brightness to 0% is used to reduce the battery consumption. The action Stopwatch (reset and restart) creates a loop to our overall process. If the condition is met, the following actions are performed by the tasker: (a) launching the data collection application, (b) activating the smartwatch screen, (c) reducing the screen brightness to 0%, and (d) resetting and restarting the stopwatch to create a loop. Action b and action c are designed to counteract the default hibernation settings of commercial devices. Hibernation settings may interfere with the normal operation of smartwatch applications (including the data collection application). Hibernation is resolved by systematically activating the screen (action b), and to reduce the battery consumption, the screen activation is coupled with reducing the screen brightness (action c).
    14. Give a name to this process, and select Save.
  3. Create a process that systematically enables the Wi-Fi of the smartwatch (Figure 2).
    1. Add a trigger to create a start point for the process. Click on the plus sign on the Trigger tab. Select Device Events, and select Screen On/Off. Select Screen On, and click on Ok.
    2. Add an action by clicking on the plus sign on the Action tab. Select the Conditions/loops tab. Select the IF clause. Add a condition by clicking on the plus sign. Select the Connectivity tab. Select Wi-Fi State. Select Wi-Fi disabled, and click on Ok.
    3. Click on the End if. Select Add action above. Select the Connectivity tab. Click on the Wi-Fi Configure tab. Select Enable Wi-Fi, and click on Ok. This is action a of the process in step 2.3.
      NOTE: Upon screen activation and if the Wi-Fi is disabled, the tasker will enable the Wi-Fi.
    4. Add an additional action between the IF statement that resets and restarts Stopwatch_2. This is action b of the process in step 2.3.
      NOTE: The stopwatch is important for disabling the Wi-Fi after a few minutes, which is an action carried out by a different process in the protocol (step 2.5). The smartwatch does not need to be constantly connected to the Wi-Fi as this increases the battery consumption.
    5. Give a name to this process, and select Save.
  4. Create a process that systematically optimizes the battery consumption (Figure 3).
    NOTE: Smartwatch devices usually have default settings to disable the screen after a period of a few seconds. For the device used in our study, this period was 15 s. The testing is presented in step 2.7.
    1. Use the default screen deactivation as a trigger.
    2. Set a condition that tests the combination of whether the smartwatch is not charging and is not connected to a network. If both apply, the process disables the Wi-Fi connectivity to reduce the battery consumption. This is action a of the process in step 2.4.
      NOTE: If the smartwatch is charging, the Wi-Fi must be kept enabled, allowing any data collected during the day to be sent via the Wi-Fi connection to our online server. Usually, charging takes place overnight.
    3. Set a condition that tests whether Bluetooth is enabled. If it is, the Bluetooth is disabled to reduce the battery consumption. This is action b of the process in step 2.4.
    4. Set an additional action that is automatically activated following the trigger. This action sets the screen brightness to 50% (action c of the process in step 2.4).
      NOTE: User interactions may change the brightness levels. Higher levels of screen brightness drain the battery faster, and as a comprise, the screen brightness is set to 50% as the optimal level that allows the user to easily interact with the smartwatch while also conserving the battery.
  5. Create a process that systematically logs event information (Figure 4).
    1. Add a trigger to create a start point for the process. Click on the plus sign on the Trigger tab. Select Date and Time. Select the Regular Interval tab. Do not use a reference time.
    2. Set the regular interval. Set a fixed time interval to act as a trigger to initiate the procedure. Set the interval at 5 min, and click on Ok.
      NOTE: This creates an infinite trigger that is executed every 5 min; the selection of the interval is based on the battery capacity of the device and other conditions dependent on the requirements of the researcher.
    3. To add an action, click on the plus sign on the Action tab. Select Logging. Click on Log Event.
    4. Click the Ellipsis Points tab. Find and select Wi-Fi SSID (Wi-Fi network name), and select Ok.
    5. By clicking again on the Ellipsis Points tab, and following the exact same steps, further add the Wi-Fi signal strength, device serial number, GPS latitude, GPS longitude, accuracy of the GPS signal, as well as whether the smartwatch is charging or not (action a of the process in step 2.5).
      NOTE: This action creates a log event with pre-specified variables relevant to the project.
    6. Give a name to this process, and select Save.
    7. Click on the Logging tab, and set a condition that tests the combination of whether the smartwatch is not charging, the screen is turned off, and the stopwatch described in point
      2.3.3 is >4 min and disables the Wi-Fi when all these conditions are met (action b of the process in step 2.5).
  6. Create a process that provides user notifications if the GPS signal is disabled (Figure 5)
    1. Set the connection to a Wi-Fi network as the trigger.
    2. Set an action that is automatically activated following the trigger. This action creates a log event point similar to that in step 2.5.2 (action a of the process in step 2.6).
      NOTE: This additional log event provides the information regarding the exact time the smartwatch was connected to the home Wi-Fi network.
    3. Set a condition that tests whether the GPS sensor has been disabled, or its accuracy status has been changed, or airplane mode has been enabled. Add an action between the IF statement that displays the notification error "ERROR!!! Please check settings" (action b of the process in step 2.6).
  7. Test each process created.
    1. Click on the Process tab.
    2. Click on the Trigger tab.
    3. Select Test trigger.
      NOTE: Test trigger initiates the actions of the process selected. If the result is the intended one, the process is saved.

3. Exporting the created processes (steps 2.1-2.6)

  1. Export and save the files of the created processes (steps 2.1-2.6) in mdr format (mdr file) in the same smartphone directory as in step 1.1.3.

4. Transferring and installing the files created to the smartwatch

  1. Transfer the files from the smartphone to a laptop/PC.
    1. Connect the smartphone to the laptop/PC.
    2. Find the directory with the extracted APK and mdr files (tasker extension files) created with the device automation application.
    3. Copy and paste all the files into a directory in the laptop/PC.
  2. Transfer the files from the laptop/PC to the smartwatch device.
    NOTE: In the study, the smartwatch was also equipped with a magnetic charger cable that also allowed the transfer of data/files.
    1. Connect the smartwatch with the magnetic charger to the laptop/PC.
    2. Select the option to transfer files on the smartwatch notification panel.
    3. On the laptop/PC, navigate to the directory with the saved files from step 4.1.2.
    4. Copy all the files, and paste them into a directory in the smartwatch.

5. Setting up the smartwatch for field use

  1. Install the applications as well as the processes on the smartphone to the smartwatch.
    1. Navigate to the destination with the pasted files, and install all the APK files. These include the application locker, the tasker, and the data collection application (see Table of Materials).
    2. Install the mdr file that contains the processes created in step 2.
    3. Accept all the permissions that are needed to operate the processes.
      NOTE: The permissions may vary depending on the nature of the created processes.
  2. Set or change the important default settings of the device.
    NOTE: Before the smartwatch is given to a participant, several important settings must be modified.
    1. Swipe the smartwatch screen to left, and navigate to the smartwatch settings function. Click on Settings.
    2. Select Sound, and disable all sounds by minimizing the volume levels of all the individual sound settings. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the main settings screen.
      NOTE: Distractions and unnecessary notifications by the smartwatch are not advised because this will create unnecessary hassle for the participants, especially during school and work hours.
    3. Scroll down, and select the Connect function. Scroll down, and select GPS. Click on Mode, and set the GPS settings to High accuracy.
    4. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the main settings screen.
    5. Scroll down, select the Power saving function, deactivate the Standby intelligence power setting, and check that the battery saver is always turned off. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the main settings screen.
      NOTE: Although the battery consumption must be taken into account, keeping the standard power saving mode activated may interfere with the smooth operation of the applications and negatively affect the data quality and completeness.
    6. Scroll down, and select the Date and time function. Disable the Automatic time zone tab. Scroll down, click on Select time zone, select the correct time zone, and enable the 24-hour format.
    7. Scroll up, enable the Automatic time zone, and check that the Automatic date and time mode is set to Use network-provided time.
      NOTE: This is important to ensure that each sensor measurement is accompanied by the correct timestamp.
    8. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the main settings screen. Scroll down, select More, open the option Background Cleaner, and disable the Battery saver.
      NOTE: All the settings that interfere with the smooth operation of applications in the background must be disabled. In this case, such a setting is the background cleaner, and if it remains enabled, these applications will not be able to work in the background, thus affecting the general setup of the smartwatch and interfering with the data collection approach.
    9. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the More settings screen, scroll down, select the App freeze function, click on Next, scroll down, click on Google Play Store, and select Freeze; the application will be automatically disabled.
      NOTE: If left activated, the Play Store is likely to perform updates. Such updates may interfere with the processes created. In addition, some updates may take place on different days for the different study participants, and, thus, for a duration of time, the data will not be collected in the same manner from all the participants.
    10. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the More settings screen, select the Notifications function, select Google, and block all notifications from this application.
      NOTE: Depending on the device and operating system, other applications may also show notifications.Distractions and unnecessary notifications by the smartwatch are not advised because this will create unnecessary hassle for the participants, especially during school and work hours.
    11. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the More settings screen, scroll down, select the Data Saver function, and disable the data saver. Swipe the screen to the right to return to the More settings screen.
      NOTE: Disable any setting or functionality that may affect data uploading or receiving.
    12. Select the App Settings function, scroll down, select the Special access function, and click on Battery optimization settings. Click on the Triangle, and select All apps.
    13. Scroll down to find the application locker, select the application locker, select Don't optimize, and click on Done. Find all the relevant applications that are used in the smartwatch setup (application locker, tasker, data collection application), and select Don't optimize.
      NOTE: The main applications that perform or support data collection must operate without any battery restrictions.
    14. After finishing the setup, perform a check of the settings that were implemented in this step.
      NOTE: The responsiveness of the touch screen may be lacking, and important modifications to the settings may not have been done correctly, so run a check to make sure that every step was done correctly. Check again that all the sounds and vibrations are minimized, the GPS is in high accuracy mode, and the date and time settings are correct. Furthermore, make sure to disable any settings that interfere with the smooth operation of the applications in the background. Additionally, make sure that any other application that can perform updates is frozen.Disable any settings or functionalities that may affect data uploading or receiving. Make sure that the main applications that perform or support the data collection can operate without any battery restrictions.
  3. Set up the application locker.
    1. From the home screen, navigate to find the installed applications.
    2. Select App Locker.
    3. Select how you want the App Locker to lock the applications (possibilities include the use of a PIN code or pattern code).
    4. Select the applications you want to lock. Among others, the camera, voice recording, browser, and gaming applications can be locked. Activate the App Locker.
    5. Connect the smartwatch to the participant's home Wi-Fi network.
      NOTE: The setup is complete. The smartwatch is ready to be given to a participant.
  4. Allow the participant to use the smartwatch.
    1. Instruct the participants to wear the smartwatch daily and charge the device every night during their sleep.
      NOTE: During the day, the participants were able to use the smartwatch as a normal digital watch and assess their activity levels through the smartwatch pedometer indicator. The participants were not required to carry out any specific tasks for the smartwatch to be able to collect and transmit the data. The configuration of the devices as described in the protocol in combination with the automated processes developed with the tasker minimized the hassle for the participants.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The protocol describes simple and cost-effective solutions to real-life challenges affecting recruitment, compliance, and data quality in population studies employing wearable sensors. The steps described here allowed for the successful setup of a consumer wearable device for exposure and health monitoring in a large population study involving children with asthma and adults with atrial fibrillation. Figure 6 provides a graphical overview of the provided protocols and illustrates the key steps undertaken to address the main underlying issues identified.

Here, we present the representative results from a subset of 17 participants (asthmatic children aged 6-11 years old) who engaged in the LIFE MEDEA study in the spring of 202013. The 17 participants were equipped with a smartwatch that provided time-stamped data on physical activity (pedometer, accelerometer, heart rate) and GPS locations before and after the implementation of the protocol. These data were collected via the data collection application and were automatically synchronized with a cloud-based database when the smartwatch was in contact with the Wi-Fi network inside each participant's home, as described previously13. However, through the application of the described protocol, information on Wi-Fi connectivity, Wi-Fi signal strength, battery capacity, and whether the device was charging or not was also made available. The data on these additional variables were not automatically synchronized with the cloud-based database but had to be manually downloaded from each smartwatch via Bluetooth after the end of the study period. By comparing the data collected for a duration of 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after the protocol implementation, we evaluated the impact of these solutions in improving data completeness, defined as the percentage of time with collected data per day. Figure 7A presents the percentage of time with data before and after protocol implementation for each participant separately, while Figure 7B presents the corresponding distributions of the percentage of time with data for the whole group before and after the protocol implementation. Interestingly, the protocol implementation led to a statically significant increase in data completeness, with the percentage of time with data increasing from a median of 36.5% (min: 9.3%, max: 68.1%) to a median of 48.9% (IQR: 18.4%, 77.8%, = 0.013).

Furthermore, in Figure 8, we present an extreme case of poor GPS data collected during 24 h from a single patient with AF participating in the study. Although the patient was wearing the watch as instructed, the actual raw GPS signal collected was scattered across the 24 h (Figure 8A), and the estimation of the duration of time indoors and the duration of time outdoors was difficult. The implementation of a GPS data filling algorithm (Supplementary Figure 1) allows for replacing missing data with estimated values (Figure 8B). Confirmation that the estimated time indoors and the estimated time outdoors were correct was provided by the logged smartwatch connectivity with the Wi-Fi network signal (Figure 8C). For the same patient, we also showcase another extreme case of a day with poor GPS data collected (Figure 9A). However, in this case, the implementation of the GPS data filling algorithm alone did not accurately estimate all the missing data. Characteristically, the algorithm correctly estimated that the participant was mostly out of their residence between approximately 09:00 to 21:00 that day and that they returned home for a brief period around 18:00, but it failed to capture that the participant also returned home for a period of about 90 min at approximately 13:30 (Figure 9B). Nevertheless, this event was not missed when the data on smartwatch connectivity with the Wi-Fi network signal were also considered (Figure 9C).

Finally, following successful piloting, the protocol was implemented across the full cohort of MEDEA participants during the spring of 2020 in both Cyprus and Greece (n = 108 asthmatic children). However, a few weeks after the smartwatches were distributed to the children and data collection began, the health authorities in Cyprus and Greece enforced a series of public health interventions of increasing intensity to control the COVID-19 pandemic in their respective countries. The public health interventions were initially characterized by social distancing measures and a ban on large public events but quickly escalated to strict national lockdowns during the months of March and April. Considering the unprecedented disturbances in the daily routine and behavior of the population, the decision was taken to continue tracking the location and activity of asthmatic children using the smartwatches during the duration of lockdowns to objectively quantify their compliance with the public health intervention measures and overall changes in physical activity. The data collected were used to calculate individual profiles of daily "fraction time spent at home" and "total steps/day" and were analyzed statistically to assess changes in these parameters over the escalating levels of the COVID-19 lockdown measures. The timeline and description of the escalating levels of the COVID-19 lockdown measures in the two countries are presented in Figure 10 and are described in detail by Kouis et al. in an earlier publication13. In summary, the results indicated a statistically significant mean increase in "fraction time spent at home" in both countries across the increasing intervention levels. The mean increase in "fraction time spent at home" was equal to 41.4% and 14.3% (at level 1), 48.7% and 23.1% (at level 2), and 45.2% and 32.0% (at level 3) for Cyprus and Greece, respectively. Physical activity in Cyprus and Greece demonstrated significant mean decreases of −2,531 and −1,191 steps/day (at level 1), −3,638 and −2,337 steps/day (at level 2), and −3,644 and −1,961 steps/day (at level 3)in Cyprus and Greece, respectively13. The weekly averages of "fraction time spent at home" and "total steps/day"in asthmatic children before COVID-19 and during the three levels of COVID-19 lockdown measures are displayed in Figure 1113.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT:
The anonymized dataset has been submitted to Figshare online open-access repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21601371.v3).

Table 1: Real-life challenges identified in relation to the use of smartwatch devices and the employed solutions. Please click here to download this Table.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Activating the data collection application. Schematic diagram of the process to systematically activate the data collection application. The parallelogram denotes a trigger, the diamond denotes a condition, and the rectangle denotes an action. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Enabling Wi-Fi connectivity. Schematic diagram of the process to systematically enable Wi-Fi connectivity. The parallelogram denotes a trigger, the diamond denotes a condition, and the rectangle denotes an action. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Optimizing battery consumption. Schematic diagram of the processes leading to actions that systematically optimize the battery consumption. The parallelogram denotes a trigger, the diamond denotes a condition, and the rectangle denotes an action. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Logging event information. Schematic diagram of the processes that systematically log event information relevant to the project. The parallelogram denotes a trigger, the diamond denotes a condition, and the rectangle denotes an action. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: User notification if the GPS signal is disabled. Schematic diagram of the processes that systematically check the GPS signal status and provide notifications to alert users of problems. The parallelogram denotes a trigger, the diamond denotes a condition, and the rectangle denotes an action. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Schematic overview of the protocols. Schematic overview of the underlying challenges identified and the provided protocols with an illustration of the key steps in the processes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7
Figure 7: Data completeness before and after the implementation of the protocol. Data completeness for a representative group of participants (n = 17) for a period of 2 weeks before and after implementation of the protocol. (A) The percentage of time with data before and after the protocol implementation for each participant separately. (B) The corresponding distributions for the whole group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8
Figure 8: Implementation of the GPS data filling algorithm (extreme case 1). (A) Example case of a day with poor raw GPS signal data and (B) the implementation of the GPS data filling algorithm to replace the missing data with estimated values. (C) The confirmation of indoor and outdoor classifications based on the Wi-Fi received signal indicator. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9
Figure 9: Implementation of GPS data filling algorithm (extreme case 2). (A) Example case of a day with poor raw GPS signal data and (B) the implementation of the GPS data filling algorithm to replace the missing data with estimated values. (C) The GPS data filling algorithm led to some indoor and outdoor misclassification, which was resolved using the Wi-Fi received signal indicator. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10
Figure 10: Timeline of public health interventions in Cyprus and Greece. Timeline of the study recordings in relation to the introduction of public health interventions in (A) Cyprus and (B) Greece during March and April 2020.The image is reproduced under license CC BY 4.0, without any changes, from the original study by Kouis et al., first published in Scientific Reports Journal13. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 11
Figure 11: Changes in mobility in response to public health interventions among asthmatic children. Weekly averages of the fraction time spent at home and steps/day of asthmatic children before and during the three levels of public health interventions in (A) Cyprus and (B) Greece. The image is reproduced under license CC BY 4.0, without any changes, from the original study by Kouis et al., first published in Scientific Reports Journal13. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Supplementary Figure 1: The implementation of a GPS data filling algorithm. Please click here to download this File.

Supplementary File 1: The macros described in this protocol. Please click here to download this File.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Wearable sensors are useful tools that allow the continuous and non-invasive monitoring of health parameters and patient behavior. Commercial smartwatches, which are equipped with a variety of sensors, provide a promising alternative to traditional data collection methods, and their use in clinical and public health research is only expected to rise as a result of increased variety and quality of built-in sensors, stronger academic-industry partnerships, and reductions in retail prices14. In this study, we highlight real-life challenges that may affect recruitment, user compliance, and data quality in population studies and provide examples of simple and cost-effective solutions to overcome them in the field. The implementation of this protocol during the roll-out of the study13 led to significantly improved results in terms of data completeness and data quality. The most critical steps within the protocol are step 2.2 (which ensures the systematic activation of the data collection application at regular time intervals), step 2.5 (which provides a separate log of important events about the smartwatch status), and step 5.2.8 (which allows the uninterrupted operation of the smartwatch background processes).

In the past, several studies have addressed the validity of consumer wearable devices for a variety of health and activity endpoints, and the results were recently synthesized in a large systematic review and meta-analysis15. However, of the total 169 studies identified in the systematic review, only 48 involved populations in a free-living environment, while only 36 studies involved populations with any kind of mobility limitation or a chronic disease. Although the authors concluded that, overall, the commercial devices are accurate for measuring steps and heart rate, especially in laboratory-based settings, they highlighted the risk of overestimation or underestimation in free-living environments, while differences in the usability and validity of measurements between healthy controls and chronic patients were not explored15. Both points are particularly important as one of the main arguments for shifting to digital health is to enable the monitoring of patients with chronic diseases outside of healthcare settings16.

Nevertheless, some prior studies have focused on and quantified problems encountered by participants and researchers during the rollout of clinical studies in free-living environments involving consumer wearable devices17,18,19. In a well conducted feasibility study that involved a small number of participants (n = 26) but observed them for a significant time period (3 months), Beukenhorst et al. reported that, on average, patients wore the watch on 73% of the days and that temporary and permanent non-usage increased over the study weeks17.

In a much larger group, Galarnyk et al. reported that from a total 230 individuals recruited in the study and provided with a smartwatch, only 130 (57%) used it at least once and successfully transmitted some data18. Furthermore, some studies have also highlighted the fact that during the implementation phase, intensive technical support is required18,19. Characteristically, in the Parkinson@Home Study, the authors reported an 88% data completeness rate but also highlighted that almost all participants required at least one support call for device troubleshooting during the 3 month study period19. We reported a similar experience in our study13, although official records of troubleshooting calls and house visits were not kept.

In our study, we also focused on data quality issues related to GPS signals. We had to construct individual participant exposures in outdoor and indoor (at home) microenvironments, a task complicated by the frequent and persistent loss of signal, especially in indoor environments, and for this reason, we developed a data filling algorithm, as suggested in previous studies20,21. Although, the algorithm performed reasonably well, the inclusion of a Wi-Fi received signal strength indicator, as collected by the tasker application, significantly improved the performance of the algorithm and largely minimized misclassification. The utility of this Wi-Fi received signal strength indicator has also been demonstrated in previous studies focusing on indoor localisation22,23, and when coupled with GPS measurements, this indicator can provide a valid measurement of 24 h individual exposure to outdoor and indoor microenvironments.

Finally, the protocol suggested here was implemented and tested in real-life conditions in the spring of 2020 both in children and elderly individuals. Although each solution suggested is simple and does not require prior programming knowledge, all the solutions together addressed all the main issues identified, notably by improving and systematizing the data collection, reducing the battery consumption, blocking unwanted applications and smartwatch settings, and improving the GPS signal. However, the processes, as described in the protocol, were only tested with a smartwatch device using Android version 7.1.1. Although it is possible that the direct replication of these processes will be possible with other Android versions, we cannot exclude the possibility that some adjustments may be required, and as a result, the direct generalizability of the protocol may be limited. In addition, the protocol may have to be modified to reflect variations in the technical specifications of other smartphone devices. For example, the time trigger for data collection may be set according to the battery capacity of the smartwatch device or depending on the time resolution required for the collected variables. Nevertheless, even if the application of this protocol to a different smartphone device or a different Android version may require troubleshooting and the modification of some of the individual steps, overall, similar steps will have to be undertaken (or it will have to be confirmed that certain steps are not required) during the setup of any smartwatch prior to it being given to a study participant. The level of detail provided in the protocol allows for the easy adaptation of these solutions to any smartwatch device. Furthermore, this work did not aim and was not originally designed to assess the reasons that may affect user compliance with wearable devices during the performance of population studies. Future studies using appropriate tools and methodologies are required to further examine this topic. Such studies can provide the additional evidence needed to efficiently improve the existing methods of incorporating wearable devices into research studies, especially under real-life conditions.

Currently, the existing methods are quite limited and primarily include the development of an extended support system (initial training, a user manual, a helpline, and on-site visits)19. In addition, a previous study highlighted that in digitalized clinical trials, a significant dropout rate should be expected and a priori contingency plans, such as access to a wider participant recruitment pool, are required18. The incorporation of the solutions presented in this study can complement and, more critically, reduce the burden on the extended support system while increasing the data completeness and data quality. In addition, based on the observations by Galarnyk et al., making the initiation of device use as easy as possible may further ensure compliance and reduce dropout rates18. Finally, future applications of some of these solutions, especially the use of device automation applications, include the further customization of commercial devices to support mobility in the elderly or in persons with disabilities24,25, support early warning systems26, and ensure Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity in Internet of Bodies (IoB) applications27.

In summary, this work provides a protocol that includes simple and cost-effective solutions to real-life challenges affecting recruitment, compliance, and data quality in population studies employing consumer wearable devices. The protocol relies on freely available software tools and does not require any previous programming knowledge. This approach can be easily replicated or adapted by health researchers working with wearable devices in the fields of clinical research and public health.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the participants and their families, as well as to the teaching and administrative personnel of the participating primary schools in Cyprus and Greece. The study was financed by the European Union LIFE Project MEDEA (LIFE16 CCA/CY/000041).

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
APK Extractor Meher Version 4.21.08 Application
Charger/Adaptor with data cable Jiangsu Chenyang Electron Co. Ltd C-P17 Charger
Embrace application EmbraceTech LTD Version 1.5.4 Application
LEMFO LF25 Smartwatch Shenzhen domino Times Technology Co. Ltd DM368 Plus Smartwatch
Lock App - Smart App Locker ANUJ TENANI Version 4.0 Application
Macrodroid-Device Automation ArloSoft Version 5.5.2 Application
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Xiaomi M1804C3CG Smartphone

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Alami, H., Gagnon, M. P., Fortin, J. P. Digital health and the challenge of health systems transformation. mHealth. 3, 31 (2017).
  2. Dunn, J., Runge, R., Snyder, M. Wearables and the medical revolution. Personalized Medicine. 15 (5), 429-448 (2018).
  3. Bietz, M. J., et al. Opportunities and challenges in the use of personal health data for health research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 23, 42-48 (2016).
  4. Coughlin, S. S. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 43 (1), 87-91 (1990).
  5. Munos, B., et al. Mobile health: The power of wearables, sensors, and apps to transform clinical trials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1375 (1), 3-18 (2016).
  6. Reeder, B., David, A. Health at hand: A systematic review of smart watch uses for health and wellness. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 63, 269-276 (2016).
  7. Trifan, A., Oliveira, M., Oliveira, J. L. Passive sensing of health outcomes through smartphones: Systematic review of current solutions and possible limitations. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 7 (8), 12649 (2019).
  8. Rodgers, M. M., Alon, G., Pai, V. M., Conroy, R. S. Wearable technologies for active living and rehabilitation: current research challenges and future opportunities. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. 6, 2055668319839607 (2019).
  9. Huberty, J., Ehlers, D. K., Kurka, J., Ainsworth, B., Buman, M. Feasibility of three wearable sensors for 24 hour monitoring in middle-aged women. BMC Women's Health. 15, 55 (2015).
  10. Schall, M. C., Sesek, R. F., Cavuoto, L. A. Barriers to the adoption of wearable sensors in the workplace: A survey of occupational safety and health professionals. Human Factors. 60 (3), 351-362 (2018).
  11. Henriksen, A., et al. Using fitness trackers and smartwatches to measure physical activity in research: Analysis of consumer wrist-worn wearables. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 20 (3), 9157 (2018).
  12. Kouis, P., et al. The MEDEA childhood asthma study design for mitigation of desert dust health effects: Implementation of novel methods for assessment of air pollution exposure and lessons learned. BMC Pediatrics. 21, 13 (2021).
  13. Kouis, P., et al. Use of wearable sensors to assess compliance of asthmatic children in response to lockdown measures for the COVID-19 epidemic. Scientific Reports. 11, 5895 (2021).
  14. Arigo, D., et al. The history and future of digital health in the field of behavioral medicine. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 42 (1), 67-83 (2019).
  15. Fuller, D., et al. Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: Systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 8 (9), 18694 (2020).
  16. Majumder, S., Mondal, T., Deen, M. J. Wearable sensors for remote health monitoring. Sensors. 17 (1), 130 (2017).
  17. Beukenhorst, A. L., et al. Engagement and participant experiences with consumer smartwatches for health research: Longitudinal, observational feasibility study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 8 (1), 14368 (2020).
  18. Galarnyk, M., Quer, G., McLaughlin, K., Ariniello, L., Steinhubl, S. R. Usability of a wrist-worn smartwatch in a direct-to-participant randomized pragmatic clinical trial. Digital Biomarkers. 3 (3), 176-184 (2019).
  19. de Lima, A. L. S., et al. Large-scale wearable sensor deployment in Parkinson's patients: The Parkinson@ home study protocol. JMIR Research Protocols. 5 (3), 5990 (2016).
  20. Steinle, S., Reis, S., Sabel, C. E. Quantifying human exposure to air pollution-Moving from static monitoring to spatio-temporally resolved personal exposure assessment. Science of the Total Environment. 443, 184-193 (2013).
  21. Dias, D., Tchepel, O. Modelling of human exposure to air pollution in the urban environment: a GPS-based approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 21 (5), 3558-3571 (2014).
  22. Chen, W., Kao, K., Chang, Y., Chang, C. An RSSI-based distributed real-time indoor positioning framework. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI). , 1288-1291 (2018).
  23. Nagah Amr, M., El Attar, H. M., Abd El Azeem, M. H., El Badawy, H. An enhanced indoor positioning technique based on a novel received signal strength indicator distance prediction and correction model. Sensors. 21 (3), 719 (2021).
  24. Lancioni, G. E., et al. An upgraded smartphone-based program for leisure and communication of people with intellectual and other disabilities. Frontiers in Public Health. 6, 234 (2018).
  25. Lancioni, G. E., et al. People with intellectual and visual disabilities manage functional occupation via basic technology providing spatial cues and timely repetition of response-related instructions. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. 6 (1), 11-19 (2022).
  26. Rao, S. IoT enabled wearable device for COVID safety and emergencies. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 3 (3), 146-154 (2021).
  27. Brunschwiler, T., et al. Internet of the body-Wearable monitoring and coaching. 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS). , 1-6 (2019).

Tags

Wearable Devices Exposure Monitoring Health Monitoring Population Studies Smartwatches Atrial Fibrillation Asthmatic Children Physical Activity Assessment Location Tracking Data Transmission Wireless Network Compliance Assessment Data Quality Assessment Data Completeness Improvement Device Automation Application Macro/task Creation Trigger Setup Regular Interval Setting
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Michanikou, A., Kouis, P.,More

Michanikou, A., Kouis, P., Karanicolas, K., Yiallouros, P. K. Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies. J. Vis. Exp. (192), e63275, doi:10.3791/63275 (2023).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter