Ocular diseases encompass a broad range of both genetic and acquired disorders. In 2015, an estimated 36 million people were legally blind worldwide, and over 1 billion people suffer from at least some level of visual impairment, highlighting the need to scale up alleviation efforts at all levels1. The main methods for delivering ocular medications include both topical and local administration, such as eye drops or subconjunctival (SCJ), intracameral, intravitreal, and subretinal injections. Although noninvasive topical therapy is the most common delivery method for ophthalmic drugs and is extensively used for many anterior segment disorders, the presence of corneal anatomical barriers presents a challenge for the bioavailability, biodistribution, and efficacy of topically administrated substances, suggesting that it may not be the best candidate treatment route for many diseases of the inner eye. Local injection into the specific ocular compartment affected by the disease is likely to be a more effective and targeted drug delivery approach2. However, adverse effects resulting from repeated injections can complicate administration strategies. Ideally, a therapy should maintain long-term therapeutic efficacy following a single administration. Thus, gene therapy is a promising option for minimizing the number of required injections and providing sustained transgene expression for the treatment of ocular disease3,4.
Numerous viral and nonviral vectors are available for gene therapy; however, AAV vectors are of high interest due to their excellent safety profile. AAV is a small, single-stranded, non-enveloped DNA virus that was initially discovered as a contaminant of an adenovirus preparation in 1965 by Atchison et al.5,6 AAV was subsequently engineered as an efficient viral vector for gene delivery in the 1980s and has become the gene therapy vector of choice for many diseases, including ocular disorders, over the last few decades. The most notable of these is the first commercially available gene therapy drug, voretigene neparvovec, which was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat Leber's Congenital Amaurosis, a rare posterior eye disease. Although voretigene neparvovec has successfully overcome barriers to clinical development, challenges remain for the commercialization of additional ocular gene therapies. For example, voretigene neparvovec is administered to patients who retain viable retinal cells via subretinal injection. Thus, patients with more advanced forms of the disease who lack viable retinal cells are not eligible for treatment, as it would provide no clinical benefit. In addition, known complications associated with the subretinal injection procedure were observed, including eye inflammation, cataracts, retinal tearing, maculopathy, and pain7,8. Other concerns related to this procedure include the possibility of hemorrhage, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, and revocation of the ocular immune privileged status through eye tissue destruction9,10,11,12. Thus, efforts to explore less invasive gene delivery routes such as SCJ injection have become increasingly important13,14,15,16,17.
The conjunctiva is a thin membrane containing 3-5 layers of cells and connecting the anterior eye to the interior eyelid. SCJ injections are used clinically for ophthalmic drug delivery to both the anterior and/or posterior segments of the eye for the treatment of ocular diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, retinitis, and posterior uveitis18,19. They are relatively simple to perform, employed routinely for ophthalmic drug delivery in an outpatient setting20, somewhat painless, do not compromise ocular immune privilege, and allow administered drugs to spread through a large periorbital region that encompasses the optic nerve. Hence, SCJ injections are an attractive route of administration for AAV gene therapy applications. Natural AAV serotypes administered via SCJ injection in mice have previously been characterized for safety, transduction efficiency, serum immunogenicity, biodistribution, and tissue specificity13,16,21. These data demonstrated that gene delivery to individual ocular tissues via SCJ administration is a formal possibility.
This paper describes a simple and adaptable protocol for SCJ injection to deliver AAV vectors in a mouse model. To ensure the reproducibility of this approach, an injection system consisting of a stereomicroscope, a programmable infusion/withdrawal syringe pump (which allows consistent and precise injection speed and pressure), and a gastight removable syringe coupled with microinjection needles is described. This system is adaptable for other intraocular administration routes such as intrastromal, intracameral, intravitreal, and subretinal injections in small animals. In addition, a fluorescein dye is often utilized to allow for visualization of the AAV injection site. The key practical steps in the administration route, setup for the injection platform, preparation of the injection, and tips from direct experience will be discussed in detail. Finally, common validation techniques for confirmation of AAV delivery to the desired tissues will be briefly discussed.