Transepicardial intramyocardial injection
This procedure has the benefit of direct cardiac visualization and has been demonstrated to provide greater local retention of therapeutics than systemic administration methods9,10,14. However, thoracotomies are invasive, require considerable technical skill, and present a greater risk of morbidity and mortality than other methods discussed10,15. Knowledge of the critical and precarious stages of the procedure can assist in the mediation of this increased risk.
Great care must be exercised upon manipulating the heart to expose the cardiac apex due to the high risk of arrhythmia and associated hemodynamic compromise. Continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring and electrocardiography allow for rapid identification of hypotension or unstable arrhythmias, facilitating prompt intervention and correction. Transient hypotension can generally be treated with metaraminol boluses. Sustained hypotension may be temporized by reducing inhalant anaesthetic (careful monitoring of anaesthetic depth) and commencing a vasopressor infusion, while concurrently determining the cause of altered hemodynamics. Unstable arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, can be treated by electrical cardioversion with or without intravenous antiarrhythmics.
Equally important for animal survival is the successful removal of free gas from the pleural cavity before closing the chest. Failure to do so can culminate in developing a pneumothorax, leaving the animal at great risk of respiratory compromise and death once disconnected from the mechanical ventilator at recovery. Positive airway pressure must be maintained for at least 30 s until bubbling is no longer observed. The silicone tubing is promptly removed upon the cessation of bubbling, and the thorax is then rapidly closed. It is also possible to surgically place a thoracostomy tube at closure, allowing manual air and inflammatory fluid removal over the next 24-72 h. This, however, is difficult to keep clean and intact, especially if animals are housed together. Damage or contamination of the tube can lead to pyothorax, pneumothorax, or sepsis. In our experience, inserting a temporary chest drain is not required if free gas is adequately removed prior to chest closure.
Percutaneous transendocardial intramyocardial injection
This method of therapeutic administration has the benefit of allowing for local tissue delivery with lower risk due to its less invasive nature compared with a surgical approach10,14. This technique is already used in large animal studies, with both fluoroscopy and electromechanical mapping as a guide in the absence of direct visualization10,16,17.
Given the heart isn't under direct vision, it is prudent for the proceduralist to use orthogonal fluoroscopic views when selecting an injection site. Furthermore, the injection of diluted iodine contrast before and delivery of the therapeutic is extremely valuable in confirming myocardial contact. Appropriate contact can be confirmed by observing a characteristic 'myocardial blush', which may be one of the only markers of injection success prior to tissue harvest. Due to the risk of chamber perforation, the myocardial wall thickness at the selected injection site is also recommended to be greater than 9 mm14,16.
Jugular venous osmotic minipump
The osmotic minipump is a popular device commonly employed in small animal studies. There has been increasing interest in using this device in large animal models7,18,19, given its unique advantage of administering a therapeutic agent at a consistent rate over a set time period. A possible limitation of this method is the inability to alter or stop infusion rates of the drug without replacing or removing the pump. This should be considered before trialing therapy in this manner.
This study demonstrated that this method could be performed with a high success rate in swine, with low morbidity and mortality. It must be noted that many vital structures are adjacent to the surgical site, including lymph nodes, the thymus, and the carotid artery. Adherence to the method, and consultation of anatomical texts20, are strongly recommended to prevent inadvertent damage to any of these structures. The most concerning complication of this method is hemorrhagic shock due to inadvertent injury to the jugular vein or a surrounding structure. It is therefore critical that the soft tissue surrounding the jugular vein is carefully removed. Failure to properly complete this step can lead to difficulty in placing the minipump tubing or controlling inadvertent bleeding.
This article has described three methods for the delivery of cardioactive therapeutics. Despite the reported success of each technique, there are inherent limitations to be considered. Invasive procedures (transepicardial injection) allow for increased accuracy of therapeutic delivery; however, they bring a greater risk of potentially fatal complications. Furthermore, invasive delivery has a greater requirement for technical skills to minimize the risk of complications. Similarly, fluoroscopic-guided, transendocardial injection requires a degree of technical skill for catheterization and manipulation of hardware. If this method is performed improperly, injection failure and fatal complications are possible.
The direct injection methods described allow for the one-off administration of a therapeutic into the target tissue. The jugular venous osmotic minipump allows for the systemic administration of a therapeutic over a 7 day period. Comparatively, this method is simpler and associated with less risk, however, it relies on a systemic therapeutic finding its way to the myocardium. Additionally, once the pump is in place, it is impossible to discontinue administration or alter the dose rate without re-anaesthetizing the animal and removing the pump.
All methods described in this article were performed on animals on the day or 2 weeks after myocardial infarction. Therefore, this work cannot report the success of mentioned methods in healthy animals or animals subjected to an alternative cardiac pathology. Finally, the pharmacology and biotechnology of any intended agent are to be carefully considered, as this will be inherently linked to the efficacy of the chosen delivery route. A detailed discussion of this is beyond the scope of this manuscript.
Comprehensive depictions of preclinical methods benefit animal welfare and the wider scientific community. The resultant enhanced reproducibility of procedures and results leads to fewer animal health complications, reduced number of animals required to produce significant results, and greater confidence in experimental outcomes21,22. Three methods of administration of novel therapeutics are described in this article for the treatment of myocardial infarction in a porcine model. By detailing the techniques used and articulating the benefits and risks of each, it is anticipated that researchers will be able to comfortably create consistent and reliable preclinical models that suit their research goals.