JoVE Science Education
Sensation and Perception
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Science Education Sensation and Perception
The Rubber Hand Illusion
  • 00:00Overview
  • 01:09Experimental Design
  • 02:21Running the Experiment
  • 04:13Representative Results
  • 05:20Applications
  • 07:34Summary

고무 손 환상

English

Share

Overview

출처: 조나단 플롬바움 연구소 -존스 홉킨스 대학

물체에 도달, 장애물을 타격하지 않고 걷고, 앉아서 의자에 착륙 (바닥에 떨어지는 대신), 이러한 모든 물리적 행동은 공간에서 우리 자신의 몸을 인식할 수있는 능력에 달려 있으며, 우리의 팔다리가 서로 상대적이며 전 세계에 비해 어디에 있는지 알 수 있습니다. 인간의 뇌가이 정보를 인코딩하는 한 가지 방법은 proprioception이라고하며, 뇌는 사지를 추적하기 위해 자체 제어 및 피드백 신호에 의존합니다. 인간의 뇌는 포만입력과 함께 시야, 터치, 심지어 사운드를 통합하여 공간에서 신체의 일부를 표현합니다. 이 모든 정보를 어떻게 결합합니까? 1998년, 보비닉과 코헨은 인간의 뇌가 우주에서 몸을 표현하기 위해 감각과 선전 입력을 통합하는 방법을 조사하는 데 사용되어 온 고무 손 환상이라고 불리는 놀라운 환상을 묘사했습니다. 1 이 비디오는 고무 손 환상을 유도하는 방법을 설명하고 후속 연구에 의해 사용 된 방법을 설명합니다.

Procedure

1. 재료 이 실험에는 고무 손, 페인트 브러시 2개, 폐막상자 의 세 가지 중요한 장비가 필요합니다. 폐막 상자를 구축하려면 높이가 약 1피트이고 길이가 2피트인 골판지 조각이 필요합니다. 중간 아래로 직선을 그린 다음 두 사각형의 중간에 손과 팔이 통과 할 수있을만큼 큰 터널을 잘라. 그림 1은 작업 참가자의 관점에서 볼 수 있듯이 상자의 이 부분의 회로도 도면을 보여 주며, 이는 작업 참가자의 관점에서 볼 수 있습니다. 그림 1: 참가자의 관점에서 볼 수 있는 폐백상자의 회로도 도면입니다. 골판지 벽의 두 구멍은 참가자가 편안하게 팔을 삽입 할 수있을만큼 큽합니다. 이 그림의 더 큰 버전을 보려면 여기를 클릭하십시오. 다음으로, 골판지 상자의 한쪽에는 불투명한 상의와 상자의 두 반쪽 사이에 불투명한 칸막이가 부착됩니다. 참가자의 실제 팔은 상자의 이 부분으로 들어가며, 참가자가 시각적으로 가려집니다. 도 2는 실험을 수행하는 사람의 관점에서 볼 수 있듯이 이 첨부 파일이 있는 완성된 상자의 회로도 도면을 나타낸다. 그림 2: 실험자의 관점에서 볼 수 있는 폐백상자의 회로도 도면. 골판지 벽의 두 구멍은 참가자가 편안하게 팔을 삽입 할 수있을만큼 큽합니다. 불투명 한 상단의 측면은 참가자가 실제 팔을 삽입하는 측면으로 실험자가 실험 중에 브러시 할 수 있습니다. 다른 쪽은 실험 중에 고무 팔이 앉을 곳입니다. 이 그림의 더 큰 버전을 보려면 여기를 클릭하십시오. 마지막으로 참가자가 환상을 경험한 정도를 평가하기 위해 설문조사를 수행해야 합니다. 그림 3은 보비닉과 코헨이 사용하는 방법을 직접 모델링한 이러한 설문 조사입니다. 1 그림 3: 저울을 가진 설문조사 질문. 이 설문조사는 실험 후 참가자가 환상을 경험한 정도를 평가하는 데 사용됩니다. 이 그림의 더 큰 버전을 보려면 여기를 클릭하십시오. 2. 환상을 유도 참가자의 환상을 유도하려면, 폐막 상자의 평평한 측면 앞에 테이블에 그녀를 앉는다. 왼쪽 팔을 왼쪽 어깨에서 가장 먼 구멍에 편안하게 삽입할 수 있도록 상자를 배치해야 합니다. 참가자가 편안하게 앉아 팔을 삽입하면 고무 팔을 배치하여 참가자에게 가까운 구멍에서 빠져 나옵니다. 참가자에게 왼팔과 손가락을 가능한 한 적게 움직이라고 지시합니다. 참가자에게 폐막벽 너머로 보라고 한다. 그녀의 팔은 바클루더 상자의 상자 부분 안에 있기 때문에 보이지 않습니다. 그러나 고무 팔은 그녀에게 완전히 볼 수 있어야합니다. 이제 참가자 앞에 앉아 페인트 브러시로 실제 손과 고무 손을 천천히 브러시합니다. 동기화에서 브러시를 시도합니다. 10분 동안 칫솔질을 계속합니다. 참가자는 칫솔질 기간 동안 반응할 수 있으며 고무 손이 자신의 것 같은 느낌이 든다고 외설합니다. 참가자에게 이러한 경험이 실험의 맥락에서 정상임을 알수 있습니다. 10분 후 상자와 고무 팔을 제거하고 참가자에게 설문조사를 완료하도록 요청합니다.

Results

Figure 4 shows typical survey results for one participant. In the first three items, a participant tends to strongly agree that the rubber hand felt like her own and that it felt like she could feel the brushing on the rubber hand. These results suggest that the visual perception of the rubber hand-in the place where her actual hand should have been-induced her brain to assimilate the rubber hand into its representation of her body. Moreover, she experienced brushing although the rubber hand obviously has no touch receptors. Thus the visual seeing of brushing, in this context, is sufficient to induce the brain to produce sensations of brushing. That is an important part of the effect-touch can be felt without actual touching of the skin, at least under some conditions. Visual inputs play a surprisingly strong role in our sense of our bodies.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Typical survey responses.

The remaining items in the survey demonstrate that the opposite is not true. People tend to disagree with statements that suggest that their visual representation of the rubber hand began to change. In other words, feeling it to be their own does not make it look like their own in appearance. So vision plays an important role in our sense of touch and body position, but touch and body position do not influence vision in the same way.

Applications and Summary

The rubber hand is a strange and striking illusion that has begun to play an important role in our understanding of how the brain integrates information from multiple sensory systems. An important study by Ehrsson and colleagues (2004), for example, induced the rubber hand illusion in much the same way just described, but with participants simultaneously undergoing fMRI.2 For a point of comparison, the researchers used a condition in which they brushed the rubber and actual hands of their participants asynchronously. This does not usually produce an experience of the illusion. They could then compare brain activity in this condition to brain activity during the usual, synchronous stroking condition. The result was that the synchronous condition produced greater activity in the premotor cortex. The premotor cortex is a part of the brain that is used to control motor actions. Activity is usually found in this area before someone executes an action. This led the authors to conclude that because the premotor cortex is the site of action planning, in some sense, it is the main site of representation for one’s sense of their own body. As a result, it is also the site where information about one’s body from different sources becomes integrated.

References

  1. Botvinick, M., Cohen, J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature. (1998).
  2. Ehrsson, H.H., Spence, C., Passingham, R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science. (2004).

Transcript

Illusions are often used in psychology to test processes of perception; as it turns out, tricking the brain is rather easy.

Under normal circumstances, individuals walk around without bumping into any obstacles, because they know where their limbs are relative to items in the surroundings. This concept of body awareness is referred to as proprioception.

However, even with this understanding, the same person can be deceived into thinking that someone else’s arm—like the mannequin’s situated close by—is their own and react accordingly.

This video will demonstrate how to induce this body transfer trick, called the Rubber Hand Illusion—where a fake limb is perceived as being real—using methods originally devised by Botvinick and Cohen. It will also investigate how such an experience can be applied, for instance, to the treatment of phantom limb pain.

In this experiment, participants are asked to rest one arm on a table and a box is placed over it, occluding the limb from being visible. However, the other side is open, and a fake rubber hand is placed in direct sight.

As participants stare at the life-sized model, both appendages are lightly stroked with two paintbrushes in synchrony over a period of 10 min.

Afterwards, they are asked to complete a short survey about their experiences—rating how much they agree or disagree with different perceptual effects. Their responses on the sliding scale serve as the dependent variable and ultimately reveal whether or not the illusion was induced.

Participants are expected to feel like the rubber hand was their own during the brushing period. Yet, they are not expected to think that it looks similar to their own in appearance. Thus, vision plays an important role in our sense of touch and body position, but these do not influence visual representations in the same manner.

In preparation for the experiment, obtain the following materials: a rubber hand, two paint brushes, scissors, tape, and several pieces of cardboard that are 1 ft high by 2 ft long.

First build the occluder box: Take one piece of cardboard and draw a straight line down the middle of the longest side. At the bottom center of each half, cut a circle large enough for a hand and arm to pass through. Then, using tape, attach a second piece at the mid-point to create a divider. Finally, add the last section of cardboard across the top.

Before proceeding, create a survey, like the one used by Botvinick and Cohen, to extensively assess the participants’ subjective experiences.

Now, to begin the experiment, seat the participant at a table in front of the flat side of the occluder box. Have them insert their left arm into the hole directly ahead, and ask them to refrain from moving their arm and fingers as much as possible.

Next, place the rubber arm through the hole on their right side. Instruct the participant to look over the wall of the occluder box and focus on this artificial part.

Then, sit in front of the participant, and use the two paintbrushes to simultaneously touch their real and rubber hand for 10 min. If they react during the brushing period, inform them that such experiences are normal for this experiment.

Following the tactile phase, remove the box and rubber arm from the table, and ask them to complete the survey, rating nine statements on a scale of ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’.

For each participant, determine whether or not the illusion was induced. To accomplish this, examine the surveys individually and initially focus on the first three items.

Notice that the participant shown here strongly agreed that they could feel the brushing on the rubber hand as if it were their own, indicating that their brain was tricked.

To see if proprioception was affected, look at the next four items: Questions 4 through 6 and 8. Note that responses were made towards ‘strongly disagree’, which suggests that they were still very aware of their own arms in space.

Furthermore, from the responses on the remaining questions—7 and 9—the participant also disagreed that the rubber hand began to look like their own in appearance. Overall, these results suggest that although vision influences our sense of touch and body position, the converse does not necessarily hold true.

Now that you are familiar with how to conduct the rubber hand illusion, let’s look at some other ways researchers use it to better understand how the brain integrates information related to vision, touch, and proprioception.

To understand what’s going on in the brain during the illusion, researchers exposed participants to the task while undergoing functional MRI. In this case, the premotor cortex—an area used to control motor actions—was the region of focus.

Activity from the synchronous condition was compared to an asynchronous one—where brushing doesn’t induce the illusion. They found that when the brain was tricked, there was greater activation relative to when it was not deceived.

Such observations suggest that neural activity in the premotor cortex is associated with one’s sense of their own body. Anatomically, this makes sense: the region is connected to visual and somatosensory areas, particularly the posterior parietal cortex, providing an anchor between visual, tactile, and proprioceptive information.

Understanding the neural underpinnings of the rubber hand illusion can also help to treat disorders where body ownership is distorted, as is the case in schizophrenia. In these patients, the illusion is stronger, with faster induction and increased perceptual reports, even during sensory asynchrony.

Interestingly, these effects can be mimicked in healthy individuals by administering drugs like ketamine or amphetamine, providing another approach for studying the neural mechanisms behind body ownership.

Finally, under certain circumstances, the illusion can be used therapeutically to treat individuals with Phantom Limb Pain, which occurs when amputees still have feelings in the body part that no longer exists.

Using mirrors, their brains can be tricked into seeing two complete limbs. This approach could ultimately help to reorganize the connections within the related multi-sensory pathways and alleviate pain.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s video on the Rubber Hand Illusion. Now you should have a good understanding of how to conduct this experiment to investigate the brain’s perception of the body in space, as well as how to interpret survey results from the participants’ experiences. In addition, you should also know more about the brain regions related to body ownership and the complexity involved in multisensory integration.

Thanks for watching!

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. The Rubber Hand Illusion. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).