출처: 알렉산더 S 래트너와 크리스토퍼 J 그리어; 펜실베이니아 주립대학, 유니버시티 파크, 펜실베이니아 주 기계 및 원자력 공학과
열교환기는 두 개의 유체 스트림 간에 열 에너지를 전달하며 에너지 시스템에서 유비쿼터스입니다. 일반적인 응용 분야에는 자동차 라디에이터(핫 엔진 냉각수에서 주변 공기로의 열 전달), 냉장고 증발기(냉장고 실 내부 공기 가용공기) 및 발전소의 냉각탑(물과 주변 공기를 증발시키는 응축 증기)이 있습니다. 이 실험의 목적은 열교환기를 위한 실험측정(등급)및 모델링 절차를 도입하는 것입니다.
이 실험에서는 수중 튜브 내 열교환기를 구성하고 평가합니다. 온도 및 유량 측정은 열 전달속도(Q)및 전체 전도도(UA)를 결정하기 위해 사용될 것입니다. 측정된 열교환기 UA는 기하학 및 작동 조건에 대한 예측값과 비교됩니다.
Table 1 – Measurements and derived LMTD and UA values for heat exchanger at hot and cold flow rates of 0.20 and 0.15 l min-1.
| Hot and cold flow rates (l min-1) | TH,in (°C, ±0.25°C) | TC,out (°C, ±0.25°C) | TH,out (°C, ±0.25°C) | TC,in (°C, ±0.25°C) | QC (W) | QH (W) | LMTD (°C, ±0.25°C) | UA (W K-1) |
| 0.126 ± 0.006 | 31.2 | 25.7 | 28.7 | 23.1 | 22.8 ± 3.3 | 21.9 ± 3.3 | 5.55 | 4.0 ± 0.5 |
| 0.126 ± 0.006 | 31.2 | 25.8 | 28.7 | 23.1 | 23.7 ± 3.3 | 21.9 ± 3.3 | 5.50 | 4.1 ± 0.5 |
| 0.126 ± 0.006 | 31.1 | 25.9 | 28.6 | 23.4 | 21.9 ± 3.3 | 21.9 ± 3.3 | 5.20 | 4.2 ± 0.5 |
| 0.094 ± 0.006 | 30.8 | 26.2 | 28.1 | 23.7 | 16.4 ± 2.6 | 17.7 ± 2.6 | 4.50 | 3.8 ± 0.5 |
| 0.094 ± 0.006 | 30.7 | 26.2 | 27.7 | 23.8 | 15.8 ± 2.6 | 19.7 ± 2.7 | 4.19 | 4.2 ± 0.5 |
| 0.094 ± 0.006 | 30.6 | 26.2 | 27.7 | 23.9 | 15.1 ± 2.5 | 19.1 ± 2.7 | 4.09 | 4.2 ± 0.6 |
Representative measured temperatures and flow rates and resulting LMTD and UA values are presented in Table 1 for hot and cold fluid flow rates of 0.20 and 0.15 l min-1 (3 measurements each). Uncertainty propagation analysis was performed to determine uncertainties for derived quantities (QC, QH, LMTD, UA). The UA was evaluated using the mean heat transfer rate of the two streams. At the higher flow rate conditions close agreement for hot and cold flow rates is observed. At lower flow rates, agreement is just within experimental uncertainty.
The average overall heat transfer rate is relatively constant over the considered range of conditions (UA ~ 4.0 ± 0.5 W K-1). This is higher than the predicted value for laminar steady fully developed flow (Eqn. 4): UA = 2.7 W K-1. The measured value is lower than the result assuming developing flow in both channels beginning at the inlets: 4.8 W K-1 (using developing flow correction factors from [1]). In actuality, the hot inner channel flow partially develops in the plumbing before reaching the HX inlet. This may explain the intermediate measured UA value.
In this experiment, a tube-in-tube counter-flow heat exchanger was fabricated, and its heat transfer capacity (UA) was experimentally measured (rated). The resulting performance was compared with results from a theoretical model. Modern heat exchangers often employ more sophisticated designs, with finned and enhanced surfaces to increase heat transfer intensity and optimized arrangements of fluid cross- and counter-flow. However, the basic concepts and parameters introduced here (UA, LMTD) apply to all heat exchangers.
Heat exchanger rating experiments, as demonstrated here are critical for determining whether manufactured heat exchangers meet desired capacities (UA values) to ensure acceptable energy system performance. Similarly, heat exchanger performance models (e.g., Eqn. 4) must be developed and validated to guide heat exchanger design. This experiment provides a hands-on introduction to these heat exchanger rating and modeling processes.
Heat exchangers are employed in numerous energy intensive technologies and familiar household appliances. In many power generation plants, steam generator heat exchangers transfer heat from high temperature gas to produce high-pressure steam to drive turbines. Downstream from these turbines, condenser heat exchangers reject heat from the low-pressure steam, liquefying the fluid, and allowing the cycle to operate continuously. In many industrial processes, recuperative heat exchangers can transfer low-temperature heat from an exhaust stream to preheat intake fluid, reducing energy consumption. In refrigerators and air conditioning systems, evaporator heat exchangers absorb thermal energy from air in a conditioned space to maintain desired temperatures.
Heat exchangers are ubiquitous components in energy systems. Some common examples are car radiators and refrigerator evaporators. In both cases, the heat exchanger is facilitating the transfer of heat, from one stream of fluid to another. From these examples, it is clear that heat exchangers are important in a variety of systems; Primarily providing thermal management or transitions in thermodynamic cycles. An understanding of how to model and rate heat exchangers is important for optimizing designs and integrating heat exchangers into larger systems. This video will illustrate some principles of heat exchanger design and analysis, and then demonstrate those concepts on a simple tube-in-tube heat exchanger design. At the end, some common applications will be explored.
A well designed heat exchanger should facilitate efficient, continuous heat transfer between two fluid streams, without allowing them to mix. As two fluid streams enter a heat exchanger, they are brought into close thermal contact across a physical barrier. Heat exchange is driven by a local temperature differences as the fluids progress, until the fluids reach the exit. The result is that the hotter of the two fluids entering the heat exchanger will exit with a reduced temperature, and the colder of the two with an increased temperature. During steady operation, the heat transfer rate of the hot fluid is determined by the mass flow rate and specific heat of the fluid, multiplied by the difference in temperature between the entrance and the exit. The same formula applies to the cold fluid when the corresponding values are used. If heat leakage to the surroundings is negligible, the magnitude of the two transfer rates will be equal. This means that any heat lost by the hot fluid, is gained by the cold fluid. The overall conductance in Watts per Kelvin, is a measure of the heat transfer capacity of a heat exchanger. Let’s analyze a particular geometry known as a counter-flow, tube-in-tube heat exchanger. In this design, the hot fluid flows in one direction inside a straight section of tube. The cold fluid flows in the opposite direction, in the annulus between the hot tube and a second outer tube. The average temperature difference driving heat transfer between the two streams in this geometry, is the log mean temperature difference, which can be calculated from the input and output temperatures of both streams. Using this model of heat exchanger operation, we can answer two different types of heat exchanger analysis problems. Rating and design. If the heat transfer rate and the log mean temperature difference are known, for example by experimental measurement, then the overall conductance can be calculated from the ratio of the two. For the purpose of design however, it is useful to predict what the overall conductance will be from the geometry and material properties of the heat exchanger. This can be done by finding the sum of thermal resistances between the two streams. For the tube-in-tube geometry, these resistances are determined by: convection in the hot fluid tube, conduction through the inner tube wall, and convection again in the cold fluid annulus. The inverse of this sum gives the overall conductance for the tube-in-tube counter-flow heat exchanger. Now that we have seen how to analyze the heat exchanger, let’s test one in the laboratory.
Affix two plastic containers on opposite sides of the work surface to serve as hot and cold water reservoirs. If necessary, drill holes in the lids for inlet and outlet water lines, as well as the pump power cable. When you are finished, mount a small, submersible pump in each reservoir. Next, mount a water flow meter, or rotameter, vertically near each reservoir, and then use soft PVC tubing to connect the pump outlets to the flow meter inlets. Now, install two compression pipe tee fittings onto the outer cold water tube of the heat exchanger. Connect one flexible PVC tube, from the side port of the nearby tee fitting, to the outlet of hot flow meter. For the hot counter flow tube, cut a section of aluminum tubing equal in length to the heat exchanger, including the tee fittings on the end, and insert it into the assembly. Next, connect a soft plastic tube, from the compression fitting at other end of the heat exchanger assembly, to the hot water reservoir. Tighten the compression fittings to seal the soft plastic tubing around the aluminum tube. This will separate the hot flow, through the inner aluminum tube, from the outer cold flow. Connect the flexible PVC tube, from the side port on one tee fitting, to the cold flow meter outlet, and then connect a second tube to the side port of the other tee fitting returning to the cold water reservoir. Before continuing, confirm that the hot and cold stream inlets, to the heat exchanger, are on opposite ends. Drill a small hole through one side of the soft plastic tube near each inlet and outlet port of the heat exchanger. Gently insert a thermocouple probe into each port so that the probe tip is approximately in the center of the tube. Finally, use the epoxy, or similar adhesive, to seal the small gap in the tubes around the thermocouple probes against water leaks. When the epoxy is cured, connect all four thermocouple probes to a thermocouple reader. Now that the assembly is complete, you are ready to begin testing.
Fill the cold reservoir with room temperature tap water, and the hot reservoir with warm water. Turn on both water pumps and adjust the needle valves on the flow meters to increase the flow in both loops. Allow the water to circulate long enough to flush out any trapped air bubbles. Once the air bubbles are removed, adjust the flow rate in both loops to approximately 0.1 liters per minute. Wait a few minutes to allow the system to stabilize, and then record the inlet and outlet temperatures reported by the four thermocouple readings. Your thermocouple reader may have a hold function to freeze the current values while you are recording. Record five more sets of readings at these flow conditions. Repeat these measurements for flow rates of approximately 0.125 liters per minute, and 0.15 liters per minute. If the temperature difference between the hot and cold inputs drops below 5 degrees Celsius, refill the reservoirs with fresh hot and cold water. Now that the measurements are complete, let’s take a look at the results.
You should have 18 sets of data, and for each set a measured volume flow rate. Note for these tests, the same flow rate, V-dot, is used for the hot and cold streams. First, use the density of water to convert each value of the volume flow rate to a mass flow rate. Now, calculate the rate of energy change for the hot and cold streams in each set by multiplying the mass flow rate, the specific heat of water, and the respective temperature differences. In the principle section, we assumed that the magnitude of these rates would be equal. Propagate uncertainties so that you can compare them. In most cases, the heat transfer rates match to within uncertainty; However, as the flow rate decreases, there is a trend towards increased heat loss from the hot fluid, as compared to the heat gained by the cold fluid. This is likely the result of heat loss to the surrounding environment; But since the effect is small, the average heat transfer rate can be used for the rest of the analysis. Next, lets evaluate the overall conductance of the heat exchanger, which can be determined from the measured heat transfer rate, and the log mean temperature difference. The overall conductance depends on material thermal conductivities, flow conditions, and the heat exchanger geometry. We anticipate that this value will not change significantly with flow rate for the low velocity laminar flows considered here. Use the measured temperatures with the equation given in the text to calculate the log mean temperature difference. Now, divide the average rate of energy change by the log mean temperature difference for each set to yield the overall conductance. As we anticipated, the overall conductance is relatively constant over the range of conditions that were tested, as evidenced by the small standard deviation over the data set. This result, however, is higher than the theoretical value predicted for steady fully developed laminar flow. If we assume developing flow at the inlets in both channels, and use suitable correction factors, the theoretical prediction will be higher than our measured result. In reality, flow in the inner channel will be partially developed before reaching the heat exchanger inlet, and this may explain the intermediate value of overall conductance. Now that we have analyzed the results of our simple heat exchanger, let’s look at some typical applications.
Heat exchangers are employed in a wide variety of scenarios whenever heat transfer needs to be facilitated between two fluid streams. In many power generation plants, steam generator heat exchangers transfer heat from high temperature gas to produce high pressure steam to drive turbines. Down stream from these turbines, condenser heat exchangers reject heat from the low pressure steam, liquefying the fluid and allowing the cycle to operate continuously. In refrigerators, and air conditioning systems, evaporator heat exchangers absorb thermal energy from air in the conditioned space to maintain desired temperatures.
You’ve just watched Jove’s introduction to heat exchanger analysis. You should know understand the basic principles of heat exchangers, and how to analyze their performance experimentally and theoretically. Thanks for watching.
