Name: Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2017-12-11T12:30:00.000+00:00
Duration: 9 min 43 s
Description: Learn reversible cooling-induced deactivation to study cortical contributions to obstacle memory in walking cats. This method reveals how parietal area 5 integrates sensory and motor information for locomotor control.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

playerTrialDesktop

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. C.W. was supported by an Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship (NSERC).

All procedures were conducted in compliance with the National Research Council&#39;s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (eighth edition; 2011) and the Canadian Council on Animal Care&#39;s Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (1993), and were approved by the University of Western Ontario Animal Use Subcommittee of the University Council on Animal Care.
The following procedure can be applied to experiments studying cortical contributions to locomotor control in the walking cat.
1. Apparatus
<ol>
	<li>Construct the apparatus used to assess obstacle memory. 
	NOTE: The apparatus consists of a 2.43 m long, 29 cm wide walkway enclosed by 18 cm high clear acrylic walls (Figure 1). A narrow slot halfway along the apparatus allows a 25.8 cm wide x 3 mm thick obstacle to be raised onto or removed from the walkway using a lever mounted underneath the walking surface.</li>
	<li>To ensure that attention of the animal is maintained on eating, avoid using the hand to raise or lower the obstacle. Instead, the obstacle can be raised or lowered using the experimenter&#39;s leg to move the lever underneath the walkway, allowing the experimenter to continue feeding the animal.</li>
	<li>Properly maintain the lever system to ensure that the obstacle can be raised or lowered soundlessly.</li>
	<li>Use a small elevated platform (23 cm long x 23 cm wide x 16 cm high) upon which soft food is placed, to guide movements of the animal.</li>
	<li>Record all trials using an ethernet camera (54 frames/s) mounted on a tripod 1.85 m away from the midline of the walkway.</li>
</ol>
2. Training Procedures
NOTE: &#160;For successful data acquisition, a period of training preceding behavioral testing ensures that each animal is properly acclimated to the testing room and apparatus. Repeated exposure to a novel environment will aid in reducing startling or other stressful behaviors.&#160;&#160;Acclimation may vary between animals and may require 1-2 months of training. Initial acclimation sessions may be up to 5 min in length depending on the focus and motivation of the animal to eat. Subsequent sessions should aim to increase the duration of time that the animal is motivated to work (typically around 20-25 min).
<ol>
	<li>Acquire mature ( &#62;6 months of age) domestic short hair cats from a commercial laboratory breeder of any weight or sex. 
	NOTE: Motivation to work for food and a cooperative disposition comprise the selection criteria when considering which animals should be included in the study.</li>
	<li>Acclimate each animal to wearing a harness to which a 1 m long leash is attached. Anchor the leash to a shelf above the walkway over the midpoint of the walkway. 
	NOTE: This allows the animal to walk along the central portion of the apparatus without any tension, thus encouraging the animal to remain within this portion of the apparatus. Establishing such boundaries is helpful for working with a moving test subject.</li>
	<li>Place the animal onto the walkway, allowing it to eat from the platform upon which soft food is placed. 
	NOTE: One aim of this initial training is to ensure that the animal readily follows the food platform when moved forwards, and can walk comfortably with the harness and leash.&#160;The use of soft food as positive reinforcement encourages the animal to remain focused throughout each training or testing session, and promotes a comfortable working environment.</li>
	<li>Ensure that the animal is comfortable with handling, including instances where the animal must be moved to the start area of the walkway.</li>
</ol>
3. Behavioral Training and Testing Protocol
NOTE: The obstacle memory is assessed in two paradigms: a visually-dependent obstacle memory task, and a tactile-dependent obstacle memory task. Both paradigms should be used during initial training and subsequent testing.
<ol>
	<li>Visual obstacle memory
	<ol>
		<li>To assess the visual obstacle memory, raise the obstacle onto the walkway (Figure 2A). Place the platform on the far side of the obstacle. Place the animal in the start area of the walkway.</li>
		<li>Allow the animal to approach the food, stepping over the obstacle with only its forelegs in order to eat from the platform.</li>
		<li>As the animal continues to eat, lower the obstacle such that it becomes flush with the walkway to prevent any further visual or tactile inputs.</li>
		<li>Following a variable delay period, move the food forwards again to encourage the animal to resume walking; this delay can be less than 1 s to upwards of 2 min.</li>
		<li>Importantly, perform trials where the obstacle is absent in order to prevent habituation to the obstacle and development of a learned avoidance response. In such visual obstacle-absent trials, ensure that the obstacle is not raised onto the walkway before placing the animal in the start area of the walkway.</li>
		<li>Observe hindleg stepping in obstacle-present and obstacle-absent trials to verify typical locomotor behaviors and intact visual obstacle memory prior to cooling. Ensure that the animal can clear the obstacle without contact, and that stepping of all four legs is significantly elevated in obstacle-present trials. 
		NOTE: Watching videos of training trials may assist in this verification.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Tactile obstacle memory
	<ol>
		<li>To assess the tactile obstacle memory, ensure that the obstacle is not raised onto the walkway before placing the animal in the start area of the walkway (Figure 2B).</li>
		<li>Allow the animal to walk towards the food platform placed on the far side of the obstacle slot.</li>
		<li>As the animal eats, raise the obstacle onto the walkway beneath the food dish, preventing any visual input of the obstacle.</li>
		<li>As the food is moved forwards, note that the animal should contact the obstacle with their forelegs before stepping over it.</li>
		<li>Allow the animal to continue eating while straddling the obstacle between their fore- and hindlegs. During this time, lower the obstacle so that it becomes flush with the walkway to prevent any further visual or tactile inputs.</li>
		<li>Following a variable delay period, move the food forwards once again to encourage the animal to resume walking.</li>
		<li>Importantly, perform trials where the obstacle is absent and no foreleg contact occurs for preventing habituation to the obstacle and development of a learned avoidance response.
		<ol>
			<li>In these tactile obstacle-absent trials, have the animal approach and eat from the food platform, as described in step 3.2.1. However, raise and lower the obstacle (step 3.2.2) before moving the food forward in step 3.2.3. Ensure that a similar delay period where the animal is allowed to continue eating (step 3.2.4) precedes the final continuation of locomotion (step 3.2.5).</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Observe the hindleg stepping in the obstacle-present and obstacle-absent trials to verify normal locomotor behaviors and intact visual obstacle memory prior to cooling.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
4. Video Analyses
NOTE: To assess obstacle memory, analyses during initial training and subsequent testing after cooling loop implantation involve quantifying the peak step height, step clearance, and the horizontal distance between the toe and obstacle at the peak of each step for both visual and tactile paradigms (Figure 2C).
<ol>
	<li>Analyze the videos using custom written scripts.</li>
	<li>For every trial, track each foot by marking the position of the toe closest to the camera throughout each step.</li>
	<li>Measure the peak step height as the perpendicular distance between the toe and the surface of the walkway at the highest point in each step trajectory (Figure 2C).</li>
	<li>In the obstacle-present trials, measure the step clearance as the step height directly above the obstacle slot subtracted by the height of the obstacle.</li>
	<li>Additionally, measure the horizontal distance between the toe and the obstacle at the peak of each step in the obstacle-present trials.</li>
	<li>Confirm that the obstacle memory capabilities are intact prior to the cooling loop implantation by verifying that the peak step height is elevated in the obstacle-present trials in comparison to stepping in the obstacle-absent trials.</li>
</ol>
5. Cooling Loop (Cryoloop) Implantation
<ol>
	<li>Implant cryoloops bilaterally over areas 5 and 7 according to previously reported surgical procedures8 (Figure 3).</li>
	<li>In brief, for each hemisphere, perform a craniotomy and durotomy from Horsley-Clarke coordinates20 A15 to A25 to expose the juncture of the ansate and lateral sulci.</li>
	<li>Position individual cooling loops shaped from 23-gauge stainless steel hypodermic tubing with the loop in direct contact with the cortical surface of parietal area 5 or 7.</li>
	<li>Secure the base of each cryoloop to the skull with dental acrylic anchored to the stainless steel screws.</li>
	<li>Close the craniotomies with additional dental acrylic; draw up the skin margins up to the acrylic edges and suture together.</li>
</ol>
6. Cortical Cooling Protocol
<ol>
	<li>Experimental setup 
	NOTE: Before bringing the animal into the testing room, the cooling circuit is prepared and tested. The cooling circuit consists of a methanol reservoir with an intake tube (3.2 mm O.D., 1.6 mm I.D.), a reciprocating piston pump, and dry ice bath connected via polytetrafluoroethylene tubing (1.6 mm O.D., 0.5 mm I.D.; Figure 4). Additionally, a digital thermometer is required.
	<ol>
		<li>Add 500 cc dry ice to 200 mL of methanol in the ice bath. Fit tubing ends snugly over the inlet and outlet of a dummy cryoloop to complete the cooling circuit.</li>
		<li>Attach the thermocouple plug to a digital thermometer for continuous temperature monitoring using a cable composed of two male thermocouple connectors and a thermocouple wire. Ensure that the length of this cable is sufficient to reach the head of the animal when one end is plugged into the thermometer.</li>
		<li>Turn on the piston pump using the switch. 
		NOTE: Methanol should be drawn up from the reservoir, passed through the pump to the dry ice bath where the flowing methanol in the tubing will be cooled to -75 &#176;C. The chilled methanol will then exit the ice bath and run through the attached cryoloop before returning to the methanol reservoir.</li>
		<li>Ensure that the pump setting, length of tubing within the ice bath, and length of tubing from the ice bath to the dummy loops are optimal such that the dummy cryoloop temperature can reach a steady state around -5.0 &#176;C. 
		NOTE: Such temperatures achieved during this initial setup are often sufficient for achieving test temperatures of 3.0 &#177; 1.0 &#176;C when the same system is used to cool an implanted cryoloop. Difficulty in attaining sufficient cooling can be solved by adjusting the speed of the pump, increasing the length of tubing submerged within the ice bath, and/or minimizing the length of tubing from the ice bath to the cryoloop.</li>
		<li>If necessary, lengthen a section of tubing by threading the end of the tube through a tube end fitting and flange the end of the tube with a flanging tool. Attach tubing of a desired length with a similarly flanged end using a connector.</li>
		<li>Verify that all connections are snug and no leaks are present. Once satisfied with the initial setup, switch the pump off, and remove the dummy cryoloop; the circuit is now prepared for a test animal.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Behavioral testing
	<ol>
		<li>Place the animal on the testing apparatus. Slide the harness over the head and secure the strap snuggly around the animal. Attach the leash.</li>
		<li>Remove the protective cap of the implanted cryoloop to expose the inlet and outlet tubes. Fit tubing ends snugly over the inlet and outlet tubes of the cryoloop. Connect the thermocouple plug to the digital thermometer.</li>
		<li>Begin the testing session with a visual (step 3.1) or tactile (step 3.2) obstacle memory trial. Follow with additional trials of all four types (visual obstacle-present, visual obstacle-absent, tactile obstacle-present, tactile obstacle-absent) in a random fashion. 
		NOTE: A typical testing session consists of a &#39;warm&#39; block of trials, where memory-guided obstacle avoidance is observed in the absence of cooling to establish baseline measures.</li>
		<li>Switch on the piston pump, and wait for the cryoloop to reach a temperature of 3.0 &#177; 1.0 &#176;C (1-2 min). Then, run a &#39;cool&#39; block of trials after the piston pump has been switched on. During this block of trials, if needed, assess contributions of the cooled area to memory-guided. Ensure that the temperature of the cryoloop is maintained at 3.0 &#177; 1.0 &#176;C throughout the entire block. 
		NOTE: All four trial types should be randomly interspersed throughout the block.</li>
		<li>Run a final &#39;rewarm&#39; block of trials after the piston pump has been switched off, and the cryoloop has returned to its original temperature. 
		NOTE: Baseline stepping behavior is re-established during this block. Again, all four trial types should be randomly interspersed throughout the block.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Clean-up
	<ol>
		<li>When the behavioral testing is concluded, remove the tubing from inlet and outlet tubes. Be conscious of residual methanol that may drip from the tubing ends and may irritate the animal.</li>
		<li>Ensure that the protective cap is replaced. Remove the leash and harness before returning the animal to the colony. Trim the tubing ends (3-4 mm) using a tubing cutter to prevent leaky connections on the next testing day.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
7. Verifying the Extent of Cooling
<ol>
	<li>At the end of behavioral testing, confirm that the extent of deactivation is restricted to the region of cortex directly beneath each cryoloop using previously reported techniques8. 
	NOTE: This can be verified with thermocline mapping12 or with a thermal imaging camera13,14,19.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Drew, T., Marigold, D. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Taking+the+next+step%3A+cortical+contributions+to+the+control+of+locomotion%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr.+Opin.+Neurobiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion.</a> Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 33, 25-33 (2015).</li>
<li>Takakusaki, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Neurophysiology+of+gait%3A+From+the+spinal+cord+to+the+frontal+lobe%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mov.+Disord%22%5BJournal%5D)">Neurophysiology of gait: From the spinal cord to the frontal lobe.</a> Mov. Disord. 28, 1483-1491 (2013).</li>
<li>Drew, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Motor+cortical+activity+during+voluntary+gait+modifications+in+the+cat.+I.+cells+related+to+the+forelimbs%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurophysiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Motor cortical activity during voluntary gait modifications in the cat. I. cells related to the forelimbs.</a> J. Neurophysiol. 70, 179-199 (1993).</li>
<li>Beloozerova, I. N., Sirota, M. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+role+of+the+motor+cortex+in+the+control+of+accuracy+of+locomotor+movements+in+the+cat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Physiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The role of the motor cortex in the control of accuracy of locomotor movements in the cat.</a> J. Physiol. 461, 1-25 (1993).</li>
<li>McVea, D. A., Taylor, A. J., Pearson, K. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Long-lasting+working+memories+of+obstacles+established+by+foreleg+stepping+in+walking+cats+require+area+5+of+the+posterior+parietal+cortex%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Long-lasting working memories of obstacles established by foreleg stepping in walking cats require area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex.</a> J. Neurosci. 29, 9396-9404 (2009).</li>
<li>Lajoie, K., Andujar, J. -E., Pearson, K. G., Drew, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Neurons+in+area+5+of+the+posterior+parietal+cortex+in+the+cat+contribute+to+interlimb+coordination+during+visually+guided+locomotion%3A+a+role+in+working+memory%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurophysiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Neurons in area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex in the cat contribute to interlimb coordination during visually guided locomotion: a role in working memory.</a> J. Neurophysiol. 103, 2234-2254 (2010).</li>
<li>Beloozerova, I. N., Sirota, M. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Integration+of+motor+and+visual+information+in+the+parietal+area+5+during+locomotion%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurophysiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Integration of motor and visual information in the parietal area 5 during locomotion.</a> J. Neurophysiol. 90, 961-971 (2003).</li>
<li>Lomber, S. G., Payne, B. R., Horel, J. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+cryoloop%3A+An+adaptable+reversible+cooling+deactivation+method+for+behavioral+or+electrophysiological+assessment+of+neural+function%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci.+Methods%22%5BJournal%5D)">The cryoloop: An adaptable reversible cooling deactivation method for behavioral or electrophysiological assessment of neural function.</a> J. Neurosci. Methods. 86, 179-194 (1999).</li>
<li>Lomber, S. G., Cornwell, P., Sun, J., Macneil, M. A., Payne, B. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Reversible+inactivation+of+visual+processing+operations+in+middle+suprasylvian+cortex+of+the+behaving+cat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+U.+S.+A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Reversible inactivation of visual processing operations in middle suprasylvian cortex of the behaving cat.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2999-3003 (1994).</li>
<li>Lomber, S. G., Payne, B. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Contributions+of+cat+posterior+parietal+cortex+to+visuospatial+discrimination%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Vis.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Contributions of cat posterior parietal cortex to visuospatial discrimination.</a> Vis. Neurosci. 17, 701-709 (2000).</li>
<li>Lomber, S. G., Malhotra, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Double+dissociation+of+%27what%27+and+%27where%27+processing+in+auditory+cortex%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Double dissociation of 'what' and 'where' processing in auditory cortex.</a> Nat. Neurosci. 11, 609-616 (2008).</li>
<li>Lomber, S. G., Meredith, M. A., Kral, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cross-modal+plasticity+in+specific+auditory+cortices+underlies+visual+compensations+in+the+deaf%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf.</a> Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1421-1427 (2010).</li>
<li>Kok, M. A., Stolzberg, D., Brown, T. A., Lomber, S. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dissociable+influences+of+primary+auditory+cortex+and+the+posterior+auditory+field+on+neuronal+responses+in+the+dorsal+zone+of+auditory+cortex%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurophysiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dissociable influences of primary auditory cortex and the posterior auditory field on neuronal responses in the dorsal zone of auditory cortex.</a> J. Neurophysiol. 113, 475-486 (2015).</li>
<li>Carrasco, A., Kok, M. A., Lomber, S. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effects+of+core+auditory+cortex+deactivation+on+neuronal+response+to+simple+and+complex+acoustic+signals+in+the+contralateral+anterior+auditory+field%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cereb.+Cortex%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effects of core auditory cortex deactivation on neuronal response to simple and complex acoustic signals in the contralateral anterior auditory field.</a> Cereb. Cortex. 25, 84-96 (2015).</li>
<li>Coomber, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cortical+inactivation+by+cooling+in+small+animals%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front.+Syst.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cortical inactivation by cooling in small animals.</a> Front. Syst. Neurosci. 5, 53(2011).</li>
<li>Malmierca, M. S., Anderson, L. A., Antunes, F. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+cortical+modulation+of+stimulus-specific+adaptation+in+the+auditory+midbrain+and+thalamus%3A+a+potential+neuronal+correlate+for+predictive+coding%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front.+Syst.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">The cortical modulation of stimulus-specific adaptation in the auditory midbrain and thalamus: a potential neuronal correlate for predictive coding.</a> Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 19(2015).</li>
<li>Antunes, F. M., Malmierca, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+auditory+cortex+deactivation+on+stimulus-specific+adaptation+in+the+medial+geniculate+body%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of auditory cortex deactivation on stimulus-specific adaptation in the medial geniculate body.</a> J. Neurosci. 31, 17306-17316 (2011).</li>
<li>Peel, T. R., Johnston, K., Lomber, S. G., Corneil, B. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Bilateral+saccadic+deficits+following+large+and+reversible+inactivation+of+unilateral+frontal+eye+field%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurophysiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Bilateral saccadic deficits following large and reversible inactivation of unilateral frontal eye field.</a> J. Neurophysiol. 111, 415-433 (2014).</li>
<li>Wong, C., Wong, G., Pearson, K. G., Lomber, S. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Memory-guided+stumbling+correction+in+the+hindlimb+of+quadrupeds+relies+on+parietal+area+5%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cereb.+Cortex%22%5BJournal%5D)">Memory-guided stumbling correction in the hindlimb of quadrupeds relies on parietal area 5.</a> Cereb. Cortex. , (2016).</li>
<li>Horsley, V., Clarke, R. H. <a target="_blank" href="https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/130/6/1449/297146/The-structure-and-functions-of-the-cerebellum">The structure and function of the cerebellum examined by a new method.</a> Brain Behav Evol. 31, 45-124 (1908).</li>
<li>Lomber, S. G., Malhotra, S., Hall, A. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Functional+specialization+in+non-primary+auditory+cortex+of+the+cat%3A+areal+and+laminar+contributions+to+sound+localization%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hear.+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Functional specialization in non-primary auditory cortex of the cat: areal and laminar contributions to sound localization.</a> Hear. Res. 229, 31-45 (2007).</li>
<li>Johnston, K., Koval, M. J., Lomber, S. G., Everling, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Macaque+dorsolateral+prefrontal+cortex+does+not+suppress+saccade-related+activity+in+the+superior+colliculus%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cereb.+Cortex%22%5BJournal%5D)">Macaque dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not suppress saccade-related activity in the superior colliculus.</a> Cereb. Cortex. 24, 1373-1388 (2014).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The described paradigm employs cooling-induced deactivations of discrete cortical areas using the cryoloop in order to study memory-guided obstacle locomotion in the cat. The visual and tactile obstacle memory paradigms are fairly simple for animals to execute as they exploit naturalistic locomotor behaviors that occur with minimal effort when an animal is motivated to follow a moving food source. Thus, the majority of the training period is devoted to acclimating the animal the testing room and cooling equipment. Most a...

On naturalistic, uneven terrain, sensory information about an obstacle, which can be acquired via vision or touch, can rapidly modify locomotion for avoidance. This careful coordination of stepping movements involves multiple cortical regions1,2. For example, areas of motor cortex3,4 and parietal cortex5,6,7 have been implicated during complex locomotor tasks such as obstacle avoidance. In quadrupedal animals, step modulations required for obstacle avoidance must extend to both the forelegs and hindlegs. If forward locomotion is delayed between the foreleg and hindleg obstacle clearance (which may arise as an animal treads carefully through a complex, naturalistic environment stalking prey), information about the obstacle maintained in the memory is used to guide the hindleg stepping over the obstacle once walking resumes.
Experimental techniques aimed to deactivate discrete cortical areas can be used to study cortical contributions to memory-guided obstacle locomotion. Cooling-induced cortical deactivation provides a reversible, reliable, and reproducible method for assessing cortical contributions to an overt behavior8. Cryoloops made from stainless steel tubing are shaped specific to the cortical area of interest, ensuring highly selective and discrete deactivation of loci. Once implanted, chilled methanol pumped through the lumen of a cryoloop cools the region of cortex directly beneath the loop to &#60;20 &#176;C. Below this critical temperature, synaptic transmission is inhibited in the region of the cortex directly beneath the loop. Such deactivation can be reversed simply by ceasing the flow of methanol. This method has been used to study cortical contributions to sensory processing and behaviors9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, as well as the motor control of saccadic eye movements18 and memory-guided obstacle locomotion19.
The purpose of this protocol is to use reversible cooling-induced deactivations to assess the involvement of the parietal cortical areas for locomotor coordination in the cat. Specifically, memory-guided obstacle locomotion was examined with or without active parietal cortex. These methods have been used to successfully demonstrate the role of parietal area 5 in memory-guided obstacle avoidance in the walking cat19.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Camera</td><td>IDS Imaging Development Systems GmbH</td><td>Model: UI-5240CP-C-HQ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Intake tubing</td><td>Restek</td><td>25306</td><td>Unflanged end is submerged in the methanol reservoir while the flanged end is connected to the pump</td></tr><tr><td>Pump</td><td>Fluid Metering, Inc.</td><td>Model: QG 150</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Nalgene Dewar vacuum flask</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>F9401</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Teflon tubing</td><td>Ezkem</td><td>A051754</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Microprobe thermometer</td><td>Physitemp</td><td>Model: BAT-12</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Flanged tube end fittings</td><td>Valco Instruments Co. Inc.</td><td>CF-1BK</td><td>Assorted colours available for colour coding. Packages include the same number of washers as fittings</td></tr><tr><td>Washers</td><td>Valco Instruments Co. Inc.</td><td>CF-W1</td><td>Extra washers</td></tr><tr><td>Flanging kit</td><td>Pro Liquid GmbH</td><td>201553</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tubing connector</td><td>Restek</td><td>25323</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tubing cutter</td><td>Restek</td><td>25069</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Male thermocouple connector</td><td>Omega</td><td>SMPW-T-M</td><td>Used to make cable connection to thermometer</td></tr><tr><td>Thermocouple wire</td><td>Omega</td><td>PP-T-24S</td><td>Used to make cable connection to thermometer</td></tr><tr><td>MATLAB</td><td>MathWorks</td><td>n/a</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

reversible cooling-induced deactivations to study cortical contributions to obstacle memory in the walking cat

Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat

On complex, naturalistic terrain, sensory information about an environmental obstacle can be used to rapidly adjust locomotor movements for avoidance. For example, in the cat, visual information about an impending obstacle can modulate stepping for avoidance. Locomotor adaptation can also occur independent of vision, as sudden tactile inputs to the leg by an expected obstacle can modify the stepping of all four legs for avoidance. Such complex locomotor coordination involves supraspinal structures, such as the parietal cortex. This protocol describes the use of reversible, cooling-induced cortical deactivation to assess parietal cortex contributions to memory-guided obstacle locomotion in the cat. Small cooling loops, known as cryoloops, are specially shaped to deactivate discrete regions of interest to assess their contributions to an overt behavior. Such methods have been used to elucidate the role of parietal area 5 in memory-guided obstacle avoidance in the cat.

This protocol has been successfully used to examine parietal cortex contributions to obstacle memory in the walking cat19. In this study, cryoloops were implanted bilaterally over parietal areas 5 and 7 in three adult (&gt;6 months of age) female cats (Figure 5A). Animals were assessed in the tactile obstacle memory paradigm in the absence of cooling (warm, control condition), or when area 5 or 7 was bilaterally deactivated.
<p cla...

Complex locomotion in naturalistic environments requiring careful coordination of the limbs involves regions of the parietal cortex. The following protocol describes the use of reversible cooling-induced deactivation to demonstrate the role of parietal area 5 in memory-guided obstacle avoidance in the walking cat.

On complex, naturalistic terrain, sensory information about an environmental obstacle can be used to rapidly adjust locomotor movements for avoidance. For ...

The overall goal of the use of cooling-induced deactivations in this study is to assess cortical contributions to obstacle memory in the walking cat. This method can help answer key questions in the field of locomotor control, such as whether the parietal cortex is involved in memory-guided obstacle avoidance. The main advantage of this technique is the ability to reverse the deactivation.This allows each animal to serve as its own control. To begin, construct the apparatus shown here as described in the accompanying text protocol. Next, place the animal onto the testing apparatus while wearing the testing harness, to acclimate the animal to the setup.This leash orientation allows the animal to walk along the central portion of the apparatus without any tension, thus encouraging the animal to remain within this portion of the apparatus. Establishing such boundaries is helpful when working with a moving test subject. Place soft food onto the food platform and then set the animal onto the walkway, allowing it to eat from the platform.Ensure that the animal is comfortable with handling, including instances where the animal must be moved to the start area of the walkway. In order to as

reversible-cooling-induced-deactivations-to-study-cortical

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

This article presents the protocol of T-maze tests using a modified automated apparatus for assessing the learning and memory functions in mice.

T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice

Here, we craft a glass pipette with dual functions: inhibition of deep brain structures by microinjections of drugs and real-time monitoring of their effects through simultaneous electrophysiological recordings.

Simultaneous Electrophysiological Recording and Micro-injections of Inhibitory Agents in the Rodent Brain

The ability to assess executive functions such as behavioral flexibility in rats is useful for investigating the neurobiology of cognition in both intact animals and disease models. Here we describe automated tasks for assessing strategy shifting and reversal learning, which are particularly sensitive to disruptions in prefrontal cortical networks.

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

The goal of this protocol is to investigate spatial cognition in rodents. The double-H water maze is a novel test, which is particularly useful to elucidate the different components of learning, consolidation and memory, as well as the interplay of memory systems.

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Here we present a protocol for a mouse-specific test of cognition that does not require swimming. This test can be used to successfully distinguish controlled cortical impact-induced traumatic brain injury mice from sham controls.

Assessing Spatial Memory Impairment in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Using a Radial Water Tread Maze

This protocol describes the use of a modified T-maze to evaluate functional learning/memory in asphyxia cardiac arrest-induced cerebral ischemia.

Utilizing the Modified T-Maze to Assess Functional Memory Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest

This article presents experimental procedures for assessing memory impairments in pilocarpine-induced epileptic mice. This protocol can be used to study the pathophysiologic mechanisms of epilepsy-associated cognitive decline, which is one of the most common comorbidities in epilepsy.

Assessment of Memory Function in Pilocarpine-induced Epileptic Mice

Here, we present a protocol for the active place avoidance test, a hippocampus-dependent spatial learning paradigm designed for rodents. Altering key parameters allows for re-testing of animals before and after treatments or over time.

The Active Place Avoidance (APA) Test, an Effective, Versatile and Repeatable Spatial Learning Task for Mice

Most behavior experiments for rodents were originally devised for rats. Due to the behavioral differences between rats and mice, sometimes modifications are required for mice. We present a method to test spatial working memory in mice, minimizing the stress during the working memory task.

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

The objective of this study was to establish a reproducible method for performing a craniectomy followed by permanent, selective middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats for application in experimental studies of motor and spatial memory deficits.

Selective and Permanent Occlusion of the Middle Cerebral Artery in Rats: An Experimental Approach for Studying Motor and Spatial Memory Deficits

Learn reversible cooling-induced deactivation to study cortical contributions to obstacle memory in walking cats. This method reveals how parietal area 5 integrates sensory and motor information for locomotor control.

Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat

Explore More Videos