-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Calculus
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Biopharma

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
<<<<<<< HEAD
K12 Schools
Biopharma
=======
K12 Schools
>>>>>>> dee1fd4 (fixed header link)

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Calculus

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
Measuring Contralateral Silent Period Induced by Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation t...
Measuring Contralateral Silent Period Induced by Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation t...
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Journal Neuroscience
Measuring Contralateral Silent Period Induced by Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Investigate M1 Corticospinal Inhibition

Measuring Contralateral Silent Period Induced by Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Investigate M1 Corticospinal Inhibition

Full Text
3,124 Views
07:33 min
August 23, 2022

DOI: 10.3791/64231-v

Ingrid Rebello-Sanchez1, Joao Parente1, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios1,2, Anna Marduy1, Danielle Carolina Pimenta1, Daniel Lima1, Eric Slawka1, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas1, Gleysson Rodrigues Rosa1, Kamran Nazim3, Abhishek Datta3,4, Felipe Fregni1

1Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital,Harvard Medical School, 2Universidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencia en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, 3Research and Development,Soterix Medical, 4City College of New York

Overview

The article presents a protocol for assessing the contralateral silent period (cSP) as a biomarker for cortical excitability and treatment response, particularly in the context of studying M1 corticospinal inhibition in upper and lower limbs. This method is intended to provide insights into the complexities of corticospinal inhibitory circuitry, aiming to aid in the diagnosis of various neurological diseases.

Key Study Components

Area of Science

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical neurophysiology
  • Electromyography

Background

  • The contralateral silent period is a measure of corticospinal inhibition.
  • Understanding cSP can help index cortical excitability.
  • Identifying treatment responses in neurological conditions is vital.
  • Current methodologies are aimed at improving the reliability and reproducibility of assessments.

Purpose of Study

  • To provide a robust method for assessing cSP's role in corticospinal inhibition.
  • To contribute to identifying biomarkers for various neurological diseases.
  • To enhance the procedural rigor in clinical neurophysiology research.

Methods Used

  • The protocol employs transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess corticospinal excitability.
  • Participants’ first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle is monitored via electromyography (EMG).
  • Parameters such as the resting motor threshold and suprathreshold stimuli are systematically determined.
  • The method includes careful electrode positioning and standardized force measurements for contraction.
  • Various cortical landmarks are identified for effective target localization.

Main Results

  • The study underscores the feasibility of measuring cSP and its application as a biomarker.
  • Results indicate cSP reflects changes in corticospinal excitability during voluntary contraction.
  • Procedure validates the effectiveness of eliciting MEPs and capturing important EMG data.
  • It highlights critical metrics for suprathreshold TMS stimuli in varying study populations.

Conclusions

  • This study establishes a framework for assessing cSP, enabling advances in understanding cortical inhibition.
  • The methodological rigor is expected to aid researchers in exploring neurological disease mechanisms.
  • The findings suggest potential applications in clinical diagnostics and treatment monitoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the advantages of using TMS for assessing cSP?
TMS allows for non-invasive measurement of brain activity and provides direct insights into corticospinal excitability. It is critical for understanding neural mechanisms in both health and disease.
How is the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle selected for assessment?
The FDI muscle is chosen based on its role in finger movement assessment, with precise electrode placements to ensure accurate EMG readings during TMS stimulation.
What types of outcomes are typically measured using this protocol?
Outcomes include motor evoked potentials (MEPs), measures of corticospinal inhibition, and the duration of the contralateral silent period.
How can the protocol be adapted for different populations?
Researchers can adjust stimulus intensities and measurement parameters based on the specific neurological conditions or demographics of the study populations.
What are the key limitations of this assessment method?
Variability in individual responses to TMS, along with potential limitations in electrode placement, may affect data consistency. Standardization across studies is essential for comparability.

Contralateral silent period (cSP) assessment is a promising biomarker to index cortical excitability and treatment response. We demonstrate a protocol to assess cSP intended for studying M1 corticospinal inhibition of upper and lower limbs.

In this protocol, we'll demonstrate a feasible easily reproducible, and reliable method for upper and lower limb assessment of corticospinal inhibition. Contralateral silent period is a metric that provides information from complex corticospinal inhibitory circuitry. This method is that therefore a promising candidate of a diagnostic, surrogate, and predictive biomarker for different neurological diseases.

Demonstrating the procedure will be Danielle Pimenta, Anne Pessotto, and Daniel Lima, research fellows from my laboratory. To select the muscle for positioning the electrodes, ask the subject to put their hand over the table in a prone position. Then to identify the first dorsal interosseous or FDI muscle, ask the subject to abduct the index finger against the resistance, keeping the rest of the hand still and laying on the table, while palpitating the area.

Clean the area with alcohol pads to remove skin oils and other factors that can increase impedance. Place the negative electrode on the belly of the FDI muscle, and the positive on the distal interphalangeal joint with an interelectrode distance of at least 1.5 centimeters. Place the reference or neutral electrode on the wrist over the ulnar styloid process.

Next, determine the required muscle contraction force. Use a digital pinch dynamometer and quadrangular pyramid support to minimize mechanical distortions and elevate the sensitivity for minimal contractions. Place the dynamometer between the first and second fingers with the help of the pyramidal support.

Ensure that the first and second fingers generate the forces of the pinching movement and capture the electromyography or EMG. With the fixed position ask the participant to press the dynamometer with the first finger and the side of the pyramid with the index finger, squeezing the dynamometer pyramid system with their maximum force and creating a strong contraction of the FDI muscle. Using this value as reference, determine the 20%of maximum force.

The participant must practice maintaining the target at 20%of sustained contraction. Next, to identify the initial location for hotspot searching put a swim cap on the subject's head. All the reference points will be marked on it.

Measure the sagittal circumference of the head from the nasion to the inion. Divide the value by two and mark the middle spot on the head. Mark the location of the patient's nasion, inion, the helix of both right and left ears, and right and left supraorbital ridge.

Measure the tragus to tragus distance and add a mark halfway. Mark the intersection between them, a point identified as the vertex. From the vertex, move five centimeters laterally in parallel to the mid sagittal line on the contralateral side to the selected muscle.

This mark identifies the M1 on the same coronal level as the hand motor cortex. Use this as the first spot to initiate the search for the hotspot. The hotspot is the area of the motor cortex where the lowest motor threshold is detectable.

Set up a low intensity, and initiate the search by delivering multiple pulses to the first spot. Pursue with small intensity increments until identifying the lowest stimulus that detects electromyography or EMG indexed response. To deliver the stimuli, angle the figure of eight coil at 45 degrees to the mid sagittal line with the handle pointed toward the posterior of the patient.

To ensure that the best spot is identified, move around the first spot and test the subsequent three motor evoked potential or MEPs at one centimeter each anterior, lateral and posterior to it. Once the hotspot is identified, mark the spot in the patient's head. Use this location during the experiment and the potential follow-up visits.

Use both hands to support the coil on the sub's head. Next to determine the resting motor threshold or RMT, apply 10 consecutive stimuli at the hotspot and select the lowest intensity that produced an MEP with a peak to peak amplitude of at least 50 microvolts on the target muscle in 50%of the trials. For the contralateral silent period or CSP, deliver the 10 suprathreshold stimuli with the stimulation intensity of 120%of the RMT with 10 seconds period in between them to elicit MEPs during tonic voluntary contraction of the target muscle.

During stimulation ask the patient to maintain 20%of the maximum motor contraction of the target muscle. To capture the whole silent period or SP, confirm that the EMG time window is long enough to capture up to 400 milliseconds of activity. The delivery of suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation or TMS pulse elicited an observable MEP in the EMG recording of the target muscle, and a subsequent period of background EMG activity suppression of approximately 150 to 300 milliseconds.

The relative SP is measured from the MEP start to the reappearance of EMG activity. In contrast, absolute SP is measured from the end of the MEP to the onset of the reemergence of voluntary EMG activity. The stimulus intensity used to elicit MEP directly influence CSP metrics and can vary for difference in study populations.

Check for previous successful experiments done in the population of interest to allow for standardization.

View the full transcript and gain access to thousands of scientific videos

Sign In Start Free Trial

Explore More Videos

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationCorticospinal InhibitionContralateral Silent PeriodFDI MuscleElectromyographyMuscle Contraction ForceDiagnostic BiomarkerNeurological DiseasesResearch ProtocolElectrode PositioningPinch DynamometerMuscle AssessmentElectrical ImpedanceHotspot Searching

Related Videos

Utilizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Study the Human Neuromuscular System

12:19

Utilizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Study the Human Neuromuscular System

Related Videos

27.4K Views

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Changes in Human Corticomotoneuronal Synapses

06:02

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Changes in Human Corticomotoneuronal Synapses

Related Videos

334 Views

Assessing Corticospinal Pathways Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

05:36

Assessing Corticospinal Pathways Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Related Videos

193 Views

Measuring the Contralateral Silent Period Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

06:40

Measuring the Contralateral Silent Period Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Related Videos

509 Views

Non-invasive Assessment of Changes in Corticomotoneuronal Transmission in Humans

09:30

Non-invasive Assessment of Changes in Corticomotoneuronal Transmission in Humans

Related Videos

8.2K Views

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

09:48

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Related Videos

10.3K Views

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

08:55

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

Related Videos

9.7K Views

Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

11:06

Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Related Videos

9K Views

Measuring and Manipulating Functionally Specific Neural Pathways in the Human Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

09:52

Measuring and Manipulating Functionally Specific Neural Pathways in the Human Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Related Videos

9.7K Views

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation

08:24

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation

Related Videos

6.5K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
  • Biopharma
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code