Back to chapter

33.1:

Phylogenetic Trees

JoVE Core
Biology
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Core Biology
Phylogenetic Trees

Languages

Share

Phylogenetic trees depict the evolutionary relationships among organisms. The relationships take the form of a tree with tips, branches, nodes, and a root.

Specifically, the tips of the tree represent extant, or living, taxa and the branches denote evolutionary changes between ancestors and descendants such as the change in the DNA sequence, or the evolution of a characteristic like feathers.

Groups that share an immediate common ancestor, sister taxa, are their closest relatives and share nodes, points where branches meet, like lizards and birds and rodents and humans. A basal node corresponds to the most recent common ancestor of all organisms in the tree.

Phylogenetic trees group organisms that are descendants of a common ancestor.

When a group contains the most recent common ancestor and all of its descendants, it is called a clade, or a monophyletic group. For instance, all living vertebrates with feathers are considered birds.

A paraphyletic group includes a common ancestral species and some of its descendants. For instance, all scaly animals with four legs are reptiles, with the exclusion of mammals and birds.

Historically, biologists also classified some organisms as polyphyletic. This abandoned designation grouped organisms that do not share an immediate common ancestor. For instance, Insectivora are toothless, insect-eating mammals.

The evolutionary relationships among organisms can be determined by comparing morphological or genetic features.

To construct accurate phylogenetic trees, scientists turned to methods such as maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Using maximum parsimony, one assumes the least amount of change between organisms.

Consider the arrangement of elk, salmon, and whale on a phylogenetic tree. Both the salmon and whale are marine animals. It would seem the simplest explanation is that salmon and whales are a monophyletic group.

A closer look at their anatomy, however, reveals that the whale and elk are more closely related. Placing elk and whales together assumes fewer evolutionary changes, a less complicated scenario that is the goal of maximum parsimony analysis.

An alternative approach, maximum likelihood, takes into account that not all changes are equally likely. So one can construct a phylogenetic tree based on the most likely scenario that leads to the observed organisms.

For instance, the scientists constructing the phylogenetic tree from DNA sequences might take into account that adenine is more easily replaced by guanine, than by thiamine.

Sophisticated computer algorithms aid the construction of the most parsimonious and most likely phylogenetic trees.

33.1:

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.

The length of the branches can depict time or the relative amount of change among organisms. For instance, the branch length might indicate the number of amino acid changes in the sequence that underlies the phylogenetic tree. The exact meaning must be shown clearly on a legend accompanying the phylogenetic tree. If such a legend is not present, the branch length is arbitrary, and the reader should not infer any information.

Trees may or may not have a root. The tree is unrooted if the most recent common ancestor of all organisms of interest is unknown. In this case, the depiction of the phylogenetic relationships resembles a snowflake, not a tree. The scientist can root the tree by including an outgroup into the analysis. An outgroup is an organism that is not closely related to any of the organisms that the scientist wishes to arrange on the tree.

Suggested Reading

Gregory, T. Ryan. “Understanding Evolutionary Trees.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 1, no. 2 (April 2008): 121. [Source]

Sober, Elliott. “The Contest Between Parsimony and Likelihood.” Systematic Biology 53, no. 4 (August 1, 2004): 644–53. [Source]