$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The following results are a representation from our previous reports 6,9. Data are presented as mean±standard error of mean. Table 3 shows the morphometric properties of the EDL muscle in normal BL10 and dystrophin-deficient (mdx) mice at 4 to 6 months of age. Figure 4 shows representative contractile and passive properties of the EDL muscle from BL10 and mdx mice. The contractile properties of the EDL muscle are described by the following terms including the specific (absolute force divided by the CSA) twitch force (Figure 4A), specific maximal tetanic force (Figure 4B), TPT and ½ RT of the absolute maximal tetanic force (Figure 4C and D). The TPT and ½ RT can also be calculate from the absolute twitch force. The stress-strain profile (Figure 4E) and SRR (Figure 4F) are used to describe the passive properties of the EDL muscle.
Absence of dystrophin has a significant impact on the contractile and passive properties of the EDL muscle 6,9. Specific twitch and tetanic forces are significantly reduced in the mdx EDL muscle. The TPT is significantly faster while the ½ RT is significantly slower in the mdx EDL muscle. The stress-strain profile suggests that stiffness is significantly increased in the mdx EDL muscle. The mdx EDL muscle also yields a significantly much higher resistance force (passive stress) before reaching the peak stress, while the post-peak stresses decline much faster. Further, the SRR was significantly higher in the mdx EDL muscle compared to that of the BL10 EDL muscle.
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance between two groups is analyzed by the Student t-test. For statistical significance among multiple groups, One-way or Two-way ANOVA analysis followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis is recommended using the SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Difference is considered significant when p < 0.05.
Table 1. Materials and equipment.
| Experiment | Resting tension (gram) | Pulse frequency (Hz) | Pulse width (ms) | Stimulation duration (ms) | Stretch length | Stretch duration (ms) | Stretch rate | Comments |
| 1. Evaluation of contractile and passive properties of the EDL muscle ex vivo |
| 1.3.1 Measuring the contractile properties of the EDL muscle |
| 1. Warm up | 1.0 | 150 | 0.2 | 300 | | | | Rest the muscle for 60 sec between each stimulus. These preliminary tetanic contractions stabilize the muscle for subsequent measurements. |
| 2. Optimal muscle length (Lo) | 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 | 1 | 0.2 | 300 | | | | Allow the muscle to relax for 30 sec between each stimulus. Measure the muscle optimal length using a digital caliper. |
| 3. Single twitch force (Pt) | Adjust resting tension to Lo | 1 | 0.2 | 300 | | | | |
| 4. Tetanic muscle force | Adjust resting tension to Lo | 50, 80, 100, 120, 150 and 200 | 0.2 | 300 | | | | Allow the muscle to relax for 1 min between each stimulus. Determine the frequency that generate the maximal absolute tetanic force (Po). |
| 5. Eccentric contraction | Adjust resting tension to Lo | Use the frequency that generates the maximum tetanic force (Po) | 0.2 | 700 | 10% Lo | last 200 ms of the stimulation duration | 0.5 Lo/sec | Repeat the eccentric contraction for 10 cycles with 2 min rest between cycles. |
| 6. CSA of the EDL muscle | | | | | | | | CSA = (muscle mass (g) / [1.06 g/cm3 x (Lo x 0.44)]. 1.06 g/cm3 is the muscle density and 0.44 is the EDL muscle fiber length to Lo ratio. |
| 1.3.2 Measuring the passive properties of the EDL muscle |
| 1. Six-step stretching protocol | Adjust resting tension to Lo | | | | 10% Lo | | 2 cm/sec | Repeat the stretching protocol with an increment of 10% Lo till 160% Lo is reached. Alow 1.5 sec between stretch cycles. |
| 2. SRR | Adjust resting tension to Lo | | | | 10% Lo | | 2 cm/sec | SSR is calculated by dividing the difference in the stress with the time elapsed between two time points in a time frame. |
| 2.3 Measuring the contractile properties of the TA muscle |
| 1. Warm up | 4.0 | 150 | 0.2 | 300 | | | | Rest the muscle for 60 sec between each stimulus. |
| 2. Optimal muscle length (Lo) | 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 | 1 | 0.2 | 300 | | | | Allow the muscle to relax for 30 sec between each stimulus. Measure the muscle optimal length using a digital caliper. |
| 3. CSA of the TA muscle | | | | | | | | CSA = (muscle mass (g) / [1.06 g/cm3 x (Lo x 0.6)]. 0.6 is the TA muscle fiber length to Lo ratio. |
Table 2. Parameters for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of the EDL and TA muscles.
| Strain | Age (month) | Body weight (g) | EDL weight (mg) | EDL Lo (mm) | EDL CSA (mm2) |
| BL10 | 6 | 32.03 ± 0.57 | 13.90 ± 0.77 | 14.09 ± 0.04 | 2.12 ± 0.12 |
| mdx | 6 | 35.44 ± 0.42* | 16.73 ± 0.42* | 13.93 ± 0.05* | 2.57 ± 0.07* |
Table 3. Morphometric properties of the EDL muscle. *, the value in mdx mice is significantly different from that of age-matched BL10 mice.

Figure 1. A schematic diagram of the custom-made mouse dissection board. The dissection board is made from a ½ inch thick plexiglass and was fabricated at the institutional shop. Click here to view larger figure.
/>
Figure 2. A series of digital images showing the steps of tying a double square knot followed by a loop knot at the MTJ. Asterisk, the EDL muscle; Arrow, the distal tendon of the EDL muscle.
/>
Figure 3. A schematic diagram of the custom-made platform for in situ TA muscle function assay. The plexiglass animal platform and the stainless steel knee holder were designed to mount on the 809B in situ mouse apparatus. *, Stainless steel rod (Cat# MPR-2.0, Siskiyou, Grants Pass, OR); #, Universal electrode holder (Cat# MXB, Siskiyou, Grants Pass, OR); §, electrode attachment rod (Cat# MPR-3.0, Siskiyou, Grants Pass, OR); **, Sylgard block. Click here to view larger figure.
/>
Figure 4. Representative results for the contractile and passive properties of the EDL muscle. The contractile properties of the EDL muscle are characterized by the specific twitch force (A), the specific tetanic force (B), the time to peak tension (C) and the half relaxation time (D). The passive properties of the EDL muscle are assessed by the stress strain profile (E) and the SSR. *, mdx mice are significantly different from age-matched BL10 mice.