Stereotaxic vector injection allows targeting spinal cord neurons for applications such as neuronal network mapping based on transsynaptic virus spreading 6,7 or optogenetic dissection 8, axon guidance during regeneration from injury 9,10, or gene therapy for the prevention or treatment of neurodegeneration 11,12. Viral vectors have been used for gene manipulation in the spinal cord to study somatosensory, motor and autonomic pathways 9,10,13-15. The mouse is the model organism most widely used in studies involving stereotaxic injection of a viral vector into the brain or the spinal cord, but the technique has been employed in other species including nonhuman primates 16.
Stereotaxic vector injection into the mouse spinal cord is safe; the surgical procedure described here requires a single laminectomy at the injection site so that the animal recovers without instability in its spine movements. Injection and slow removal of the cannula are complete within 10 min, the entire procedure including skin preparation and wound closure lasts approximately 40 min. We provide postsurgical anesthesia for 72 hr with carprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic drug.
To minimize tissue trauma, we employ pulled glass cannulas with a tip diameter of 40 μm. A sharp beveled cannula tip eases insertion into the spinal cord, justifying the investment in a micropipette grinder. Use of a grinder also allows maintaining a consistent bevel angle in each experiment, reducing variation of the injection results. We prefer automated control of the injection speed over manual dispensation 17 for an even distribution of the virus particle suspension in the dorsal horn and to reduce the risk of an injection error. Equally critical is a slow extraction of the cannula, which should be initiated 2-5 min after completing the injection to avoid drawing the virus suspension back up and causing an extraspinal spill.
Extent and distribution of the intraspinal transfection depend on the injected particle dose and intrinsic properties of the viral vector such as serotype and infection efficacy. The optimal particle dilution has to be determined empirically for each virus and serotype and may vary between different batches of the same virus. Efficacy of both infection and DNA transduction may also differ depending on the targeted population of neurons 18,19. AAV achieves gene transfer in neurons without pathogenic and minimal immune side effects 20. In our experience, the infection of dorsal horn neurons is complete within 1-2 weeks and stable. We have observed minor microglial responses at injection sites but these resolved within one week.
We recommend comparing different serotypes of vectors that express a reporter gene such as eGfp to evaluate transfection rates, determine the time intervals between injection and stable transfection and establish whether the infection is limited to neurons. Specificity will depend on the cell tropism of the vector, the transfected gene and its promoter. Investigators studying somatosensory pathways should also examine dorsal root ganglion neurons for a potential expression of the reporter gene, which may result from infection of these neurons at their central terminals in the dorsal horn or from contamination of the cerebrospinal fluid 19.
In the United States, the use of viral vectors for gene manipulation is regulated by the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (http://oba.od.nih.gov/rdna/nih_guidelines_oba.html). These Guidelines stipulate requirements for investigator training, personal protection, viral vector containment, decontamination, disposal of contaminated materials such as used syringes and cannulas, and animal housing after the injection. Investigators should work with their local IACUC or equivalent body of institutional oversight to determine the rules and regulations that apply to their research.