Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove


Microfluidic Pneumatic Cages: A Novel Approach for In-chip Crystal Trapping, Manipulation and Controlled Chemical Treatment

Published: July 12, 2016 doi: 10.3791/54193


Herein, we describe the fabrication and operation of a double-layer microfluidic system made of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). We demonstrate the potential of this device for trapping, directing the coordination pathway of a crystalline molecular material and controlling chemical reactions onto on-chip trapped structures.


The precise localization and controlled chemical treatment of structures on a surface are significant challenges for common laboratory technologies. Herein, we introduce a microfluidic-based technology, employing a double-layer microfluidic device, which can trap and localize in situ and ex situ synthesized structures on microfluidic channel surfaces. Crucially, we show how such a device can be used to conduct controlled chemical reactions onto on-chip trapped structures and we demonstrate how the synthetic pathway of a crystalline molecular material and its positioning inside a microfluidic channel can be precisely modified with this technology. This approach provides new opportunities for the controlled assembly of structures on surface and for their subsequent treatment.


Molecular materials have long been studied in the scientific community because of their broad number of applications in fields such as molecular electronics, optics and sensors1-4. Amongst these, organic conductors are an especially exciting class of molecular materials because of their central role in flexible displays and integrated functional devices5,6. However, methodologies used to enable electronic charge transport in molecular-based materials are restricted to the formation of charge transport complexes (CTCs) and charge transport salts (CTSs)7-10. Frequently, CTCs and CTSs are generated by electrochemical methods or by direct chemical redox reactions; processes that hamper a controlled transformation of donor or acceptor moieties to more complex architectures where multifunctionality can be conceived. Accordingly, the elucidation of new systematic methods for the controllable generation and manipulation of molecular-based materials remains a significant challenge in the fields of materials science and molecular engineering, and if successful will undoubtedly lead to new functions and novel technological applications.

In this context, microfluidic technologies have recently been used to synthesize molecular-based materials due to their ability to control heat and mass transfer as well as the reaction-diffusion volume of reagents during a synthetic process11,12. Put simply, in continuous flows and at low Reynolds numbers a stable interface between two or more reagent streams can be achieved, which affords the formation of a well-controlled reaction zone inside the flow path, where mixing only occurs through diffusion13-16. Indeed, we have previously employed laminar flows to localize the synthetic pathway of crystalline molecular materials such as coordination polymers (CPs) inside microfluidic channels17. Although this methodology has shown great promise in realizing novel CP nanostructures, the direct integration of such structures onto surfaces, as well as controlled chemical treatment after their formation has yet to be realized in situ18. To overcome this limitation, we have recently shown that the actuation of microfluidic pneumatic cages (or valves) incorporated in two-layer microfluidic devices can advantageously be used in this respect. Since the pioneering work of Quake's group19, microfluidic pneumatic valves have frequently been used for single-cell trapping and isolation20, enzymatic activity investigations21, trapping of small fluid volumes22, localization of functional materials on surfaces23 and protein crystallization24. However, we have shown that double layer microfluidic devices can be used to trap, localize and integrate in situ formed structures to read out components and on surfaces18. Furthermore, we have also demonstrated that such technology can be used to perform controlled chemical treatments on trapped structures, enabling both, "microfluidic assisted ligand exchange"18 and controlled chemical doping of organic crystals18,25. In both cases, CTCs could be synthesized under controlled microfluidic conditions, and in the most recent study, multifunctionality could be described in the same material piece. Herein, we demonstrate the performance of these double-layer microfluidic devices employing dye-laden flows, generate and control the coordination pathway of a CP as well as its localization on the surface of a microfluidic channel and finally assess controlled chemical treatments onto on-chip trapped structures.


Note: Two layers of a double-layer microfluidic device are designed using a drawing software, e.g., AutoCAD and printed to form high-resolution film masks, with a feature precision limit of 5 µm. Master molds are created by SU-8 lithography on 4" silicon wafers, allowing the production of structures 50 µm in height.

1. Master Mold Fabrication Using SU-8 Photolithography

  1. Place the silicon wafer on a hot plate set at 200 °C for 10 min to dehydrate.
    Note: Silicon wafer dehydration provides a better contact and ensures the spreading of the SU-8 photoresist during the spin coating step.
  2. Cool the dehydrated wafer down to room temperature over a period of 3 min.
  3. Load the wafer onto a spin coater and deposit 4 ml of SU-8 photoresist (approximately 1 ml of SU-8 per inch of substrate) at the center of the wafer.
    1. First, spread the deposited SU-8 slowly at 500 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 10 sec. Such a rotational speed ensures that SU-8 coverage is increased over the entire wafer surface.
    2. Second, control the thickness of the SU-8 by spinning the substrate at higher speeds. In the current experiments, use a spin speed of 3,000 rpm for 30 sec to generate SU-8 features 50 µm high.
  4. Wipe the edge bead of the wafer carefully with a cotton wipe while spinning at a low rpm (typically 100 rpm).
  5. Heat the spin-coated wafer on a hot plate at 95 °C for 15 min to remove residual solvent from the SU-8 (i.e., "soft bake").
    Note: The presence of patterns or "wrinkles" in the resist layer indicates the incomplete removal of solvent.
  6. Cool the baked wafer back down to room temperature and contact the emulsion printed side of the photomask with the wafer prior to exposure.
  7. Turn on the UV-lamp and exposure unit and let the system stabilize over a period of 10 min. Measure the lamp intensity at 365 nm using an UV-optometer, and estimate the required exposure time (according to time = exposure energy/intensity at 365 nm).
    Note: The exposure energy in the current experiments was calculated to be 250 mJ/cm2.
  8. Expose the photomask on the spin-coated wafer to UV light for the time estimated in the previous step. Here, expose for 79.6 sec.
  9. Immediately after exposure, bake the exposed wafer on a hot plate at 65 °C for 1 min and subsequently at 95 °C for 5 min. In this step, the reaction is initiated by UV -light and completed after baking.
  10. Leave the post-baked wafer to cool down to room temperature over a period of 3 min.
  11. Develop the non-crosslinked SU-8 on the wafer by dissolving it in the SU-8 developer over 8 min. To ensure complete removal of non-crosslinked SU-8, split the process into two steps.
    1. In the first, immerse the wafer in the developer solution for 5 min, removing the majority of non-crosslinked SU-8.
    2. Then immerse the wafer in a fresh solution of developer for 3 min to dissolve the remaining non-crosslinked SU-8 (typically trapped between crosslinked structures).
  12. Rinse the developed wafer with isopropanol and let the wafer having patterned structures (hereinafter referred to as "master mold") stand to dry out. Observation of a milky residue upon rinsing the master mold indicates that development is incomplete.
  13. Heat the dried master mold on a hot plate at 200 °C for 2-5 min to "hard bake" the substrate and anneal potential cracks in the resist.
  14. Allow the fabricated master mold to cool down to room temperature.
  15. Place the master mold in a desiccator (connected to a vacuum pump) inside a fume hood.
  16. Pour 100 µl of trimethylsilyl chloride (TMCS) into a glass beaker and place this inside the desiccator.
    CAUTION: TMCS is flammable, corrosive and toxic; thus, handling steps should be performed under a fume hood, with the user wearing protective gloves, goggles and a lab coat.
  17. Put the desiccator under vacuum and wait at least 1 hr to allow the TMCS vapor to deposit onto the master mold surface.
  18. After 1 hr, slowly equilibrate the pressure within desiccator and open to the atmosphere.
    CAUTION: Do not breathe directly above the open desiccator.
  19. Remove the silanized master and close the desiccator.

2. Fabrication of Double-layer Microfluidic Devices

Note: The protocol is particularly sensitive to the time and temperature. Any failure to follow to the time frame and temperature may lead to fabrication of non-bonded, and therefore, non-functional devices.

  1. Pour a mixture of PDMS elastomer and curing agent (5:1 in weight) into a disposable weighing dish and completely mix with a plastic spatula. In the current experiments, use 50 g of elastomer and 10 g of curing agent to form a PDMS layer approximately 5 mm in height19,26.
  2. Place the well mixed PDMS in a desiccator under vacuum to degas and remove trapped bubbles for 15 min.
  3. Mix PDMS elastomer and curing agent (20:1 in weight) in a disposable weighing dish (e.g., 10 g elastomer and 0.5 g curing agent)19,26.
  4. Fix the "control layer" master mold in a frame (in the current experiments, an 11 mm round polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) ring).
  5. After 15 min, place the 20:1 PDMS mixture in the desiccator under vacuum for degassing.
  6. At the same time as the previous step, take out the 5:1 PDMS mixture from the desiccator and pour this onto the "control layer" master mold that is located inside the round frame. Place the frame containing the PDMS and master mold into the desiccator under vacuum as well. Keep the surplus PDMS.
  7. After 45 min (and 30 min after putting both PDMS mixtures into the desiccator), take both PDMS mixtures out of the desiccator and place the frame containing 5:1 PDMS and the "control layer" master mold in an oven at 80 °C.
  8. At the same time, begin to spin coat the "fluidic layer" master mold with the 20:1 PDMS mixture. The rotational speed for spin coating is determined based on the desired height, and has been reported elsewhere27. Aim to terminate spin coating at 60 min and keep the residual PDMS.
  9. After 60 min, put the "fluidic layer" master mold spin coated with 20:1 PDMS into an oven at 80 °C.
  10. At 75 min, take both master molds out of the oven.
  11. Peel off only the 5:1 PDMS from the "control layer" master mold, dice the substrate with a blade and punch the holes for control layers with a 1 mm biopsy puncher at the inlets positions determined in the design. Here, the control layer is 24 mm in length and 24 mm in width.
  12. Remove debris from diced chips using adhesive tape.
  13. Manually assemble the diced and punched control layer chips on top of the 20:1 PDMS spin coated on the "fluidic layer" master mold using a stereomicroscope with the magnification of 500X (Figure 1).
  14. Pour and draw the residual PDMS around the assembled chips to make a thicker PDMS layer and thereby facilitate removal of the bonded fluidic and control layers at the end.
  15. Place the "fluidic layer" master mold containing the two layer devices in an oven at 80 °C and store overnight.
  16. The following day, take the cured assembly out of the oven and allow it to cool down to room temperature.
  17. Peel off the PDMS assembly from the "fluidic layer" master mold, dice the fabricated double-layer devices with a blade (24 mm in length and 24 mm in width) and punch fluidic inlets/outlets with a 1.5 mm biopsy puncher.
  18. Treat the surface of chips with open channels and glass coverslips (24 mm × 40 mm) with a corona discharge and immediately bond them together. Treat by moving the corona discharge over the PDMS slab and glass coverslip over 1 min. Alternatively, use a benchtop plasma system to facilitate bonding.
  19. Store the bonded double-layer chips in an oven at 70-80 °C for at least 4 hr.

3. Microfluidic System Assembly

  1. After the microfluidic device has been assembled, connect the fluidic layer inlets of the chip to the fluidic reservoirs (syringes) using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubing (0.8 mm id).
  2. Connect the pressure supply source to the control layer inlets using silicone rubber tubing and metal connectors that have an external diameter of 1.6 mm.
  3. Open and close the valves by applying pressurized air at 3 bar using a pressure source which is operated manually. Supply fluids to the channels using a series of computer controlled syringe pumps.
  4. Visualize actuation of valves and device operation with a high resolution camera mounted on an inverted microscope. Use 5X to 63X magnification.

4. Manipulation of the Laminar Flow Regime by Pneumatic Cage Actuation

Note: The fluidic layer consists of two inlet converging channels, which are 150 µm in width, to a wider main channel 300 µm in width. And the control layer has a series of identical rectangular valves (250 µm × 200 µm) that are located on top of the main fluidic channel.

  1. Once the set-up is connected to the syringe pump and pneumatic controller systems, introduce an aqueous dye flow via one of the inlet channels at the flow rate of 20 µl/min.
  2. Close the valve by actuating it at 3 bar.
  3. Be aware that the fluid can still flow around the valve. This feature is important in achieving controlled chemical treatment of trapped structures18,25.
  4. Open the valve by releasing the pressure.
  5. While the dye solution flows through the first channel, inject another aqueous fluid into the second inlet channel at 20 µl/min. An interface between two aqueous flows is formed due to the laminar flow regime present in the microfluidic device.
  6. Close the valve by actuating it at 3 bar. In this case, the actuation of the valve changes the interface of the two aqueous flows; a result that can be used to modify the synthetic pathway during the formation of a CP (vide infra)18,28.
  7. Change the fluid flow rates to 30 µl/min and 10 µl/min and observe the down- or up-shifted guiding of the interface generated between the two fluids.

5. Localization of Microparticles

  1. Connect the fabricated double-layer chip to the syringe pump and pneumatic controller systems.
  2. Prepare an aqueous solution containing 10 wt.% polystyrene fluorescent particles (5 µm in diameter, excitation and emission max at 468 nm and 508 nm, respectively).
  3. Use laser excitation source operating at a wavelength of 488 nm.
  4. Introduce the particle-laden fluid into the two inlet channels at a total flow rate of 20 µl/min.
  5. Wait for 2 min until a stable flow is established.
  6. Actuate the valve at 3 bar to close it. Several particles will be trapped underneath the valve and localized on the surface whilst the flow is maintained.

6. Generation and Controlled Reduction of a Coordination Polymer (CP)

  1. Prepare a 2.5 mM aqueous solution of silver nitrate (AgNO3).
  2. Prepare a 2.5 mM aqueous solution of cysteine (Cys).
  3. Prepare a saturated ascorbic acid solution in ethanol18.
  4. Use the same double-layer chip and inject the two reagents into the two inlet channels (one reagent per inlet) each at a flow rate of 50 µl/min.
  5. Observe the formation of silver and cysteine (Ag(I)Cys) CPs at the interface of two co-flowing steams.
  6. Actuate the valve at 3 bar to trap the formed Ag(I)Cys CPs underneath the valve.
  7. Flush distilled water into the inlet channels at a flow rate of 50 µl/min to wash away the surplus reagents used during the synthetic process.
  8. Release the pressure and open the valve. The generated CPs remain underneath the valve under stopped-flow conditions.
  9. In order to conduct a controlled chemical reduction of trapped Ag(I)Cys CPs, release the valve pressure at 1 bar and flush the saturated ascorbic acid solution in ethanol at a flow rate of 10 µl/min.
  10. Observe a clear color change that is attributed to the reduction of Ag(I) to metallic silver (Ag(0)) by the ascorbic acid18.

Representative Results

The double layer microfluidic devices consist of two bonded microfluidic chips structured in PDMS as shown in Figure 1. The first layer, which is at the same time bonded to a surface, is used to flow fluids (fluid layer), whilst the second layer, which is directly bonded to the first PDMS layer, is used to flow gas (control layer).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Double-layer microfluidic device. (A) Schematic illustration and (B) micrograph of the double-layer microfluidic device used in our investigations. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Injection of gas through channels in the control layer squeezes the fluid layer towards the surface (Figure 2A and Figure 2B), allowing trapping and localization of structures on the microfluidic channel surface. PDMS membrane actuation can be used to generate pneumatic cages and/or micro-valves that are controlled by a pneumatic controller. As exemplar models of membrane actuation, we show how the complete deflection of the fluid layer avoids a dye-laden flow to circulate underneath the valve after its actuation (Figure 2C) and trapping of fluorescent microparticles on the microchannel surface (Figure 2D and 2E).

Figure 2
Figure 2. Membrane actuation and trapping of structures. (A) Side and (B) top view illustrations showing the double-layer microfluidic device before (top) and after (bottom) actuation of the pneumatic valve. (C) Micrographs of a double-layer microfluidic device before (top) and after squeezing of the fluid layer (bottom). In bottom panel, the fluid layer is filled with an aqueous solution of rhodamine dye for a better perception of the membrane actuation. (D) Bright-field micrographs of a double-layer microfluidic device before (top) and after (bottom) actuation of the valve with a flowing aqueous solution containing polystyrene fluorescent particles (10 wt.%). (E) Fluorescent images of the optical microscope images shown in D. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3A illustrates the trapping of in situ generated CPs inside a double-layer microfluidic device through actuation of a pneumatic cage. Notice that a new coordination pathway is generated after the actuation of the first valve. The valve actuation ensures the trapping of the Ag(I)Cys CP generated at the interface of the two reagent streams and facilitates the formation of a new coordination pathway (Figure 3A). A detailed chemical characterization of the Ag(I)Cys CP generated at the interface of the two reagent streams can be found in previous studies17,18. Additionally, and after removal of the surplus reagents solutions with a flow of pure water (Figure 3B), a saturated ascorbic acid solution in ethanol can be added to the microfluidic channel for controlled chemical reduction of on-chip trapped structures (Figure 3C). Reducing the valve pressure from 3 bars to 1 bar favors a controlled chemical treatment of the trapped Ag(I)Cys CP underneath the clamped area18. The color change of trapped Ag(I)Cys CPs to dark brown is attributed to the reduction of monovalent silver to the metal, in accord with previous observations18,29.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Trapping of Ag(I)Cys CPs and controlled chemical reduction. (A) Optical microscope image showing the trapping of an in situ synthetized Ag(I)Cys CP and generation of a new coordination pathway. (B) Micrograph of trapped CPs underneath the clamped area after removal of surplus reagents solutions with a water flow, and in (C), micrograph of the same micro-valve after the reduction reaction process. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.


The reported approach can be easily modified to fabricate different valve shapes to afford other applications such as fluid confinement. Indeed, the flexibility of this protocol also allows for modification of the thickness of the bottom layer, and thereby of the PDMS membrane, from a couple of tens to a few hundreds of microns to fulfill any application of interest. Moreover, dimensions of structures in each layer of the device can be optimized for the desired application and various heights of structures on the master molds can be simply achieved by spinning the photoresist at different velocities. Spinning the photoresist at a higher speed results in thinner structures.

To better implement the protocol, a clean room environment for the fabrication of the master molds is substantially essential; otherwise, the fabrication procedure will lead to defective master molds and thereby to unusable microfluidic devices. Two critical aspects should be emphasized in this protocol: i) the constant temperature of the oven that needs to be adjusted to 80 °C and ii) the programmed time period between processes that has to be complied accurately. Any modification of temperature and time frame in the protocol might lead to non-bonded chips, and thus, to non-functional devices.

The "turbulent free" conditions typically encountered in microfluidic systems have recently been employed for the generation of microstructures or molecular materials inside30 and outside single layer microfluidic chips31. In double-layer microfluidic chips, the laminar flow regime, and hence, the interface generated between continuous co-flows can be manipulated using pneumatic cages18,28. These devices also provide for effective control over the synthetic pathway, which in turn leads to precise localization and trapping on surfaces18.

As mentioned earlier, pneumatic actuation in double-layer microfluidic chips has been previously employed for various applications such as cell trapping20, enzymatic activity studies21 and protein crystallization24. However, the main objective of the reported approach is to propose a platform to be used for trapping and directing the coordination pathway of a crystalline molecular material and controlling chemical reactions onto on-chip trapped structures18,25.

The described method does not only allow trapping of anisotropic structures but can be used to localize particles onto surfaces. Future studies can be effectively directed towards the design of new valve shapes for additional application in biology, materials science and sensor technologies. The combination of different valve shapes as well as altered channel heights and membrane thicknesses can be employed to fulfill specific applications, such as chemical studies based on diffusional mixing and the localization of material growth.

A further application of the described microfluidic platforms is in the controlled chemical doping of crystals, which can lead to a rationalized formation of interfaces in crystalline structures19. This approach also provides for a wide range of post-treatments of on-chip trapped structures; a methodology that will undoubtedly open new horizons in materials engineering.

It is important to underline that the number of technologies enabling controlled chemical reactions under dynamic conditions and onto crystalline matter are very limited at present, hence making this approach very attractive in materials-related fields. However, a major limitation of this technology is the use of PDMS. PDMS elastomer is incompatible with many organic solvents, which limits the number of reactions that can be conducted inside these microfluidic chips. In future, the development of other elastomers that can tolerate and be stable against a broader number of organic solvents will be highly required in order to expand this field of research to other materials and chemistries.


The authors have nothing to disclose.


Authors would like to thank the financial support from Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) through the project no. 200021_160174.


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
High resolution film masks Microlitho, UK - Features down to 5 μm
SU8 photoresist MicroChem Corp., USA SU8-3050 -
Silicon wafers Silicon Materials Inc., Germany 4" Silicon Wafers Front surface: polished, Back surface: etched
Silicone Elastomer KIT (PDMS) Dow Corning, USA Sylgard® 184 -
Spinner Suiss MicroTech, Germany Delta 80 spinner -
UV-Optometer Gigahertz-Optik Inc., USA X1-1 -
Mask Aligner Suiss MicroTech, Germany Karl Suss MA/BA6  -
SU8 developer Micro resist technology GmbH, Germany mr-Dev 600 -
Trimethylsilyl chloride  Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland 386529 ≥97%, CAUTION: Handle it only under fume hood.
Biopsy puncher Miltex GmBH, Germany 33-31AA-P/25 1 mm
Biopsy puncher Miltex GmBH, Germany 33-31A-P/25 1.5 mm
Glass coverslip Menzel-Glaser, Germany BB024040SC 24 mm × 60 mm, #5
Laboratory Corona Treater Electro-Technic Products, USA BD-20ACV  -
PTFE tubing PKM SA, Switzerland AWG-TFS-XXX AWG 20TFS, roll of 100 m
Silicone rubber tubing Hi-Tek Products, UK - 1 mm I.D.
neMESYS Syringe Pumps Cetoni GmbH, Germany Low Pressure (290N) -
High resolution camera Zeiss, Germany Axiocam MRc 5 -
Fluorescent inverted microscope Zeiss, Germany Axio Observer A1 Operable at two wavelengths, i.e., 350 nm and 488 nm
Green polystyrene fluorescent particles Fisher Scientific, Switzerland 11523363 Size: 5.0 μm, solid content: 1%
Silver nitrate (AgNO3) Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland 209139 ≥99.0%
L-Cysteine (Cys) Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland W326305 ≥97.0%
Disposable weighing dish Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland Z154881 L × W × H : 86 mm × 86 mm × 25 mm
Disposable weighing dish Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland Z708593 Hexagonal, Size XL
Plastic spatula Semadeni, Switzerland 3340 L × W : 135 mm x 14 mm
Dye, Bemacron ROT E-G Bezema, Switzerland BZ 911.231 Red
Stereomicroscope Wild Heerbrugg, Switzerland Wild M8 500x magnification
Disposable scalpels B. Braun, Switzerland 233-5320 Nr. 20
L-Ascorbic acid Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland A4403 -



  1. Nicolet iS5 User Guide. , (2015).


Microfluidic Pneumatic Cages In-chip Crystal Trapping Manipulation Controlled Chemical Treatment Materials Science Self-assembled Structures Silanized Master Mold SU8 Photolithography Fouling Particle PDMS Mixture Elastomer Curing Agent Desiccator Vacuum Degassing
Microfluidic Pneumatic Cages: A Novel Approach for In-chip Crystal Trapping, Manipulation and Controlled Chemical Treatment
Play Video

Cite this Article

Abrishamkar, A., Paradinas, M.,More

Abrishamkar, A., Paradinas, M., Bailo, E., Rodriguez-Trujillo, R., Pfattner, R., Rossi, R. M., Ocal, C., deMello, A. J., Amabilino, D. B., Puigmartí-Luis, J. Microfluidic Pneumatic Cages: A Novel Approach for In-chip Crystal Trapping, Manipulation and Controlled Chemical Treatment. J. Vis. Exp. (113), e54193, doi:10.3791/54193 (2016).

Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter