A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Studying Ribonucleotide Incorporation: Strand-specific Detection of Ribonucleotides in the Yeast Genome and Measuring Ribonucleotide-induced Mutagenesis

7.7K views

āø±

DOI:

10.3791/58020

āø±

July 26th, 2018

Ā ,Ā Ā ,Ā 

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Ribonucleotides are among the most abundant non-canonical nucleotides incorporated into the genome during eukaryotic nuclear DNA replication. If not properly removed, ribonucleotides can cause DNA damage and mutagenesis. Here, we present two experimental approaches that are used to assess the abundance of ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA and its mutagenic effects.

Abstract

The presence of ribonucleotides in nuclear DNA has been shown to be a source of genomic instability. The extent of ribonucleotide incorporation can be assessed by alkaline hydrolysis and gel electrophoresis as RNA is highly susceptible to hydrolysis in alkaline conditions. This, in combination with Southern blot analysis can be used to determine the location and strand into which the ribonucleotides have been incorporated. However, this procedure is only semi-quantitative and may not be sensitive enough to detect small changes in ribonucleotide content, although strand-specific Southern blot probing improves the sensitivity. As a measure of one of the most striking biological consequences of ribonucleotides in DNA, spontaneous mutagenesis can be analyzed using a forward mutation assay. Using appropriate reporter genes, rare mutations that results in the loss of function can be selected and overall and specific mutation rates can be measured by combining data from fluctuation experiments with DNA sequencing of the reporter gene. The fluctuation assay is applicable to examine a wide variety of mutagenic processes in specific genetic background or growth conditions.

Introduction

During eukaryotic nuclear DNA replication, ribonucleotides are incorporated into the genome by all three major DNA replicases, DNA polymerases (Pols) α, ε, and Γ1,2. RNase H2-dependent ribonucleotide excision repair (RER3) removes the majority of these embedded ribonucleotides.

A ribonucleotide in DNA is susceptible to hydrolysis, as the 2' hydroxyl group of the sugar moiety can attack the adjacent phosphodiester bond, releasing one end with a 2'-3' cyclic phosphate and the other with a 5'-OH4. Alkaline c....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Alkaline Hydrolysis and Strand-specific Southern Blot (Figure 1)

  1. Cell growth and genomic DNA isolation
    1. Isolate yeast genomic DNA using a yeast DNA purification kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Use the cultures that are in the exponential phase of growth (between an optical density of 0.5 and 1). Resuspend the final DNA pellet in 35 mL of 1x TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)).
    2. Add 1 mL of 5 mg/mL RNase A to the DNA and incubate for 30 min at 37 °C.
    3. Precipitate the DNA using 0.1 volumes of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and 2.....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Treatment of genomic DNA with alkali followed by alkaline gel electrophoresis allows for semi-quantitative detection of the DNA fragmentation due to the abundance of stably incorporated ribonucleotides. Figure 2 shows the gel images of yeast genomic DNA treated with or without KOH5. The M644L variant of Pol2, the catalytic subunit of Polε, has reduced the ability to incorporate ribonucleotides while the M644G mutant incorporates more r.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Here, we describe the protocols for two sets of experiments that are frequently used to semi-quantitatively analyze ribonucleotides incorporated during DNA replication and the mutagenic effects of unrepaired ribonucleotides. Although these approaches involve the model eukaryote S. cerevisiae, these techniques can be easily adapted to other microbes and even higher eukaryotes.

Probing for unrepaired ribonucleotides in DNA using alkaline-agarose electrophoresis coupled with Southern blo.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank all current and former Kunkel Lab members for their work and discussions related to protocol and reused data presented here. This work was supported by Project Z01 ES065070 to T.A.K. from the Division of Intramural Research of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
YPD media20 g dextrose, 20 g peptone, 10g yeast extract, in deionized H2O up to 1 L, add 20 g Bacto agar for solid media, autoclave.
COM plates1.3 g SC dropout mix, 1.7 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids or (NH4)2SO4, 5 g (NH4)2SO4, 20 g dextrose, 20 g Bacto agar deionized H2O up to 1 L. Adjust pH to 5.8. Autoclave and 30 – 35 ml per plate.
CAN plates1.3 g SC-Ura dropout powder, 1.7 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids or (NH4)2SO4, 5 g (NH4)2SO4, 20 g dextrose, 20 g Bacto agar, 25 mg uracil and H2O up to 1 L. Autoclave for 15 mins at 121 °C and cool down to 56 °C. Add 6 mL of filter-sterilized 1% canavanine sulfate solution.
5-FOA plates1.3 g SC-Ura dropout powder, 1.7 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids or (NH4)2SO4, 5 g (NH4)2SO4, 20 g dextrose, 20 g Bacto agar, 25 mg uracil and H2O up to 800 mL. Autoclave for 15 mins at 121 °C and cool down to 60 °C. Add 200 mL of filter-sterilized 0.5% 5-FOA solution.
L-Canavanine sulfateUS BiologicalC1050
5-FOAUS BiologicalF5050
20 mL glass culture tubeAny brand
Culture rotator in 30 °C incubatorShaker incubator can be used instead
96 well round bottom platesSterile, any brand
3 mm glass beadsFisher Scientific11-312AAutoclave before use
12-channel pipettesAny brand
Ex Taq DNA PolymeraseTaKaRaRR001
Epicentre MasterPure Yeast DNA Purification KitEpicenterMPY80200
3 M sodium acetateSigma-AldrichS7899
100% ethanol
Qubit 2.0 FluorometerInvitrogenQ32866Newer model available
dsDNA BR Assay kitInvitrogenQ32850
KOHSigma-Aldrich221473
EDTASigma-AldrichE7889
Ficoll 400Dot Scientific Inc.DSF10400
Bromocresol greenEastman6356
Xylene cyanol FFInternational Technologies Inc.72120
NaOHSigma-AldrichS8045
1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)TeknovaT5080
SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel StainInvitrogenS11494
UV transilluminator
Amersham Nylon membrane Hybond-N+GE HealthcareRPN303B
3 MM CHR Chromotography paperWhatman3030-392
NaClCaledon7560-1
Stratalinker 1800Stratagene
QIAquick PCR Purification KitQiagen28106
G-25 spin columnGE Healthcare27-5325-01
1 M Sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2)Sigma-AldrichNaH2PO4 (S9638);
Na2HPO4 (S9390)
SDSSigma-AldrichL4522
BSASigma-AldrichA3059
FormamideSigma-Aldrich47671
Geiger counter

References

  1. Joyce, C. M. Choosing the right sugar: how polymerases select a nucleotide substrate. Proceedings of the National Acaddemy of Sciences U S A. 94 (5), 1619-1622 (1997).
  2. Nick McElhinny, S. A., et al.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Alkaline Gel ElectrophoresisStrand-specific Southern BlotYeast Genome AnalysisForward Mutation AssayFluctuation ExperimentDNA Polymerase VariantsAlkaline HydrolysisRadioactive Probe HybridizationGenomic Instability