A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Evaluating Skilled Prehension in Mice Using an Auto-Trainer

5.2K views

DOI:

10.3791/59784

September 12th, 2019

In This Article

Summary

Method to assess the impact of training on motor skills is a useful tool. Unfortunately, most behavioral assessments can be labor intensive and/or expensive.We describe here a robotic method of assessing prehension (reach-to-grasp) skill in mice.

Abstract

We describe a method to introduce naïve mice to a novel prehension (reach-to-grasp) task. Mice are housed singly in cages with a frontal slot that permits the mouse to reach out of its cage and retrieve food pellets. Minimal food restriction is employed to encourage the mice to perform the food retrieval from the slot. As the mice begin to associate coming to the slot for food, the pellets are manually pulled away to stimulate extension and pronation of their paw to grasp and retrieve the pellet through the frontal slot. When the mice begin to reach for the pellets as they arrive at the slot, the behavioral assay can be performed by measuring the rate at which they successfully grasp and retrieve the desired pellet. They are then introduced to an auto-trainer that automates both the process of providing food pellets for the mouse to grasp, and the recording of successful and failed reaching and grasping attempts. This allows for the collection of reaching data for multiple mice with minimal effort, to be used in experimental analysis as appropriate.

Introduction

Methods to experimentally test a motor skill pre- and post- neurological injury as well as modulate the timing, amount, and type of motor training are important to translational research. Over the last decade, mice, because of the attendant ease of genetic manipulation, have become a popular model system in which to elucidate the mechanisms of motor learning pre- and post- injury. However, behavioral assays in mice have not been optimized in the same way that such assays have been for other mammals (especially rats). Further, there are important differences between the behavior of a mouse and a rat that strongly suggest training the two species in different manners

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All methods described here have been approved by the ACUC (Animal Care and Use Committee) of the Johns Hopkins University.

1. Preparing mouse cages for use

  1. Create a slotted opening with dimensions of 0.8 cm width and 7 cm height from the base at the front end of each cage, as illustrated in Figure 1. This slot serves as the opening through which the animal will reach.
    NOTE: The auto-trainer was designed for the use with the standard mouse cage dimensions (as shown in Figure 1) supplied by most animal research supply vendors. Further, the auto-trainer will easily ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

In general, it is recommended that each training session consist of about 20-30 trials, which may be set by the user, run automatically by the auto-trainer and saved into a single log file per session and mouse. Each trial can be run consecutively, right after the other, with 2-5 s of pause. Mice trained on the auto-trainer exhibit an increase in skill over 10 training sessions.

To compare the utility of the auto-trainer to manu.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Our auto-trainer evaluates forelimb reach-to-grasp (prehension) in an automated manner. To achieve this endpoint, many of the parameters designed for the mouse prehension task, including pellet placement, pellet size, and training criteria, have been iterated over several years and adapted from prior protocols2,5,6. The advancement here is the automation of the task using a robot that allows home-cage housing. Home-cage housing .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Dan Tasch and Uri Tasch of Step Analysis, LLC have manufactured auto-trainer device with payment from Richard J. O'Brien and Steven R. Zeiler.

Acknowledgements

The auto-training device was constructed by Jason Dunthorn, Uri Tasch, and Dan Tasch at Step Analysis, LLC, with design input support and instructions provided by Robert Hubbard, Richard O'Brien, and Steven Zeiler.

Teresa Duarte of the Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown provided valuable insight and ideas about describing and categorizing mouse reaching actions.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
ABS FilamentCustom 3D PrintedN/Autilized for pellet holder, frame, arm and funnel
ABS SheetMcMaster-Carr8586K5813/8" thickness; used for platform compononents, positioning stand guides and base
Adruino MiniAdruinoA000087nano version also compatiable as well as other similar microcontrollers
Bench-Top Adjustable-Height Positioning StandMcMaster-Carr9967T4335 lbs. load capacity
Clear Acrylic Round TubeMcMaster-Carr8532K14ID 3/8"
Low-Carbon Steel WireMcMaster-Carr8855K140.148" diameter
Pellet DispenserLafayette Instrument: Neuroscience80209-45with 45 mg interchangeable pellet size wheel and optional stand
Photointerrupter Breakout Board SparkFunBOB-09322 ROHSdesigned for Sharp GP1A57HRJ00F
Reflective Object SensorFairchild SemiconductorQRD1113phototransistor output
Servo MotorSparkFunS8213generic metal gear (micro size)
Transmissive PhotointerrupterSharpGP1A57HRJ00Fgap: 10 mm, slit: 1.8 mm

References

  1. Whishaw, I. Q. An endpoint, descriptive, and kinematic comparison of skilled reaching in mice (mus musculus) with rats (rattus norvegicus). Behavior Brain Research. 78, 101-111 (1996).
  2. Farr, T. D., Whishaw, I. Q.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Prehension TaskAuto-Trainer SystemMouse Motor SkillFood Pellet RetrievalReach Distance MeasurementLabVIEW InterfaceBait Pellet SensorTraining Session DataNeurological Injury ModelsMotor Learning Assessment