Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Medicine

Intramyocardial Transplantation of MSC-Loading Injectable Hydrogels after Myocardial Infarction in a Murine Model

doi: 10.3791/61752 Published: September 20, 2020
Chan Woo Kim1,2, Chan Joon Kim1,3, Eun-Hye Park1,2, Eunmi Lee1,2, Eunhwa Seong1,2, Kiyuk Chang1,2

Abstract

One of the major issues facing current cardiac stem cell therapies for preventing postinfarct heart failure is the low retention and survival rates of transplanted cells within the injured myocardium, limiting their therapeutic efficacy. Recently, the use of scaffolding biomaterials has gained attention for improving and maximizing stem cell therapy. The objective of this protocol is to introduce a simple and straightforward technique to transplant bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) using injectable hydroxyphenyl propionic acid (GH) hydrogels; the hydrogels are favorable as a cell delivery platform for cardiac tissue engineering applications due to their ability to be cross-linked in situ and high biocompatibility. We present a simple method to fabricate MSC-loading GH hydrogels (MSC/hydrogels) and evaluate their survival and proliferation in three-dimensional (3D) in vitro culture. In addition, we demonstrate a technique for intramyocardial transplantation of MSC/hydrogels in mice, describing a surgical procedure to induce myocardial infarction (MI) via left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation and subsequent MSC/hydrogels transplantation.

Introduction

Cardiac stem cell therapy has emerged as a potential approach for myocardial repair and regeneration1,2. Despite the recent positive results in animal models and clinical trials, the application of stem cell-based therapy for myocardial repair is limited due to low retention and poor survival of injected cells at the infarcted heart tissues3,4. As a result, the use of cell-based tissue engineering, including injectable biomaterials5, cardiac patches6, and cell sheets7, has been intensively studied to improve cell retention and integration within the host myocardium.

Among the various potential approaches to bioengineered cardiac tissue repair, injectable hydrogels combined with appropriate cell types, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), are an attractive option to effectively deliver cells into myocardial regions8,9. Gelatin, a well-known natural polymer, can be used as an injectable matrix due to its great biocompatibility, considerable biodegradability, and reduced immunogenicity when compared with a wide range of biomaterials used in biomedical applications. Although gelatin-based injectable platforms have great potential, their applicability in vivo remains limited based on their low mechanical stiffness and easy degradability in the physiological environment.

To overcome these limitations, a novel and simple design of gelatin-based hydrogels consisting of hydroxyphenyl propionic acid has been proposed for in vivo applications. Gelatin-hydroxyphenyl propionic acid (GH) conjugates can be cross-linked in situ in the presence of an enzyme, horseradish peroxidase (HRP), and subsequently encapsulate various drugs, biomolecules, or cells within the hydrogel, suggesting great potential in tissue engineering applications10,11,12,13,14. In addition, we have recently investigated the therapeutic effects of GH hydrogels containing encapsulated MSCs and demonstrated their use in successful cardiac repair and regeneration after MI in a murine model15. In this protocol, we describe a simple technique for the encapsulation and in vitro three-dimensional (3D) proliferation of MSCs within GH hydrogels. We also introduce a surgical procedure designed to generate a murine MI model via coronary artery ligation and intramyocardial transplantation of MSC-loading GH hydrogels into the infarcted heart.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

All animal research procedures were provided in accordance with the Laboratory Animals Welfare Act, the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Guidelines and Policies for Rodent Experiments provided by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in the School of Medicine of The Catholic University of Korea.

1. Preparation of MSCs and injectable gelatin hydrogels

  1. Culture MSCs in a 100 mm culture dish at 37 °C and 5% CO2. When MSCs growth reaches 80% confluence, wash the dish twice with DPBS and add 1 mL of trypsin-substitute at 37 °C for 3 min.
    NOTE: MSCs were isolated from murine bone marrow following conventional procedures16, cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic−antimycotic solution, and used between passage 7‒9 for this study.
  2. Add 9 mL of culture medium and centrifuge at 500 x g for 3 min. Next, discard the resulting supernatant, resuspend the cells in 1 mL of PBS, and maintain the cell suspension on ice.
  3. Dilute 10 µL of cell suspension with 10 µL of Trypan blue and obtain the cell concentration using an automated cell counter.
  4. Resuspend and transfer MSCs to a 1 mL tube at a density of 1 x 107 cells/mL.
  5. Prepare a 6.25 wt% of GH conjugate solution in PBS and separate into 2 vials. Next, mix the GH solutions with either 6 µg/mL of HRP (GH solution A) or 0.07 wt% of H2O2 (GH solution B).
    NOTE: Prepare gelatin-hydroxyphenyl propionic acid (GH) conjugates according to published protocols12,15.
    1. Keep a 9:1 volumetric ratio of GH conjugate solution to HRP (GH solution A) and GH conjugate solution to H2O2 (GH solution B), respectively.
  6. Prior to mixing the MSCs with GH solution A, briefly centrifuge the cell suspension at 1,000 x g and carefully aspirate the resulting supernatant. Subsequently, mix the pellet containing MSCs with GH solution A.

2. In situ MSC-loading and three-dimensional in vitro culture

  1. Load GH solution A (containing MSCs) and GH solution B into either side of a dual syringe. Plate 300 µL of the combined GH solutions with MSCs at a final density of 5 x 106 cells/mL onto an eight-well chamber slide.
  2. After in situ hydrogel formation and subsequent MSC encapsulation via enzymatic cross-linking, add 700 µL of DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic−antimycotic solution.
  3. Incubate the slide at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and replace the culture medium every 2‒3 days.

3. Confirmation of in vitro proliferation and survival of MSCs within GH hydrogels

  1. To determine the viability of 3D cultured MSCs within GH hydrogels, use a live/dead cell staining assay after the predetermined incubation time.
  2. Following incubation of the encapsulated MSCs in GH hydrogels for 3, 5, 7 or 14 days, aspirate the medium and wash the well twice with PBS.
  3. Prepare a staining solution containing 5 µL of calcein AM and 20 µL of ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1) in 10 mL of DPBS.
  4. Add 200 µL of the staining solution to the well and incubate for 30 min in the dark at room temperature.
  5. Aspirate the staining solution and wash the well twice with PBS.
  6. Carefully separate the chamber from the slide and place a full coverslip over the GH hydrogels. Use a confocal microscopy to visualize the degree of proliferation and morphological changes of the encapsulated MSCs.
    NOTE: Fluorescent images were acquired under 200x magnification and imaged at the excitation/emission wavelengths of 470/540 nm for calcein and 516/607 nm for EthD-1.

4. Induction of myocardial infarction in mice

  1. Anesthetize 7-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (20‒22 g) with intraperitoneal injection of Zoletil and Rompun in saline (2 mL/kg).
  2. Prior to surgery, depilate the mouse chest using hair removal cream and sterilize the skin with iodine.
  3. Place the mouse on an operating table and intubate by inserting a catheter into the trachea to provide supplemental oxygen via mechanical ventilation.
  4. Gently cut through the skin using surgical scissors and then penetrate the intercostal muscles by micro scissors. Separate the 2nd and 3rd left ribs using a 5-0 silk suture to maintain an open chest cavity.
  5. Carefully ligate the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery using a needle holder with an 8-0 polypropylene suture and cut the suture using electrocautery.
  6. Observe an immediate color change in the anterior left ventricular wall.

5. Intramyocardial transplantation of MSC-loading GH hydrogels

  1. After inducing the myocardial infarction by LAD ligation, inject 10 µL of MSC-loading GH solutions into two different points at the infarct border zone (total: 2 x 105 MSCs/20 µL) using a dual-syringe equipped with a 26G needle.
    1. Following the same procedure described in Step 1, prepare and transfer MSC-loading GH solutions into a dual syringe.
      NOTE: To assess the engraftment of MSC-loading GH hydrogels within the infarcted area, MSCs and GH conjugates were pre-labeled with PHK26 and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), respectively.
  2. Restore the opened chest cavity and close the muscles and skin using 5-0 sutures.
    NOTE: Prior to chest closure, remove the air using a catheter syringe.
  3. Remove the tracheal tube and place the mouse in a cage under an infrared lamp during recovery.

6. Echocardiography

  1. Four weeks following transplantation, initially anesthetize the mouse with 5% isoflurane and then adjust the isoflurane concentration to 1%.
  2. Depilate the chest using hair removal cream and place the mouse on a heating pad. Apply ultrasound transducer gel onto the chest.
  3. Acquire two-dimensional parasternal short axis views and record M-mode tracings at the level of the papillary muscle.
    NOTE: Place a linear array transducer (7‒15 MHz) in the left parasternal line and view the anatomical structures.
  4. Measure corresponding lines for LVAW, LVID, and LVPW to obtain cardiac wall thickness, chamber dimension, and fractional shortening.
    NOTE: Compare cardiac function including the ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), and end-systolic volume (ESV) at the level of the papillary muscle to ensure proper assessment at the same anatomic location.

7. Histological evaluation

  1. At the predetermined time after transplantation of MSC-loading GH hydrogels into the infarcted heart, euthanize the mouse in a CO2 chamber and collect the heart for histological analysis15.
  2. For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome (MT) staining, fix the dissected heart tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and embed in paraffin. Next, cut paraffin-embedded heart blocks into 4 µm serial sections using a microtome and stain the sections with MT stain according to standard protocols17.
  3. Acquire images on a slide scanner at 20x magnification and calculate the infarct size of the treatment groups.
    Infarct size (%) = total infarct circumference / total LV circumference x 100
  4. Calculate both circumferences by midline length measurement. For LV midline circumferences, measure the centerline lengths between the endocardial and epicardial surfaces. For midline infarct circumferences, measure the lengths of infarct including more than 50 % of the whole thickness of myocardium18.
    NOTE: All image analyses were performed using ImageJ software.
  5. Measure the wall thickness of the scar at the papillary muscle levels.
  6. Calculate the fraction of collagen area.
    Collagen area (%) = total area of interstitial fibrosis/myocyte area x 100

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

To effectively deliver MSCs to the infarcted myocardium, MSC-loading in situ cross-linkable hydrogels described in Figure 1 were used in this protocol. Prior to in vivo transplantation, the proliferation and survival of MSCs in GH hydrogels were confirmed by a 3D in vitro live/dead cell staining assay (live: green; dead: red). As shown in Figure 2, representative images exhibited sufficient MSCs proliferation, showing branched networks within GH hydrogels. In addition, an extensive multicellular 3D structure of MSCs was clearly observed at day 14, indicating that GH hydrogels could provide a proper microenvironment for the encapsulated cells.

After the induction of MI via LAD ligation, MSC-loading GH hydrogels were intramyocardially transplanted into peri-infarct areas (Figure 3A). As shown in Figure 3B, the MSCs and gel were appropriately sustained within the infarcted region. MSCs, stained with PHK26 (red), were well integrated into GH hydrogels, stained with FITC (green), presenting successful engraftment and retention in the infarcted hearts for in vivo application.

To verify the therapeutic effects of MSC-loading GH hydrogels in a murine MI model, the changes in cardiac function and structure were evaluated by echocardiography and histological analysis at day 28 post-transplantation and compared among the different treatment groups. The representative echocardiography showed improved cardiac functions, including FS, EF, and ESV, in the MSC/gel treated group compared with the other groups (Figure 4). In addition, histological analysis exhibited less fibrosis, thicker infarcted walls, and a smaller infarct size in the MSC/gel treated group than in the other groups, indicating that this protocol contributed beneficial effects by significantly attenuating LV remodeling (Figure 5).

Figure 1
Figure 1: Scheme of the process for improving stem cell retention and engraftment using injectable hydrogels. In situ cross-linkable GH hydrogels containing bone marrow-derived MSCs were prepared and transplanted by intramyocardial injection into the infarcted heart. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: In vitro 3D MSC proliferation within GH hydrogels. Representative images of live (green)/dead (red) MSCs obtained via a confocal microscopy following live/dead cell staining after 3, 5, 7, and 14 days of incubation (200x magnification; scale = 100 µm). The images and video were partly adapted with permission from Kim et al.15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: In vivo transplantation of MSC/Hydrogels. (A) A schematic diagram showing intramyocardial transplantation after the induction of MI. (B) Representative images of transplanted MSCs and GH hydrogels labeled with PKH26 (red) and FITC (green), respectively. Mice were sacrificed after 1, 3, 5, or 7 days of transplantation and their hearts were then excised to assess the degree of MSC and GH hydrogel engraftment. The excised hearts were cryo-fixed, prepared into serial-sections, and imaged via a confocal microcopy (200x magnification; scale = 100 µm). The images were partly adapted with permission from Kim et al.15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Improvements in cardiac function following MSC/Hydrogels transplantation. (A) Representative video of echocardiography. (B) Representative short axis M-mode image with measurements, including left ventricular anterior wall thickness in diastole (LVAWd) and systole (LVAWs), internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd) and systole (LVIDs), and posterior wall thickness in diastole (LVPWd) and systole (LVPWs). (C‒E) Functional improvements in the ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), and end-systolic volume (ESV) after 28 days of transplantation of all treatment groups. Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001; n = 9‒12 per group). The videos and results were partly adapted with permission from Kim et al.15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Improvements in cardiac structure following MSC/Hydrogels transplantation. (A) Representative images of histological evaluation. (B‒D) Structural improvements were observed in infarct size, along with less infarcted wall thinning and fibrosis. Scale = 1 mm. Data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001; n = 4‒7 per group). The images and results were partly adapted with permission from Kim et al.15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Injectable GH hydrogels have great potential for in vivo applications because of their ability to homogenously incorporate diverse therapeutic agents in situ. Furthermore, their physical and biochemical properties can be easily manipulated based on disease-dependent requirements. In this respect, injectable hydrogels have been proposed to address the major limitations in current cardiac stem cell therapy hampered by poor survival and cell retention (i.e., < 10% within 24 h post-transplantation) in the injured heart19,20. To overcome this poor outcome, the protocol described herein provides a simple and feasible method to improve cell retention and survival using GH hydrogels that can be cross-linked in situ after myocardial transplantation, which have demonstrated favorable effects on cardiac structure and function in a murine MI model.

The primary advantage feature of this technique is its broad in vivo applicability with any type of cell and biomolecule, which can be loaded by simply mixing with the pregel GH solution prior to injection. Furthermore, to obtain a comprehensive understanding of donor-to-host interactions, a straightforward labeling approach of the GH conjugates and/or encapsulated biomolecules can be adapted to track changes in their in vivo stability, host integration, and resorption kinetics. To our knowledge, the use of injectable gelatin-based hydrogels combined with therapeutic stem cells was the first to validate the restorative potential of cardiac tissue in vitro and in vivo15.

At the current stage in this research, GH hydrogels that are loaded with MSCs, injected, and cross-linked in situ were used as a proof of concept to assess their applicability in a murine MI model. Although this method seemingly improved MSC engraftment and retention in the transplanted heart tissues, the detailed conditions during injection should be considered for optimizing therapeutic efficacy, such as the location of injection site (i.e., peri-infarct zone or infarct zone), volume and number of injections, and stiffness of the hydrogel (i.e., hard to inject or easy to leak).

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a protocol for a representative murine MI model by LAD ligation and a practical method for intramyocardial transplantation of stem cells using in situ cross-linked hydrogels to improve the retention and engraftment of transplanted MSCs. These techniques provide an effective method for intramyocardial transplantation of MSC-loading injectable hydrogels and highlight their great potential for application in large animals and clinical translation.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare with this work.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1A02049346)

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) Intron IBS-BP031-2
5-0 silk suture AILEE SK534
8-0 polypropylene suture ETHICON M8732H
8-well chamber slide Nunc LAB-TEK 154534
Angiocath Plus (22GA) catheter BD Angiocath Plus REF382423
Antibiotic-antimyocotic Gibco 15240-062
Centrifuge GYROGEN 1582MGR
Confocal microscope Zeiss LSM 510
Cover slipe MARIENFELD 101242
Deluxe High Temperature Cautery kit Bovie QTY1
DMEM Gibco 11995-065
DPBS Gibco 14040-133
Dual-syringe
EOSIN SIGMA-ALDRICH HT110116
Ethanol EMSURE K49350783 739
FBS Gibco 16000-044
Fechtner conjunctiva forceps titanium WORLD PRECISISON INSTRUMENTS WP1820
Fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer I (FITC) SIGMA-ALDRICH F7250
Forcep HEBU HB0458
Hair removal cream Ildong Pharmaceutical
Heating pad Stoelting 50300 Homeothermic Blanket System
50301 Replacement Heating Pad for 50300 (10 X 12.5cm)
Hematoxylin SIGMA-ALDRICH HHS80
Horseradish peroxide (HRP; 250-330 U/mg) SIGMA-ALDRICH P8375
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 30 wt % in H2O) SIGMA-ALDRICH 216763
Iodine Green Pharmaceutical
LIVE/DEAD cell staining kit Thermo Fisher R37601
Mechanical ventilator Harvard Apparatus
Micro centrifuge HANIL Micro 12
Micro needle holder KASCO 37-1452
Micro scissor HEBU HB7381
Microscope OLYMPUS SZ61
MT staining kit SIGMA-ALDRICH HT1079-1SET Weigert’s iron hematoxylin solution
HT15-1KT Trichrome Stain (Masson) Kit
Paraffin LK LABKOREA H06-660-107
PBS buffer Gibco 10010-023
PHK26 staining kit SIGMA-ALDRICH MINI26
Slide scanner Leica SCN400
Surgical scissor HEBU HB7454
Surgical tape 3M micopore 1530-1
Tissue cassette Scilab Korea Cas3003
Transducer gel SUNGHEUNG SH102
Trout-Barraquer needle holder curved KASCO 50-3710c
Ultrasound system Philips Affiniti 50
Xylene JUNSEI 25175-0430

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Jhund, P. S., McMurray, J. J. Heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: a lost battle in the war on heart failure. Circulation. 118, (20), 2019-2021 (2008).
  2. Cahill, T. J., Kharbanda, R. K. Heart failure after myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Mechanisms, incidence and identification of patients at risk. World Journal of Cardiology. 9, (5), 407-415 (2017).
  3. Cambria, E., et al. Translational cardiac stem cell therapy: advancing from first-generation to next-generation cell types. npj Regenerative Medicine. 2, 17 (2017).
  4. Lemcke, H., Voronina, N., Steinhoff, G., David, R. Recent Progress in Stem Cell Modification for Cardiac Regeneration. Stem Cells International. 2018, 1909346 (2018).
  5. Alagarsamy, K. N., Yan, W., Srivastava, A., Desiderio, V., Dhingra, S. Application of injectable hydrogels for cardiac stem cell therapy and tissue engineering. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. 20, (4), 221-230 (2019).
  6. Gaetani, R., et al. Epicardial application of cardiac progenitor cells in a 3D-printed gelatin/hyaluronic acid patch preserves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Biomaterials. 61, 339-348 (2015).
  7. Gao, L., et al. Myocardial Tissue Engineering With Cells Derived From Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and a Native-Like, High-Resolution, 3-Dimensionally Printed Scaffold. Circualtion Research. 120, (8), 1318-1325 (2017).
  8. Hasan, A., et al. Injectable Hydrogels for Cardiac Tissue Repair after Myocardial Infarction. Advanced Science. 2, (11), 1500122 (2015).
  9. Wu, R., Hu, X., Wang, J. Concise Review: Optimized Strategies for Stem Cell-Based Therapy in Myocardial Repair: Clinical Translatability and Potential Limitation. Stem Cells. 36, (4), 482-500 (2018).
  10. Lee, Y., et al. In situ forming gelatin-based tissue adhesives and their phenolic content-driven properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 1, (18), 2407-2414 (2013).
  11. Lee, Y., Bae, J. W., Lee, J. W., Suh, W., Park, K. D. Enzyme-catalyzed in situ forming gelatin hydrogels as bioactive wound dressings: effects of fibroblast delivery on wound healing efficacy. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2, (44), 7712-7718 (2014).
  12. Lee, S. H., et al. In situ Crosslinkable Gelatin Hydrogels for Vasculogenic Induction and Delivery of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Advanced Functional Materials. 24, (43), 6771-6781 (2014).
  13. Jung, B. K., et al. A hydrogel matrix prolongs persistence and promotes specific localization of an oncolytic adenovirus in a tumor by restricting nonspecific shedding and an antiviral immune response. Biomaterials. 147, 26-38 (2017).
  14. Kim, G., et al. Tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cell-embedded in situ crosslinkable gelatin hydrogel therapy recovers postmenopausal osteoporosis through bone regeneration. PLoS One. 13, (7), 0200111 (2018).
  15. Kim, C. W., et al. MSC-Encapsulating in situ Cross-Linkable Gelatin Hydrogels To Promote Myocardial Repair. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 3, (3), 1646-1655 (2020).
  16. Meirelles Lda, S., Nardi, N. B. Murine marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell: isolation, in vitro expansion, and characterization. Br J Haematol. 123, (4), 702-711 (2003).
  17. Ojha, N., et al. Characterization of the structural and functional changes in the myocardium following focal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 294, (6), 2435-2443 (2008).
  18. Takagawa, J., et al. Myocardial infarct size measurement in the mouse chronic infarction model: comparison of area- and length-based approaches. Journal of Applied Physiology. 102, (6), 2104-2111 (2007).
  19. Terrovitis, J., et al. Noninvasive Quantification and Optimization of Acute Cell Retention by In vivo Positron Emission Tomography After Intramyocardial Cardiac-Derived Stem Cell Delivery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 54, (17), 1619-1626 (2009).
  20. Dib, N., Khawaja, H., Varner, S., McCarthy, M., Campbell, A. Cell Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Comparison of Methods of Delivery. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 4, (2), 177-181 (2011).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Kim, C. W., Kim, C. J., Park, E. H., Lee, E., Seong, E., Chang, K. Intramyocardial Transplantation of MSC-Loading Injectable Hydrogels after Myocardial Infarction in a Murine Model. J. Vis. Exp. (163), e61752, doi:10.3791/61752 (2020).More

Kim, C. W., Kim, C. J., Park, E. H., Lee, E., Seong, E., Chang, K. Intramyocardial Transplantation of MSC-Loading Injectable Hydrogels after Myocardial Infarction in a Murine Model. J. Vis. Exp. (163), e61752, doi:10.3791/61752 (2020).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
simple hit counter