Lethality of RNAi treatment
We found that the lethality of the RNAi treatment depends strongly on the rearing history and condition of the Odonata larvae. The larvae soon after collection in the field are generally healthy and exhibit low mortality rates after the electroporation-mediated RNAi treatment. By contrast, the larvae reared in the laboratory for a long period of time (e.g., one month) tend to suffer low success rates of adult emergence. In I. senegalensis, instead of the larvae collected in the field, the larvae reared in the laboratory from eggs can be used14, but the success rates of RNAi using the laboratory-reared larvae tend to be considerably lower (many individuals died during metamorphosis) than those using the field-collected larvae. In addition, frequent larval feeding and clean water rearing are important for increasing the success rates of adult emergence and reducing the lethality of the RNAi treatment.
Efficiency of RNAi treatment
As described above, the levels of RNAi phenotype, namely size and location of the cuticle decolorization, often exhibited considerable variation between individuals subjected to the same RNAi treatment (e.g., Figure 4), but the levels of the phenotypic penetrance seem to be remarkably different between the Odonata species. The observed phenotypic regions were larger and more prominent in I. senegalensis (Figures 4-5) than in P. zonata (Figure 6) and N. pygmaea9. This difference may be due to the thickness of the cuticle on the larval surface, considering that the cuticle of I. senegalensis is thinner than the cuticle of P. zonata and N. pygmaea). As far as we examined, no clear difference was recognized between the effects of siRNA and dsRNA (Figure 4, Table 1).
Appropriate developmental stage for RNAi
It should be noted that proper larval staging is important for performing RNAi efficiently. Inhibition of adult pigmentation was caused by MCO2 RNAi before the stage D (approximately 3 days before adult emergence), which is consistent with the previous report on N. pygmaea9. The RNAi phenotypes observed when injected at the stages C and D were less conspicuous than those treated at the stages A and B, which indicate that the stages C and D may be too late to sufficiently suppress the gene expression. The appropriate timing for RNAi treatment depends on the timing of gene expression, and MCO2 gene exhibits transiently high expression during adult emergence9, as in other insects17,18. In the stinkbug Plautia stali, RNAi knockdown of MCO2 gene was observed from day 4 onwards after injection27, which is consistent with the present results.
Our previous study on I. senegalensis showed that, after the stage B, days to adult emergence exhibit relatively small variation among the majority of final instar larvae, suggesting that the stage B may correspond to the onset of the process toward adult emergence, after which the developmental processes for metamorphosis proceed in a prefixed and coordinated manner14. Morphological abnormalities caused by wounds were often observed when the larvae were RNAi-treated at the stages C and D (Figure 7B, 7C). This is likely to be associated with a dramatic progression of metamorphosis during these stages, suggesting that RNAi treatment should be avoided from the stage C and on. In summary, we recommend that final instar larvae at the stage A or B (or at the stage before the larval wings expand significantly) should be used for RNAi experiments.
Usefulness and superiority of electroporation-mediated RNAi method
The conventional RNAi is a simple and powerful experimental method, but some insect lineages like butterflies10, aphids28 and dragonflies9 exhibit low RNAi efficiency, for which establishment of gene function analysis is a major challenge. In this study, we found that electroporation-mediated RNAi can induce local gene suppression in dragonflies with almost 100% efficiency, at least in epidermis, if treated at appropriate developmental stages (Table 1). Recently, CRISPR/Cas9-based gene knockouts have been successfully applied to a variety of insects, providing a powerful molecular genetic tool for non-model organisms29. Here, however, we point out that CRISPR/Cas9 is certainly great but the electroporation-mediated RNAi method may be superior to CRISPR/Cas9 in some respects.
Firstly, in the electroporation-mediated RNAi method, the body region where RNAi phenotypes appear can be easily controlled experimentally by the position of the positive electrode upon electroporation. In addition, since the region where the gene expression is suppressed is limited around the region where the positive electrode was placed, the RNAi phenotypes can be easily compared with the control phenotypes side by side in the same individual. Secondly, compared to CRISPR/Cas9 method in which injected eggs have to be reared to adulthood to observe the knockout phenotypes, the electroporation-mediated RNAi is superior in that the gene knockdown phenotypes can usually be observed in much shorter time. For example, it takes three to four months for I. senegalensis and one to two years for P. zonata from eggs to adults14,30. However, in order to observe RNAi phenotypes within the adult epidermis, it takes less than one month from dsRNA injection into final instar larvae at the stage B to adult emergence for both I. senegalensis and P. zonata (Figure 7). Thirdly, the electroporation-mediated RNAi method entails dsRNA injection into large larvae, which is easier than microinjection into tiny eggs required for CRISPR/Cas9 method. In addition, the electroporation-mediated RNAi is applicable to insect species whose newly laid eggs are difficult to collect. For example, females of P. zonata lay eggs onto floating plants on water surface during flight, and thus it is difficult to collect their eggs both in the field and in the lab. Hence, we expect that this protocol may be generally applicable to non-model organisms in which the conventional RNAi method does not work efficiently.