$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Primary hepatocytes are important tools for liver-related basic research, disease treatment, and application such as drug testing. The current gold standard for primary hepatocyte isolation is the two-step collagenase perfusion procedure1,2,3 introduced by Seglen in the 1970s4. However, this procedure is technically challenging and has a high failure rate when performed by novice surgeons. Even when a perfusion is considered successful, drastic differences in hepatocyte viability (typically 60%-95%) and yield (0.5-5 x 108 per 200-300 g rat) may be observed between isolations. This influences the quality and scale of downstream experiments. Apart from the technical procedure, the perfusion setup used for the isolation, either commercially available or custom built, is a contributing factor. Attention must be given to the assembly, optimization, and maintenance of the perfusion setup. The purpose of this protocol is to improve the success rate and stability between isolations of primary rat hepatocytes through multiparameter perfusion control of the technical procedure and perfusion setup of the two-step collagenase perfusion procedure.
From the technical aspect, the most difficult step in the procedure is the portal vein cannulation. As for the other steps, if good practice is observed and general precautions are taken, the stability of the isolation can be improved. Therefore, understanding of the reasoning for each step is important so that the surgeon could respond to various variables that may occur during the procedure.
Various protocols for the isolation of hepatocytes and liver non-parenchymal cells from rat and mouse have been published1,2,5,6,7,8,9. The perfusion setups used in these protocols had several disadvantages, which include the reuse of perfusion tubing, problems with temperature control, need for routine optimization of perfusion parameters, and/or usage of unsuitable type of intravenous (IV) catheter for portal vein cannulation. The reuse of perfusion tubing will increase the chances of contamination, especially if the tubing was not cleaned and disinfected properly. Reuse of tubing without routine replacement will also expose the perfusion setup to problems such as leaky tubing or connectors, clogged bubble trap and constricted tubing, all of which will substantially reduce the perfusate pressure and flow rate, thus, affecting liver digestion efficiency. Without a constant heat source in some setups for temperature control, pre-warmed buffers will cool down over time, leading to low collagenase activity and digestion. Although other setups utilize a jacketed glass condenser connected to a water circulator to warm the buffer, they are bulky and require careful cleaning. Temperature, pressure, and flow rate of buffer exiting the catheter must be measured and optimized before the start of isolation toensure stable perfusion condition. Even after optimization, the parameters could still change halfway during isolation due to the actions of the operator, thereby leading to suboptimal perfusion and digestion. Most types of IV catheter are not suitable for portal vein cannulation because they do not allow continuous perfusion during cannulation. They are unable to immediately inform the surgeon when the cannulation is successful. Furthermore, it is challenging to secure the portal vein on the soft catheter without deforming it.
Here, we address these problems using standardized disposable sterile tubing, a silicone heater jacket for precise and stable temperature control, real-time monitoring and alarm system with data storage and management and use of a special IV catheter, which allows continuous perfusion while puncturing portal vein during cannulation. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first group to combine all these features into an integrated perfusion system (IPS) that is compact, making it highly portable and able to be fit into a laminar flow hood to ensure aseptic operation.