$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for more than half of heart failure cases and has become a worldwide public health issue1. Clinical observations have indicated several critical features of HFpEF: (1) ventricular diastolic dysfunction, accompanied by increased systolic stiffness, (2) normal ejection fraction at rest with impaired exercise performance, and (3) cardiac remodeling2. The proposed mechanisms include hormonal dysregulation, systemic microvascular inflammation, metabolic disorders, and abnormalities in sarcomeric and extracellular matrix proteins3. However, experimental studies have shown that heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) causes these alterations. Clinical studies have explored the therapeutic effects of angiotensin receptor inhibitors and drugs for treating HFrEF in HFpEF4,5. However, unique therapeutic approaches for HFpEF are needed. Compared with understanding the clinical symptoms, the alterations in pathology, biochemistry, and molecular biology of HFpEF remain poorly defined.
Animal models of HFpEF have been developed to explore the mechanisms, diagnostic markers, and therapeutic approaches. Laboratory animals, including pigs, dogs, rats, and mice, can develop HFpEF, and diverse risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and aging, were selected as induction factors6,7. For example, deoxycorticosterone acetate alone or combined with a high fat/sugar diet induces HFpEF in pigs8,9. Ventricular pressure overload is another technique used to develop HFpEF in large and small animal models10. In addition, specific EF cut-off values to define HFpEF have been adopted across continents in recent years, as seen in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association11, the Japanese Circulation Society/the Japanese Heart Failure Society12. Thus, many previously established models may become appropriate for HFpEF studies if the clinical criteria are adopted. For example, Youselfi et al. claimed that a genetically modified mouse strain, Col4a3-/-, was an effective HFpEF model. This strain developed typical HFpEF cardiac symptoms, such as diastolic dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cardiac remodeling13. A previous study used a high-energy diet to induce cardiac remodeling with a mid-range of EF in aged monkeys14, characterized by a metabolic disorder, fibrosis, and reduced actomyosin MgATPase in the myocardium. Mouse transverse aortic constriction (TAC) is one of the most widely used models to mimic hypertension-induced ventricular cardiomyopathy. The left ventricle progresses from concentric hypertrophy with increased EF to dilated remodeling with reduced EF15,16. The transitional phenotypes between these two typical stages suggest that the aortic constriction technique can be used to study HFpEF.
The pathological features, cellular signaling, and mRNA profiles of a porcine HFpEF model were previously published17. Here, a step-by-step protocol is presented to establish this model and the approaches to evaluate the phenotypes of this model. The procedure is illustrated in Figure 1. Briefly, the surgical plan was made jointly by the principal investigator, surgeons, laboratory technicians, and animal care staff. The minipigs underwent health examinations, including biochemical tests and echocardiography. Following surgery, anti-inflammatory and analgesic procedures were performed. Echocardiography, histological examination, and biomarkers were used to evaluate the phenotypes.