Method Article

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surfaces In Vitro

DOI:

10.3791/64712

April 21st, 2023

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We introduce four methods to evaluate the antimicrobial activities of nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces using in vitro techniques. These methods can be adapted to study the interactions of different nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces with a broad range of microbial species.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The antimicrobial activities of nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces, such as silver, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, and magnesium oxide, have been explored previously in clinical and environmental settings and in consumable food products. However, a lack of consistency in the experimental methods and materials used has culminated in conflicting results, even amongst studies of the same nanostructure types and bacterial species. For researchers who wish to employ nanostructures as an additive or coating in a product design, these conflicting data limit their utilization in clinical settings.

To confront this dilemma, in this article, we present four different methods to determine the antimicrobial activities of nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces, and discuss their applicability in different scenarios. Adapting consistent methods is expected to lead to reproducible data that can be compared across studies and implemented for different nanostructure types and microbial species. We introduce two methods to determine the antimicrobial activities of nanoparticles and two methods for the antimicrobial activities of nanostructured surfaces.

For nanoparticles, the direct co-culture method can be used to determine the minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentrations of nanoparticles, and the direct exposure culture method can be used to assess real-time bacteriostatic versus bactericidal activity resulting from nanoparticle exposure. For nanostructured surfaces, the direct culture method is used to determine the viability of bacteria indirectly and directly in contact with nanostructured surfaces, and the focused-contact exposure method is used to examine antimicrobial activity on a specific area of a nanostructured surface. We discuss key experimental variables to consider for in vitro study design when determining the antimicrobial properties of nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces. All these methods are relatively low cost, employ techniques that are relatively easy to master and repeatable for consistency, and are applicable to a broad range of nanostructure types and microbial species.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In the US alone, 1.7 million individuals develop a hospital-acquired infection (HAI) annually, with one in every 17 of these infections resulting in death1. In addition, it is estimated that the treatment costs for HAIs range from $28 billion to $45 billion annually1,2. These HAIs are predominated by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)3,4 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa4, which are commonly isolated from chronic wound infections and usually require extensive treatment and time ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

To present the direct co-culture and direct exposure methods, we use magnesium oxide nanoparticles (nMgO) as a model material to demonstrate bacterial interactions. To present the direct culture and focused-contact exposure methods, we use an Mg alloy with nanostructured surfaces as examples.

1. Sterilization of nanomaterials

NOTE: All the nanomaterials must be sterilized or disinfected prior to microbial culture. The methods that can be used include heat, pressure, radiation, and disinfectants, but the tolerance of the materials for each method must be identified prior to the in vitro exp....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The identification of the antibacterial activity of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces has been presented using four in vitro methods that are applicable across different material types and microbial species.

Method A and method B examine bacterial activities when exposed to nanoparticles at a lag phase (method A) and log phase (method B) for a duration of 24 h or longer. Method A provides results regarding the MIC and MBC, while method B determines the inhibito.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We have presented four in vitro methods (A-D) to characterize the antibacterial activities of nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces. While each of these methods quantifies bacterial growth and viability over time in response to nanomaterials, some variation exists in the methods used to measure the initial bacterial seeding density, growth, and viability over time. Three of these methods, the direct co-culture method (A)17, the direct culture method (C)14, and .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors appreciate the financial support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF CBET award 1512764 and NSF PIRE 1545852), the National Institutes of Health (NIH NIDCR 1R03DE028631), the University of California (UC) Regents Faculty Development Fellowship, the Committee on Research Seed Grant (Huinan Liu), and the UC-Riverside Graduate Research Mentorship Program Grant awarded to Patricia Holt-Torres. The authors appreciate the assistance provided by the Central Facility for Advanced Microscopy and Microanalysis (CFAMM) at UC-Riverside for the use of SEM/EDS and Dr. Perry Cheung for the use of XRD. The authors would also like to thank Morgan Elizabeth Nator....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubeMilipore SigmaZ336777
80 L NTRL Certified Convection Drying Oven MTI CorporationBPG-7082https://www.mtixtl.com/BPG-7082.aspx
(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane buffer pH 8.5; Tris buffer Sigma-Aldrich 42457
AnaSpec THIOFLAVIN T ULTRAPURE GRADEFisher Scientific50-850-291
Electron-multiplying charge-coupled device digital camera HamamatsuC9100-13
Falcon 15 mL conical tubesFisher Scientific14-959-49B
GluteraldehydeSigma-Aldrich G5882
HemocytometerBrightline, Hausser Scientific1492
Inductively coupled plasma - optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)PerkinElmer8000
Inverse microscopeNikonEclipse Ti-S
Luria Bertani BrothSigma Life Science L3022
Luria Bertani Broth + agarSigma Life Science L2897
MacroTube 5.0  Benchmark ScientificC1005-T5-ST
Magnesium oxide nanoparticlesUS Research Nanomaterials, IncStock #: US3310   MMgO, 99+%, 20 nm
MS Semi-Micro BalanceMettler ToledoMS105D
Nitrocellulose paperFisherbrand09-801A
Non-tissue treated 12-well polystyrene plateFalcon Corning Brand 351143
Non-tissue treated 48-well polystyrene plateFalcon Corning Brand 351178
Non-tissue treated 96-well polystyrene plateFalcon Corning Brand 351172
Petri dish 100 mmVWR470210-568
Petri dish, 15 mmFisherbrandFB0875713A
pH meterVWRSP70P
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)TESCAN Vega3 SBH
SonicatorVWR97043-936
Table top centrifugeFisher ScientificaccuSpin Micro 17
Table top centrifuge EppendorfCentrifuge 5430
Tryptic Soy AgarMP1010617
Tryptic Soy BrothSigma-Aldrich22092-500G
UV-Vis spectrophotometer TecanInfinite 200 PROhttps://lifesciences.tecan.com/plate_readers/infinite_200_pro
VWR Benchmark Incu-shaker 10LVWRN/A
X-ray power defraction PanalyticalN/APANalytical Empyrean Series 2

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., Abu Bakar, M. Health care-associated infections - An overview. Infection and Drug Resistance. 11, 2321-2333 (2018).
  2. O'Connell, K. M. G. Combating multidrug-resistant bacteria: Current strategies for the discov....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Antimicrobial NanoparticlesNanostructured SurfacesIn Vitro EvaluationMinimum Inhibitory ConcentrationBactericidal ConcentrationDirect Co CultureSerial DilutionBacterial ViabilityMagnesium Oxide NanoparticlesMRSA Antimicrobial Activity

Related Articles