$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) is a commonly used technique for transversely expanding the maxillary bony structure and the dental arch in skeletally mature patients1. The surgery involves a LeFort I osteotomy, a mid-palatal corticotomy, and, optionally, the release of the pterygoid-maxillary fissure2. However, undesired expansion patterns from SARPE, such as uneven expansion between left and right hemimaxillae3 and dentoalveolar process buccal tipping/rotation4, have been reported, which could lead to failure of SARPE, and sometimes, even requiring additional surgeries for correction5. Previous studies have indicated that the variation in circum-maxillary osteotomies may play a significant role in post-SARPE expansion pattern2,3, as the collisions between the bone blocks at the Le Fort I osteotomy sites can contribute to the uneven resisting force of lateral expansion of the hemimaxillae and to the rotation of the hemimaxillae with the alveolar edges below the cut moving inwards while the dentoalveolar process expands3,4. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the effects of different osteotomy directions, especially the buccal osteotomy, on post-SARPE expansion patterns.
Several finite element analysis (FEA) models have been set up to evaluate the force distribution during SARPE. However, the amount of expansion set in these models is limited to up to 1 mm, which is far below the required clinical amount6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Inadequate expansion in FEA models can lead to erroneous predictions of post-SARPE outcomes. More specifically, the collision between the bones at the osteotomy site, as reported by Chamberland and Proffit4, may not be demonstrated if the expander is not adequately turned, which may not reflect the true clinical reality. With the limited amount of expansion built in the previous models, the outcome evaluations of these models were focused on stress analysis. However, the stress analysis of FEA in dentistry is usually conducted under static loading with the mechanical properties of materials set as isotropic and linearly elastic, which further restricts the clinical relevance of the FEA studies13.
Furthermore, most of these studies did not consider the thickness of the surgical instrument at the osteotomy site6,7,8,10,11,12, often setting friction to zero at the cuts as part of the boundary conditions. However, this setting oversimplifies the contacts between the hard and soft tissues. It may significantly impact the distribution of force and the resulting expansion pattern of the hemimaxillae.
Nevertheless, no available literature has investigated the effect of osteotomy on post-SARPE asymmetry using finite element analysis (FEA) models. All the current studies employed models with symmetrical osteotomy patterns6,7,8,9,10,11,12,14, which do not reflect the reality of clinical practice where the osteotomies may differ on each side of the skull. The lack of literature examining the effect of asymmetrical osteotomies on post-SARPE asymmetry represents a significant knowledge gap that must be addressed.
Therefore, the goal of this study is to develop a novel FEA model of SARPE that can truly mimic the clinical conditions, including the expansion amount and osteotomy gap, and investigate the expansion patterns of the hemimaxillae in all three dimensions with various designs of the osteotomy. Such an approach would provide valuable insight into the mechanics underlying post-SARPE expansion patterns and serve as a useful tool for clinicians in the planning and execution of SARPE procedures.