-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
K12 Schools

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Behavior
Use of the Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device (OPAD) to Measure Changes in Nociceptive Beha...
Use of the Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device (OPAD) to Measure Changes in Nociceptive Beha...
JoVE Journal
Behavior
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Journal Behavior
Use of the Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device (OPAD) to Measure Changes in Nociceptive Behavior

Use of the Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device (OPAD) to Measure Changes in Nociceptive Behavior

Full Text
21,623 Views
12:20 min
June 10, 2013

DOI: 10.3791/50336-v

Ethan M. Anderson1,2, Richard Mills3, Todd A. Nolan4, Alan C. Jenkins4, Golam Mustafa1, Chris Lloyd3, Robert M. Caudle1,2, John K. Neubert4

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,University of Florida College of Dentistry, 2Department of Neuroscience, McKnight Brain Institute,University of Florida College of Medicine , 3Stoelting Co., 4Department of Orthodontics,University of Florida

We present a user-friendly, high-throughput operant system for the evaluation of pain behaviors in awake, conscious rodents. The Orofacial Pain Assessment Device (OPAD) can assess pain through a reward/conflict paradigm thus providing a more humane way of testing. This protocol will yield more clinically relevant and translational data from rodents.

The overall goal of this procedure is to measure rodent antinociceptive behaviors with the operant or facial pain assessment device. This is accomplished by first training the rodents on the oad for a few sessions until stable baselines are obtained. The next stage of the procedure is to remove the rodent's buckle hair and fast them the day before the experiment.

Next, baseline measurements at normal and painful temperatures are made in the oped temperature variable bars that stimulate the facial derma. If the rodent wants to gain the reward. The final stage is to introduce a pain or analgesic stimulus under the same conditions and measure the licked contact frequencies.

For example, capsaicin reduces lick frequency under painful conditions. Ultimately, results can show altered pain behaviors by analysis of the frequency of licks in the total contacts. The main advantage of this technique over existing methods like the P withdrawal or von fry, or the tail flick assay, is that instead of using reflex based measures of nociception, the orofacial pain assessment device or oped uses an operant reward conflict assay The night before an oped training session.

The rodents should not have any food to eat for this demonstration. The fast time is 15 hours, give or take an hour. The rodents must first be trained to a consistent behavior at non aversive temperatures.

This takes about six sessions. At three sessions per week. Mice can lick 600 to a thousand times per session, whereas rats can lick up to 2000 times per session.

This demonstration shows how to program a simple experiment using the Orofacial software. It has many other temperature ramping protocols and pain models available. Also, the design can be saved in any state of completion.

After turning on op pads and opening the software, turn on white noise to control for ambient noise. Next, under file, select a new experiment. Then under the subheading protocol, choose a name for the protocol and select whether it is to be blinded or not.

Under the OPED cages menu, select new oped cage and then add all connected oped cages. Under outputs, select temperature controllers. Then thermal element, adjust starting temperature to a neutral temperature if needed, adjust the ramping temperatures under the oped temperature cycle tab to change the temperature from neutral to hot to cold.

Just make the adjustments here. For step one, set the temperature to 45 degrees Celsius. Set the ramp duration to 30 seconds and set that temperature to remain for three minutes.

For step two, make the settings 33 degrees, 30 seconds, and three minutes. For step three, make the temperature seven degrees the ramp, 60 seconds and remain time. Three minutes.

Make step four, like step two, but with a 62nd ramp. Then check the box for after the following period of time and set that value to three minutes. Now under the fields tab, add any extra notes needed about the subjects.

For example, make an area for animal ID by selecting new field and changing the name to animal id. Then choose the animals tab, then text, and then use this field as the animal ID look under the stage tab. The OPPA automatically sets a first stage, name the stage, and set the duration of test period.

The behavioral session shouldn't last for longer than 10 to 20 minutes. cause after that time, the rows become satiated. Also, when you're doing experiments for several days, additional stages can be added to make the data analysis simpler.

Next, under the calculations, select new calculation and name it L over F to represent the L to face ratio. In the section labeled, enter the calculation in the area below. Adjust it to read L.Number of activations over contact.

Number of activations to create time periods for a simpler data analysis, select analysis and new time period. Name 1 33 degrees C and select the box for this period is the same in all stages. For the starts at field, enter zero.

And for the NZ field, put three minutes. Now repeat this labeling process for each time period. Finally, save and name the protocol.

It can now be used for new experiments because hair is an insulator, hairless, rodents are best for all operant procedures. Otherwise, a day or two before the animals are tested, remove just their buccal facial hair, leaving the whiskers to do this. First anesthetize the rodent.

Next, shave the cheek hair with clippers. Once the hair is clipped, apply eye ointment followed by hair removal cream, and wait a few minutes. Then wash the hair removal cream and hair away with water.

On the day of testing, anesthetize the animal with, for example, 3%isof fluorine inhalation. Next, apply ophthalmic fat ointment to both eyes. Later, avoid getting any topical drug treatments in the eyes.

Now apply a 0.1%capsaicin cream bilaterally on the exposed cheeks with a sterile cotton swab, and wait five minutes. Meanwhile, soak some gauze pads in warm 40 degrees Celsius water. After five minutes, wipe the cream off with the wet pads, followed by an alcohol swab.

Now return the rodent to its cage and set a timer for 30 minutes. First, prepare a room temperature reward mixture of one part sweetened condensed milk, two parts water. Load the mixture into the oped bottles.

Second, set up the liquid catch tray, the plexiglass cage, and the metal flooring grate on the oped machine. Once that is assembled, attach the wiring to connect the cage to the rest of the oped system. Place a reward bottle on the stand with its spout accessible to the rodent.

Initially, position the bottle a little deep so it can be withdrawn if better contacts are needed. Now, load the experiment in the software. Enter the animals being tested under the subheading.

Experiment at a title, and then add the treatment groups such as capsaicin and control. Then enter the number of animals in each group. Under the subheading tests, select animal treatments and data.

Add the letter of the treatment and the animal id. The boxes should now have the designated animal ID on their screens. Now, press the button on the box to adjust the thermos to the right temperature.

When the light goes green, place a rodent inside. For this experiment, rats are started 30 minutes after the capsaicin cream was wiped off. Now press the button again and the orange light will turn on.

Adjust the distance. The bottle is from the box to be able to lick. The rat must make contact with the thermos on its buccal region, not the vibra region.

Proper adjustment will result in a solid red box for licking above an outlined orange box for contacts. An outlined red box indicates a problem. Once the testing session is over, the oped will alert the experimenter with a tone.

Now return the rodent to its cage. If another rodent is to be tested, the box will indicate its animal ID and repeat the procedure. Many rats can be run simultaneously on the op pad.

In one protocol, up to 16 boxes can be run simultaneously. Thus, 40 to 80 rats can be tested per hour. When the experiment is complete, shut off the machine and remove the cage wiring by hand or machine wash and sanitize the great box bottle and liquid tray.

In the oped software, data analysis tools are available. Under the subheading.Results. Select whether to see a text graph or statistical analysis report.

In the graph report settings box, select a variable to examine. For instance, under calculation results, check the L over F box. Now specify the on the X Axi show field as the time period and show different series four field as the treatment.

Then select view the report. Saving, printing, copying, or emailing the report can be done at this time. Certain data points may be excluded in the box below the grouping step if needed.

If needed. The raw data in a spreadsheet form is accessible under the data subheading. The OPED was programmed for a ramping protocol for the test sessions.

Analysis of a single rodents test session shows that the lick number is high for every segment of the session at the neutral temperature, but low at the aversive temperatures. As expected, long bouts of contact are made at the neutral temperatures. Those durations decrease and the number of contacts increase during periods where the temperatures are painful.

The total amount of reward ingested is similar to the number of licks. Animals prefer feeding at the neutral temperatures to the painful temperatures. The lick to face ratio for the baseline session was calculated by the OPPA for all the animals without caps a s an application, this ratio is much higher during the three non-painful sessions than at the painful sessions.

One-way, Inova and Bonferroni tests bear out the significance. On a subsequent day. The group was then divided into capsaicin treated rodents and naive rodents.

Eight in each group at neutral temperatures. The groups did not behave significantly differently. Capase and treated rodents had a significantly lower LTA F ratio at 45 Celsius and an insignificant higher LTA F ratio at seven.

Once mastered, this technique can be done on hundreds of animals in a single day using several ePad boxes. This allows for high throughput pain testing of nociceptive or analgesic conditions if performed properly.

View the full transcript and gain access to thousands of scientific videos

Sign In Start Free Trial

Explore More Videos

Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device (OPAD)Nociceptive BehaviorPain AssessmentRodentsPeltier-based ThermodesReward BottleLicksFace ContactsLick/face RatioHigh-throughputOperant AssayCortical InputSpinal Reflex-based Nociceptive Assays

Related Videos

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)

14:56

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)

Related Videos

21.8K Views

Inducing Orofacial Neuropathic Pain in a Rat Model via Infraorbital Nerve Ligations

02:02

Inducing Orofacial Neuropathic Pain in a Rat Model via Infraorbital Nerve Ligations

Related Videos

493 Views

Meal Duration as a Measure of Orofacial Nociceptive Responses in Rodents

09:05

Meal Duration as a Measure of Orofacial Nociceptive Responses in Rodents

Related Videos

7.9K Views

Chronic Constriction Injury of the Rat's Infraorbital Nerve (IoN-CCI) to Study Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

10:52

Chronic Constriction Injury of the Rat's Infraorbital Nerve (IoN-CCI) to Study Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

Related Videos

20.4K Views

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex

06:04

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex

Related Videos

9.1K Views

Mechanical Conflict-Avoidance Assay to Measure Pain Behavior in Mice

06:57

Mechanical Conflict-Avoidance Assay to Measure Pain Behavior in Mice

Related Videos

4.1K Views

Assessment of Nerve Injury-Induced Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Rats Using an Orofacial Operant Pain Assay

07:39

Assessment of Nerve Injury-Induced Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Rats Using an Orofacial Operant Pain Assay

Related Videos

4K Views

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice

06:37

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice

Related Videos

1.6K Views

Optimizing Photoneuromodulation Techniques to Evaluate the Role of Green Light-Emitting Diodes in Pain Management

09:03

Optimizing Photoneuromodulation Techniques to Evaluate the Role of Green Light-Emitting Diodes in Pain Management

Related Videos

917 Views

Assessment of Knee Hyperalgesia in Mice using Pressure Application Measurement

04:22

Assessment of Knee Hyperalgesia in Mice using Pressure Application Measurement

Related Videos

418 Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code