Establishment of an Experimental Mouse Model of Endometrioma to Study its Related Infertility

Zhouyurong Tan; Tsz Ching Yeung; Yang Ding; Chi Chiu Wang

doi:10.3791/66240

Medicine

Establishment of an Experimental Mouse Model of Endometrioma to Study its Related Infertility

Published: April 5, 2024 doi: 10.3791/66240

Zhouyurong Tan¹, Tsz Ching Yeung¹, Yang Ding¹, Chi Chiu Wang^1,2,3,4

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, ²Reproduction and Development, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, ³School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, ⁴Chinese University of Hong Kong-Sichuan University Joint Laboratory in Reproductive Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Abstract

Endometrioma (OMA), a subtype of endometriosis characterized by the formation of endometriotic cysts in the ovaries, affects 17-44% of individuals diagnosed with endometriosis. Women with OMA often experience compromised fertility, yet the exact mechanisms underlying OMA-associated infertility remain unclear. Notably, existing animal models simulate superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), leaving a notable gap in research focused on OMA. In response to the gap of knowledge, this paper introduces a pioneering OMA-simulating mouse model and provides a comprehensive description of the techniques and procedures employed in the model. With a high success rate of 83% and ovarian lesion specificity, this model holds significant promise for advancing our understanding of OMA, particularly in the context of infertility. It offers a valuable platform for conducting targeted research into OMA-associated fertility challenges, potentially paving the way for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the field of reproductive medicine.

Introduction

Endometrioma (OMA) is the most predominant subtype of endometriosis, observed in approximately 17-44% of individuals diagnosed with endometriosis¹^,². It is characterized by the formation of endometriotic cysts within the ovaries. These cysts, colloquially termed "chocolate cysts", derive their name from their distinctive brown, tar-like consistency³. In addition to OMA, endometriosis can also present as superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). SUP refers to the lesions on the peritoneal lining, whereas DIE refers to lesions penetrating more than 5 mm underneath the peritoneal surface⁴. The heterogeneity in lesion location, appearance, and depth among these endometriosis subtypes results in diverse clinical symptoms and variable disease severity⁵^,⁶. OMA is particularly associated with more severe endometriosis stages and has been implicated in infertility, pelvic adhesions, and an increased ovarian cancer risk¹^,⁷^,⁸^,⁹.

The association of endometriosis, especially OMA, with infertility is a clinical issue of grave concern. Endometriosis is present in 25-50% of infertile women, with 30-50% of women diagnosed with endometriosis experiencing infertility¹⁰^,¹¹^,¹²^,¹³^,¹⁴. While the exact OMA-associated infertility mechanisms remain elusive, some hypotheses have been raised. One suggests that endometriosis leads to a chronic inflammatory state, which can disrupt normal ovarian function and impair oocyte quality¹⁵^,¹⁶. Another proposes abnormal iron overload in the ovarian follicular fluid, which is believed to be associated with oocyte maturation disorder¹⁴. Other studies address the disruptions in hormonal regulation¹⁷, oocyte quality¹⁸, and embryo development¹⁹.

Historically, rodent models have played a crucial role in deepening our understanding of endometriosis, particularly in studying its pathology, impact on fertility, and mechanisms of pain²⁰^,²¹^,²²^,²³. Rodents, particularly rats and mice, have been extensively utilized as animal models in exploring the cause-and-effect relationships, underlying mechanisms, potential diagnostic techniques, and therapeutic interventions for this disease²²^,²⁴^,²⁵^,²⁶. It is important to recognize that all animal models have their specific uses and limitations. The choice of a particular model depends on the specific outcome or aspect being measured or studied²⁷. For instance, a rat model demonstrated that stress could exacerbate endometriosis manifestations and influence inflammatory parameters, providing insights into the disease's potential triggers²⁸.

In the context of endometriosis research, there are various rodent models employed. One commonly used approach is the homologous model, which involves the transplantation of rodent uterine tissue into the same species' peritoneal cavity or mesenteric vessels²⁹. This model offers advantages in terms of immunocompetence and suitability for long-term studies³⁰. However, limitations arise due to the partial disparity between the implanted ectopic mouse uterine tissue and the characteristics of human endometriotic lesions³¹. Another approach is the heterologous model, where a human endometrial biopsy is implanted into an immunosuppressed mouse³². This model allows the use of human ectopic endometrium as a donor tissue for lesion development, providing constructive validity³². However, it relies on immunosuppressed mice as recipients, which hinders a comprehensive assessment of the immune responses involved in the etiology of the disorder³³. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that the existing models primarily focus on mirroring the generalized condition SUP, inadequately capturing the unique characteristics of OMA and DIE³⁴. Currently, there is a paucity of specific models available for studying DIE, with only a few models existing, including a recent rodent model developed by Yan et al.³⁵. This scarcity underscores the need for further research and the development of models that accurately capture the specific characteristics of DIE. Additionally, our understanding of OMA, especially its nuanced association with fertility, also remains limited²⁶^,³⁶.

Addressing the existing challenges, this paper presents a novel experimental homologous mouse model designed to specifically simulate OMA. It is aimed at providing unique insights into the pathological mechanisms underlying OMA-related infertility, thereby bridging the knowledge gap in this crucial area of reproductive medicine. In brief, C57BL/6J mice were used for their human-like reproductive traits. Following estrus cycle synchronization, uterine tissues from donor mice were minced and transplanted into the recipient mice's ovarian bursa at a 1:2 ratio. After a 4-week interval, both morphological and histological examinations of the ovarian lesions were conducted to validate OMA presence and evaluate any associated follicular atresia. With an 83% successful rate, this model offers researchers a reliable platform for OMA studies, emphasizing lesion development specifically in the ovaries for focused investigations.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

All experimental procedures conducted in this study were approved and regulated under protocol number 21-203-MIS_[C] by the Ethical Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

1. Animal acclimatization and selection

Mice preparation
1. Obtain 18 C57BL/6J mice (primiparous females, 8-9 weeks old: 6 donors, 12 recipients) from a reputable supplier. Verify the health certificates.
2. Maintain all mice in a controlled housing environment: 22-24 °C, humidity levels between 40% and 60%, and with a 12 h light/dark cycle. Use HEPA-filtered air, if available.
3. Allow 72 h acclimation for the mice with continuous access to food and water, minimizing human interaction to reduce stress.
Estrous cycle synchronization
1. Collect bedding containing male pheromones; introduce it to female cages for 48 h.
Vaginal cytology
1. Perform vaginal cytology the following morning.
  NOTE: It is necessary to perform a smear at a consistent time of day, typically 9:00 AM.
  1. Prepare double-headed cotton swabs, autoclaved PBS, a 35 mm Petri dish, and glass slides in advance. Dispense 10 mL of PBS in a Petri dish. Submerge one end of the cotton swab in the PBS to allow it to absorb the liquid.
  2. Gently take out one mouse from its cage and place it on the lid of an empty cage.
  3. Grasp the tail using the thumb and index finger of one hand, and with the other hand take the moistened cotton swab and delicately insert it into the mouse's vagina. Carefully insert the tip of the swab stick to a depth of approximately 1.0 cm into the mouse's vagina. Rotate the swab gently, while maintaining an angle of about 45° to the long axis of the animal's body.
    NOTE: Rotating the swab slowly during insertion can facilitate a smoother procedure and minimize the potential stimulation to the cervix.
  4. Gently remove cells from the vaginal lumen and walls by continuously rotating the swab, and then carefully withdraw the swab.
    NOTE: During this process, ensure that the swab is continuously rotated while being cautious not to come into contact with the surrounding hairs. Afterward, carefully withdraw the swab to avoid any potential contamination.
  5. Transfer the collected cells by gently rolling the swab tip onto a clean, prelabeled glass slide.
    NOTE: The swab stick should be discarded after transferring cells to slides, and a new one should be used for each animal.
  6. Inspect the slides under a microscope to detect cornified epithelial cells. Look for the uniform presence of cornified epithelial cells in vaginal cytology, which is indicative of the estrus stage. Capture photographs and record the observations.
    NOTE: With the appropriate expertise, staining of vaginal smears is not necessary. However, if an experimenter cannot "read" the smears without them being stained, then it is necessary.

2. Endometrioma model establishment

NOTE: Only select mice at the estrus stage as donor and recipient mice in the model establishment. When performing experiments on one mouse, ensure it is out of the sight of others and that it is not reintroduced to the company of other animals until completely recovered. The diagram of model generation can be found in Figure 1.

Donor tissue preparation
1. Sedate the donor mice with a combination of ketamine (75 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). Euthanize the donor mice by cervical translocation under anesthesia.
2. Disinfect the abdominal area with a 70% ethanol swab.
3. Use sterile surgical scissors to create an incision (1 cm) along the midline of the peritoneum to expose the muscular layer. Choose another pair of surgical scissors to cut the muscle layer and reveal the pelvic cavity.
4. Close the tips of the forceps and gently lift the intestines using the blunt central portion.
5. Locate the uterus and ovarian tissues. Conduct a sterile dissection of the whole uterine horn, including both uterine horns, making sure that the approximate size of the piece being removed is ~1.5 cm in length. Place the excised tissues in a petri dish containing PBS and remove any excess fat tissues.
6. Minutely dissect the tissues into 1 mm³ pieces using a sterilized scalpel. Keep the tissues moist by periodically adding PBS.
Transplantation procedure
1. Anesthetize the recipient mice with a mixture of ketamine (75 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg).
2. Apply ophthalmic ointment to prevent eye dryness during the surgery. Place the mice in a supine position on a sterile surgical board.
3. Determine the surgical site by gently manipulating the hind legs of the mouse, with a bony prominence palpable under the skin. This point of prominence, clearly visible through the skin, serves as a reliable anatomical marker for the ovaries of the recipient mouse during the surgical procedure.
4. Disinfect the surgical area with a 70% ethanol swab. Create a precise lateral incision (3-5 mm) on the predetermined surgical site.
5. Stabilize the ovary with non-dominant hand forceps. Gently inject 100 µL of PBS into the ovarian bursa, observing the slight separation.
6. Create a tiny slit in the bursa. Transplant the uterine tissue fragments (1 mm³) using micro forceps.
  NOTE: Avoid overstuffing to prevent pressure on surrounding tissues.
7. For sham surgery, replicate all steps except step 2.2.6.
Postoperative care
1. Suture the muscle layers with absorbable sutures (i.e., 5-0 vicryl) and skin with non-absorbable sutures (i.e., 5-0 nylon).
2. Place a mouse on a heating pad set to 37 °C until full consciousness returns. Monitor the breathing and wait for the extremities to turn pink.
3. Administer buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg, subcutaneously) for pain every 12 h for 48 h. Check for signs of pain, infection, or distress every 8 h for the first 24 h and then 3x daily for the next 3 days.
  NOTE: The animal is not left unattended until it has regained enough consciousness to sustain sternal recumbency.

3. Model validation

Gross validation
1. After 4 weeks, anesthetize the recipient mice using a combination of ketamine (75 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). Then, under deep anesthesia, euthanize the mice by performing cervical translocation.
2. Perform a midline incision and expose the abdominal cavity for organ inspection.
3. Extract the ovaries with visible lesions and take photographs.
4. Thoroughly inspect for extraneous endometriotic lesions.
Histological validation
NOTE: Due to the presence of potentially irritating odoriferous solvents in the histological experiments, it should be conducted in a fume hood.
1. Fix the ovaries together with lesions in 10% neutral-buffered formalin.
2. Process the tissues following the same procedures as described by Adeniran et al.³⁷, including tissue allocation, fixation, and embedding.
3. Serially section tissues at 4-5 µm thickness, float in a water bath at 45 °C, and mount on glass slides. Clearly label the slides with mouse number, ovary side, and section number. Dry overnight at 37 °C.
4. PAS-hematoxylin staining
  1. Deparaffinization: Place the slides in xylene or a xylene substitute to remove the paraffin.
    NOTE: You may need to perform this step a couple of times.
  2. Rehydration: Gradually rehydrate the tissue sections by placing the slides in a series of decreasing ethanol concentrations (100%, 95%, 80%, 70%).
  3. Periodic acid treatment: Cover the tissue sections with a 1% periodic acid solution and allow them to sit for 5-10 min at room temperature.
    NOTE: This step oxidizes the tissue's glycol groups to aldehyde groups, allowing for reaction with the Schiff reagent and the formation of a purple-pink stain to indicate the ovarian structures.
  4. Rinse the slides thoroughly with distilled water to remove any residual periodic acid.
  5. Stain the tissue sections with a Schiff's solution for 15 min.
  6. Rinse the slides first in hot running tap water to remove excess stain, then in distilled water.
  7. Counterstain the sections with 1 g/L of Meyer's hematoxylin for 2-3 min.
  8. Rinse slides in running tap water for 2-3 min.
  9. Apply Bluing Reagent for 30 s.
  10. Rinse slides in distilled water.
  11. Gradually dehydrate the sections by immersing them in increasing ethanol concentrations (70%, 80%, 95%, and 100%).
  12. Submerge the sections in a clearing agent (e.g., xylene) to make them transparent.
  13. Apply a mounting medium to the sections on the slides and gently place a coverslip over the sections, ensuring there are no air bubbles. Allow the slides to air-dry in the hood to facilitate the solidification of the mounting medium.
5. Examine under a light microscope. Document the presence of endometrial glands, stroma, and hemorrhagic cysts confirming endometriosis in the ovary.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The successful establishment of OMA
Of the 12 mice subjected to the transplantation protocol, 10 exhibited characteristic OMA lesions, both at a gross anatomical and histological level, translating to a success rate of 83%. Gross examination revealed fluid-filled lesions adherent to the ovaries, reminiscent of clinical OMA presentations (Figure 2). Histopathological scrutiny, as illustrated in Figure 3, confirmed the ectopic endometrial tissue's successful implantation. Furthermore, the infiltration of endometriotic lesions induced massive atresia of follicles beside the implants, indicating its interference with the ovarian milieu.

Model specificity
Critical to the model's validity was its specificity for ovarian endometriosis. Upon thorough examination, no extraneous endometriotic implants were identified in any other pelvic or abdominal organ, underscoring the model's precision and its potential as a robust tool for investigating endometrioma and its related infertility.

Figure 1: Endometrioma model generation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Gross anatomy of endometrioma. Compared to the sham control group, ectopic endometrial cystic growth was visible in association with the ovarian morphology 4 weeks after the transplantation in the OMA group in morphology. Blue dashed outline: endometriotic lesion. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Histological stained section of an endometrial lesion from the mouse model. Compared to the sham control group, ectopic endometrial cystic growth was visible in association with the ovary 4 weeks after the transplantation in the OMA group in histology. Black arrows indicate atretic follicles. Scale bars = 0.5 mm. Abbreviation: OMA = endometrioma. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

The prevalence of OMA in the global female population underscores a critical health concern³⁸. Beyond the general symptoms of endometriosis, OMA brings additional challenges for fertility, including severe pelvic pain, potential for ovarian torsion, and other notable implications³⁹^,⁴⁰. While the understanding of OMA pathogenesis and progression is largely shrouded in mystery, the knowledge vacuum not only impedes the formulation of targeted therapeutic strategies but also means that many women continue to suffer from suboptimal treatments and recurrent symptoms. The decision of many modern women to postpone childbearing further amplifies the fertility concerns related to OMA, making it even more imperative to understand and address its pathophysiology comprehensively.

Historically, one of the most significant roadblocks to advancing our understanding of OMA has been the lack of a resolute and accurate animal model. While several models have been explored in the past, they often fell short in reproducing the specificities of OMA or introducing additional confounding variables due to the manifestation of lesions in organs other than the ovaries⁴¹. We developed a mouse model to replicate OMA and improve our understanding of the disease. Our surgical technique involved implanting minced uterine tissues into the ovarian bursa of mice to ensure the development of endometriotic lesions in ovaries. Close monitoring post-surgery allowed us to assess OMA progression and ensure the well-being of the mice. To enhance the model's relevance, we kept the ovarian bursa intact instead of removing it. This change aimed to prevent the leaking of implants to other organs and ensure the specific localization of lesions in ovaries. Additionally, we addressed potential complications, such as bleeding or infection, during the procedure. In this study, PAS staining was used to detect mucus presence, which is commonly done to assess the histology of ovarian follicles⁴²^,⁴³. The identification of atretic follicles in ovarian sections adjacent to the endometriotic lesion is crucial evidence of how endometriosis negatively affects follicle development⁴³^,⁴⁴^,⁴⁵. This finding holds significant importance for further investigations into infertility related to endometrioma, as supported by our model. Incorporating histological validation allowed a comprehensive understanding of the pathological changes associated with endometriosis in our model. This inclusion strengthens the reliability and relevance of our findings and aids in establishing the link between endometriosis and ovarian dysfunction. It is also important to acknowledge the limitations of our technique. While this model successfully replicated ovarian lesions associated with OMA, it may not fully capture the complexity of endometriosis. Translating findings from animal models to humans has inherent limitations due to inter-species differences.

In contrast, this study builds upon previous research on ovarian endometriosis mouse models, where a similar procedure of implanting uterine horns into the ovaries was performed⁴⁶. However, there are notable differences between this method and previous models. First, this model exclusively forms lesions on the ovaries, whereas the previous model showed endometriotic lesions in other organs as well, rather than solely in the ovaries. This distinction makes their model more likely to mimic the combined subtypes of endometriosis rather than being specific to OMA. Our focused manifestation enables researchers to concentrate specifically on the nuances of OMA without the confounding influence of lesions in other organs. By overcoming these limitations, our model provides a more accurate representation of OMA and serves as a robust platform for future investigations. Second, this model demonstrates a commendable success rate of 83% in mirroring OMA, ensuring a high fidelity in reproducing the disease.

It is worth noting that OMA recurrence is a significant concern, as many women experience recurring symptoms even after initial treatment interventions. Several studies have evaluated endometriosis recurrence and diagnostic tests in this context. For example, Yildiz et al. discussed the use of transvaginal ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for detecting specific ultrasound markers and patterns for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of recurrence⁴⁷. Another study focused on the long-term follow-up of women with endometriosis and evaluated the recurrence rate after surgical treatment⁴⁸. This study emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment strategies based on disease characteristics and patient factors to minimize the risk of recurrence. Furthermore, some researchers examined the potential of circulating biomarkers for predicting endometriosis recurrence⁴⁹. The study explores specific molecular markers and their association with disease recurrence, providing insights into the development of non-invasive diagnostic tests and personalized management approaches. These studies highlight the ongoing efforts to understand and address endometriosis recurrence and the development of diagnostic tests to improve patient outcomes. Incorporating knowledge from these studies into our OMA mouse model research can contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the disease, recurrence patterns, and potential diagnostic strategies for monitoring and managing OMA.

In conclusion, the establishment of this specific OMA mouse model serves as a cornerstone for a new era of research in the field of endometriosis. By addressing a long-standing gap, it promises a cascade of insights and breakthroughs that could revolutionize the way we understand, treat, and potentially prevent endometrioma, leading to enhanced clinical outcomes and improved quality of life for affected women. Importantly, by comparing this method to previous OMA models and incorporating findings from studies on endometriosis recurrence and diagnostic tests, we can further enhance the relevance and applicability of our research in the broader context of endometriosis research and patient care.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by the Theme-based Research Scheme granted by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Government of Special Administrative Region (T13-602/21-N).

Materials

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
1 cc syringe with 25 G needle	BD Biosciences	301320
10 mm Tissue culture dish	FALCON	353001
10% Buffered formalin	Fisher Scientific	SF100-4
10x phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer	Fisher Scientific	AM9625
30 G needle	BD Biosciences	305107
5-0 black braided silk non-absorbable suture	Ethicon Inc.	W500H
70% Ethanol
Adhesive microscope slides	Marienfeld	810401
Buprenorphine Injection	Med-Vet International	RXBUPRENOR5
Double-headed cotton swab	SANYO Co., LTD.	HUBY-340
Fine forceps	Fine Science Tools	11254-20
Ketamine	Alfasan International b.v	2203095-08
Microtubes	Corning	MCT-150-C
Needle holder	Excelta Corporation	2827-NH-35-SE-ND
Ophthalmic ointment	Major Pharmaceuticals	10033691
Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) Stain Kit	Abcam	Ab150680
Powder free sterile gloves	Fisher Scientific	19020558
Processing/embedding cassettes	Fisher Scientific	15-197-700A
Size 3 scalpel	Fisher Scientific	22-079-657
Small serrated semi-curved forceps	Roboz Surgical Instruments Co.	RS-5135
Small surgical scissors	Roboz Surgical Instruments Co.	RS-5850
Standard light microscope			For evaluating vaginal cytology smears and histological analysis.
Steel scalpel blades #10	B.Braun	BB510
Sterile gauze	MEDICOM	HMWS 077
Sterilized pyrex glass Petri dishes	Corning	70160-101
Thermoregulated electric pad
VICRYL RAPIDE (polyglactin 910) absorbable Suture	Ethicon Inc.	W9918
Xylazine	Alfasan International b.v	2110333-10

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

Khan, K. N., et al. Pelvic pain in women with ovarian endometrioma is mostly associated with coexisting peritoneal lesions. Hum Reprod. 28 (1), 109-118 (2013).
Gałczyński, K., Jóźwik, M., Lewkowicz, D., Semczuk-Sikora, A., Semczuk, A. Ovarian endometrioma - a possible finding in adolescent girls and young women: A mini-review. J Ovarian Res. 12 (1), 104 (2019).
Tan, Z., et al. Impacts of endometrioma on ovarian aging from basic science to clinical management. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13, 1073261 (2022).
Khan, K. S., et al. Mri versus laparoscopy to diagnose the main causes of chronic pelvic pain in women: A test-accuracy study and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 22 (40), 1-92 (2018).
Nisenblat, V., et al. Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 (5), CD012179 (2016).
Harirchian, P., et al. Lesion kinetics in a non-human primate model of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 27 (8), 2341-2351 (2012).
Santulli, P., et al. Endometriosis-related infertility: Ovarian endometrioma per se is not associated with presentation for infertility. Hum Reprod. 31 (8), 1765-1775 (2016).
Dai, Y., Li, X., Shi, J., Leng, J. A review of the risk factors, genetics and treatment of endometriosis in chinese women: A comparative update. Reprod Health. 15 (1), 82 (2018).
Younis, J. S. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: What are the implications for women with intact endometrioma planning for a future pregnancy? A reproductive clinical outlook. Biomolecules. 12 (11), 1721 (2022).
Bonavina, G., Taylor, H. S. Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13, 1020827 (2022).
Filip, L., et al. Endometriosis associated infertility: A critical review and analysis on etiopathogenesis and therapeutic approaches. Medicina (Kaunas). 56 (9), 460 (2020).
Tanbo, T., Fedorcsak, P. Endometriosis-associated infertility: Aspects of pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment options. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 96 (6), 659-667 (2017).
Bulletti, C., Coccia, M. E., Battistoni, S., Borini, A. Endometriosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 27 (8), 441-447 (2010).
Ni, Z., et al. Iron-overloaded follicular fluid increases the risk of endometriosis-related infertility by triggering granulosa cell ferroptosis and oocyte dysmaturity. Cell Death Dis. 13 (7), 579 (2022).
Mohammed Rasheed, H. A., Hamid, P. Inflammation to infertility: Panoramic view on endometriosis. Cureus. 12 (11), e11516 (2020).
Jing, X., et al. Systemic inflammatory response markers associated with infertility and endometrioma or uterine leiomyoma in endometriosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 16, 403-412 (2020).
Marcellin, L., et al. Serum antimullerian hormone concentration increases with ovarian endometrioma size. Fertil Steril. 111 (5), 944-952.e941 (2019).
Deng, Y., et al. Does current ovarian endometrioma increase the time for dor patients to reach live birth in ivf. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 22 (1), 324 (2022).
Dongye, H., Tian, Y., Qi, D., Du, Y., Yan, L. The impact of endometrioma on embryo quality in in vitro fertilization: A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 12 (6), 2416 (2023).
He, Y., et al. Re-evaluation of mouse models of endometriosis for pathological and immunological research. Front Immunol. 13, 986202 (2022).
Kanellopoulos, D., et al. The interplay between endometriosis and fertility in rats: A systematic review. J Med Life. 15 (6), 742-746 (2022).
Tejada, M. A., et al. Rodent animal models of endometriosis-associated pain: Unmet needs and resources available for improving translational research in endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci. 24 (3), 2422 (2023).
Bruner-Tran, K. L., Mokshagundam, S., Herington, J. L., Ding, T., Osteen, K. G. Rodent models of experimental endometriosis: Identifying mechanisms of disease and therapeutic targets. Curr Womens Health Rev. 14 (2), 173-188 (2018).
Buigues, A., et al. Evaluation of pai-1 in endometriosis using a homologous immunocompetent mouse model. Biol Reprod. 99 (2), 326-335 (2018).
Tirado-Gonzalez, I., et al. Endometriosis research: Animal models for the study of a complex disease. J Reprod Immunol. 86 (2), 141-147 (2010).
Lagana, A. S., et al. Translational animal models for endometriosis research: A long and windy road. Ann Transl Med. 6 (22), 431 (2018).
Mukherjee, P., Roy, S., Ghosh, D., Nandi, S. K. Role of animal models in biomedical research: A review. Lab Anim Res. 38 (1), 18 (2022).
Cuevas, M., et al. Stress exacerbates endometriosis manifestations and inflammatory parameters in an animal model. Reprod Sci. 19 (8), 851-862 (2012).
Nunez-Badinez, P., et al. Preclinical models of endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: An innovative medicines initiative-paincare initiative to improve their value for translational research in pelvic pain. Pain. 162 (9), 2349-2365 (2021).
Umezawa, M., et al. Expression profile of extracellular matrix and adhesion molecules in the development of endometriosis in a mouse model. Reprod Sci. 19 (12), 1365-1372 (2012).
Grummer, R. Animal models in endometriosis research. Hum Reprod Update. 12 (5), 641-649 (2006).
Tejada, M. A., et al. Identification of altered evoked and non-evoked responses in a heterologous mouse model of endometriosis-associated pain. Biomedicines. 10 (2), 501 (2022).
Bruner-Tran, K. L., Carvalho-Macedo, A. C., Duleba, A. J., Crispens, M. A., Osteen, K. G. Experimental endometriosis in immunocompromised mice after adoptive transfer of human leukocytes. Fertil Steril. 93 (8), 2519-2524 (2010).
Malvezzi, H., Marengo, E. B., Podgaec, S., Piccinato, C. A. Endometriosis: Current challenges in modeling a multifactorial disease of unknown etiology. J Transl Med. 18 (1), 311 (2020).
Yan, D., Liu, X., Guo, S. -W. The establishment of a mouse model of deep endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 34 (2), 235-247 (2018).
Santulli, P., et al. Protein oxidative stress markers in peritoneal fluids of women with deep infiltrating endometriosis are increased. Hum Reprod. 30 (1), 49-60 (2015).
Adeniran, B. V., Bjarkadottir, B. D., Appeltant, R., Lane, S., Williams, S. A. Improved preservation of ovarian tissue morphology that is compatible with antigen detection using a fixative mixture of formalin and acetic acid. Hum Reprod. 36 (7), 1871-1890 (2021).
Sima, R. M., et al. Novel diagnosis of mesenteric endometrioma: Case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 98 (29), e16432 (2019).
Eskenazi, B., Warner, M. L. Epidemiology of endometriosis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 24 (2), 235-258 (1997).
Laufer, M. R., Goitein, L., Bush, M., Cramer, D. W., Emans, S. J. Prevalence of endometriosis in adolescent girls with chronic pelvic pain not responding to conventional therapy. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 10 (4), 199-202 (1997).
Tan, Z., et al. What we have learned from animal models to understand the etiology and pathology of endometrioma-related infertility. Biomedicines. 10 (7), 1483 (2022).
Meyerholz, D. K., et al. Glycogen depletion can increase the specificity of mucin detection in airway tissues. BMC Research Notes. 11 (1), 763 (2018).
Fang, E., et al. Cpeb3 deficiency in mice affect ovarian follicle development and causes premature ovarian insufficiency. Cell Death Dis. 13 (1), 21 (2021).
Zhou, J., Peng, X., Mei, S. Autophagy in ovarian follicular development and atresia. Int J Biol Sci. 15 (4), 726-737 (2019).
Kitajima, M., et al. Enhanced follicular recruitment and atresia in cortex derived from ovaries with endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 101 (4), 1031-1037 (2014).
Hayashi, S., et al. Novel ovarian endometriosis model causes infertility via iron-mediated oxidative stress in mice. Redox Biol. 37, 101726 (2020).
Yildiz, S., et al. The pain symptoms and mass recurrence rates after ovarian cystectomy or uni/bilateral oophorectomy procedures in patients over 40 years old with endometriosis. Ginekol Pol. 91 (6), 295-300 (2020).
Guney, G., et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin serum level: A potential noninvasive biomarker of endometriosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 102 (41), e35539 (2023).
Kaya, C., et al. The role of serum caspase 3 levels in prediction of endometriosis severity. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 83 (6), 576-585 (2018).

Medicine