A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Investigations on Alterations of Hippocampal Circuit Function Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

15.1K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/4411

⸱

November 19th, 2012

 ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

A multi-faceted approach to investigating functional changes to hippocampal circuitry is explained. Electrophysiological techniques are described along with the injury protocol, behavioral testing and regional dissection method. The combination of these techniques can be applied in similar fashion for other brain regions and scientific questions.

Abstract

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) afflicts more than 1.7 million people in the United States each year and even mild TBI can lead to persistent neurological impairments 1. Two pervasive and disabling symptoms experienced by TBI survivors, memory deficits and a reduction in seizure threshold, are thought to be mediated by TBI-induced hippocampal dysfunction 2,3. In order to demonstrate how altered hippocampal circuit function adversely affects behavior after TBI in mice, we employ lateral fluid percussion injury, a commonly used animal model of TBI that recreates many features of human TBI including neuronal cell loss, gliosis, and ionic perturbation 4-6.

Here we demonstrate a combinatorial method for investigating TBI-induced hippocampal dysfunction. Our approach incorporates multiple ex vivo physiological techniques together with animal behavior and biochemical analysis, in order to analyze post-TBI changes in the hippocampus. We begin with the experimental injury paradigm along with behavioral analysis to assess cognitive disability following TBI. Next, we feature three distinct ex vivo recording techniques: extracellular field potential recording, visualized whole-cell patch-clamping, and voltage sensitive dye recording. Finally, we demonstrate a method for regionally dissecting subregions of the hippocampus that can be useful for detailed analysis of neurochemical and metabolic alterations post-TBI.

These methods have been used to examine the alterations in hippocampal circuitry following TBI and to probe the opposing changes in network circuit function that occur in the dentate gyrus and CA1 subregions of the hippocampus (see Figure 1). The ability to analyze the post-TBI changes in each subregion is essential to understanding the underlying mechanisms contributing to TBI-induced behavioral and cognitive deficits.

The multi-faceted system outlined here allows investigators to push past characterization of phenomenology induced by a disease state (in this case TBI) and determine the mechanisms responsible for the observed pathology associated with TBI.

Protocol

1. Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury

  1. Anaesthetize the mouse using a mixture of ketamine and xylazine given intraperitoneally. Then prepare the mouse's head for incision using an iodine scrub.
  2. Perform a craniectomy over the right parietal area using 3 mm (outside diameter) trephine.
  3. Secure Luer-loc needle hub (inside diameter 3 mm) over the craniectomy using cyanoarylate and dental acrylic.
  4. 24 hr later, anaesthetize the mouse using isoflurane via inhalation.
  5. Once normal breathing resumes, but before the mouse becomes sensitive to stimulation, deliver 20 msec pulse of saline into the skull via the fluid percussion injury....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Each technique outlined above contributes to the greater understanding of the underlying mechanism causing the observed behavioral deficit. By combining the unique information gained from each method we are able to examine the biological mechanisms with more precision.

Measuring fEPSPs is useful for quantifying the net synaptic efficacy of large, spatially defined regions of neurons. It also can provide information about the potential of a group of cells to undergo synaptic plasticity, a ne.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Elliot Bourgeois for his technical assistance. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health grants R01HD059288 and R01NS069629.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Axopatch 200B amplifierMolecular DevicesAXOPATCH 200BPatch-clamp rig
Digidata 1322A digitizerMolecular DevicesPatch-clamp rig
MP-225 micromanipulatorSutterMP-225Patch-clamp rig
DMLFSA microscopeLeicaPatch-clamp rig
Multiclamp 700B amplifierMolecular DevicesMULTICLAMP 700BMultipurpose (field) rig
Digidata 1440 digitizerMolecular DevicesMultipurpos (field) rig
MPC-200 micromanipulatorSutterMPC-200Multipurpose (field) rig
BX51WI microscope OlympusBX51WIMultipurpose (field) rig
Axoclamp 900A amplifierMolecular DevicesAXOCLAMP 900AVSD rig
Digidata 1322 digitizerMolecular DevicesVSD rig
Redshirt CCD-SMQ cameraRedshirtNCS01VSD rig
VT 1200S VibratomeLeica14048142066
P-30 Electrode pullerSutterP-30/P
cOmplete protease inhibitorRoche11697498001

References

  1. Faul, M., Xu, L., Wald, M. M., Coronado, V. G. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits Hospitalizations and Deaths 2002-2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. , (2010).
  2. McAllister, T. W.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Fluid Percussion InjuryContextual Fear ConditioningExtracellular RecordingWhole-cell Patch ClampVoltage Sensitive DyeHippocampal Slice PreparationSynaptic Transmission AnalysisSubregion Dissection