Cutaneous malignant melanomas are the least common, yet most deadly type of skin cancer. Due to an increasing incidence, a high grade of malignancy and a rapid dissemination, melanomas now account for 75% of malignant skin tumors related deaths1,2. Besides surgical excision of the primary tumor, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy and combined chemo- and immunotherapy of metastasized melanoma are the state-of-the-art strategies for melanoma treatment3,4. However, malignant melanoma is characterized by a poor response to chemotherapeutics (5-12%)5,6, and only those 50-70% of melanoma patients carrying the BRAF V600E gene mutation benefit from promising new targeted therapies as treatment with vemurafenib7 To improve overall survival, a much better understanding of the mechanisms of melanoma tumorigenesis is needed.
To study those mechanisms in the past, well-established commercially available cell lines were used. More recent approaches to study the molecular events of cancer initiation and progression utilize primary cultures derived directly from tumor tissue - a strategy bearing manifold benefits: The researcher has full control of patient and tissue selection. The sampled cells gained from expertly selected tumor tissue, resemble the tumor with all its heterogeneity and follow-up data of the patient and a detailed pathology is available to allow the characteristics of the culture to be compared with those of the original tumor8.
In contrast, the use of established cell lines as relevant model systems in cancer research is discussed controversially. Already in 1987 Osborne and colleagues described significant biological differences among MCF-7 human breast cancer cell lines from different laboratories9. This extensive genomic instability and variation in RNA expression during subculture was confirmed by Hiorns et al. and provided supportive data for evidence that cell lines do evolve in culture, thereby weakening the direct relevance of such established cultures as models of human cancer10.
Another important consideration, which has largely been ignored over the years, is the risk of contamination or overgrowth of cultures with unrelated 'false' cells, which was first highlighted over twenty years ago by demonstrating that a large number of cell lines were contaminated by HeLa cells8,11. The misinterpretation of data from 'false' cell lines has recently come to light in the literature again. Using a combination of DNA profiling and molecular cytogenetics, MacLeod et al. revealed that of 252 new tumor-derived human cell lines deposited at the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ), nearly 18% were found to be intraspecies or interspecies cross-contaminants12,13.
To avoid these problems and to make use of the advantages mentioned above, we decided to establish low-passage melanoma cell lines from freshly excised metastases.
Robust cell separation and analysis technologies require single-cell preparations to be generated while simultaneously limiting cell death and destruction of characteristic surface proteins. A benchtop instrument for the automated dissociation of tissues into single-cell suspensions is the gentleMACS Dissociator manufactured by Miltenyi. When used in combination with gentleMACS C Tubes and optimized dissociation solutions, an effective and gentle dissociation of tumor tissue in a closed system is achieved while preserving antigen epitopes and reducing cell loss. The instrument offers optimized, pre-set programs for a variety of specific applications and guaranties standardized preparation of single-cell suspensions from melanoma tissue14.
Recent reports revealed that the majority of tumors harbor a small subpopulation of so called cancer stem cells (CSCs), which exclusively exhibit tumor-initiating and self-renewing capacity. The identification of melanocyte-producing stem cells in the dermis of the skin led to the hypothesis that these cells might be the origin of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in melanoma since exposure to UVA radiation can prime these cells for malignant transformation15. The result of such a genetic lesion would be cells that harbor a combination of tumor and stem cell characteristics.
One of the key markers proposed to represent the subpopulation of CSCs in melanoma is CD13316-20. CD133 (also known as Prominin 1), a member of pentaspan transmembrane glycoproteins, is expressed in hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, neuronal and glial stem cells21-23. Expression of CD133 is correlated with asymmetric cell division24, and the glycosylated epitope of CD133 was shown to be downregulated upon cell differentiation25. Recently, CD133+ melanoma cells were shown to have self-renewal and tumor-initiation capacity19,20.
To study the function of CD133+ putative melanoma CSCs, we have modified and optimized the Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) system from Miltenyi Biotech to obtain highly enriched and viable populations of CD133+ and CD133- cells.
Magnetic bead-based cell separation allows for either negative selection as shown by Matheu et al.26 or positive selection as we show here. During positive selection the particular target cell type, e.g. CD133 expressing cells, is magnetically labeled with MicroBeads, 50-nm superparamagnetic particles that are conjugated to highly specific antibodies against a particular cell surface antigen. During separation, the magnetically labeled cells are retained within the column in the magnetic field of the separator, whereas unlabeled cells flow through. Following washing steps, the column is removed from the magnetic field of the separator, and the target cells are eluted from the column. The LS or MS columns used during positive selection result in fractions of labeled and unlabeled cells with high purity. On the other hand, LD columns, used for negative selection, result in a slightly lower purity of the labeled fraction. Due to the denser packing of their matrix the flow rate in these columns is lower resulting in a higher risk of unlabeled cells to be trapped in the column. LD columns should therefore be used only for stringent depletion of an unwanted cell subpopulation. Positive selection can be performed by direct (antibody coupled to MicroBeads) or indirect magnetic labeling (incubation with MicroBeads following the incubation with the primary antibody). Specific MACS MicroBeads are available for the positive selection of numerous cell types of primary tumor cells like prostate or melanoma27.