$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Human aging is associated with cognitive decline in all domains, but might be particularly pronounced for functions associated with the prefrontal cortex and the medial temporal lobes, such as working memory (WM), episodic memory, and executive functions, (Bäckman et al.1, Brehmer et al.2, Shing et al.3, West4). Correspondingly, brain-imaging studies showed that volume reductions are most prominent in prefrontal and mediotemporal areas (Raz et al.5,6) and that altered functioning within and between these regions might contribute to age-related cognitive changes (Sander et al.7, Park and Reuter-Lorenz8). Molecular imaging studies indicate that age-related dopamine losses might be powerful mediators of impairment in multiple cognitive tasks (Bäckman et al.9,10; Erixon-Lindroth et al.11, Volkow et al.12). There is considerable evidence that perceptive and cognitive competencies in old age might be enhanced by emotional stimuli. The tendency for older adults to perform better on positively valenced stimuli with regard to measures of attention, recognition, and emotional memory enhancement has been termed the age-related positivity effect (Charles et al.13, Mather and Knight14, Löckenhoff and Carstensen15, Grühn et al.16, Isaacowitz et al.17) and might reflect a difference in motivational goals as the end of life approaches (Carstensen and Löckenhoff18).
Neuropsychological testing of cognitive functions is usually conducted either by means of paper-and-pencil tests or computer-based tests on workstations, and might prove difficult when testing older subjects. Firstly, impaired motor skills might limit the use of paper-and-pencil tests and secondly, older subjects are often not familiar with keyboards, mouse pads, or other input devices applied during computer-based neuropsychological testing. As a result, older subjects often show poor motivation or compliance during neuropsychological testing, which might impair performance and decrease the validity of the findings. Furthermore, paper-and-pencil testing as well a computer-based testing on workstations requires permanent attendance of the experimenter for instruction and feedback as well as for documentation of results, which are then rarely transferred to a database and therefore only accessible to a very limited number of people. Thus, this "conventional" approach to neuropsychological testing ties up considerable human resources increases the probability of errors when transferring results, limits data access, and slows the workflow.
Our aim was to test a tablet-based application for the investigation of several neuropsychological domains. We used an iPad application as we hypothesized, that such a simple tool might be a quick and effective method to screen for and track cognitive deficits in clinical and outpatient settings. Regardless of age, subjects should be enabled to perform the tasks without instruction or feedback from an experimenter and should be able to complete the tests. Regardless of age, subjects should be enabled to perform the tasks without instruction or feedback from an experimenter. We hypothesized, that the touchpad would allow for a more intuitive use than other response devices (e.g. mouse pad or keyboard) particularly for older subjects, who are not familiar with computers. Heightened compliance and motivation for task performance might increase validity of results, while benefits for the experimenter should include a standardized and time saving testing procedure, a secure transfer of test results to a database and facilitation of data storage and analysis.