A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability

9.4K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/52715

⸱

June 21st, 2015

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Production bleed water (PBW) was treated with cupric oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) and cellular toxicity was assessed in cultured human cells. The goal of this protocol was to integrate the native environmental sample into a cell culture format assessing the changes in toxicity due to CuO-NP treatment.

Abstract

In situ recovery (ISR) is the predominant method of uranium extraction in the United States. During ISR, uranium is leached from an ore body and extracted through ion exchange. The resultant production bleed water (PBW) contains contaminants such as arsenic and other heavy metals. Samples of PBW from an active ISR uranium facility were treated with cupric oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs). CuO-NP treatment of PBW reduced priority contaminants, including arsenic, selenium, uranium, and vanadium. Untreated and CuO-NP treated PBW was used as the liquid component of the cell growth media and changes in viability were determined by the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay in human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep G2) cells. CuO-NP treatment was associated with improved HEK and HEP cell viability. Limitations of this method include dilution of the PBW by growth media components and during osmolality adjustment as well as necessary pH adjustment. This method is limited in its wider context due to dilution effects and changes in the pH of the PBW which is traditionally slightly acidic however; this method could have a broader use assessing CuO-NP treatment in more neutral waters.

Introduction

Approximately 20% of the US electrical supply is provided by nuclear energy and, based in part on national incentives to increase energy independence, US nuclear capacity is expected to increase 1. Worldwide growth of nuclear energy also is expected to continue, with much of the growth occurring outside the US 2. As of 2013, 83% of US uranium was imported, but 952,544 metric tons of reserves exist in the US 3,4. In 2013 there were 7 new facility applications and 14 restart/expansion applications between Wyoming, New Mexico, and Nebraska 5. In the US, uranium is predominately extracted through in situ recovery (ISR) ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All samples were collected at the uranium liquid processing building of a uranium ISR facility in Wyoming.

1. Production Bleed Water (PBW)

  1. Collect two types of water samples from an ISR uranium facility: PBW and reverse osmosis (RO) water. Collect PBW from a monitoring tap after the ion exchange process but before reverse osmosis decontamination. Collect RO samples after the PBW is decontaminated by reverse osmosis treatment.
    NOTE: Lixiviant is transported in pipelines from multiple well fields to the uranium liquid processing building, where it is collected in a column and prepared for ion exchange. Approximately 1-3% of....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

PBW component concentrations and pH in untreated and CuO-NP-treated PBW are reported in Table 1. Martinson and Reddy (2009), reported that the point of zero charge of the CuO-NP is estimated at 9.4 ± 0.4. Given that the pH of PBW was 7.2-7.4, in these conditions, water donates protons to CuO-NPs, causing the nanoparticle surface to be positively charged allowing for the adsorption of negatively charged species. CuO-NP treatment removed priority contaminants from PBW, including arsenic, selenium, uranium .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Previous studies reported that CuO-NPs removed arsenic from groundwater 11,13,30,31. This study supports these previous findings and also reports that CuO-NPs remove additional contaminants from PBW. This study also confirms previous reports that CuO-NPs are effective at arsenic removal, despite the presence of other contaminants and potential competing ions 11. Speciation modeling predicted that 97% of vanadium species in PBW are negatively charged, allowing for adsorption to CuO-NPs, and batch tre.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Roger Hopper and the Wyoming Department of Agriculture, Analytical Services Lab for the mass spectroscopy analysis of our samples. We would like to express our gratitude to the University of Wyoming, School of Pharmacy for allowing us to video this protocol in their laboratories. We would also like to thank the Theodore O. and Dorothy S. King Endowed Professorship Agreement for their graduate assistantship (SC), the University of Wyoming for the Graduate Assistantship support (JRS), and the Science Posse (NSF GK-12 Project # 084129) for the teaching fellowship (JRS). We would also like to thank Uranium One for allowing us to obtain samples and assistin....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
CuCl2Sigma203149
Borosilicate glass ballsVWR26396-6396 mm
Nitric AcidFisherA509-P500Trace metal grade
0.45 μm syringe filterFisherSLHA 033S S
10x EMEMFisherBW12-684F
Fetal Bovine SerumATCC30-2020
L-glutamineFisherBP379-100
NaHCO3SigmaS5761
Penicillin/StreptomycinATCC30-2300
0.22 μm vacuum filter unitFisher09-740-28C
HEK293ATCCCRL-1573
HEPG2ATCCHB-8065
TrypsinSigmaSV3003101
MTTSigmaM2128
D-penicillamineFisherICN15180680
96-well platesFisher07-200-92
DMSOFisherD12814
Spectra Max 190Molecular Devices
Visual MINTEQ version 3.0KTH Royal Institute of Technology
ICP-MSAgilentDetails of instruments, models and detection limits were published in Reddy et al., 2013.
IC DIONEX DX 500DionexDetails of instruments, models and detection limits were published in Reddy et al., 2013.
VWR IncubatorVWR

References

  1. What is the status of the U.S. nuclear industry? Washington (DC): U.S. Energy Information Administration (US). , Available from: http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/article/nuclear_industry.cfm (2014).
  2. International Energy Outlook. Washington (DC): U.S. Energy Information Administration (US). , Available from: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/ieo11/pdf/0484%282011%29.pdf (2011).
  3. Uranium Marketing Annual Report. Washington (DC): U.S. Energy Inf....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Production Bleed WaterCell Viability AssayArsenic RemovalUranium RecoveryHEK 293 CellsHep G2 CellsMTT AssayOsmolality AdjustmentpH Adjustment