$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In vitro cell counting is an important basic technique in a wide range of tissue culture experiments. Accurately determining the number of cells in a culture is essential for experimental reproducibility and standardization1,2. Cell counting can be performed manually using a hemocytometer as well as using a variety of automated methods, each with their own advantages and disadvantages3,4,5. Most of the automated methods for cell counting belong to one of two classes, those that use the Coulter principle or flow cytometry. Coulter counters take advantage of cells electrical resistance to determine cell number and size. They are fast, accurate and cheaper than flow cytometers. However, they are rarely used for only cell counting due to their considerable cost compared to manual counting3. Flow cytometers, on the other hand, are expensive but they have many applications such as cell counting, analysis of the cells shape, structure and measuring internal cell markers4,5. Machines that use either of these two principles are available from many manufacturers. Manual counting is affordable but time-consuming and subject to bias while the automated methods come with a fraction of the time required for the manual counting but using expensive machines6.
Other common cell culture procedures are in vitro cell motility assays, namely, cell migration and invasion7. Migration and invasion assays are commonly used to investigate cell motility and invasiveness in response to a chemotactic response. In addition, they are widely used to study embryonic development, differentiation, inflammatory response, and metastasis of multiple cell types7-11. Cells that have migrated or invaded through the porous membrane of a migration assay can be quantified in two different ways. Firstly, by staining the cells with a fluorescent dye, dissociation from the membrane, and quantification using a fluorescent reader12. A limitation of this method of quantification is that no record can be retained of the membranes and there is no possibility for further analysis13. The second quantification method is for migrated/invaded cells to be fixed and stained with fluorescent dye or more commonly, with cytological dyes such as crystal violet, toluidine blue dye or hematoxylin; then cells are quantified manually using inverted microscopic images of these membranes which is a very time-consuming task12,13.
To overcome the drawbacks of manual cell counting, two reliable and accurate automated cell counters for cell concentration and for the migration assay were developed. These automated cell counter algorithms were developed for ImageJ as a plugin using Oracle's Java computer language. ImageJ is a public and widely-used image processing tool developed by the National Institute of Health (NIH)14,15; thus, writing these plugins for ImageJ facilitates easy integration into the biological community.
Automation of cell counting ensures high throughput and reproducibility compared to manual counting. Although other available software and plugins can be used to calculate cell concentration through image analysis5,16,17, Cell Concentration Calculator plugin is fast and can also handle dilutions of cells and treatments. Moreover, all results and calculations from these two counters can be saved and exported. The two plugins described in this paper are optimized for the use of a phase contrast microscope for live cell imaging and large field of view (entire membrane capture) imaging for migration assay membranes through the use of a dissecting scope. The plugins are freely available for download with installation instructions from: http://peng.lab.yorku.ca/imagej-plugins.