This protocol describes in detail how to label neurons of the somatosensory cortex of C75BL/6 mice in order to analyze their connectivity and their excitability. With respect to existing methods, it visualizes discriminating aspects of connectivity, such as the number of axonal branches per neuron, their precise topography, and their anatomical location. By altering the position of the electrodes, it is possible to target other neuron populations, such as the cingulate cortex (keep the same angle between the electrodes and the brain, but change the orientation of the poles) or the hippocampus5, and perform similar experiments labeling individual neurons or broader populations, depending on the desired strategy. However, there are limitations to this, as not all populations are equally accessible or equally selectively labeled. For example, in the hippocampus, it is possible to selectively target late-born neurons of the CA1 region, but early electroporation marks heterogeneous populations of inner and outer pyramidal cells. In the cerebral cortex, neurons are born in a sequential manner, so the gestation day during the IUE determines which cortical layer is affected. Performing earlier IUE targets deeper neurons (e.g., IUE at E14 labels layer IV neurons)22.
For a successful IUE, it is recommended to take into account certain considerations. First, it is important to do the surgery in less than 30 min in order to reduce the stress on the mother and to increase the chances of survival of the pups. Second, the most difficult part of the procedure is the injection of the DNA—perform the injection via the borosilicate capillaries as gently as possible. If the embryos are pressed too hard, they can be harmed. In terms of troubleshooting the death of the embryos during DNA injections, beveling the tip with a 30° angle can increase the efficacy of this process. If a beveller is not available and the capillaries are cut solely with forceps, the correct angle can be confirmed in the dissecting microscope. Discard inadequate capillaries. Finally, adapting the electroporation conditions to the stage of the embryo is important in order to increase the survival rate (see Table 1).
Some considerations are necessary with regard to the reconstruction of axons and dendrites. To label individual neurons, the proper concentration of the Cre plasmid are essential to obtain a good, sparse expression and to avoid the confounding overlap of neuronal projections belonging to different neurons. Although this protocol proposes the use of 4 ng/µL, it may be necessary to adjust the plasmid concentration for each experiment, depending on the promoter used, the quality of the DNA preparation, and the method of DNA quantification (e.g., reduce it to 2 ng/µL if labeling too many neurons). In addition, for axonal tracking, it is important to cut at an appropriate angle in order to have the whole neuron in the same plane.
Critical steps for successful patch-clamp recordings are the health of the tissue of the acute slices and the location and abundance of electroporated GFP-positive neurons. If patching steps fail or aberrant responses are found during the recordings, reduce the time for processing the acute slices. If GFP neurons are difficult to identify and locate due to their reduced numbers in the acute slice, ensure that sufficient CAG-GFP plasmid is included in the electroporation mix. With regard to the main limitations of the approaches described herein, the patch-clamp technique allows the recording of many different parameters describing the excitability of the neuron, but it does not evaluate aspects that depend on the whole circuit. Also, and as referred to above, not all neuronal subpopulations are accessible through IUE. In summary, in the future, these techniques can contribute to the further analysis of the structural and functional connectivity of different neuronal subpopulations in the brain.