Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid

Summary

Phenotypic differences among cervid populations may be related to population-level genetics or nutrition; discerning which is difficult in the wild. This protocol describes how we designed a controlled study where nutritional variation was eliminated. We found that phenotypic variation of male white-tailed deer was more limited by nutrition than genetics.

Abstract

Cervid phenotype can be placed into one of two categories: efficiency, which promotes survival over extravagant morphometric growth, and luxury, which promotes growth of large weaponry and body size. Populations of the same species display each phenotype depending on environmental conditions. Although antler and body size of male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) varies by physiographic region in Mississippi, USA and is strongly correlated with regional variation in nutritional quality, the effects of population-level genetics from native stocks and previous re-stocking efforts cannot be disregarded. This protocol describes how we designed a controlled study, where other factors that influence phenotype, such as age and nutrition, are controlled. We brought wild-caught pregnant females and six-month-old fawns from three distinct physiographic regions in Mississippi, USA to the Mississippi State University Rusty Dawkins Memorial Deer Unit. Deer from the same region were bred to produce a second generation of offspring, allowing us to assess generational responses and maternal effects. All deer ate the same high-quality (20% crude protein deer pellet) diet ad libitum. We uniquely marked each neonate and recorded body mass, hind foot, and total body length. Each subsequent fall, we sedated individuals via remote injection and sampled the same morphometrics plus antlers of adults. We found that all morphometrics increased in size from first to second generation, with full compensation of antler size (regional variation no longer present) and partial compensation of body mass (some evidence of regional variation) evident in the second generation. Second generation males that originated from our poorest quality soil region displayed about a 40% increase in antler size and about a 25% increase in body mass when compared to their wild harvested counterparts. Our results suggest phenotypic variation of wild male white-tailed deer in Mississippi are more related to differences in nutritional quality than population-level genetics.

Introduction

Environmental factors a mother experiences during gestation and lactation may influence her offspring's phenotype, independent of genotype^1,2,3. Mothers who inhabit high-quality environments likely will produce offspring that exhibit a luxury phenotype (large antler and body size⁴), whereas mothers who inhabit a low-quality environment may produce offspring that exhibit an efficiency phenotype (small antler and body size⁴). Therefore, persisting in a high-quality environment may allow a mother to produce male offspring with large phenotypic characteristics, which may directly influence the offspring's reproductive opportunities^5,6,7,8 and indirectly influence the mother's inclusive fitness.

Although nutrition directly influences phenotypic characteristics across taxa (Ursus americanus, Ursus arctos⁹; Liasis fuscusI¹⁰; Larus michahellis¹¹), several factors may affect white-tailed deer phenotypes in Mississippi, USA. Antler and body size are about one-third larger for some populations compared to others¹². This variation is strongly correlated with forage quality^13,14; the largest males are found in areas with the greatest quality of forage. However, historic restoration efforts of white-tailed deer in Mississippi may have led to genetic bottlenecks and/or founder effects^15,16, which may also partially explain some of the observed regional variation in white-tailed deer phenotype.

We provide the protocol we used to control nutritional quality of wild-caught white-tailed deer, which allowed us to assess whether male phenotype is restricted by population-level genetics. This protocol also allowed us to assess whether lagging maternal effects were present in our populations. Our controlled design is preferential to studies conducted on free ranging populations which are limited to using environmental variables as a proxy for nutritional restriction^3,17. Our controlled design also allows for other variables such as potential chronic stress related to social interactions to be held constant as all individuals are subjected to similar housing and husbandry practices. Additionally, because nutrition directly influences other life history aspects ranging from reproduction to survival^18,19, controlling nutrition allows for investigators to assess other variables that affect mammalian life history aspects. Similar protocols have been described to assess questions related to life history aspects for other ungulates across North America (e.g., ^20,21).

Protocol

Ethics Statement: The Mississippi State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all capture, handling, and marking techniques under protocols 04-068, 07-036, 10-033 and 13-034.

1. Establish Capture Sites, Immobilize and Transport wild White-tailed Deer

1. Identify public and private properties that are enrolled in the Deer Management Assistance Program²² and establish ≥29 capture sites throughout three source regions in Mississippi, USA.
   1. Identify several capture locations within each source region to ensure that the range of genetic variation present in the regional population is captured.
   2. Note: Here, source regions included the Delta, which comprises almost 17% of total land area in Mississippi, USA, and is considered a high-quality soil region with agriculture as the primary land use^23,24. All study animals were captured from this region within the distribution of O. v. virginianus²⁵. Other regions included the Thin Loess region (upper and lower Thin Loess combined), which comprises almost 14% of total land area in Mississippi, USA and is considered a medium quality soil region. Agriculture is also a primary land use in the Thin Loess region, though not as prevalent as in the Delta^23,24. All study animals were captured from this region within the distribution of O. v. virginianus²¹. Lastly, the Lower Coastal Plain (LCP) soil region comprises nearly 22% of Mississippi and is classified as a low quality soil region. Primary land uses in the LCP are pine timber production and livestock grazing^23,24. The LCP also overlaps the geographical distribution of O. v. osceola; four of the six source populations were within 21 km of this distribution²⁵. This subspecies was described as smaller than O. v. virginianus²⁶.

Figure 1: Source Populations. Physiographic regions where pregnant dams and fawns were caught in Mississippi, USA. This figure has been modified from reference³¹. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

2. Select potential capture sites that meet the following criteria; habitat characteristics conducive to deer movement, proximity to roads for access, and distribution across the study area.
   NOTE: Capture sites must allow for concealment of the capture technician.
   1. Bait sites with about 10 kg of shelled corn to entice deer to visit and evaluate use based on bait consumption and deer photographed by motion-sensitive cameras. Relocate to alternate sites if deer do not attend baited sites within 5-7 days.
3. During capture events, sit in a concealed "stand."
   1. Place stand about 20 m downwind from the bait pile, taking the prevailing wind direction into consideration so that deer approaching the bait are less able to smell the capture technician.
      NOTE: Elevated stands are strongly preferred, and safety harnesses are required. There are several variations of stands with a variety of commercial sources and use varies by personal preference. For example, a lock-on stand would include seating with a ladder for access attached to a tree with straps. Portable climbing stands can be carried in by the capture technician and allow for increased mobility as the technician can choose a specific tree once they arrive at the capture site. Portable climbing stands are limited to use in straight trees without branches up the chosen height.
4. Use a dart gun coupled with a 3 cc radio-telemetry dart to deliver a mixture of teletamine HCl (4.4 mg/kg) and xylazine HCl (2.2 mg/kg).
   1. Schedule capture efforts to coincide with the typical crepuscular activity cycle of deer²⁷. Begin each capture attempt 2-3 h prior to sunset.
   2. Continue capture events for 2-3 h after sunset using night-vision goggles and a red dot laser for shot placement if deer are not captured during daylight hours.
   3. Take shots at deer when they are broadside and stationary.
      NOTE: The hind quarter of the deer is the target because it has significant muscle tissue and is located away from the heart and lungs.
   4. Wait about 15 min for darted target animals (six-month-old fawns of either sex or pregnant adult females) to become fully immobilized before locating it with directional radio-telemetry equipment.
   5. Confirm individuals are sedated by checking for eye reflexes (blinking). Then apply ophthalmic ointment to the eyes and blindfold deer to reduce stress.
      NOTE: Loss of thermoregulation is a consequence of immobilization.
   6. Use a rectal thermometer to assess body temperature after recovery. Warm deer with heated blankets if the animal's temperature is below 37.7 °C. Cool deer with ice packs if the animal's temperature is above 40.0 °C.
   7. Place deer in a sternal position on a military style gurney and transport deer from the capture location to an enclosed trailer.
   8. After placing the deer into the trailer, reverse the effects of xylazine HCl with 0.125 mg/kg yohimbine HCl²⁸.
   9. Transport all captured deer to the desired captive facility (e.g., Mississippi State University Rusty Dawkins Memorial Deer Unit; MSU Deer Unit) and keep them separated by source region.

2. Captive Facilities and General Husbandry Practices of Research Animals

NOTE: The MSU Deer Unit is subdivided into five 0.4 to 0.8 ha pens.

1. Cover every side of each pen with shade cloth to act as a visual and physical barrier between pens. Shade cloth helps reduce injuries and provides shade during summer months.
2. Place 1-2 elevated box blinds at one end of each pen to facilitate darting events during data collection.
3. Place two trough style feeders at separate ends of each pen to reduce competition for food among deer. Also provide a water trough in each pen.
4. Provide deer with a high-quality diet (20% crude protein deer pellets) ad libitum.
   NOTE: Here, additional available forages within pens included (Trifolium spp) and fescue (Festuca spp) along with volunteer grasses and forbs.
5. If present, maintain available forages within pens using a mixture of herbicides to control broadleaf weeds and grasses using mixture rates found on respective labels.
   NOTE: Using off-campus facilities to house ≥5.5 month old males will likely be needed. These facilities consisted of two 0.7 ha pens on each of three properties with husbandry practices similar to the MSU Deer Unit.

Figure 2: Captive Facility Locations. Study area where satellite facilities and the Mississippi State University (MSU) Deer Unit were located. Shaded areas indicate Oktibbeha (A), Noxubee (B), Attala (C), Scott (D), and Copiah (E), counties, Mississippi, USA.This figure has been modified from reference³⁴. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

3. Parasite and Disease Control

1. Monitor research animals for roundworm parasites (Strongyloides spp) using fecal floatation with parasites measured as eggs per gram (EPG).
   1. If present at high levels, provide parasite control by administering a pelleted wormer (active ingredient fenbendazole) at a rate of about 0.77 kg of pelleted wormer per 22.7 kg of feed during the month of May.
   2. If parasite levels remain high after initial treatment, use an ivermectin pour-on treatment (5 mg/mL)²⁹, mixed at a rate of 2 mL/0.45 kg and administer to animals at a rate of 0.45 kg of treated feed per 45.4 kg of animal mass.
      NOTE: Epizootic hemorrhagic disease is sometimes lethal viral disease spread by a biting midge (Culicoides spp) during summer and fall months. If present, treat the research facility with insecticide (5% ultra-low volume insecticide) 2-3 times per week from July 1 to October 1 to decrease prevalence of the vectors among research animals. Spray this insecticide within each pen and around the perimeter of the facility about 90 min before official sunset via fogger. Preferred methods to control for parasites and diseases are unique to each captive facility. Veterinarians must be consulted during any captive wildlife research to ensure animal health and safety.

4. Data Collection

Figure 3: Data Collection of Newborn Fawns. Measuring hind foot length from a new born fawn at the Mississippi State University Rusty Dawkins Memorial Deer Unit in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, USA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

1. Search the captive facility daily for fawns during the parturition season.
   1. Uniquely mark newborn fawns with medium plastic ear tags using an ear tagger with antibiotic applied to the male end of the tag to prevent potential infection. Place ear tag about the center of the fawn's ear.
   2. Measure body mass (nearest 0.01 kg) with a digital hanging scale and measure hind foot length and total body length (nearest mm).
   3. Collect hair samples and send them to a remote site for parentage assignment (see the Table of Materials).
      NOTE: Parentage assignment was made using DNA based on a proprietary, non-statistical custom structured query language database. In the pairwise allele comparison, the remote parentage assignment site assigned parentage when they excluded all but one sire and one dam based upon a shared allele from each parent at all loci tested (B. G. Cassidy, personal communication). This method of parentage assignment was also used in previous research conducted on captive white-tailed deer^30,31.
   4. Administer 2 cc of Clostridium perfringens types C and D toxoid and Clostridium perfringens types C and D antitoxin subcutaneously and administer 0.3 cc/kg of ivermectin in propylene glycol (Mississippi State University Veterinarian School, Mississippi, USA) orally to each fawn.
2. Chemically immobilize adult males (≥1.5 years-old) during October and November for data collection.
   1. Immobilize penned adults using the same combination of teletamine HCl and xylazine HCl used for capture of wild animals (step 1.4).
   2. During sedation events, walk the technician who will be darting to the end of the pen where the elevated blinds are located. Have a single technician in each of two blinds.
   3. Have the individual who walked the technician to the blind walk back to the opposite end of the pen.
      NOTE: Deer move away from these technicians and locate themselves in front of the blinds where technicians are in position to take ethical shots on each deer.
   4. Take shots at deer when they are broadside and stationary (section 1.4).
   5. Wait about 15 min for darted animals to become fully immobilized before approaching it.
   6. Confirm individuals are sedated by checking for eye reflexes (blinking). Apply ophthalmic ointment to the eyes and blindfold deer to reduce stress.
   7. After the darters successfully sedate an individual deer, monitor the deer's vital rates.
      1. Use a rectal thermometer to assess body temperature after recovery. Warm deer with heated blankets if the animal's temperature is below 37.7 °C. Cool deer with ice packs if the animal's temperature is above 40.0 °C.
   8. Load the deer on a military-style gurney, and transport it via utility task vehicle to a predetermined data collection area.
   9. Once transported, record the same morphometric measurements recorded at birth (step 4.1).
      1. Measure body mass (nearest 0.01 kg) with a digital hanging scale and measure hind foot length and total body length (nearest mm).
         NOTE: Individual deer react differently to the combination of drugs used during sedation events so administer about 0.1-0.3 cc of the teletamine HCl and xylazine HCl mixture (depending on body mass of an individual deer) if an individual comes out of sedation before data collection is completed.
   10. Administer size-appropriate amounts of antibiotic, ivermectin, a clostidrial vaccine, and a leptospirosis vaccine to all deer after they are transported to the data collection area (see sections 1 and 3).
3. Take three antler measurements from adult males using an antler measuring tape while the animal is sedated.
   1. Measure the inside spread (widest distance between main beams), basal circumference (smallest diameter located between the burr and G1 tine), and main beam length (distance from antler base to the tip of the main beam) of antlers prior to antler removal.
   2. Remove antlers about 3 cm above the burr using a reciprocating saw. Do not remove antlers less than 3 cm.

Figure 4: Data Collection of Adult Males. Antler removal via reciprocating saw from a captive adult male white-tailed deer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

4. After all data is collected from the sedated individual, place the deer into the appropriate pen and administer either 0.125 mg/kg yohimbine HCl²⁸ or 4.0 mg/kg tolazoline HCl³² to reverse the effects of xylazine HCl. Monitor individuals to ensure they remain in a sternal position until they come out of sedation and are fully alert.
   NOTE: If complications occur and animals must be euthanized, then euthanasia by cerebral dislocation via bolt stunner and severing of the jugular vein are ethical means to dispatch the animal.
5. Bring the antlers to a designated area to finish measuring antler size.
   1. Measure each individual tine protruding from the main beam (G1, G2, G3, etc.) and additional abnormal points by aid of wire.
      NOTE: Points that do not have a matching counterpart on the opposite main beam or are not consistent with the definition of a typical antler set are defined by the Boone and Crockett Club³³.
   2. Wrap the wire around where the tine intersects the main beam and mark that point for reference.
   3. Measure from this reference point to the tip of the tine and repeat for each tine.
   4. Collect remaining circumference measurements by identifying the smallest point between the G1 and G2 tines (H2 circumference), the G2 and G3 tines (H3 circumference), and the G3 and G4 tine if present (H4 circumference).
   5. If the G4 tine is not present, measure the distance between the midpoint of the G3 tine and the end of the main beam and measure the H4 circumference at the midway point.
   6. Measure less than four circumferences when antlers contain less than three tines.
      NOTE: For example, a main beam with two typical points include only three circumference measurements. Individuals may use other guidelines (Safari Club International) for calculating antler size; however, consistent methods must be used for each animal for valid comparison.
   7. After making all measurements, calculate an antler score similar to the gross nontypical Boone and Crockett score³³.
   8. Weigh antlers to the nearest 0.1 g using a scientific digital scale and assign a minimal critical antler mass of 1 g for first-year animals with antlers shorter than 3 cm.
6. Chemically immobilize penned juveniles at approximately 5.5 months of age using the same methods for adults (section 4.2) and mark juveniles with a large plastic ear tag (step 4.1.1).
   1. Use the same drug mixture rates to immobilize captive adults as used for immobilizing wild deer (section 1).
   2. Collect the same measurements collected at birth (step 4.1.2) and administer the same prophylactics as adults (section 4.2).
      NOTE: After all data is collected, transport each juvenile male to its randomly assigned satellite facility via trailer.

5. Producing First- and Second-generation Offspring

1. Classify six-month-old wild-caught fawns and offspring born at the captive facility from wild-caught mothers as first-generation individuals.
2. During the breeding season, place two males with 7-16 females for an average breeding sex ratio of one male to eight females.
   NOTE: Select breeding males from satellite facilities based on physical appearance, because the healthiest males (largest antlers and body size) are most likely to service females for the entirety of the breeding season without suffering from injury due to the aggressive nature of males during the breeding season.
   1. Only allow deer to breed with other individuals from the same source region (e.g., Delta males breed Delta females, Thin Loess males breed Thin Loess females, and LCP males breed LCP males).
3. Classify deer conceived by first-generation parents as second-generation offspring. Raise these individuals in captivity from birth and feed the same high-quality diet as their parents.
   NOTE: Females may produce offspring multiple years but typically with different sires each year. Collect the same data on second-generation offspring as collected on first-generation and wild-caught individuals.

Results

Individual age, nutritional quality, and genetics influence male white-tailed deer phenotype. Our study design allowed us to control the quality of nutrition deer were consuming and allowed us to identify the age of each deer for valid comparisons within year classes. By controlling nutrition and age with our study design, we were better able to understand whether population-level genetics were restricting the phenotype of males from two study populations. Improved nutrition had a positiv...

Discussion

There are several steps associated with our protocol; however, there are four critical steps that must be taken to ensure success with this protocol. First, during capture of wild deer, there must be several capture locations throughout a single source region (step 1.1.1). Having multiple capture locations ensures that any genetic variability associated with the source region will be represented among deer. Second, deer must be kept separated by source region during breeding season (steps 1.4.9 and 5.2.1). Ensuring anima...

Materials

List of materials used in this article

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Shelled Corn
Elevated Stand
Safety Harness
Ground Blind
Model 196 Projector	Pneu-Dart, Pennsylvania, USA
3cc Radio-Telemetry Darts	(Pneu-Dart, Pennsylvania, USA)
Various Sized Darts	(Pneu-Dart, Pennsylvania, USA)
Teletamine HCl	(Telazol, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Iowa, USA)
Xylazine HCl	(West Texas Rx Pharmacy, Amarillo, Texas, USA)
Yhoimbine HCl
Tolazoline HCl
Military Style Gurney
Rectal Thermometer
Shade Cloth
20% Crude Protein Deer Pellets	(Purina AntlerMax Professional High Energy Breeder 59UB, Purina, Missouri, USA)
Trough Style Feeders
Commercial Clover	(Durana Clover, Pennington Seed Co., Georgia, USA)
Commercial Fescue	(Max-Q Fescue, Pennington Seed Co., Georgia, USA)
Blankets
Ice Packs
Broadleaf Weed Control (2, 4-DB Herbacide, Butyrac 200)
Grass Control	(Poast Herbacide, BASF Co.)
Pelleted Wormer	Safeguard Co.,		active ingredient fenbendazole
Parasite Pour-on Treatment	(Ivomec, Merial Co.)
Insecticide	Riptide, McLaughlin Gormley King Co.)
Medium and Large Plastic Ear Tags	(Allflex, Texas, USA)
Remote site that assigned parentage	DNA Solutions Animal Solutions Manager (DNA Solutions, Oklahoma, USA)
Digital Hanging Scale	(Moultrie, EBSCO Industries, Inc.)
Tape Measure
Clostridium Perfringens Types C and D Toxoid Essential 3	(Colorado Serum Co.)
Clostridium Perfringens Types C and D Antitoxin Equine Origin	(Colorado Serum Co.)
Ivermectin in propylene glycol
Antibiotic	(Nuflor, Schuering-Plough Animal Health Corp., New Jersey, USA)
Ivermectin	(Norbrook Labratories, LTD., Down, Northern Ireland, UK)
Clostidrial vaccine	(Vision 7 with SPUR, Ivesco LLC, Iowa, USA)
Leptospirosis vaccine	(Leptoferm-5, Pfizer, Inc., New York, USA)
Trailer for transport
Reciprocating saw	(DEWALT, Maryland, USA)
Scientific Digital Scale	(Global Industrail, Global Equipment Company Inc)
Antler Measuring Tape
Fogger
Plastic Ear Tags	(Allflex, Texas, USA)
Plastic Ear Tagger	(Allflex, Texas, USA)