The reconstruction of the suprahepatic vena cava (SHVC) remains a difficult step in rat orthotopic liver transplantation. In this article, we show a step-by-step protocol for SHVC reconstruction in rats using a novel magnetic anastomosis technique.
The rat model of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is essential for transplant research. It is a very sophisticated animal model and requires a steep learning curve. The introduction of the cuff technique for anastomosis of the portal vein (PV) and infrahepatic vena cava (IHVC) has significantly simplified the transplant procedure in rats. However, due to the short anterior wall of the recipients’ suprahepatic vena cava (SHVC), the cuff technique is very difficult to use for the reconstruction of the SHVC. Most researchers in this field still use the hand-suture technique for SHVC reconstruction, which makes it the bottleneck step in rat orthotopic liver transplantation. The magnetic anastomosis technique (i.e., magnamosis) is a method of connecting two vessels using the attractive force between two magnets. Our recent study has shown that the magnetic anastomosis technique is superior to the hand-suture technique for SHVC reconstruction in rats. In this article, we show a step-by-step protocol for SHVC reconstruction in rats using the novel magnetic anastomosis technique. In this model, the reconstruction of the PV and IHVC was performed by the standard cuff technique, while the reconstruction of the bile duct (BD) was performed by a stent technique. The hepatic re-arterialization was not performed. The magnetic anastomosis technique made SHVC reconstruction much easier and significantly shortened the anphepatic phase. After a reasonable learning curve, even researchers without advanced microsurgical skills can produce reliable and reproducible results using this rat model of OLT.
The rat model of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is essential for transplant research1,2. The first rat OLT was described by Lee et al. in 19733. In that model, all the vessels were reconstructed by the hand-suture technique. The hand-suture technique requires advanced microsurgical skills, which significantly limits its utilization. Since then, various modifications to the original protocol of rat OLT have been reported. Among them, the cuff technique for anastomosis of the portal vein (PV) and infrahepatic vena cava (IHVC) reported by Kamada et al. in 1979 is considered a major improvement to this model, as it significantly simplified the reconstruction procedures4. However, due to the short anterior wall of the recipients' suprahepatic vena cava (SHVC), the cuff technique is very difficult to use for the reconstruction of the SHVC. Most researchers in this field still use the hand-suture technique for SHVC reconstruction, which makes it the bottleneck step in rat OLT5,6,7.
The magnetic anastomosis technique (i.e., magnamosis) is a method of connecting two vessels or other tubular structures using the attractive force between two magnets8,9,10,11. The magnetic force gradually compresses and remodels the tissue into a strong, sutureless anastomosis12,13. This compression anastomosis has been proven to be effective in humans14,15. We have designed a pair of magnetic rings specifically for the anastomosis of the SHVC in rats. Our recent study has shown that the magnetic anastomosis technique is superior to the hand-suture technique for SHVC reconstruction in rat OLT16. The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed, step-by-step protocol for SHVC reconstruction in rats using the novel magnetic anastomosis technique.
The protocol was carried out in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
NOTE: None of the procedures in this protocol was performed under a surgical microscope.
1. Preoperative Preparation
2. Donor Operation
3. Graft Preparation
NOTE: All procedures for the liver graft preparation are performed in a cold saline bath at 4 °C.
4. Recipient Operation
NOTE: The schema of the graft implantation in the recipient rat is shown in Figure 5.
After approximately 10 attempts, the magnetic anastomosis technique for SHVC reconstruction was successfully mastered by a researcher who had no prior microsurgical training. The reconstruction of the SHVC took less than 2 min. The anhepatic phase for the recipient rats was approximately 10 min. No thrombosis, bleeding or angiostegnosis was observed at the SHVC anastomotic site at 1, 5 and 30 days after reperfusion. The inferior vena cavography was performed at 2 weeks after transplantation. As shown in Figure 6, the magnetic rings were intact, and the blood flow was patent through the SHVC anastomosis. The post-transplant survival rate was 95% at day 1, 90% at day 3, and 85% at days 7 to 30 (Figure 7).
Figure 1: The design (A) and photo (B) of the magnetic ring for anastomosis of the SHVC.
SHVC: suprahepatic vena cava. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: The cuffs and the stent for anastomosis of the IHVC (A), PV (B) and BD (C).
IHVC: infrahepatic vena cava; PV: portal vein; BD: bile duct. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Schema of the cuff anastomosis of the IHVC and PV. Insert the IHVC or PV into a cuff (A); Evert the distal end of the IHVC or PV over the cuff body using two microforceps (B); Secure the edge with a 6-0 silk suture (C); Insert the cuff body of the donor's IHVC or PV into the recipient's IHVC or PV (D).
IHVC: infrahepatic vena cava; PV: portal vein. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Schema of the magnetic anastomosis of the SHVC. Pass the SHVC through a magnetic ring using the titanium-alloy microforceps (A); Evert the distal end of the SHVC over the ring (B); Secure the ring with a 6-0 silk suture (C). Couple the magnetic rings embedded in the donor's and recipient's SHVC together through magnetic force (D).
SHVC: suprahepatic vena cava. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Schema of the graft implantation in the recipient rat. Reconstruction of the SHVC: magnetic anastomosis; Reconstruction of the IHVC and PV: cuff anastomosis; Reconstruction of the BD: stent anastomosis. Reconstruction of the HA: not performed.
SHVC: suprahepatic vena cava; IHVC: infrahepatic vena cava; PV: portal vein; BD: bile duct; HA: hepatic artery. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Inferior vena cavography of the rat at 2 weeks after transplantation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Representative survival cure after transplantation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Many clinical progresses in liver transplantation can be attributed to animal studies. Rat OLT is a widely used and well accepted model in the research of organ preservation, transplant immunology, physiology and pathology. However, it is also a very complicated procedure and requires advanced microsurgical skill. Despite many improvements in the procedure of rat OLT, the SHVC anastomosis remained a challenging step. In this article, we describe a novel magnetic anastomosis technique for SHVC reconstruction in rat OLT. The application of this technique reduced the time for SHVC reconstruction to less than 2 min and the anhepatic phase of rat OLT to approximately 10 min. We believe this technique has great implications in transplant research.
The critical step in using this magnetic anastomosis technique for the reconstruction of the SHVC is to attach the magnetic rings to the donor’s and recipient’s SHVC. Every caution should be used to avoid twisting the SHVC. Moreover, when connecting the two magnetic rings, air bubbles in the SHVC should be removed thoroughly.
There are some limitations in using this technique. Some strains of rats such as Fischer-344 rats and Buffalo rats have an extremely short SHVC. It is impossible to attach the magnetic ring to their SHVC. Thus, they are not suitable for this technique. However, this technique can be easily applied for OLT in most strains of rats including Sprague Dawley rats, Lewis rats and brown Norway rats. Magnetic rings can interfere with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Therefore, this magnetic anastomosis technique cannot be used if an MRI exam is required for the experiment.
In summary, the magnetic anastomosis technique makes easy and fast SHVC reconstruction in rats possible. After a reasonable learning curve, even researchers without advanced microsurgical skills can produce reliable and reproducible results using this rat model of OLT.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education Innovation Team Development Program of China (No. IRT16R57), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81470896), and a research fund for Young Talent Recruiting Plans of Xi’an Jiaotong University (RW).
Anesthesia Machine | Harvard | tabletop | Animal anaesthesia |
PLX7000B HF Mobile Digital C-arm System | Perlong Medical | PLX7000B | It is mainly used for the angiography and photography of various operations |
Syringe Pump | Mindray | BeneFusion SP5 | intravenous infusion |
Isoflurane | RWD life Science Co. | anesthetic:for the induction and maintenanceof anesthesia | |
iohexol | Shanghai General Pharmaceutical Co | intravascular contrast media | |
heparin sodium injection | SPH No.1 Biochemical & Pharmaceutical Co., LTD | prevent the formation of thrombosis | |
cefuroxime | Glaxo Operations UK Limited | an antibiotic | |
buprenorphine | TIPR Pharmaceutical Responsible Co.,Ltd | an analgesic | |
curved microforceps | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | W40350 | surgical tool |
hemostatic forceps(straight) | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | J31010 | surgical tool |
hemostatic forceps(curved) | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | J31020 | surgical tool |
Satinsky clamp | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | XEC050 | surgical tool |
needle holder | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | J32010 | surgical tool |
microneedle holder | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | WBA040 | surgical tool |
notched forceps | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | J42010 | surgical tool |
tissue forceps(with hook) | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | J41010 | surgical tool |
tissue scissor | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | Y00040 | surgical tool |
surgical scissors | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | Y00030 | surgical tool |
micro scissors | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | MR-S121T | surgical tool |
microvessel clips | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | XEC240 | surgical tool |
straight microforceps(titanium alloy) | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | WCC010 | surgical tool |
curved microforceps (titanium alloy) | Shanghai Medical Instruments (Group) Ltd., Corp. | WCC020 | surgical tool |