A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Establishing Pollination Requirements in Japanese Plum by Phenological Monitoring, Hand Pollinations, Fluorescence Microscopy and Molecular Genotyping

2.8K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/61897

⸱

November 9th, 2020

 ,  , 
1Unidad de Hortofruticultura, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), 2(CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza), Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón - IA2, 3Departamento de Hortofruticultura, Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Extremadura (CICYTEX), Instituto de Investigaciones Agrarias Finca La Orden

In This Article

Summary

A methodology for the determination of pollination requirements in Japanese plum-type hybrids is described, which combines field- and laboratory-pollinations and observations of pollen tubes under the fluorescence microscopy with the identification of S-genotypes by PCR and the monitoring of flowering for the selection of pollinizers.

Abstract

The Japanese plum cultivars commonly grown are interspecific hybrids derived from crosses between the original Prunus salicina with other Prunus species. Most hybrids exhibit gametophytic self-incompatibility, which is controlled by a single and highly polymorphic S-locus that contains multiple alleles. Most cultivated hybrids are self-incompatible and need pollen from a compatible donor to fertilize their flowers. Establishing pollination requirements in Japanese plum is becoming increasingly important due to the high number of new cultivars with unknown pollination requirements. In this work, a methodology for the determination of pollination requirements in Japanese plum-type hybrids is described. Self-(in)compatibility is determined by hand-pollinations in both the field and in the laboratory, followed by monitoring pollen tube elongation with fluorescence microscopy, and also monitoring fruit maturation in the field. Selection of pollinizer cultivars is assessed by combining the identification of S-genotypes by PCR analysis with the monitoring of flowering time in the field. Knowing the pollination requirements of cultivars facilitates the selection of cultivars for the design of new orchards and allows the early detection of productivity problems related with pollination deficiency in established orchards.

Introduction

Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) is native to China1. In the 19th century, this crop was introduced from Japan to the United States, where it was intercrossed with other North American diploid plums2. In the 20th century, some of these hybrids were spread to temperate regions around the world. Nowadays, the term “Japanese plum” refers to a wide range of interspecific hybrids derived from crosses between the original P. salicina with up to 15 other diploid Prunus spp.3,4,5.

Japanese plum, like other species of the Rosaceae family, exhibits Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility (GSI), which is controlled by a single and highly polymorphic S-locus containing multiple alleles6. The S-locus contains two genes that encode a ribonuclease (S-RNase) expressed in the pistil, and an F-box protein (SFB) expressed in the pollen grain7. In the self-Incompatibility reaction, when the S-allele expressed in the pollen grain (haploid) is the same as one of the two expressed in the pistil (diploid), the growth of the pollen tube across the style is arrested due to the degradation of the pollen tube RNA by the action of the S-RNase8. Since this process prevents fertilization of the female gametophyte in the ovule, GSI promotes the outcrossing between cultivars.

Although some Japanese plum cultivars are self-compatible, most cultivars currently grown are self-incompatible, and need pollen from inter-compatible donors to fertilize their flowers3. In stone fruit species of genus Prunus such as almond9, apricot10,11,12 and sweet cherry13, pollination requirements of cultivars can be established by different approaches. Self-(in)compatibility can be determined by self-pollination of flowers in the field and subsequent monitoring of fruit set, or by semi-in vivo self-pollinations at controlled conditions in a laboratory and the observation of pollen tubes under the microscope14,15,16,17,18. Incompatibility relationships among cultivars can be determined by cross pollinations in the field or the laboratory using pollen of the potential pollinizer cultivar, and by the identification of S-alleles of each cultivar by PCR analysis14,15,16,19,20,21,22. In species such as sweet cherry or almond, self-(in)compatibility can be also assessed by the identification of particular S alleles associated to self-compatibility, as S4’ in sweet cherry13 or Sf in almond23.

Several plum breeding programs from the main producing countries are releasing a number of new cultivars2,14, many of them with unknown pollination requirements. In this work, a methodology for the determination of pollination requirements in Japanese plum-type hybrids is described. Self-(in)compatibility is determined by self-pollinations in both the field and the laboratory, followed by observations of pollen tubes under the fluorescence microscopy. Selection of pollinizer cultivars combines the identification of S-genotypes by PCR analysis with the monitoring of flowering time in the field.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Hand-pollination in the field

  1. Pollen extraction
    1. To obtain pollen, collect flower buds at stage D24, according to stage 57 on the BBCH scale25,26.
      NOTE: More flower buds are necessary in Japanese plum than in other Prunus species because their anthers produce less pollen.
    2. Remove the anthers using a plastic mesh (2 mm x 2 mm pore size) and place them on paper at room temperature for 24 h until anther dehiscence.
    3. Sieve the pollen grains through a fine mesh (0.26 mm x 0.26 mm pore size), and conserve them in a 10 mL glass tube with a cap at 4 °C until use.
  2. Pollination of emasculated flowers
    1. When between 10%–20% of flowers are open, select and label several branches. Remove open flowers and young buds, leaving only flower buds at stage D24, according to stage 57 on the BBCH scale25,26.
    2. Remove the petals, sepals, and stamens of between 800 and 1,000 flower buds per treatment with either fingernails or tweezers.
    3. Hand pollinate the pistils with the help of a fine paintbrush 24 h after emasculation. Some branches containing half of the pistils with pollen of the same cultivar, and the other half with compatible pollen from other cultivar as a control. Be careful not to contaminate the fingertip or paintbrush with pollen grains from other cultivars.
    4. Record weekly counts of flowers and developing fruits to characterize fruit drop pattern and quantify the final fruit set in each pollination treatment.
  3. Supplementary pollination in the field
    1. A few days before the first flowers open, enclose selected trees in a 0.8 mm mesh cage to avoid the arrival of pollinating insects.
    2. When 10%–20% flowers are open, select and label several branches per pollination treatment, leaving 1,000–1,500 flowers per treatment.
    3. On the next day, when flowers are open, pollinate each flower with the help of a paintbrush with the corresponding pollen (pollen from the same cultivar for self-pollination, and from other compatible cultivars as cross-pollination control).
    4. Pollinate every other day until all flowers open.
    5. Record weekly counts of flowers and developing fruits from anthesis to harvest to characterize fruit drop pattern and quantify final fruit set in each pollination treatment.

2. Hand-pollinations in the laboratory

  1. Collect 50–100 flowers at stage D24, according to stage 57 on the BBCH scale25,26.
  2. In the laboratory, emasculate 30 flowers per treatment (self- and cross-pollination).
    NOTE: Emasculation should be proceeded carefully to avoid any damage on the pistils.
  3. Make a fresh cut on the base of each flower pedicel underwater before placing it on a piece of wet florist foam (one piece of foam for each pollination treatment).
  4. Hand pollinate each pistil 24 h later using a fine paintbrush with pollen collected previously (see section 1.1). Pollinate one set of pistils with pollen from the same cultivar, and the other set with pollen from a compatible cultivar as control.
  5. Leave the pollinated pistils 72 h after pollination at room temperature. The floral foam should be continuously wet with water.
  6. Fix the pistils in a fixative solution of ethanol/acetic acid (3:1) for at least 24 h at 4 °C. Replace the fixative with 75% ethanol. Samples can be conserved in this solution at 4 °C until use27.
    NOTE: Ensure that the samples are completely submerged in the solution.

3. Microscopic observations

  1. Evaluation of in vitro pollen germination
    1. To elaborate pollen germination medium, dissolve 25 g of sucrose on 250 mL of distilled water, then add 0.075 g of calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)2] and 0.075 g of boric acid (H3BO3).
    2. Add 2 g of agar to the solution and mix until completely dissolved28.
    3. To sterilize the medium, autoclave it at 120 °C for 20 min. Cool the medium and, before it solidifies, distribute 3 mL per sterile Petri dish (55 mm x 12 mm) in a sterile laminar flow hood. After medium solidification, conserve the Petri dishes wrapped in aluminum foil at 4 °C until use.
    4. Spread the pollen of each cultivar previously used as pollen donor in the controlled pollinations in two Petri dishes and incubate them at 25 °C for 24 h.
      NOTE: The inoculated culture media can be observed with microscopy immediately after or stored at -20 °C until use. For this purpose, the Petri dishes should be changed from the freezer to the fridge 24 h before microscopy observations.
    5. To observe the pollen grains, prepare 1% (v/v) aniline blue solution that stains callose. First, prepare a 0.1 N potassium phosphate tribasic (K3PO4) solution by dissolving 7.97 g of K3PO4 in 1,000 mL of distilled water. To elaborate the 1% (v/v) aniline blue solution, dissolve 1 mL of aniline blue in 100 mL of 0.1 N K3PO4.
    6. Add 2–3 drops of aniline blue solution to each Petri dish plate and observe after 5 min under a UV epifluorescence microscope using exciter filter BP340-390 and barrier filter LP425. Count viable and non-viable pollen grains in three fields per plate, each field containing 100-200 pollen grains, in two Petri dishes for each cultivar.
  2. Pollen tube growth
    1. Rinse the fixed pistils with distilled water three times (1 h each, 3 h in total) and transfer to 5% (w/v) sodium sulphite (Na2SO3) at 4 °C for 24 h. To prepare this solution, dissolve 5 g of sodium sulphite in 100 mL of distilled water.
    2. Autoclave the pistils at 120 °C for 8 min in 5% (w/v) sodium sulphite to soften the tissues.
    3. Squash softened pistils in a drop of 1% (v/v) aniline blue solution under a cover glass on a slide to stain callose.
    4. Observe pollen tube growth along the style under a microscope with UV epifluorescence using exciter filter BP340-390 and barrier filter LP425.

4. Determining incompatibility relationships

  1. DNA extraction from leaves
    1. To extract DNA, collect 3–4 young leaves of each cultivar in the field, preferably in spring.
      NOTE: DNA can also be extracted from mature leaves, but DNA from young leaves has less phenolic compounds.
    2. Isolate DNA using a commercial kit and follow the provided protocol kit (see Table of Materials).
    3. Quantify the DNA concentration and evaluate the quality of the DNA of each sample at 260 nm in an UV-Vis microvolume spectrophotometer. Adjust the DNA concentration to 10 ng/μL.
  2. PCR conditions for fragment amplification
    1. Label 0.2 mL PCR tubes and caps.
    2. Prepare the PCR reagents according to Table 1 and let them thaw on ice.
    3. Set up a volume of master mix of each pair of primers in a 1.5 mL microtube according to the number of reactions plus 10% of excess, considering a volume of 16 μL per reaction. Add the reagents following the order in Table 1 and mix thoroughly.
    4. Aliquot 16 μL of master mix into each 0.2 mL PCR tube containing 4 μL of DNA template or 4 μL of sterilized distilled water as negative control (C-). Use DNA of cultivars with known genotype as positive controls. Mix gently, close the reaction tubes with the caps, and centrifugate at 2,000 x g for 30 s to collect the entire volume at the bottom of the reaction tube.
    5. Place the reaction tubes in the thermocycler and set up the PCR program using the following temperature profile: an initial step of 3 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 56 °C and 3 min at 72 °C, and a final step of 7 min at 72 °C20.
  3. Electrophoresis and estimation of fragment size
    1. To prepare a 1.7% (w/v) agarose mini gel, dissolve 0.68 g of agarose and 40 mL of 1x TBE buffer into a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Melt the solution by heating in a microwave at 600 W at 30 s intervals to avoid boiling.
    2. Let the solution stay on the bench to cool down, and then add 3.5 μL of nucleic acid staining solution.
    3. Place the gel tray into the casting stand and put the selected comb into the gel mold. Be sure to have enough wells for each PCR product and DNA ladder.
    4. Pour the agarose solution into the gel mold and let it cool down until polymerization. Remove the comb of the polymerized gel. Place the gel in the horizontal electrophoresis system containing enough 1x TBE buffer to cover the surface of the gel.
    5. Load the first and last wells with 2 μL of the DNA molecular weight ladder (1 kb DNA Ladder). Load 3 μL of each product of the PCR in the other wells. Close the chamber, turn on the power, and run the gel at 100 V for 30 min.
    6. Observe the gel under UV light using a gel documentation system. Use the DNA molecular weight ladder to determine the size of the amplified fragment and compare it with the positive controls in order to identify the corresponding alleles.

5. Monitoring flower dates

  1. Monitor the phenology of different trees of each cultivar at flowering over different years. Establish the length of the flowering period from the first (about 5%) to the last open flowers (about 95%). Full bloom is considered when at least 50% of flowers are at stage F24, according to stage 65 on the BBCH scale25,26.
  2. To compare the flowering dates of inter-compatible cultivars and determine those that coincide at flowering time every year, elaborate a calendar of flowering times with data from several years.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Each Japanese plum flower bud contains an inflorescence with 1–3 flowers. As in other stone fruit species, each flower is made up of four whorls: carpel, stamens, petals, and sepals, which are fused forming a cup at the base of the flower. Flower structures are smaller than other stone fruits, with a short and fragile pistil surrounded by the stamens that contain a small amount of pollen grains. At full bloom, the flowers of each inflorescence appear separated on short stalks, showing the white petals forming a balloon s...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The methodology described herein for pollination requirements of Japanese plum cultivars requires determining the self-(in)compatibility of each cultivar by controlled pollinations in the field or the laboratory, and the subsequent observation of pollen tube growth with fluorescence microscopy. The incompatibility relationships are established by the characterization of the S-alleles by molecular genotyping. Finally, the selection of pollinizers is performed by the monitoring phenology to detect those cultivars ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (RFP2015-00015-00 and RTA2017-00003-00); Gobierno de Aragón—European Social Fund, European Union (Grupo Consolidado A12-17R), and Junta de Extremadura —Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), Plan Regional de Investigación (IB16181), Grupo de Investigación (AGA001, GR18196). B.I. Guerrero was supported by a fellowship of Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología of México (CONACYT, 471839).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Acetic Acid GlacialPanreac131008.1611
AgariNtRON Biotechnology25999
Aniline blueDifco8504-88
Boric Acid (H3BO4)Panreac131015.1210
Calcium Nitrate 4-hydrate (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O)Panreac131231.1211
CoverglassDeltalabD10246024 mm x 60 mm
Digital CameraImaging Developmet SystemsUI-1490SE
Digital Camera Software SuiteImaging Developmet Systems4.93.0.
DNA OligosThermoFisher Scientific
dNTP Mix, 10 mM eachThermoSischer ScientificR0193
DreamTaq Green DNA polymeraseThermoFisher ScientificEP0713
Ethanol 96°VWR-Chemicals83804.360
1Kb DNA Ladder (U.S. Patent No. 4.403.036) (500pb-12Kb)Invitrogen15615-016Size: 250µg; Conc: 1.0 µg/µl
Gel Documentation SystemBio-Rad1708195
Hand CounterTamacoTM-4
Image Lab SoftwareBio-RadImage Analyse System for Gel Documentation System
MetaPhor AgaroseLonza50180
Microcentrifuge 5415 REppendorfZ605212
Microscope with UV epiflurescenceLeicaDM2500Exciter filter BP340-390, Barrier filter LP425
MicroslidesDeltalabD10000426 mm x 76 mm
Mini Electrophoresis SystemFisherbrand14955170
MinicentrifugeThermoFisher Scientific15334204
NanoDrop 1000 SpectrophotometerThermoFisher ScientificND1000
Petri DishesDeltalab20020155 mm x 14 mm
Potassium Phosphate Tribasic (K3PO4·1.5H2O)Panreac141513
Primer forward 'Pru C2'ThermoFisher Scientific
Primer forward Pru T2'ThermoFisher Scientific
Primer reverse 'PCER'ThermoFisher Scientific
RedSafe Nucleic Acid Staining SolutioniNtRON Biotechnology21141
SaccharosePanreac131621.1211
Sodium sulphite anhydrous (Na2SO3)Panreac131717.1211
Speedtools plant DNA extraction KitBiotools21272
TBE Buffer (10X)PanreacA0972,5000PE
Thermal Cycler T100Bio-Rad1861096
Thermomixer comfortEppendorfT1317
Vertical Autoclave Presoclave IIJP Selecta4001725
VortexFisherbrand11746744

References

  1. Hendrick, U. P. The Plums of New York. , J. B. Lyon Co., State Printers. (1911).
  2. Okie, W. R., Hancock, J. F. Plums. Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding. Hancock, J. F. , Springer. Dordrecht. 337-357 (2008).
  3. Guerra, M. E., Rodrigo, J. Japanese plum pollination: a review. Scientia Horticulturae. 197, 674-686 (2015).
  4. Okie, W. R. Introgression of Prunus species in plum. New York Fruit Quarterly. 14 (1), 29-37 (2006).
  5. Okie, W. R., Weinberger, J. H. Fruit Breeding, vol. 1. Tree and tropical fruits. Janick, J., Moore, J. , John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York. 559-608 (1996).
  6. Mccubbin, A. G., Kao, T. Molecular recognition and response in pollen and pistil interactions. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 16, 333-364 (2000).
  7. Hegedűs, A., Halász, J. Recent findings of the tree fruit self-incompatibility studies. International Journal of Horticultural Science. 13 (2), 7-15 (2007).
  8. de Nettancourt, D. Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. , Springer-Verlag. Berlín. (2001).
  9. Tao, R., et al. Identification of stylar RNases associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility in almond (Prunus dulcis). Plant and Cell Physiology. 38 (3), 304-311 (1997).
  10. Halász, J., Pedryc, A., Ercisli, S., Yilmaz, K., Hegedűs, A. S-genotyping supports the genetic relationships between Turkish and Hungarian apricot germplasm. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 135 (5), 410-417 (2010).
  11. Lora, J., Hormaza, J. I., Herrero, M., Rodrigo, J. Self-incompatibility and S-allele identification in new apricot cultivars. Acta Horticulturae. (1231), 171-176 (2019).
  12. Herrera, S., Lora, J., Hormaza, J. I., Rodrigo, J. Determination of self- and inter-(in)compatibility relationships in apricot combining hand-pollination, microscopy and genetic analyses. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (160), (2020).
  13. Cachi, A. M., Wunsch, A. Characterization of self-compatibility in sweet cherry varieties by crossing experiments and molecular genetic analysis. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 10, 1205-1212 (2014).
  14. Guerra, M. E., Guerrero, B. I., Casadomet, C., Rodrigo, J. Self-compatibility, S-RNase allele identification, and selection of pollinizers in new Japanese plum-type cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae. 261, 109022(2020).
  15. Herrera, S., Lora, J., Hormaza, J. I., Herrero, M., Rodrigo, J. Optimizing production in the new generation of apricot cultivars: self-incompatibility, S-RNase allele identification, and incompatibility group assignment. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9, 1-12 (2018).
  16. Herrera, S., Rodrigo, J., Hormaza, J. I., Lora, J. Identification of self-incompatibility alleles by specific PCR analysis and S-RNase sequencing in apricot. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 19 (11), 3612(2018).
  17. Sociasi Company, R., Kodad, O., Fernández i Martí, J. M., Alonso, J. M. Mutations conferring self-compatibility in Prunus species: from deletions and insertions to epigenetic alterations. Scientia Horticulturae. 192, 125-131 (2015).
  18. Rodrigo, J., Herrero, M. Evaluation of pollination as the cause of erratic fruit set in apricot 'Moniqui. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 71 (5), 801-805 (1996).
  19. Beppu, K., et al. Se-haplotype confers self-compatibility in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl). Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 80 (6), 760-764 (2005).
  20. Guerra, M. E., Rodrigo, J., López-Corrales, M., Wünsch, A. S-RNase genotyping and incompatibility group assignment by PCR and pollination experiments in Japanese plum. Plant Breeding. 128 (3), 304-311 (2009).
  21. Guerra, M. E., Wunsch, A., López-Corrales, M., Rodrigo, J. Flower emasculation as the cause for lack of fruit set in Japanese plum crosses. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 135 (6), 556-562 (2010).
  22. Guerra, M. E., Wünsch, A., López-Corrales, M., Rodrigo, J. Lack of fruit set caused by ovule degeneration in Japanese plum. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 136 (6), 375-381 (2011).
  23. Fernández i Martí, A., Gradziel, T. M., Socias i Company, R. Methylation of the Sf locus in almond is associated with S-RNase loss of function. Plant Molecular Biology. 86, 681-689 (2014).
  24. Baggiolini, M. Les stades repérés des arbres fruitiers à noyau. Revue romande d'Agriculture et d'Arboriculture. 8, 3-4 (1952).
  25. Meier, U. Growth stages of mono-and dicotyledonous plants: BBCH Monograph. Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. , (2001).
  26. Fadón, E., Herrero, M., Rodrigo, J. Flower development in sweet cherry framed in the BBCH scale. Scientia Horticulturae. 192, 141-147 (2015).
  27. Fadon, E., Rodrigo, J. Combining histochemical staining and image analysis to quantify starch in the ovary primordia of sweet cherry during winter dormancy. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (145), (2019).
  28. Hormaza, J. I., Pinney, K., Polito, V. S. Correlation in the tolerance to ozone between sporophytes and male gametophytes of several fruit and nut tree species (Rosaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction. 9, 44-48 (1996).
  29. Burgos, L., et al. The self-compatibility trait of the main apricot cultivars and new selections from breeding programmes. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 72 (1), 147-154 (1997).
  30. Dicenta, F., Ortega, E., Cánovas, J. A., Egea, J. Self-pollination vs. cross-pollination in almond: pollen tube growth, fruit set and fruit characteristics. Plant Breeding. 121, 163-167 (2002).
  31. Alonso, J. M., Socias i Company, R. Differential pollen tube growth in inbred self-compatible almond genotypes. Euphytica. 144, 207-213 (2005).
  32. Hedhly, A., Hormaza, J. I., Herrero, M. The effect of temperature on pollen germination, pollen tube growth, and stigmatic receptivity in peach. Plant Biology. 7, 476-483 (2005).
  33. Hedhly, A., Hormaza, J. I., Herrero, M. Warm temperatures at bloom reduce fruit set in sweet cherry. Journal of Applied Botany. 81, 158-164 (2007).
  34. Milatović, D., Nikolić, D. Analysis of self-(in)compatibility in apricot cultivars using fluorescence microscopy. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 82, 170-174 (2007).
  35. Jia, H. J., He, F. J., Xiong, C. Z., Zhu, F. R., Okamoto, G. Influences of cross pollination on pollen tube growth and fruit set in Zuili plums (Prunus salicina). Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 50, 203-209 (2008).
  36. Herrero, M., Salvador, J. La polinización del ciruelo Red Beaut. Información Técnica Econónomica Agraria. 41, 3-7 (1980).
  37. Ramming, D. W. Plum. Register of new fruit and nut varieties: Brooks and Olmo, List 37. HortScience. 30 (6), 1142-1144 (1995).
  38. Hartmann, W., Neümuller, M. Plum breeding. Breeding plantation tree crops: Temperate species. , Springer. New York, NY. 161-231 (2009).
  39. Guerra, M. E., López-Corrales, M., Wünsch, A. Improved S-genotyping and new incompatibility groups in Japanese plum. Euphytica. 186 (2), 445-452 (2012).
  40. Tao, R., et al. Molecular typing of S-alleles through identification, characterization and cDNA cloning for S-RNases in sweet cherry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 124 (3), 224-233 (1999).
  41. Yamane, H., Tao, R., Sugiura, A., Hauck, N. R., Lezzoni, A. F. Identification and characterization of S-RNases in tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus). Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 126, 661-667 (2001).
  42. López, M., Jose, F., Vargas, F. J., Battle, I. Self-(in)compatibility almond genotypes: a review. Euphytica. 150, 1-16 (2006).
  43. Bošković, R., Tobutt, K. R. Correlation of stylar ribonuclease zymograms with incompatibility alleles in sweet cherry. Euphytica. 90, 245-250 (1996).
  44. Beppu, K., Syogase, K., Yamane, H., Tao, R., Kataoka, I. Inheritance of self-compatibility conferred by the Se-haplotype of Japanese plum and development of Se-RNase gene-specific PCR primers. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 85, 215-218 (2010).
  45. Beppu, K., Kumai, M., Yamane, H., Tao, R., Kataoka, I. Molecular and genetic analyses of the S-haplotype of the self-compatible Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) "Methley". Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 87 (5), 493-498 (2012).
  46. Beppu, K., Konishi, K., Kataoka, I. S-haplotypes and self-compatibility of the Japanese plum cultivar 'Karari'. Acta Horticulturae. 929, 261-266 (2012).
  47. Sapir, G., Stern, R. A., Shafir, S., Goldway, M. S-RNase based S-genotyping of Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) and its implication on the assortment of cultivar-couples in the orchard. Scientia Horticulturae. 118, 8-13 (2008).
  48. Karp, D. Luther Burbank's plums. HortScience. 50 (2), 189-194 (2015).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Hand PollinationS Genotype AnalysisPollen Tube ElongationFruit Set AnalysisPCR Analysis
Establishing Pollination Requirements in Japanese Plum by Phenological Monitoring, Hand Pollinations, Fluorescence Microscopy and Molecular Genotyping
Contact Us
Recommend to Library

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved.