Loss of motor function following traumatic peripheral nerve injury has a significant impact on the quality of life and socioeconomic status of patients1,2,3. The prognosis of this patient population remains poor due to minimal improvements in surgical techniques over the years4. Direct end-to-end tension-free epineural repair forms the gold standard surgical reconstruction. However, in cases with extended nerve gaps interposition of an autologous nerve graft has proven to be superior5,6. The associated donor site morbidity and limited availability of autologous nerve grafts have imposed the need for alternative techniques7,8.
Experimental animal models have been used to elucidate the mechanism of peripheral nerve regeneration and to evaluate outcomes of a variety of reconstructive and pharmacological treatment options8,9. The rat sciatic nerve model is the most frequently used animal model10. Their small size makes them easy to handle and house. Due to their superlative neuroregenerative potential, the diminished time between intervention and evaluation of outcomes can result in relatively lower costs11,12. Other advantages of its use include morphological similarities to human nerve fibers and the high number of comparative/historic studies13. Although the latter should be approached cautiously, as a wide variety of different outcome measures between studies makes it difficult to compare results14,15,16,17,18.
Outcome measures to assess nerve regeneration range from electrophysiology to histomorphometry, but these methods imply a correlation but do not necessarily directly measure the return of motor function14,15. Regenerating nerve fibers might not make appropriate connections which can cause an overestimation of the number of functional connections14,15,19,20. The best and clinically most relevant measurement to demonstrate correct reinnervation of end organs remains assessment of muscle function21,22,23. Creating motor function assessment tools for animal models is, however, challenging. Medinaceli et al. first described the walking track analysis, which has since been the most frequently used method to evaluate functional recovery in experimental peripheral nerve studies21,24,25,26,27,28. The walking track analysis quantifies the sciatic functional index (SFI) based on measurements of pawprints from walking rats21,29. Major limitations of the walking track analysis, such as toe contractures, automutilation, smearing of the print and poor correlation with other measures of reinnervation, have necessitated the use of other parameters for quantification of functional recovery30,31.
In previous studies in Lewis rats32 and New Zealand rabbits33, we validated the isometric tetanic force (ITF) measurement for the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle and demonstrated its effectiveness in the evaluation of muscle recovery after different types of nerve repair34,35,36,37,38,39. The TA muscle is well suited because of its relatively large size, innervation by the peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve and well elucidated biochemical properties40,41,42,43. When muscle length (preload force) and electrical parameters are optimized the ITF provides a side-to-side variability of 4.4% and 7.5% in rats32 and rabbits33, respectively.
This article provides a detailed protocol of the ITF measurement in the rat sciatic nerve model, including a thorough description of the necessary pre-surgical planning, surgical approach and dissection of the common peroneal nerve and the distal TA muscle tendon. Using predetermined values for the stimulus intensity and duration, the optimal muscle length and stimulus pulse frequency will be defined. With these four parameters, the ITF can subsequently be consistently and accurately measured.